Neural basis of the time window for subjective motor-auditory integration

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue JAN2016, 2016, Pages

  Toida, Koichi ^a,b   Ueno, Kanako ^a,b   Shimada, Sotaro ^a,b  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Delayed auditory feedback; Enhanced P2; Event related potential (ERP); N300; Sense of agency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MOTOR AUDITORY INTEGRATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84956651856     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00688     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Amoruso, L., Gelormini, C., Aboitiz, F., Gonzalez, M. A., Manes, F., Cardona, J. F., et al. (2013). N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:57. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057
2. Baumann, S., Meyer, M., and Jancke, L. (2008). Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 2238-2249. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20157
3. Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., and Schroger, E. (2012). Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 83, 120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.08.003
4. Blakemore, S. J., Frith, C. D., and Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 551-559. doi: 10.1162/089892999563607
5. Chen, Z., Jones, A. J., Liu, P., Li, W., Huang, D., and Liu, H. (2013). Dynamics of vocalization-induced modulation of auditory cortical activity at mid-utterance. PLoS ONE 8:e60039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060039
6. Demiral, S. B., Malcolm, G. L., and Henderson, J. M. (2012). ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing. Neuropsychologia 50, 1271-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.011
7. Desmurget, M., Reilly, K. T., Richard, N., Szathmari, A., Mottolese, C., and Sirigu, A. (2009). Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science 324, 811-813. doi: 10.1126/science.1169896
8. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., and Donchin, E. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biol. Psychol. 14, 1-52. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(82)90016-3
9. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., and Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18, 324-333. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00041-1
10. Fujisaki, W., and Nishida, S. (2010). A common perceptual temporal limit of binding synchronous inputs across different sensory attributes and modalities. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 277, 2281-2290. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0243
11. Fujisaki, W., Shimojo, S., Kashino, M., and Nishida, S. (2004). Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 773-778. doi: 10.1038/nn1268
12. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 14-21. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
13. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press
14. Gregg, M. K., and Snyder, J. S. (2012). Enhanced sensory processing accompanies successful detection of change for real-world sounds. Neuroimage 62, 113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.057
15. Haggard, P., Clark, S., and Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 382-385. doi: 10.1038/nn827
16. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., and Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182, 177-180. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4108.177
17. Hyde, M. (1997). The N1 response and its applications. Audiol. Neurootol. 2, 281-307. doi: 10.1159/000259253
18. Joos, K., Gilles, A., de Heyning, V. P., Ridder, D. D., and Vanneste, S. (2014). From sensation to percept: the neural signature of auditory event-related potentials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 42, 148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.009
19. Kalckert, A., and Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:40. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040
20. Kononowicz, T. W., and van Rijn, H. (2014). Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: a dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes. J. Neurosci. 34, 2931-2939. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-13.2014
21. Kornhuber, H. H., and Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei willkürbewegungen und passiven bewegungen des menschen: bereitschaftspotential und reafferente potentiale. Pflügers Arch 284, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/BF00412364
22. Kutas, M., and Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 621-647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
23. Kutas, M., and Hilyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-205. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657
24. Laszlo, S., and Federmeier, K. D. (2012). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology 48, 176-186. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01058.x
25. Legrain, V., Perchet, C., and García-Larrea, L. (2009). Involuntary orienting of attention to nociceptive events: neural and behavioral signatures. J. Physiol. 102, 2423-2434. doi: 10.1152/jn.00372.2009
26. Libet, B., Gleason, C., Wright, E. W., and Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to action relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). Brain 106, 623-642. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.3.623
27. May, P. J. C., and Tiitinen, H. (2010). Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance- elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47, 66-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00856.x
28. Miall, R. C., and Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 9, 1265-1279. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4
29. Miyazaki, M., Yamamoto, S., Uchida, S., and Kitazawa, S. (2006). Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in tactile temporal order judgment. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 875-877. doi: 10.1038/nn1712
30. Mudrik, L., Shalgi, S., Lamy, D., and Deouell, L. Y. (2014). Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: replication and extension. Neuropsychologia 56, 447-458. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.020
31. Näätänen, R., Astikainen, P., Ruusuvirta, T., and Huotilainen, M. (2010). Automatic auditory intelligence: an expression of the sensory- cognitive core of cognitive processes. Brain Res. Rev. 64, 123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.03.001
32. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Livonen, A., et al. (1997). Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature 385, 432-434. doi: 10.1038/385432a0
33. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., and Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118, 2544-2590. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
34. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T., and Takegata, R. (2004). The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.04.001
35. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., and Winkler, I. (2001). ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 24, 283-288. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01790-2
36. Paavilainen, P. (2013). The mismatch-negativity (MMN) component of the auditory event-related potential to violations of abstract regularities: a review. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 88, 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.015
37. Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9, 456-479. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002
38. Raij, T., McEvoy, L., Mäkelä, J. P., and Hari, R. (1997). Human auditory cortex is activated by omissions of auditory stimuli. Brain Res. 745, 134-143. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01140-7
39. Reinke, K. S., He, Y., Wang, C., and Alain, C. (2003). Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. Cogn. Brain Res. 17, 781-791. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00202-7
40. Renoult, L., Wang, X., Calcagno, V., Prevost, M., and Debruille, J. B. (2012). From N400 to N300: variations in the timing of semantic processing with repetition. Neuroimage 61, 206-215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.069
41. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G. Jr., and Macht, M. (1982). Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science 218, 909-911. doi: 10.1126/science.7134983
42. Sams, M., Alho, K., and Näätänen, R. (1984). Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 21, 434-441. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00223.x
43. Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., and Näätänen, R. (1985). Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 437-448. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90054-1
44. SanMiguel, I., Widmann, A., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N., and Schröger, E. (2013). Hearing silences: human auditory processing relies on preactivation of sound-specific brain activity patterns. J. Neurosci. 33, 8633-8639. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5821-12.2013
45. Sato, A., and Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 94, 241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.04.003
46. Shahin, A., Bosnyak, D. J., Trainor, L. J., and Roberts, L. E. (2003). Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J. Neurosci. 23, 5545-5552.
47. Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., and Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE 4:e6185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006185
48. Shimada, S., Hiraki, K., and Oda, I. (2005). The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. Neuroimage 24, 1225-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.039
49. Shimada, S., Qi, Y., and Hiraki, K. (2010). Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Exp. Brain Res. 201, 359-364. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2028-6
50. Shimada, S., Suzuki, T., Yoda, N., and Hayashi, T. (2014). Relationship between sensitivity to visuotactile temporal discrepancy and the rubber hand illusion. Neurosci. Res. 85, 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.009
51. Stekelenburg, J. J., Sugano, Y., and Vroomen, J. (2011). Neural correlates of motor-sensory temporal recalibration. Brain Res. 1397, 46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.045
52. Sugita, Y., and Suzuki, Y. (2003). Audiovisual perception: implicit estimation of sound-arrival time. Nature 421, 911. doi: 10.1038/421911a
53. Sun, F., Hoshi-Shiba, R., Abla, D., and Okanoya, K. (2012). Neural correlates of abstract rule learning: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 50, 2617-2624. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.013
54. Todorovic, A., van Ede, F., Maris, E., and de Lange, F. P. (2011). Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J. Neurosci. 31, 9118-9123. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1425-11.2011
55. Toida, K., Ueno, K., and Shimada, S. (2014). Recalibration of subjective simultaneity between self-generated movement and delayed auditory feedback. Neuroreport 25, 284-288. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000079
56. Vroomen, J., Keetels, M., de Gelder, B., and Bertelson, P. (2004). Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audio-visual asynchrony. Cogn. Brain Res. 22, 32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.003
57. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., and Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent Negative Variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 203, 380-384. doi: 10.1038/203380a0
58. Wolpert, D. M., and Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat. Neursci. 3, 1212-1217. doi: 10.1038/81497
59. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269, 1880-1882. doi: 10.1126/science.7569931
60. Yamamoto, S., and Kitazawa, S. (2001). Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 759-765. doi: 10.1038/nn721
61. Yamamoto, S., Miyazaki, M., Iwano, T., and Kitazawa, S. (2012). Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in audiovisual temporal order judgments. PLoS ONE 7:e40379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040379