Evaluation of the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for urethral reconstruction

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 317-325

  Feng, Chao ^a   Xu, Yue Min ^a   Fu, Qiang ^a   Zhu, Wei Dong ^a   Cui, Lei ^b   Chen, Jie ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shanghai Tissue Engineering Research and Development Center(LCSY)   (China)

Author keywords

Scaffold; Tissue engineering; Urethral reconstruction

Indexed keywords

CELL INFILTRATION; CELLULAR COVERAGE; CYTOTOXIC; DAYS AFTER SEEDING; DIFFERENT PORE SIZES; MATRIX; MECHANICAL EVALUATION; METABOLIC ACTIVITY; MTT ASSAYS; POLYGLYCOLIC ACIDS; SEM; SMALL INTESTINAL SUBMUCOSA; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS; SYNTHETIC SCAFFOLDS; TENSILE MECHANICAL TESTING; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CELLS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; METABOLISM; MUSCLE; PORE SIZE; PROGRAMMED CONTROL SYSTEMS; REPAIR; STRESSES; SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS; TENSILE TESTING; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS;

BIOMATERIAL; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

ACELLULAR CORPUS SPONGIOSUM MATRIX; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLADDER MUCOSA; CELL CULTURE; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL INVASION; CELL ISOLATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS CAVERNOSUM; CYTOTOXICITY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MITOCHONDRIAL RESPIRATION; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SMALL INTESTINE MUCOSA; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; SUBMUCOSA; TENSILE STRENGTH; TISSUE ENGINEERING; URETHRA; URETHROPLASTY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELLS, CULTURED; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MYOCYTES, SMOOTH MUSCLE; POROSITY; RABBITS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; URETHRA; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 77952720027     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32729     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, Zhang J, Zhang HZ, Zhang XR, Wu DL, Chen R. One-stage urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft: An experimental and clinical study. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:381-384. (Pubitemid 36215827)
2. Song LJ, Xu YM, Hu XY, Zhang HZ. Urethral substitution using autologous lingual mucosal grafts: An experimental study. BJU Int 2008;101:739-743.
3. Patterson JM, Chapple CR. Surgical techniques in substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol 2008;53:1162-1171.
4. Nelson CP, Bloom DA, Kinast R, Wei JT, Park JM. Long-term patient reported outcome and satisfaction after oral mucosa graft urethroplasty for hypospadias. J Urol 2005;174:1075-1078. (Pubitemid 41140685)
5. Kumar A, Goyal NK, Das SK, Trivedi S, Dwivedi US, Singh PB. Oral complications after lingual mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:970-973. (Pubitemid 47568872)
6. Barbagli G. Interview with Dr Guido Barbagli. Substitution urethroplasty: Which tissues and techniques are optimal for urethral replacement? Eur Urol 2007;52:602-604.
7. Nakanishi Y, Chen G, Komuro H, Ushida T, Kaneko S, Tateishi T, Kaneko M. Tissue-engineered urinary bladder wall using PLGA mesh-collagen hybrid scaffolds: A comparison study of collagen sponge and gel as a scaffold. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1781-1784. (Pubitemid 37505412)
8. Atala A, Vacanti JP, Peters CA, Mandell J, Retik AB, Freeman MR. Formation of urothelial structures in vivo from dissociated cells attached to biodegradable polymer scaffolds in vitro. J Urol 1992; 148:658-662.
9. Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Colombo F, Austoni E. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: Short-term results. Eur Urol 2007;51:1695-1701. (Pubitemid 46634746)
10. Friedrich MJ. Tissue engineering in the genitourinary system. JAMA 2000;283:2509.
11. Wünsch L, Ehlers EM, Russlies M. Matrix testing for urothelial tissue engineering. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2005;15:164-169. (Pubitemid 40992003)
12. Pariente JL, Kim BS, Atala A. In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human bladder smooth muscle cells. J Urol 2002;167:1867-1871.
13. Chen F, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology 1999;4: 407-410.
14. Freytes DO, Badylak SF, Webster TJ, Geddes LA, Rundell AE. Biaxial strength of multilaminated extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials 2004;25:2353-2361.
15. Raghavan D, Kropp BP, Lin HK, Zhang Y, Cowan R, Madihally SV. Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are location-dependent. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;73:90-96. (Pubitemid 40354828)
16. Xu ZC, Zhang WJ, Li H, Cui L, Cen L, Zhou GD, Liu W, Cao Y. Engineering of an elastic large muscular vessel wall with pulsatile stimulation in bioreactor. Biomaterials 2008;29:1464-1472.
17. Pilatz A, Schultheiss D, Gabouev AI, Schlote N, Mertsching H, Jonas U, Stief CG. Isolation of primary endothelial and stromal cell cultures of the corpus cavernosum penis for basic research and tissue engineering. Eur Urol 2005;47:710-719. (Pubitemid 40521926)
18. Kim BS, Atala A, Yoo JJ. A collagen matrix derived from bladder can be used to engineer smooth muscle tissue. World J Urol 2008;26:307-314.
19. El-Assmy A, El-Hamid MA, Hafez AT. Urethral replacement: A comparison between small intestinal submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration. BJU Int 2004;94:1132-1135. (Pubitemid 39577107)
20. Nuininga JE, van Moerkerk H, Hanssen A, Hulsbergen CA, Oosterwijk- Wakka J, Oosterwijk E, de Gier RP. Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa. Eur Urol 2003;44:266-271.
21. Lu SH, Sacks MS, Chung SY, Gloeckner DC, Pruchnic R, Huard J, de Groat WC, Chancellor MB. Biaxial mechanical properties of muscle-derived cell seeded small intestinal submucosa for bladder wall reconstitution. Biomaterials 2005;26:443-449.
22. Bolland F, Korossis S, Wilshaw SP, Ingham E, Fisher J, Kearney JN, Southgate J. Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007;28:1061-1070.
23. Xu LS, Zhang JM, Zuo ZN. Urethral reconstruction using acellular corpus spongiosum-urethral matrix graft in rabbits. J Clin Reh Tissue Eng Res (Chinese) 2007;11:3784-3788.
24. Kimuli M, Eardley I, Southgate J. In vitro assessment of decellularized porcine dermis as a matrix for urinary tract reconstruction. BJU Int 2004;94:859-866.
25. Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Müeller R, Griffith LG. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng 2001;7:557-572.
26. Brehmer B, Rohrmann D, Becker C, Rau G, Jakse G. Different types of scaffolds for reconstruction of the urinary tract by tissue engineering. Urol Int 2007;78:23-29.
27. Ng KW, Khor HL, Hutmacher DW. In vitro characterization of natural and synthetic dermal matrices cultured with human dermal fibroblast. Biomaterials 2004;25:2807-2818.
28. Joo KJ, Kim BS, Han JH, Kim CJ, Kwon CH, Park HJ. Porcine vesical acellular matrix graft of tunica albuginea for penile reconstruction. Asian J Androl 2006;8:543-548.
29. Zhang Y, Kropp BP, Moore P, Cowan R, Furness PD 3rd, Kolligian ME, Frey P, Cheng EY. Coculture of bladder urothelial and smooth muscle cells on small intestinal submucosa: potential applications for tissue engineering technology. J Urol 2000;164:928-934.
30. Armour AD, Fish JS, Woodhouse KA, Semple JL. A comparison of human and porcine acellularized dermis: Interactions with human fibroblasts in vitro. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117: 845-856.
31. Timmins NE, Scherberich A, Früh JA, Heberer M, Martin I, Jakob M. Three-dimensional cell culture and tissue engineering in a TCUP (tissue culture under perfusion). Tissue Eng 2007;13: 2021-2028.