Delegation in Hard Times: The Financial Management of Arm's Length Bodies in the UK

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 362-378

  Tonkiss, Katherine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

ambiguity; arm's length bodies; control; independence; quangos

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978977181     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/faam.12089     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Almquist, R., G. Grossi, G.J. van Helden and C. Reichard (2013), ‘Public Sector Governance and Accountability’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 24, Nos. 7–8, pp. 479–97.
2. Arnaboldi, M. and I. Lapsley (2009), ‘On the Implementation of Accrual Accounting: A Study of Conflict and Ambiguity’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 809–36.
3. Baier, V.E., J.G. March and H. Saetren (1986), ‘Implementation and Ambiguity’, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 2, Nos. 3–4, pp. 197–212.
4. Barbieri, D., D. Galli, P. Fedele and E. Ongaro (2013), ‘Drivers of Autonomy of Public Agencies in Italy’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 26–49.
5. Bowerman, M., C. Humphrey and D. Owen (2003), ‘Struggling for Supremacy: The Case of UK Public Audit Institutions’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 14, Nos. 1–2, pp. 1–22.
6. Caperchione, E., F. Salvatori and E. Benghi (2014), ‘Where There's a Will, There's a Way – Acting Beyond Cutbacks’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 135–38.
7. Christensen, T., A. Lie and P. Laegreid (2008), ‘Beyond New Public Management: Agencification and Regulatory Reform in Norway’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 15–30.
8. Dubnick, M. (2005), ‘Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms’, Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 376–417.
9. Flinders, M. (2004), ‘Distributed Public Governance in Britain’, Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 4, pp. 883–909.
10. Flinders, M. (2008), Delegated Governance and the British State: Walking Without Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
11. Goddard, A. (2005), ‘Accounting and NPM in UK Local Government – Contributions Towards Governance and Accountability’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 191–218.
12. HM Government (2012), The Civil Service Reform Plan [online] (http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Civil-Service-Reform-Plan-acc-final.pdf).
13. HM Treasury (2013), Managing Public Money (TSO, London).
14. Hood, C. (1991), ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’, Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 3–19.
15. Hordern, J. (2014), ‘An Unfinished Experiment: Ambiguity and Conflict in the Implementation of Higher Skills Policy’, Research Papers in Education, DOI 10.1080/02671522.2013.879335.
16. Kickert, W. (2012), ‘State Responses to Financial Crisis in Britain, Germany and the Netherlands’, Public Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 299–309.
17. Kim, P.S. (2003), ‘Management Innovation in Quasi-Governmental Agencies in Korea’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 535–52.
18. Leslie, K. and A. Canwell (2010), ‘Leadershp at All Levels: Leading Public Sector Organisations in an Age of Austerity’, European Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 297–305.
19. Matland, R.E. (1995), ‘Synthesising the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 145–74.
20. McCarthaigh, M. (2012), ‘Shrinking the Quango State: An International View’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 397–99.
21. McLoughlin, K., S.P. Osbourne and E. Ferlie (2002), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects (Routledge, London).
22. Mutiganda, J.C. (2013), ‘Budgetary Governance and Accountability in Public Sector Organisations: An Institutional and Critical Realism Approach’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 24, Nos. 7–8, pp. 518–31.
23. National Audit Office (2013), The Efficiency and Reform Group (The Stationery Office, London).
24. Overmans, J.F.A. and M. Noordegraaf (2014), ‘Managing Austerity: Rhetorical and Real Responses to Fiscal Stress in Local Government’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 99–106.
25. Pandey, S.K. (2010), ‘Cutback Management and the Paradox of Publicness’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 564–71.
26. Papenfuß, U. (2014), ‘How (Should) Public Authorities Report on State-Owned Enterprises for Sustainability and Cutback Management – A New Quality Model’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 115–22.
27. Peters, B.G. (2011), ‘Governance Responses to the Fiscal Crisis – Comparative Perspectives’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 75–80.
28. Pipan, T. and B. Czarniawska (2010), ‘How to Construct an Actor Network: Management Accounting from Idea to Practice’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 243–51.
29. Pollitt, C. (2010), ‘Cuts and Reforms – Public Services as we Move into a New Era’, Society and Economy, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 17–31.
30. Pollitt, C. and C. Talbot (2004), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation (Routledge, London).
31. Pressman, J. and A. Wildavsky (1973), Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland (University of California Press, Berkeley).
32. Robbins, G. and I. Lapsley (2014), ‘The Success Story of the Eurozone Crisis? Ireland's Austerity Measures’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 91–98.
33. Schofield, J. and C. Sausman (2004), ‘Symposium on Implementing Public Policy: Learning from Theory and Practice’, Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 235–48.
34. Shaoul, J., A. Stafford and P. Stapleton (2012), ‘Accountability and Corporate Governance of Public Private Partnerships’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 213–29.
35. Skelcher, C., S. Wier and L. Wilson (2000), Advance of the Quango State (LGIU, London).
36. Skelcher, C., S. Wier, M. Flinders, K. Tonkiss and K. Dommett (2013), Public Bodies Reform by the UK Government 2010–2013: Initial Findings (http://www.shrinkingthestate.org.uk/).
37. Smullen, A. (2010), Transforming Agency Reform: Rhetoric and Culture in Comparative Perspective (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke).
38. Smyth, A. (2012), ‘Contesting Public Accountability: A Dialogical Exploration of Accountability and Social Housing’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 230–43.
39. Tonkiss, K. and A. Noonan (2013), ‘Debate: Arm's Length Bodies and Alternative Models of Service Delivery’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 395–97.
40. Van Thiel, S. (2011), ‘The Empty Nest Syndrome’, in S. Van Thiel et al. (eds.), New Steering Concepts in Public Management (Emerald, Bingley), pp. 25–40.
41. Verhoest, K. (2005), ‘Effects of Autonomy, Performance Contracting, and Competition on the Performance of a Public Agency: A Case Study’, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 235–58.
42. Verhoest, K., B.G. Peters, G. Bouckaert and B. Verschuere (2004), ‘The Organisational Study of Autonomy: A Conceptual Review’, Public Administration and Development, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 101–18.
43. Verhoest, K., S. van Thiel, G. Bouckaert and P. Laegreid (eds.) (2012), Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke).
44. Wallace, M. and E. Hoyle (2012), ‘The Dynamics of Irony in Organisational Change: Coping With a School Merger’, Public Administration, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 974–99.