Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research

Health Expectations

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 359-368

  Wright, David ^a   Foster, Claire ^b   Amir, Ziv ^c   Elliott, Jim ^d   Wilson, Roger ^e  

^a MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Research Management Consultant   (United Kingdom)

^e And member of NCRI Consumer Liaison Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical appraisal; Guidlines; Quality; User involvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; HUMAN; LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 78149489456     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hanley JBradburn JBarnes M et al. Involving the Public in NHSPublic Healthand Social Care Research: Briefing Notes for Researchers2nd edn. Eastleigh: Involve2003.
2. Parkes MPanelli R. Integrating catchment ecosystems and community health: the value of participatory action research. Ecosystem Health2001; 7: 85-106.
3. Cassidy J. Why patient representation might harm science? Breast Cancer Research2007; 9 (Suppl. 2): S4.
4. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care2nd edn. London: Department of Health2005.
5. Boote JBarber RCooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy2006; 75: 280-297.
6. Hanley BTruesdale AKing AElbourne DChalmers I. Involving consumers in designingconductingand interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal2001; 322: 519-523.
7. Buckland SGorin S. Involving Consumers? An Exploration of Consumer Involvement in NHS Research and Development managed by Department of Health Regional Offices. Eastleigh: Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit2001.
8. Reason PBradbury H. Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worth of human aspiration. In: Reason PBradbury H (eds) Handbook of Action Research: ParticipationInquiry and Practice. London: Sage2001: 1-14.
9. Turner MBeresford P. User Controlled Research: Its Meaning and Potential. Eastleigh: Involve2005.
10. Integrated Research Application SystemVersion 2.5. Available at:accessed 23 November 2009.
11. Boote JTelford RCooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy2002; 61: 213-236.
12. Wright DNMCorner JLHopkinson JBFoster CL. The case for user involvement in research: the research priorities of cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research2007; 9 (Suppl. 2): S3.
13. National Breast Cancer Coalition. Available at:accessed 23 November 2009.
14. Corner JWright DFoster CGunaratnam YHopkinson JOkamoto I. The Macmillan Listening Study: Listening to the Views of People Affected by Cancer About Cancer Research. London: Macmillan Cancer Support2006.
15. Tallon DChard JDieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet2000; 355: 2037-2040.
16. Corner JWright DHopkinson JGunaratnam YMcDonald JWFoster C. The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study. British Journal of Cancer2007; 96: 875-881.
17. Fisher M. The role of service users in problem formulation and technical aspects of social research. Social Work Education2002; 21: 305-312.
18. Wright DCorner JHopkinson JFoster C. Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expectations2006; 9: 3-12.
19. Wright DNMHopkinson JCorner JFoster C. How to involve cancer patients at the end of life as co-researchers. Palliative Medicine2006; 20: 821-827.
20. Amir ZLuker K. Involving users in research. Health Service Journal2005; 13: 31.
21. O'Donnell MEntwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. Health Policy2004; 70: 281-290.
22. Mort MWiston G. The user card: picking through the organisational undergrowth in health and social care. Contemporary Political Studies1996; 2: 1133-1140.
23. Stevens TWilde DHunt JAhmedzai SH. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expectations2003; 6: 81-88.
24. MacNeil SDFernandez CV. Offering results to research participants. British Medical Journal2006; 332: 188-189.
25. Chambers RO'Brien LMLinnell SSharp S. Why don't health researchers report consumer involvement? Quality in Primary Care2004; 12: 151-157.