The Simoa HD-1 Analyzer: A Novel Fully Automated Digital Immunoassay Analyzer with Single-Molecule Sensitivity and Multiplexing

Journal of Laboratory Automation

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 533-547

  Wilson, David H ^a   Rissin, David M ^a   Kan, Cheuk W ^a   Fournier, David R ^a   Piech, Tomasz ^a   Campbell, Todd G ^a   Meyer, Raymond E ^a   Fishburn, Matthew W ^a   Cabrera, Carlos ^a   Patel, Purvish P ^a   Frew, Erica ^a   Chen, Yao ^a   Chang, Lei ^a   Ferrell, Evan P ^a   von Einem, Volker ^b   McGuigan, William ^c   Reinhardt, Marcus ^b   Sayer, Heiko ^b   Vielsack, Claus ^b   Duffy, David C ^a  

^a QUANTERIX CORPORATION   (United States)

^b STRATEC Biomedical AG   (Germany)

^c Stratec Biomedical USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

digital immunoassay; HD 1; multiplexing; Simoa; single molecule array

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; DIAGNOSIS; IMMUNOLOGY; LABORATORIES; MOLECULES; MULTIPLEXING; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TURNAROUND TIME;

COEFFICIENTS OF VARIATIONS; DIGITAL IMMUNOASSAY; HD-1; LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTIONS; SIMOA; SINGLE MOLECULE; SINGLE-MOLECULE SENSITIVITY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES;

DISEASES;

ALPHA INTERFERON; ALPHA1 INTERFERON; ANTIGEN P24; C PEPTIDE; GRANULOCYTE MACROPHAGE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR; INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERLEUKIN 13; INTERLEUKIN 15; INTERLEUKIN 17; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; TAU PROTEIN; TROPONIN I; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL IMMUNOASSAY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOASSAY; IMMUNOASSAY ANALYZER; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE; TURNAROUND TIME; DEVICES; HUMAN; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LABORATORY TECHNIQUE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TIME FACTOR;

AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; CLINICAL LABORATORY TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84978536012     PISSN: 22110682     EISSN: 22110690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2211068215589580     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. N.RifaiG.A.GilletteS.A.CarrProtein Biomarker Discovery and Validation: The Long and Uncertain Path to Clinical Utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 971–983.
2. E.DruckerK.KrapfenbauerPitfalls and Limitations in Translation from Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Utility in Predictive and Personalised Medicine. EPMA J. 2013, 4 (1), 7.
3. M.A.TainskyGenomic and Proteomic Biomarkers for Cancer: A Multitude of Opportunities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta2009, 1796 (2), 176–193.
4. R.SimonGenomic Biomarkers in Predictive Medicine: An Interim Analysis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011, 3 (8), 429–435.
5. M.W.QoronflehK.LindpaintnerProtein Biomarker Immunoassays Opportunities and Challenges. Drug Discov. World2010, 11, 19–28.
6. T.FarrahE.W.DeutschM.R.Hoopmann. The State of the Human Proteome in 2012 as Viewed through PeptideAtlas. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 162–171.
7. J.CuiQ.LiuD.Puett. Computational Prediction of Human Proteins That Can Be Secreted into the Bloodstream. Bioinformatics2008, 24 (20), 2370–2375.
8. N.L.AndersonThe Clinical Plasma Proteome: A Survey of Clinical Assays for Proteins in Plasma and Serum. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56 (2), 177–185.
9. S.LeeS.KimJ.Malm. Improved Porous Silicon Microarray Based Prostate Specific Antigen Immunoassay by Optimized Surface Density of the Capture Antibody. Anal. Chim. Acta2013, 796, 108–114.
10. J.ChenC.WangJ.IrudayarajUltrasensitive Protein Detection in Blood Serum Using Gold Nanoparticle Probes by Single Molecule Spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14 (4), 040501.
11. D.S.GrubishaR.J.LipertH.Y.Park. Femtomolar Detection of Prostate-Specific Antigen: An Immunoassay Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering and Immunogold Labels. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75 (21), 5936–5943.
12. S.KunduC.GinsburghS.Lynch. An Ultrasensitive Immunoassay Detection System for Biomarkers Utilizing Raman Scattering Methods. American Laboratory, Oct31, 2012.
13. R.LiuX.LiuY.Tang. Highly Sensitive Immunoassay Based on Immunogold-Silver Amplification and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometric Detection. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83 (6), 2330–2336.
14. J.KaiA.PuntambekarD.Sehy. Amplifying Immunoassay Sensitivity. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. News2011, 31 (18), 26–27.
15. R.RicaM.M.StevensPlasmonic ELISA for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Disease Biomarkers with the Naked Eye. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 821–824.
16. R.D.JoergerT.M.TrubyE.R.Hendrickson. Analyte Detection with DNA-Labeled Antibodies and Polymerase Chain Reaction. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41 (9), 1371–1377.
17. J.M.NamC.S.ThaxtonC.A.MirkinNanoparticle-Based Bio-Bar Codes for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Proteins. Science2003, 301 (5641), 1884–1886.
18. Y.P.BaoT.F.WieP.A.Lefebvre. Detection of Protein Analytes via Nanoparticle-Based Bio Bar Code Technology. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78 (6), 2055–2059.
19. J.E.McDermedR.SandersS.Fait. Nucleic Acid Detection Immunoassay for Prostate-Specific Antigen Based on Immuno-PCR Methodology. Clin. Chem. 2012, 58 (4), 732–740.
20. C.S.ThaxtonR.ElghanianA.D.Thomas. Nanoparticle-Based Bio-Barcode Assay Redefines “Undetectable” PSA and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106 (44), 18437–18442.
21. J.ToddB.FreeseA.Lu. Ultrasensitive Flow-Based Immunoassays Using Single-Molecule Counting. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53 (11), 1990–1995.
22. D.M.RissinC.W.KanT.G.Campbell. Single-Molecule Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detects Serum Proteins at Subfemtomolar Concentrations. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 595–599.
23. W.McGuiganD.R.FournierG.W.Watson. The Optics Inside an Automated Single Molecule Array Analyzer. In SPIE, Proceedings of the SPIE Conference: Advanced Biomedical and Clinical Diagnostic Systems XII; San Francisco, CA, Feb 27, 2014;, Eds. SPIE: Bellingham, WA, 2014.
24. L.ChangD.M.RissinD.R.Fournier. Single Molecule Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays: Theoretical Considerations. J. Immunol. Methods2012, 378 (1–2), 102–115.
25. C.W.KanA.J.RivnakD.C.Duffy. Isolation and Detection of Single Molecules on Paramagnetic Beads Using Sequential Fluid Flows in Microfabricated Polymer Array Assemblies. Lab Chip2012, 12 (5), 977–985.
26. D.M.RissinC.W.KanL.Song. Multiplexed Single Molecule Immunoassays. Lab Chip2013, 13 (15), 2902–2911.
27. D.M.RissinD.R.FournierT.Piech. Simultaneous Detection of Single Molecules and Singulated Ensembles of Molecules Enables Immunoassays with Broad Dynamic Range. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83 (6), 2279–2285.
28. D.M.RissinD.H.WilsonD.C.DuffyMeasurement of Single Protein Molecules Using Digital ELISA. In The Immunoassay Handbook, 4th ed.;, Ed.; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, 2013; pp 223–242.
29. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods: Approved Guideline, 2nd ed.; CLSI Document EP5-A2, 2004; 24 (25).
30. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantitation: Approved Guideline, 2nd ed.; CLSI Document EP17-A, 2004; 24 (34).
31. J.RandallE.MörtbergG.K.Provuncher. Tau Proteins in Serum Predict Neurological Outcome after Hypoxic Brain Injury from Cardiac Arrest: Results of a Pilot Study. Resuscitation2013, 84 (3), 351–356.
32. L.ChangL.SongD.R.Fournier. Simple Diffusion-Constrained Immunoassay for p24 Protein with the Sensitivity of Nucleic Acid Amplification for Detecting Acute HIV Infection. J. Virol. Methods2013, 188 (1–2), 153–160.
33. D.H.WilsonD.W.HanlonG.K.Provuncher. Fifth-Generation Digital Immunoassay for Prostate-Specific Antigen by Single Molecule Array Technology. Clin. Chem. 2011, 57 (12), 1712–1721.
34. R.ZafonteW.T.FriedewaldS.M.Lee. The Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment (COBRIT) Trial: Design and Methods. J. Neurotrauma2009, 26 (12), 2207–2216.
35. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Structure of HIV. http://www.niaid.nih.gov/topics/HIVAIDS/Understanding/Biology/pages/structure.aspx (accessed Nov 2011).
36. D.WildC.SheehanS.BinderIntroduction to Immunoassay Product Technology in Clinical Diagnostic Testing. In The Immunoassay Handbook, 4th ed.;, Ed.; Elsevier: Waltham, MA, 2013; pp 505–515.
37. E.GomezD.J.JespersenJ.A.Harring. Evaluation of the Bio-Rad BioPlex 2200 Syphilis Multiplex Flow Immunoassay for the Detection of IgM- and IgG-Class Antitreponemal Antibodies. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2010, 17 (6), 966–968.
38. J.L.BockThe New Era of Automated Immunoassay. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2000, 113 (5), 628–646.
39. C.H.SelfD.B.CookAdvances in Immunoassay Technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1996, 7 (1), 60–65.
40. L.RenautC.MonnetO.Dubreuil. Affinity Maturation of Antibodies: Optimized Methods to Generate High-Quality ScFv Libraries and Isolate IgG Candidates by High-Throughput Screening. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 907, 451–461.
41. J.BolandG.CareyE.Krodel. The Ciba Corning ACS:180 Benchtop Immunoassay Analyzer. Clin. Chem. 1990, 36 (9), 1598–1601.
42. M.FioreJ.MitchellT.Doan. The Abbott IMx Automated Benchtop Immunochemistry Analyzer System. Clin. Chem. 1988, 34 (9), 1726–1732.