Comparative study of different seeding methods based on a multilayer SIS scaffold: Which is the optimal procedure for urethral tissue engineering?

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 104, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1098-1108

  Lv, Xiang Guo ^a   Feng, Chao ^a   Fu, Qiang ^a   Xie, Hong ^a   Wang, Ying ^a   Huang, Jian Wen ^a   Xie, Min Kai ^a   Atala, Anthony ^b   Xu, Yue Min ^a   Zhao, Wei Xin ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

centrifugation seeding; seeding technology; static agitation seeding; urethra reconstruction

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CELL ENGINEERING; CELLS; CENTRIFUGATION; CYTOLOGY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CENTRIFUGATION METHODS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DYNAMIC SEEDING; HISTOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; SEEDING TECHNOLOGY; SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA; THREE DIMENSIONAL SCAFFOLD;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

AGITATION; CENTRIFUGATION; COCULTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; SMALL INTESTINE; SUBMUCOSA; TISSUE ENGINEERING; URETHRAL TISSUE; URETHROPLASTY;

EID: 84978758227     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33460     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Substitution urethroplasty with buccal mucosal-free grafts. J Urol 2001;165:1131–1133; discussion 3-4.
2. Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: Is it the new gold standard? BJU Int 2004;93:1191–1193.
3. Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int 2004;94:867–869.
4. Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, Gonzalez CM. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urology 2005;66:716–720.
5. Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, Lopez-Bayghen E, Soker S, Atala A. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: An observational study. Lancet 2011;377:1175–1182.
6. Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, MacNeil S, Chapple CR. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty—Clinical outcomes. Eur Urol 2008;53:1263–1269.
7. Zhang Y, Kropp BP, Moore P, Cowan R, Furness PD III, Kolligian ME, Frey P, Cheng EY. Coculture of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells on small intestinal submucosa: Potential applications for tissue engineering technology. J Urol 2000;164:928–934; discussion 34–35.
8. Feng C, Xu YM, Fu Q, Zhu WD, Cui L. Reconstruction of three-dimensional neourethra using lingual keratinocytes and corporal smooth muscle cells seeded acellular corporal spongiosum. Tissue Eng Part A 2011;17:3011–3019.
9. Fu WJ, Xu YD, Wang ZX, Li G, Shi JG, Cui FZ, Zhang Y, Zhang X. New ureteral scaffold constructed with composite poly(l-lactic acid)-collagen and urothelial cells by new centrifugal seeding system. J Biomed Mater Res A 2012;100:1725–1733.
10. Fiala R, Vidlar A, Vrtal R, Belej K, Student V. Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol 2007;5:1702–1708; discussion 8.
11. Rotariu P, Yohannes P, Alexianu M, Gershbaum D, Pinkashov D, Morgenstern N, Smith AD. Reconstruction of rabbit urethra with surgisis small intestinal submucosa. J Endourol 2002;16:617–620.
12. Lu SH, Lin AT, Chen KK, Chiang HS, Chang LS. Characterization of smooth muscle differentiation of purified human skeletal muscle-derived cells. J Cell Mol Med 2011;15:587–592.
13. Takahashi Y, Tabata Y. Homogeneous seeding of mesenchymal stem cells into nonwoven fabric for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2003;9:931–938.
14. Petrenko YA, Ivanov RV, Lozinsky VI, Petrenko AY. Comparison of the methods for seeding human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to macroporous alginate cryogel carriers. Bull Exp Biol Med 2011;150:543–546.
15. Xiao YL, Riesle J, Van Blitterswijk CA. Static and dynamic fibroblast seeding and cultivation in porous PEO/PBT scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:773–777.
16. Gooch KJ, Kwon JH, Blunk T, Langer R, Freed LE, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Effects of mixing intensity on tissue-engineered cartilage. Biotechnol Bioeng 2001;72:402–407.
17. Bodin A, Bharadwaj S, Wu S, Gatenholm P, Atala A, Zhang Y. Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 2010;31:8889–8901.
18. Yang TH, Miyoshi H, Ohshima N. Novel cell immobilization method utilizing centrifugal force to achieve high-density hepatocyte culture in porous scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:379–386.
19. Atala A. Experimental and clinical experience with tissue engineering techniques for urethral reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am. 2002;29:485–492
20. Feng C, Xu YM, Fu Q, Zhu WD, Cui L, Chen J. Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;94:317–325.
21. Dorin RP, Pohl HG, De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Tubularized urethral replacement with unseeded matrices: What is the maximum distance for normal tissue regeneration? World J Urol 2008;26:323–326.
22. Wu S, Liu Y, Bharadwaj S, Atala A, Zhang Y. Human urine-derived stem cells seeded in a modified 3D porous small intestinal submucosa scaffold for urethral tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011;32:1317–1326.
23. Cheng EY, Kropp BP. Urologic tissue engineering with small-intestinal submucosa: Potential clinical applications. World J Urol 2000;18:26–30.
24. Liu Y, Bharadwaj S, Lee SJ, Atala A, Zhang Y. Optimization of a natural collagen scaffold to aid cell-matrix penetration for urologic tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009;30:3865–3873.
25. Wendt D, Marsano A, Jakob M, Heberer M, Martin I. Oscillating perfusion of cell suspensions through three-dimensional scaffolds enhances cell seeding efficiency and uniformity. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;84:205–214.
26. Ng R, Gurm JS, Yang ST. Centrifugal seeding of mammalian cells in nonwoven fibrous matrices. Biotechnol Prog 2010;26:239–245.
27. Roh JD, Nelson GN, Udelsman BV, Brennan MP, Lockhart B, Fong PM, Lopez RI, Saltzman MS, Breuer CK. Centrifugal seeding increases seeding efficiency and cellular distribution of bone marrow stromal cells in porous biodegradable scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007;13:2743–2749.
28. Kim BS, Putnam AJ, Kulik TJ, Mooney DJ. Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998;57:46–54.
29. Burg KJ, Holder WD Jr, Culberson CR, Beiler RJ, Greene KG, Loebsack AB, Roland WD, Eiselt P, Mooney DJ, Halberstadt CR. Comparative study of seeding methods for three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:576.
30. Garcia-Urena MA, Vega Ruiz V, Diaz Godoy A, Baez Perea JM, Marin Gomez LM, Carnero Hernandez FJ, García MÁ. Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. Am J Surg 2007;193:538–542.
31. Mueller SM, Schneider TO, Shortkroff S, Breinan HA, Spector M. Alpha-smooth muscle actin and contractile behavior of bovine meniscus cells seeded in type I and type II collagen-GAG matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:157–166.
32. Hwang M, Kim HJ, Noh HJ, Chang YC, Chae YM, Kim KH, Jeon JP, Lee TS, Oh HK, Lee YS, Park KK. TGF-beta1 siRNA suppresses the tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the kidney of ureteral obstruction. Exp Mol Pathol 2006;81:48–54.
33. Zhao F, Ma T. Perfusion bioreactor system for human mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: Dynamic cell seeding and construct development. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005;91:482–493.
34. Li Y, Ma T, Kniss DA, Lasky LC, Yang ST. Effects of filtration seeding on cell density, spatial distribution, and proliferation in nonwoven fibrous matrices. Biotechnol Prog 2001;17:935–944.