Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: A narrative review of case examples

Health Policy

Volumn 102, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 105-116

  Boote, Jonathan ^a   Baird, Wendy ^a   Sutton, Anthea ^b  

^a NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire and the Humber   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conduct; Design; Narrative literature review; Public involvement; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ATAXIA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CARE; SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 80052814022     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives. Welcome. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.copr.nih.gov/.
2. Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.chf.org.au/.
3. Department of Health Research governance framework for health and social care 2005, Department of Health, London. 2nd ed.
4. National Institute for Health Research. Patients and public. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.crncc.nihr.ac.uk/ppi.
5. Boote J., Baird W., Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2010, 95:10-23.
6. Beresford P. Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 2005, 14:4-9.
7. Thompson J., Barber R., Ward P.R., Boote J.D., Cooper C.L., Armitage C.J., et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expectations 2009, 12:209-220.
8. Boote, J. Patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a bibliography. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/_file.ashx?id=3959.
9. Staniszewska S., Herron-Marx S., Mockford C. Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008, 20:373-374.
10. Staley K. Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research 2009, INVOLVE, Eastleigh.
11. Evans D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2003, 12:77-84.
12. The Cochrane Collaboration. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.cochrane.org/.
13. Bastian H. The power of sharing knowledge: consumer participation in the Cochrane Collaboration 1994, [accessed in 2011]. http://consumers.cochrane.org/sites/consumers.cochrane.org/files/BastianPowerofSh%20aringKnowledge_1994.pdf.
14. Wale J., Colombo C., Belizan M., Nadel J. International health consumers in The Cochrane Collaboration: fifteen years on. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2010, 33(3):182-189.
15. Kelson M. Consumer collaboration, patient-defined outcomes and the preparation of Cochrane Reviews. Health Expectations 1999, 2(2):129-135.
16. Shea B., Santesso N., Qualman A., Heiberg T., Leong A., Judd M., et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expectations 2005, 8(4):352-359.
17. Ghersi D. Making it happen: approaches to involving consumers in Cochrane reviews. Evaluation and the Health Professions 2002, 25(3):270-283.
18. Sakala C., Gyte G., Henderson S., Neilson J.P., Horey D. Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: the experience of the Cochrane Collaboration's Pregnancy and Childbirth Group. Birth 2001, 28(2):133-137.
19. Skoetz N., Weingart O., Engert A. Resources review. A consumer network for haematological malignancies. Health Expectations 2005, 8:86-90.
20. Braye S., Preston-Shoot M. Emerging out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviews. Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2005, 1(2):173-194.
21. Smith E., Donovan S., Beresford P., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J., et al. Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review. Health Expectations 2009, 12:197-208.
22. INVOLVE. About us. [accessed in 2011]. http://www.invo.org.uk/About_Us.asp.
23. Boote J., Telford R., Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy 2002, 61(2):213-236.
24. Keown K., Van Eerd D., Irvin E. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2008, 28(2):67-72.
25. Serrano-Aguilar P., Trujillo-Martín M.M., Ramos-Goñi J.M., Mahtani-Chugan V., Perestelo-Pérez L., Posada-de la Paz M. Patient involvement in health research: a contribution to a systematic review on the effectiveness of treatments for degenerative ataxias. Social Science and Medicine 2009, 69(6):920-925.
26. Brett J., Staniszewska S., Mockford C., Seers K., Herron-Marx S., Bayliss H. The PIRICOM Study: a systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research 2010, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, [accessed, 2011]. http://www.ukcrc.org/index.aspx?o=3233.
27. Carr S., Coren E. Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews 2007, SCIE, London, [accessed, 2011]. http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/researchresources/rr02.pdf.
28. Nilsen E.S., Myrhaug H.T., Johansen M., Oliver S., Oxman A.D. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, 3(September). ncbi-p:1469493X.
29. Carr S., Fleischmann P. Systematic review of consumers' perspective on electro-convulsive therapy. Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews 2007, SCIE, London, [accessed in 2011]. http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/researchresources/rr02.pdf, S. Carr, E. Coren (Eds.).
30. Rees R., Oliver S. An example from sexual health promotion. Collection of examples of service user and carer participation in systematic reviews 2007, SCIE, London, [accessed in 2011]. http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/researchresources/rr02.pdf, S. Carr, E. Coren (Eds.).
31. Rose D., Wykes T., Leese M., Bindman J., Fleischmann P. Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: systematic review. British Medical Journal 2003, 326:1363-1367.
32. Rees R., Kavanagh J., Burchett H., Shepherd J., Brunton G., Harden A., et al. HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): a systematic review of research relevant to the development and implementation of effective and appropriate interventions 2004, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London.
33. Braye S, Preston-Shoot M, Cull L-A, Johns R, Roche, J. Teaching, learning and assessment of law in social work education, Knowledge Review 8. Social Care Institute for Excellence, London; 2005 [accessed in 2011]. http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/knowledgereviews/kr08.asp.
34. Braye S., Preston-Shoot M., Johns R. Law in social work education: reviewing the evidence on teaching, learning and assessment. Social Work Education 2005, 24(5):547-563.
35. Smith E., Ross F., Donovan S., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J., et al. User involvement in the design and undertaking of nursing, midwifery and health visiting research 2005, NCCSDO, London.
36. Smith E., Ross F., Donovan S., Manthorpe J., Brearley S., Sitzia J., et al. Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008, 45:298-315.
37. Trujillo-Martín M.M., Serrano-Aguilar P., Monton-Alvarez F., Carrillo-Fumero R. Effectiveness and safety of treatments for degenerative ataxias: a systematic review. Movement Disorders 2009, 15(24 (8)):1111-1124.
38. Schardt C., Adams M.B., Owens T., Keitz S., Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2007, 7:16. 10.1186/1472-6947-7-16.
39. NIHR Research Design Services. [accessed, 2011]. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/infrastructure/Pages/infrastructure_research_design_services.aspx.
40. NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire and the Humber. RDSYH public involvement in grant applications funding award. [accessed, 2011]. http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/patient-and-public-involvement/ensuring-ppi-in-research-design/rdsyh-public-involvement-in-grant-applications-funding-award.aspx.
41. National Research Ethics Service and INVOLVE. Patient and public involvement in research and Research Ethics Committee review 2009. [accessed, 2011]. http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/involve_nresfinalstatement310309.pdf.
42. Boote J., Baird W., Sutton A. Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a review. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2011, 5(11):91-111.
43. Hanley B., Bradburn J., Gorin S., Barnes M., Evans C., Goodare H., et al. Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: briefing notes for researchers 2000, Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit, Winchester.
44. Telford R., Boote J., Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expectations 2004, 7(3):209-220.
45. Boote J., Barber R., Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and sub-group analysis. Health Policy 2006, 75(3):280-297.