Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT

Hydrology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-39

  Golmohammadi, Golmar ^a   Prasher, Shiv ^a   Madani, Ali ^a   Rudra, Ramesh ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

APEX; Canagagigue; Hydrology; MIKE SHE; SWAT

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977862911     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23065338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/hydrology1010020     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Singh, J.; Knapp H.V.; Arnold, J.G.; Demissie, M. Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois River Watershed using HSPF and SWAT. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 41, 343-360
2. Arabi, M.; Meals, D.W.; Hoag, D. Lessons Learned from the NIFA-CEAP: Simulation Modeling for the Watershed-Scale Assessment of Conservation Practices; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2012
3. Shi, P.; Chen, C.; Srinivasan, R.; Zhang, X.S.; Cai, T.; Fang, X.Q.; Qu, S.M.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.F. Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in Xixian watershed and comparison with the XAJ model. J. Am. Water Resour. Manag. 2011, 25, 2595-2612
4. Abu El-Nasr, A.; Arnold, J.G.; Feyen, J.; Berlamont, J. Modeling the hydrology of a catchment using a distributed and a semi distributed model. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19, 573-587
5. Beven, K. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling; Abbott, M.B., Refsgaard, J.C. Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 255-278
6. Refsgaard, J.C.; Storm, B. MIKE SHE. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology; Singh, V.P., Ed.; Water Resources Publications: Highlands Ranch, CO, USA, 1995; pp. 809-846
7. Williams, J.R. The EPIC Model, In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology; Singh, V.P., Ed.; Water Resources Publications: Highlands Ranch, CO, USA, 1995; pp. 909-1000
8. Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R.; Muttiah, R.S.; Williams, J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34, 73-89
9. Borah, D.K.; Bera, M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of mathematical bases. Trans. ASAE 2003, 46, 1553-1566
10. Borah, D.K.; Arnold, J.G.; Bera, M.; Krug, E.C.; Liang, X.Z. Storm event and continuous hydrologic modeling for comprehensive and efficient watershed simulations. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2007, 12, 605-616
11. Im, S.; Brannan, K.; Mostaghimi, S.; Cho, J. A comparison of SWAT and HSPF models for simulating hydrologic and water quality responses from an urbanizing watershed. In Proceedings of 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27-30 July 2003
12. Refsgaard, J.C.; Knudsen, J. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32, 2189-2202
13. Nielsen, S.A.; Hansen, E. Numerical simulation of the rainfall runoff process on a daily basis. Nord. Hydrol. 1973, 4, 171-190
14. Abbott, M.B.; Bathurst, J.C.; Cunge, J.A.; O'Connel, P.E.; Rasmussen, J. An introduction to the European Hydrological Systems-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE". 2. Structure of a physically based distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol. 1986, 87, 61-77
15. Abbott, M.B.; Bathurst, J.C.; Cunge; J.A.; O'Connel, P.E. Rasmussen, J. An introduction to the European Hydrological Systems-Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE". 1. History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol. 1986, 87, 45-59
16. Knudsen, J.; Thomsen, A.; Refsgaard, J.C. WATBAL: A semi-distributed, physically based hydrological modelling system. Nord. Hydrol. 1986, 17, 347-362
17. Presant, E.W.; Wicklund, R.E. Soils of Waterloo County; Report No. 44; Canada Department of Agriculture, Guelph, ON, Canada, 1971
18. Hoffman, D.W.; Matthews, B.C.; Wicklund, R.E. Soil Survey of Wellington County Ontario; Report No. 35, Ontario Soil Survey Canada, Department of Agriculture and Ontario Department of Agriculture, Guelph, ON, Canada, 1963
19. Carey, J.H.; Fox, M.E.; Brownlee, B.G.; Metcalfe, J.L.; Mason, P.D.; Yerex. W.H. The Fate and Effects of Contaminant in Canagagigue Creek 1. Stream Ecology and Identification of Major Contaminants; Scientific Series No. 135; Environment Canada: Burlington, ON, Canada, 1983
20. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R.; King, K.W. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation; Version 2000; Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service: Temple, TX, USA, 2002
21. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R.; King, K.W. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: User's Manual; Version 2000; Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service: Temple, TX, USA, 2002
22. Vazquez-Amábile, G.; Engel, B.A. Use of SWAT to compute groundwater table depth and streamflow in Muscatatuck River Watershed. Trans. ASAE 2005, 48, 991-1003
23. Williams, J.R.; Harman, W.L.; Magre, M.; Kizil, U.; Lindley, J.A; Padmanabhan, G.; Wang, E. APEX feedlot water quality simulation. Trans. ASAE 2006, 49, 61-73
24. Williams, J.R.; Izaurralde, R.C. The APEX model. In Watershed Models; Singh, V.P., Frevert, D.K., Eds.; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 437-482
25. Williams, J.R.; Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R. The APEX Model; Report No. 00-06; Blackland Research and Extension Center: Temple, TX, USA, 2000
26. Williams, J.R.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Steglich, E.M. Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender Model: Theoretical Documentation Version 0604; Report No. 2008-17; Blackland Research and Extension Center: Temple, TX, USA, 2008
27. DHI. MIKE SHE: An Integrated Hydrological Modeling System; Danish Hydraulic Institute: Hørsholm, Denmark, 2004
28. Refsgaard, J.C. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J. Hydrol. 1997, 198, 69-97
29. Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10, 282-290
30. Legates, D.R.; McCabe, G.J. Evaluating the use of "goodness-of-fit" measures in hydrological and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 1999, 35, 233-241
31. Singh, J.; Knapp, H.V.; Demissie, M. Hydrologic Modeling of the Iroquois River Watershed Using HSPF and SWAT; ISWS CR 2004-08; Illionois State Water Survey. Champaign, IL, USA, 2004. Available online: www.sws.uiuc.edu/pubdoc/CR/ISWSCR2004-08.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2014)
32. Santhi, C.; Arnold, J.G.; Williams, J.R.; Dugas, W.A.; Srinivasan, R.; Hauck, L.M. Validation of the SWAT Model on a Large River Basin with Point and Nonpoint Sources. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2001, 37, 1169-1188
33. Van Liew, M.W.; Arnold, J.G.; Garbrecht, J.D. Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models. Trans. ASAE 2003, 46, 1539-1551
34. Gupta, H.V.; Sorooshian, S.; Yapo, P.O. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1999, 4, 135-143
35. Oogathoo, S. Runoff Simulation in the Canagagigue Creek Watershed Using the MIKE SHE Model. Master's Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2006
36. Rong, H. Water Quality Evaluation under Climate Change Impacts for Canagagigue Creek watershed in southern Ontario. Master's Thesis, University of Guelph, ON, Canada, 2009
37. Smedema, L.K.; Rycroft, D.W. Land Drainage-Planning and Design of Agricultural Drainage Systems; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1982
38. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Srinivansan, R.; Williams, J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool:User's Manual; Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service: Temple, TX, USA, 2000