Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois River watershed using HSPF and SWAT

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 343-360

  Singh, Jaswinder ^a   Knapp, H Vernon ^a   Arnold, J G ^b   Demissie, Misganaw ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Hydrologic cycle; Modeling; Nonpoint source pollution; Surface water; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGY;

AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (PET); RIVER WATERSHEDS;

WATERSHEDS;

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; STREAMFLOW; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURE; EVAPORATION; HYDROLYSIS; WATER SHEDS;

ILLINOIS; IROQUOIS COUNTY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 18444409410     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arnold, J.G. and P.M. Allen, 1999. Automated Methods for Estimating Baseflow and Groundwater Recharge from Streamflow Records. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 35(2):411-424.
2. Arnold, J.G., R.S. Muttiah, R. Srinivasan, and P.M. Allen, 2000. Regional Estimation of Base Flow and Groundwater Recharge in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. J. Hydrol. 227:21-40.
3. Arnold, J.G., R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams, 1998. Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment. PartI : Model Development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 34(1):73-89.
4. Bergman, M.J. and L.J. Donnangelo, 2000. Simulation of Freshwater Discharges From Ungaged Areas to the Sebestian River, Florida. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 36(5):1121-1132.
5. Bicknell, B.R., J.C. Imhoff, J.L. Kittle, Jr., T.H. Jobes, and A.S. Donigian, Jr., 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF), User's Manual for Version 12.0. USEPA, Athens, Georgia.
6. Borah, D.K. and M. Bera, 2003. Watershed-Scale Hydrologic and Nonpoint-Source Pollution Models: Review of Mathematical Bases. Trans. ASAE 46(6):1553-1566.
7. Chew, C.Y., L.W. Moore, and R.H. Smith, 1991. Hydrologic Simulation of Tennessee's North Reelfoot Creek Watershed. Res. J. Water Pollution Control Federation 63:10-16.
8. Deliman, P.N., R.H. Glick, and C.E. Ruiz, 1999. Review of Watershed Water Quality Models. Technical Report W-99-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
9. Di Luzio, M., R. Srinivasan, J.G. Arnold, and S. Neitsch, 2002. ARCVIEW Interface for SWAT 2000 User's Guide. Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, Texas. Available at http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/downloads/doc/swatav2000.pdf. Accessed in March 2003.
10. Donigian, A.S., J.C. Imhoff, and B.R. Bicknell, 1983. Predicting Water Quality Resulting From Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Via Simulation - HSPF. In: Agricultural Management and Water Quality, F.W. Schaller and G.W. Bailey (Editors). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 200-249.
11. Duncker, J.J. and C.S. Melching, 1998. Regional Rainfall-Runoff Relations for Simulations of Streamflow for Watersheds in Du Page County, Illinois. USGS, WRIR 98-4035. Urbana, Illinois.
12. Franchini, M. and M. Pacciani, 1991. Comparative Analysis of Several Conceptual Rainfall Runoff Models. J. Hydrol. 122:161-219.
13. Green, W.H. and G.A. Ampt, 1911. Studies on Soil Physics, 1. The Flow of Air and Water Through Soils. J. Agric. Sciences 4:11-24.
14. Im, S., K. Brannan, S. Mostaghimi, and J. Cho, 2003. A Comparison of SWAT and HSPF Models for Simulating Hydrologic and Water Quality Responses From an Urbanizing Watershed. 2003 ASAE Annual International Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Las Vegas, Nevada, ASAE Paper No. 03-2175. St. Joseph, Michigan.
15. James, L.D., 1972. Hydrologic Modeling, Parameter Estimation, and Watershed Characteristics. J. Hydrol. 17:283-307.
16. Jones, P.M. and T.A. Winterstein, 2000. Characterization of Rainfall-Runoff Response and Estimation of the Effect of Wetland Restoration on Runoff, Herone Lake Basin, Southwestern Minnesota, 1991-97. USGS, WRIR 00-4095. Mounds View, Minnesota.
17. Knapp, H.V., 1992. Kankakee River Basin Streamflow Assessment Model: Hydrologic Analysis. Illinois State Water Survey Contract Report 541, Champaign, Illinois.
18. Laroche, A-M., J. Gallichand, R. Lagace, and A Pesant, 1996. Simulating Atrazine Transport With HSPF in an Agricultural Watershed. J. Environmental Eng. 122(7):622-630.
19. Mades, D.M. and K.A. Oberg, 1986. Evaluation of the U.S. Geological Survey's Gaging-Station Network in Illinois. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 86-4072. Urbana, Illinois.
20. Monteith, J.L., 1965. Evaporation and the Environment. In: The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms. XIXth Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, Cambridge University Press. Swansea, United Kingdom, pp. 205-234.
21. Nash, J.E. and J.V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models. Part 1: A Discussion of Principles. J. Hydrol. 10(3):282-290.
22. Nasr, A., M. Bruen, G. Parkin, S. Birkinshaw, R. Moles, and P. Byrne, 2003. Modelling Phosphorous Loss from Agricultural Catchments: A Comparison of the Performance of SWAT, HSPF, and SHETRAN for the Clarianna Catchment. In: Diffuse Pollution and Basin Management, M. Buren (Editor). Proc., 7th International Specialised IWA Conference, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 3-181 to 3-185.
23. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, R. Srinivasan, and J.R. Williams, 2002a. Soil and Water Assessment Tool User's Manual: Version 2000. GSWRL Report 02-02, BRC Report 02-06, Publ. Texas Water Resources Institute, TR-192, College Station, Texas, 438 pp. Available at http://www.brc.tamus.edu/ swat/downloads/doc/swatuserman.pdf. Accessed in March 2003.
24. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, and R. Srinivasan, 2002b. Pesticide Fate and Transport Predicted by the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Atrazine, Metachlor and Trifluralin in the Sugar Creek Watershed. BRC Publ. No. 2002-03, Blackland Research Center,Texas Agric. Experiment Station, Temple, Texas.
25. Page, L.M., K.S. Cummings, S.L. Post, and M.E. Retzer, 1992. Biologically Significant Illinois Streams: An Evaluation of the Streams of Illinois Based on Aquatic Biodiversity. Technical Report 1992(1), Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity, Champaign, Illinois.
26. Philip, J.R., 1957. The Theory of Infiltration: 1. The Infiltration Equation and Its Solution. Soil Science 83:345-357.
27. Saleh, A. and B. Du., 2004. Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF Within BASINS Program for the Upper North Bosque River Watershed in Central Texas. Trans. ASAE 47(4):1039-1049.
28. Santhi, C., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Williams, W.A. Dugas, R. Srinivasan, and L.M. Hauck, 2001. Validation of the SWAT Model on a Large River Basin With Point and Nonpoint Sources. JAWRA 37(5):1169-1188.
29. Sogbedgi, J.M. and G.F. McIsaac, 2002. Modeling Streamflow From Artificially Drained Agricultural Watersheds in Illinois. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 38(6):1753-1765.
30. USDA-SCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service), 1972. Hydrology, Section 4, Chapters 4-10. In: National Engineering Handbook. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C.
31. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2000. BASINS Technical Note 6: Estimating Hydrology and Hydraulic Parameters for HSPF. USEPA, Office of Water, EPA-823-R-99-013, Washington, D.C.
32. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2001. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources - BASINS Version 3.0, User's Manual. EPA-823-B-01-001, Washington, D.C.
33. Van Liew, M.W. and J. Garbrecht, 2003. Hydrologic Simulation of the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed Using SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 39(2):413-426.
34. Van Liew, M.W., J.G. Arnold, and J.D. Garbrecht, 2003. Hydrologic Simulation on Agricultural Watersheds: Choosing Between Two Models. Trans. ASAE 46(6):1539-1551.