Evaluation of public involvement in research: Time for a major re-think?

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 209-211

  Edelman, Natalie ^a   Barron, Duncan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complex intervention; Evaluation; Public involvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH;

EID: 84978786382     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: 17581060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1355819615612510     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. INVOLVE. What is public involvement in research? INVOLVE 2012, http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/ what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/ (2014, accessed 25 November 2014).
2. Ward PR, Thompson J, Barber R, et al. Critical perspectives on ‘consumer involvement’ in health research. J Sociol 2009; 46: 1-20.
3. Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, et al. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005234.
4. Robinson L, Newton J and Dawson P. Professionals and the public: power or partnership in health research? J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 18: 276-282.
5. Petit-Zeman S and Locock L. Bring on the evidence. Nature 2013; 501: 160-161.
6. Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh, UK: INVOLVE, 2009.
7. Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, et al. ‘The missing links’: understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expect 2012; 17(6): 755-764.
8. Fudge N, Wolfe CD and McKevitt C. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 2008; 336: 313-317.
9. INVOLVE. The impact of public involvement on research: a discussion paper from the INVOLVE Evidence, Knowledge and Learning working group. Eastleigh, Yorkshire: INVOLVE, 2007.
10. Boote J, Baird W and Sutton A. Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2011; 102: 105-116.
11. Carter P, Beech R, Coxon D, et al. Mobilising the knowledge of clinicians and patients for applied health research. Contemp Soc Sci 2013; 8: 307-320.
12. Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, et al. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expect 2010; 13: 359-368.
13. Mathie E, Wilson P, Poland F, et al. Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey. Int J Consumer Stud 2014; 38: 35-44.
14. Telford R, Boote JD and Cooper CL. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect 2004; 7: 209-220.
15. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al. The PIRICOM Study. A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patient and public involvement in health and social care research. London: United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration, 2010.
16. INVOLVE. Patient and public involvement in research and research ethics committee review. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2009.
17. Staley K and Minogue V. User involvement leads to more ethically sound research. Clin Ethics 2006; 1: 95-100.
18. Denegri S (ed). NIHR strategic review of public involvement in research - '‘breaking boundaries’'. In: Public involvement in research: changing landscapes, Birmingham, 26-27 November 2014.
19. Boote J, Baird W and Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2010; 95: 10-23.
20. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, et al. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27: 391-399.
21. Boote J, Telford R and Cooper CL. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 2002; 61: 213-236.
22. Boote J. Towards a new research agenda for PPI: an overview of the journey travelled, and consideration of where we may want to go next. In: Patient, carer and public involvement seminar ‘Moving from project-led PPI to research-led PPI’, 14 May 2013, University of Leeds, National Institute for Health Research.
23. Petticrew M. INVONET workshop 2008, 13 February 2008, London: INVOLVE.
24. Evans D. Patient and public involvement in research in the English NHS: a documentary analysis of the complex interplay of evidence and policy. Evidence Policy: J Res, Debate Pract 2014; 10: 361-377.
25. Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, et al. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2013; 18(5): 661-675.
26. Snape D, Kirkham J, Britten N, et al. Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004943.
27. Snape D, Kirkham J, Preston J, et al. Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004217.
28. Ives J, Damery S and Redwod S. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who’s sailing the ship? J Med Ethics 2013; 39: 181-185.
29. INVOLVE. Values, principles and standards for public involvement in research. INVOLVE, 2014 27 October 2014.
30. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expectations 2008; 111: 72-84.