Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models

Water Resources Research

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 2189-2202

  Refsgaard, Jens Christian ^a   Knudsen, Jesper ^a  

^a DHI   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RUNOFF;

CASE STUDY; CATCHMENT; CLIMATE; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; PREDICTION; ZIMBABWE;

HYDROLOGICAL MODEL;

ZIMBABWE;

EID: 0029662866     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96WR00896     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abbott, M. B., J. C. Bathurst, J. A. Cunge, P. E. O'Connel, and J. Rasmussen, An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE," 1, History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 45-59, 1986a.
2. Abbott, M. B., J. C. Bathurst, J. A. Cunge, P. E. O'Connell, and J. Rasmussen, An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen "SHE," 2, Structure of a physically based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77, 1986b.
3. Anderson, J., Communal land physical resource inventory, Mhondoro and Ngczi, Draft Rep. A 551, Chem. and Soil Res. Inst., Minist. of Agric., Harare, Zimbabwe, 1989.
4. Bcven, K. J., Changing ideas in hydrology - The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172, 1989.
5. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), Validation of hydrological models, Phase H, Hørsholm, 1993a.
6. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), MIKE SHE WM, short description, 1993b.
7. Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI), MIKE11 short description. 1994.
8. Flavelle, P., A quantitative measure of model validation and its potential use for regulatory purposes. Adv. Water Resour., 15, 5-13, 1992.
9. Franchini, M., and M. Pacciani, Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models, J. Hydrol., 122, 161-219, 1991.
10. Grayson, R. B., I. D. Moore, and T. A. McHahon, Physically based hydrologic modeling, 2, Is the concept realistic?, Water Resour. Res., 28(10), 2659-2666, 1992.
11. Jain, S. K., B. Storm, J. C. Bathurst, J. C. Refsgaard, and R. D. Singh, Application of the SHE to catchments in India, 2, Field experiments and simulation studies with the SHE on the Kolar subbasin to the Narmada River, J. Hydrol., 140, 25-47, 1992.
12. Klemes, V., Sensitivity of water resources systems to climate variations, WCP Rep. 98, World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva, 1985.
13. Klemes, V., Operational testing of hydrological simulation models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 31(1), 13-24, 1986.
14. Knudsen, J., A. Thomsen, and J. C. Refsgaard, WATBAL: A semi-distributed, physically based hydrological modelling system, Nordic Hydrol., 17, 347-362, 1986.
15. Loague, K. M., and R. A. Freeze, A comparison of rainfall-runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments, Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 229-248, 1985.
16. Michaud, J., and S. Sorooshian, Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed, Water Resour. Res., 30(3), 593-605, 1994.
17. Naef, F., Can we model the rainfall-runoff process today?, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 26(3), 281-289, 1981.
18. Nash, I. E., and I. V. Sutcliffe, River flow forecasting through conceptual models, I, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
19. Nielsen, S. A., and Bari, Simulation of runoff from ungauged catchments by a semi-distributed hydrological modelling system, Proceedings, 6th IAHR Congress, Int. Assoc. for Hydraul. Res., Delft, Netherlands, 1988.
20. Nielsen, S. A., and E. Hansen, Numerical simulation of the rainfall-runoff process on a daily basis, Nordic Hydrol., 4, 171-190, 1973.
21. Refsgaard, J. C., Model and data requirements for simulation of runoff and land surface processes, in Proceedings from NATO Advanced Research Workshop "Global Environmental Change and Land Surface Processes in Hydrology: The Trials and Tribulations of Modelling and Measurering, Tucson, May 17-21, 1993, edited by S. Sorooshian and V. K. Gupta, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.
22. Refsgaard, J. C., and B. Storm, MIKE SHE, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by V. J. Singh, pp. 809-846, Water Resour. Publ., Littleton, Colo., 1995.
23. Refsgaard, J. C., S. M. Seth, J. C. Bathurst, M. Erlich, B. Storm, G. H. Jørgensen, and S. Chandra, Application of the SHE to catchments in India, 1, General results, J. Hydrol., 140, 1-23, 1992.
24. Schlesinger, S., R. E. Crosbie, R. E. Gagné, G. S. Innis, C. S. Lalwani, J. Loch, J. Sylvester, R. D. Wright, N. Kheir, and D. Bartos, Terminology for model credibility, Simulation, 32(3), 103-104, 1979.
25. Smith, R. E., D. R. Goodrich, D. A. Woolhiser, and J. R. Simanton, Comment on "Physically based modeling, 2, Is the concept realistic?" by R. B. Grayson, I. D. More, and T. A. McHahon, Water Resour. Res., 30(3), 851-854, 1994.
26. Timberlake, J., Brief description of the vegetation of Mondoro and Ngezi communal lands, Mashonaland West, Natl. Herbarium, Harare, Zimbabwe, 1989.
27. Tsang, C.-F., The modelling process and model validation, Ground Water, 29(6), 825-831, 1991.
28. U.S. Committee, Task Committee on Quantifying Land-Use Change Effects, Evaluation of hydrological models used to quantify major land-use change effects, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 111(1), 1-17, 1985.
29. Wilcox, B. P., W. J. Rawls, D. L. Brakensiek, and J. R. Wright, Predicting runoff from rangeland catchments: A comparison of two models, Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2401-2410, 1990.
30. World Meteorological Organization, (WMO), Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting, WMO Oper. Hydrol. Rep. 7, WMO 429, Geneva, 1975.
31. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Third planning meeting on World Climate Programme Water, WCP 114, WMO/TD 106, Geneva, 1985.
32. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Intercomparison of models for snowmelt runoff, WMO Oper. Hydrol. Rep. 23, WMO 646, Geneva, 1986.
33. World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models, WMO Oper. Hydrol. Rep. 38, WMO 779, Geneva, 1992.