Modelling the hydrology of a catchment using a distributed and a semi-distributed model

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 573-587

  Abu El Nasr, Ahmed ^a   Arnold, Jeffrey G ^b   Feyen, Jan ^a   Berlamont, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrology; Performance indices; Semi and fully distributed model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); FLOW OF FLUIDS; HYDROLOGY; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RIVERS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BASEFLOW; FARM-LANDS; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION; PERFORMANCE INDICES;

CATCHMENTS;

CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RIVER BASIN; RIVER DISCHARGE;

EID: 14244249189     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5610     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott ME, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connel PE, Rasmussen J. 1986a. An introduction to the European Hydrological Systems-Système Hydrologique Européen, 'SHE'. 1. History and philosophy of a physically based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 45-59.
2. Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connel PE, Rasmussen J. 1986b. An introduction to the European Hydrological Systems-Système Hydrologique Européen, 'SHE'. 2. Structure of a physically based distributed modelling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 61-77.
3. Abu El-Nasr A, Berlamont J, Van Elsen L, Feyen J. 2000. Using GIS as a tool to assess the performance of a distributed physically based model. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Hydroinformatics, July 2000, Iowa, USA.
4. Abu El-Nasr A, Feyen J, Berlamont J. 2001. Modeling a mid-size catchment using a physically distributed hydrological model. Hydrological Science and Technology (AIH) 17: 1-10.
5. Abu El-Nasr A, Willems P, Arnold J, Feyen J. 2002. Comparison of two methods to split the total discharge in its components. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Hydroinformatics July 2002, Cardiff, UK; 253-258.
6. Arnold JG, Allen PM. 1996. Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 176: 55-77.
7. Arnold JG, Allen PM, Bernhardt G. 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology 142 1-4): 47-69.
8. Arnold JG, Allen PM, Muttiah RS, Bernhardt G. 1995. Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Groundwater 33 6): 1010-1018.
9. Arnold JG, Stinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 73-89.
10. Arnold JG, Stinivasan R, Engelel BA. 1999a. Flexible watershed configurations for simulating models. Hydrological Science and Technology (AIH) 10: 5-14.
11. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Allen PM. 1999b. Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(5): 1037-1052.
12. Bandy J, Willems, P. 2000. Towards a more physically-based calibration of lumped conceptual rainfall runoff models. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Hydroinformatics, July 2000, Iowa, USA.
13. Beven K. 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology-the case of physically based models. Journal of Hydrology 105: 157-172.
14. Beven K. 1996. A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds). Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht; 255-278.
15. Beven K. 2000. Rainfall-runoff modelling. In The Primer. John Wiley: Chichester, UK; 360.
16. Box GEP, Cox DR. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B26: 211-252.
17. DRI. 1999. MIKE SHE 5.44-Water Movement User Manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute: Denmark; Section 3, 1-32.
18. Feyen L, Vázquez R, Christiaens K, Sels O, Feyen J. 2000. Application of a distributed physically-based hydrological model to a medium size catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 4(1): 47-63.
19. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. 1998. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and non-commensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research 34(4): 751-763
20. Hubrechts L, Vlassak V, Van Criekingen A, Feyen J. 1997. Handleiding bij AARDEWERK-SISBIS. Bevraginssysteem voor bodemprofielgegevens, bodemoppervlaktegegevens en bodemgeschiktheids-gegevens. Interne publikatie in. 48. Institute for Land and Water Management: Leuven, Belgium; 56.
21. Klemes V. 1985. Sensitivity of water resources systems to climate variations. WCP Report 98, World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva.
22. Klemes V. 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal 31(1): 13-24.
23. Knudsen J, Thomsen A, Refsgaard JC. 1986. WATBAL: a semi-distributed, physically based hydrological modelling system. Nordic Hydrology 17: 347-362.
24. Legates DR, McCabe GJ. 1999. Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrological and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research 35(1): 233-241.
25. Loague KM, Freeze RA. 1985. A comparison of rainfafl-runoff modeling techniques on small upland catchments. Water Resources Research 21: 229-248.
26. Loague K, Green RE. 1991. Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and applications. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 7: 51-73.
27. McCuen RH. 1982. A Guide to Hydrologic Methods Using SCS Methods. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 145.
28. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-differences groundwater flow model. In Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. US Geological Survey; Book 6, Ch. Al, 586.
29. Michaud J, Sorooshian S. 1994. Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a mid-sized semiarid watershed. Water Resources Research 21(2): 593-605.
30. Möller D, Kuhlmann F. 1999. ProLand: a new approach to generate and evaluate land use options. In IX European Congress of Agriculture Economics, August 1999, Warsaw, Poland.
31. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10 282-290.
32. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivansan R, Williams JR. 2000. Soil and Water Assessment Tool-User's Manual. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service: Temple, TX.
33. Nielsen SA, Hansen E. 1973. Numerical simulation of the rainfall runoff process on a daily basis. Nordic Hydrology 4: 171-190.
34. Refsgaard JC. 1997. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology 198: 69-97.
35. Refsgaard JC, Knudsen J. 1996. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research 32(7): 2189-2202.
36. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. 1995. MIKESHE. In Computer Models in Watershed Hydrology, Singh VJ (ed.). Water Resources Publication; 809-846.
37. Refsgaard JC, Storm B. 1996. Construction, calibration and validation of hydrological models. In Distributed Hydrological Modelling, Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds). Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht; 41-54.
38. Smedema. LK, Rycroft DW. 1983. Land Drainage-Planning and Design of Agricultural Drainage Systems. Cornell University Press: Ithica, NY.
39. Sophocleous MA, Koelliker JK, Govindaraju RS, Birdie T, Ramireddygari SR, Perkins SP. 1999. International numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in South-Central Kansas. Journal of Hydrology 214: 179-196.
40. Srinivasan R, Arnold JG, Rosenthal W, Muttiah RS. 1993. Hydrologic modelling of Texas Gulf basin using GIS. In Proceedings of Second International GIS and Environmental Modeling, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Breckenridge, CO; 213-217.
41. Srinivasan R, Ramanarayanan TS, Arnold JG, Bednarz ST. 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, part II: model application. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34(1): 91-101.
42. Van Orshoven J, Maes J, Vereecken H, Feyen J. 1991. A procedure for the statistical characterization of the units of the Belgian soil map. Pedologie XLI-3: 193-212.
43. Weber A, Hoffmann M, Wolters V, Köhler W. 1999. Ein habitateignungsmodell für die feldlerche (Alauda arvensis) basierend auf einem zellulären automaten. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fuer Oekologie 29: 329-336.
44. Weber A, Fohrer N, Möller D. 2001. Long-term land use change in a mesoscale watershed due to socio-economic factors-effects on landscape structures and functions. Ecological Modelling 140: 125-140.
45. Willems P. 1998. Hydrological applications of extreme value analysis. In Hydrology in a Changing Environment, Wheather H, Kirby C (eds). John Wiley: Chichester, UK; 16-25.
46. Willems P. 2000. Compound intensity/duration/frequency-relationships of extreme precipitation for two seasons and two storm types. Journal of Hydrology 233: 189-205.
47. Woolhiser DA, Smith RE, Goodrich DC. 1990. A kinematic runoff and erosion manual: documentation and user manual. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, ARS 77; 130.
48. Xevi E, Christiaens K, Espino A, Sewnandan W, Mallants D, Sorensen H, Feyen J. 1997. Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of the MIKE-SHE model using the Neuenkirchen Catchment as case study. Water Resources Management 11: 219-239.