Humanlike robot hands controlled by brain activity arouse illusion of ownership in operators

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Alimardani, Maryam ^a,b   Nishio, Shuichi ^b   Ishiguro, Hiroshi ^a,b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; BIOMIMETICS; BODY IMAGE; BRAIN; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; IMAGINATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

AROUSAL; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; BIOMIMETICS; BODY IMAGE; BRAIN; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; IMAGINATION; OWNERSHIP; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84883039108     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02396     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Nishio, S. & Ishiguro, H. Android science research for bridging humans and robots. Trans IEICE. 91, 411-416 (2008) (in Japanese).
2. Botvinick, M. Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998). (Pubitemid 28099666)
3. Ehrsson, H. H. The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 317, 1048 (2007). (Pubitemid 47330182)
4. Petkova, V. I.&Ehrsson, H. H. If Iwere you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One 3, e3832 (2008).
5. Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P. & Passingham, R. E. Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J Neurosci. 25, 10564-10573 (2005). (Pubitemid 41628458)
6. Walsh, L. D., Moseley, G. L., Taylor, J. L. & Gandevia, S. C. Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership. J physiol. 589, 3009-3021 (2011).
7. O'Doherty, J. E. et al. Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature 479, 228-231 (2011).
8. Lebedev, M. A. & Nicolelis, M. A. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci. 29, 536-546 (2006). (Pubitemid 44291817)
9. Armel, K. C. & Ramachandran, V. S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proc Biol Sci. 270, 1499-1506 (2003). (Pubitemid 36851274)
10. Watanabe, T., Nishio, S., Ogawa, K. & Ishiguro, H. Body ownership transfer to android robot induced by teleoperation. Trans IEICE. 94, 86-93 (2011) (in Japanese).
11. Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P., Frank, N., Mainy, N. & Sirigu, A. A specific role for efferent information in self-recognition. Cognition 96, 215-231 (2007).
12. Chapman, C. E., Jiang, W. & Lamarre, Y. Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 72, 316-334 (1988).
13. Voss, M., Ingram, J. N., Wolpert, D. M. & Haggard P. Mere Expectation to Move Causes Attenuation of Sensory Signals. PLoS ONE 3, e2866 (2008).
14. Lebedev, M. A., Denton, J. M. & Nelson, R. J. Vibration-entrained and premovement activity in monkey primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol. 72, 1654-1673 (1994). (Pubitemid 24325093)
15. Seki, K. & Fetz, E. E. Gating of sensory input at spinal and cortical levels during preparation and execution of voluntary movement. J Neurosci. 32, 890-902 (2012).
16. Prut, Y. & Fetz, E. E. Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity. Nature 401, 590-594 (1999).
17. Neuper, C.,Muller-Putz, G. R., Scherer, R. & Pfurtscheller, G. Motor imagery and EEG-based control of spelling devices and neuroprostheses. Progress in brain research 159, 393-409 (2006). (Pubitemid 44634656)