Evaluating techniques for metagenome annotation using simulated sequence data

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Randle Boggis, Richard J ^a   Helgason, Thorunn ^a   Sapp, Melanie ^b   Ashton, Peter D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA sequencing; Metagenome analysis; Metagenomics; Microbial ecology; Sequence annotation

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL ECOLOGY;

BACTERIUM; CLASSIFICATION; EVALUATION STUDY; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

BACTERIA; ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84978402065     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw095     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Achtman M, Wagner M. Microbial diversity and the genetic nature of microbial species. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008;6:431-40.
2. Anderson RE, Sogin ML, Baross JA. Biogeography and ecology of the rare and abundant microbial lineages in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2015;91:1-11.
3. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 2011;473:174-80.
4. Bapteste E, Boucher Y. Epistemological Impacts of Horizontal Gene Transfer on Classification in Microbiology. In: Gogarten DMB, Gogarten DJP, Olendzenski DLC (eds). Horizontal Gene Transfer. New York City, USA: Humana Press, 2009, 55-72.
5. Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A et al. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26: 1146-53.
6. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 2015;12:59-60.
7. Carr R, Borenstein E. Comparative analysis of functional metagenomic annotation and the mappability of short reads. PLoS One 2014;9:e105776.
8. Chun J, Lee J-H, Jung Y et al. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2007;57:2259-61.
9. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014;505:559-63.
10. Desai N, Antonopoulos D, Gilbert JA et al. From genomics to metagenomics. Curr Opin Biotech 2012;23:72-6.
11. Fournier P-E, Dumler JS, Greub G et al. Gene sequence-based criteria for identification of new rickettsia isolates and description of Rickettsia heilongjiangensis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:5456-65.
12. Garcia-Etxebarria K, Garcia-Garcerá M, Calafell F. Consistency of metagenomic assignment programs in simulated and real data. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15:90.
13. Gevers D, Cohan FM, Lawrence JG et al. Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:733-9.
14. Gogarten JP, Townsend JP. Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:679-87.
15. Henry VJ, Bandrowski AE, Pepin A-S et al. OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis. Database 2014;2014:bau069.
16. Hoff KJ. The effect of sequencing errors on metagenomic gene prediction. BMC Genomics 2009;10:520.
17. Hugenholtz P. Exploring prokaryotic diversity in the genomic era. Genome Biol 2002;3:reviews0003.
18. Hunter CI, Mitchell A, Jones P et al. Metagenomic analysis: the challenge of the data bonanza. Brief Bioinform 2012;13:743-6.
19. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J et al. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res 2007;17:377-86.
20. Huson DH, Xie C. A poor man's BLASTX-high-throughput metagenomic protein database search using PAUDA. Bioinformatics 2014;30:38-9.
21. Jia B, Xuan L, Cai K et al. NeSSM: a next-generation sequencing simulator for metagenomics. PLoS One 2013;8:e75448.
22. Joshi NA, Fass JN. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, qualitybased trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33) [Software]. 2011, https://github.com/najoshi/sickle (18 May 2016, date last accessed).
23. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27-30.
24. Lane DJ, Pace B, Olsen GJ et al. Rapid determination of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:6955-9.
25. Lindgreen S, Adair KL, Gardner PP. An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools. Sci Rep 2016;6:19233.
26. Lipson DA, Haggerty JM, Srinivas A et al. Metagenomic insights into anaerobic metabolism along an Arctic peat soil profile. PLoS One 2013;8:e64659.
27. Mavromatis K, IvanovaN, Barry K et al. Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods. Nat Methods 2007;4:495-500.
28. Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G et al. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Methods 2013;10: 881-4.
29. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:386.
30. Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S et al. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:W182-5.
31. Pignatelli M, Moya A. Evaluating the fidelity of de novo short read metagenomic assembly using simulated data. PLoS One 2011;6:e19984.
32. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126-31.
33. Rosselló-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001;25:39-67.
34. Shakya M, Quince C, Campbell JH et al. Comparative metagenomic and rRNA microbial diversity characterization using Archaeal and Bacterial synthetic communities. EnvironMicrobiol 2013;15:1882-99.
35. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNADNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994;44:846-9.
36. Streit WR, Schmitz RA. Metagenomics-the key to the uncultured microbes. Curr Opin Microbiol 2004;7:492-8.
37. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997;278:631-7.
38. Thomas T, Gilbert J, Meyer F. Metagenomics - a guide fromsampling to data analysis. Microb Inform Exp 2012;2:3.
39. Tringe SG, von Mering C, Kobayashi A et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 2005;308:554-7.
40. Větrovský T, Baldrian P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One 2013;8:e57923.
41. Wilke A, Glass EM, Bischof J et al. MG-RAST Technical Report and Manual v3.3.6 r1. Argonne National Laboratory: University of Chicago, 2013.
42. Wilke A, Harrison T, Wilkening J et al. The M5nr: a novel nonredundant database containing protein sequences and annotations from multiple sources and associated tools. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:141.
43. Woese CR, Fox GE. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1977;74:5088-90.
44. Wu S, Zhu Z, Fu L et al. WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis. BMC Genomics 2011;12:444.
45. Xie W, Wang F, Guo L et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities inhabiting deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys with contrasting chemistries. ISME J 2011;5:414-26.
46. Zhao Y, Tang H, Ye Y. RAPSearch2: a fast and memory-efficient protein similarity search tool for next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:125-6.