Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes

Nature Reviews Materials

Volumn 1, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Werber, Jay R ^a   Osuji, Chinedum O ^a   Elimelech, Menachem ^a  

^a Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977655215     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20588437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.18     Document Type: Review

References (128)

1. Elimelech, M. The global challenge for adequate and safe water. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. 55, 3-10 (2006).
2. Shannon, M. A. et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301-310 (2008).
3. Schwarzenbach, R. P. et al. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313, 1072-1077 (2006).
4. Kolpin, D. W. et al. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 1202-1211 (2002).
5. Tang, J. Y., Busetti, F., Charrois, J. W. & Escher, B. I. Which chemicals drive biological effects in wastewater and recycled water? Water Res. 60, 289-299 (2014).
6. Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M., Yoxtheimer, D. & Abad, J. D. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340, 1235009 (2013).
7. Shaffer, D. L. et al. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9569-9583 (2013).
8. Gregory, K. B., Vidic, R. D. & Dzombak, D. A. Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7, 181-186 (2011).
9. Bond, R. & Veerapaneni, S. Zero liquid discharge for inland desalination (Awwa Research Foundation, 2007).
10. Mickley, M. Survey of high-recovery and zero liquid discharge technologies for water utilities (WateReuse Foundation, 2008).
11. van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Brdjanovic, D. Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment. Science 344, 1452-1453 (2014).
12. Grant, S. B. et al. Taking the "waste" out of "wastewater" for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337, 681-686 (2012).
13. Sales, C. M. & Lee, P. K. Resource recovery from wastewater: application of meta-omics to phosphorus and carbon management. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 33, 260-267 (2015).
14. Wang, X. et al. Probabilistic evaluation of integrating resource recovery into wastewater treatment to improve environmental sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1630-1635 (2015).
15. Elimelech, M. & Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333, 712-717 (2011).
16. Semiat, R. Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 8193-8201 (2008).
17. Baker, R. W. Membrane Technology and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).
18. Gin, D. L. & Noble, R. D. Designing the next generation of chemical separation membranes. Science 332, 674-676 (2011).
19. Tang, C. Y., Kwon, Y.-N. & Leckie, J. O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes. Desalination 242, 168-182 (2009).
20. Lu, X. et al. Elements provide a clue: nanoscale characterization of thin-film composite polyamide membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 16917-16922 (2015).
21. Karan, S., Jiang, Z. & Livingston, A. G. Sub-10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation. Science 348, 1347-1351 (2015).
22. Kwak, S. Y., Jung, S. G. & Kim, S. H. Structure-motion-performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 4334-4340 (2001).
23. Mehta, A. & Zydney, A. L. Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249, 245-249 (2005).
24. Geise, G. M., Paul, D. R. & Freeman, B. D. Fundamental water and salt transport properties of polymeric materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 1-42 (2014).
25. Geise, G. M., Park, H. B., Sagle, A. C., Freeman, B. D. & McGrath, J. E. Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 369, 130-138 (2011).
26. Robeson, L. M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 320, 390-400 (2008).
27. Yip, N. Y. & Elimelech, M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 10273-10282 (2011).
28. Iwahashi, H. et al. Advanced RO system for high temperature and high concentration seawater desalination at the Arabian Gulf. IDA World Congress (San Diego, 2015).
29. Cohen-Tanugi, D., McGovern, R. K., Dave, S. H., Lienhard, J. H. & Grossman, J. C. Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1134-1141 (2014).
30. Deshmukh, A., Yip, N. Y., Lin, S. & Elimelech, M. Desalination by forward osmosis: identifying performance limiting parameters through module-scale modeling. J. Membr. Sci. 491, 159-167 (2015).
31. Singh, R. Production of high-purity water by membrane processes. Desalin. Water Treat. 3, 99-110 (2012).
32. Miyashita, Y., Park, S.-H., Hyung, H., Huang, C.-H. & Kim, J.-H. Removal of N-nitrosamines and their precursors by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J. Environ. Eng. 135, 788-795 (2009).
33. Ozaki, H. & Li, H. Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane. Water Res. 36, 123-130 (2002).
34. Fritzmann, C., Löwenberg, J., Wintgens, T. & Melin, T. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 216, 1-76 (2007).
35. Le-Clech, P., Chen, V. & Fane, T. A. G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 284, 17-53 (2006).
36. Cheryan, M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 31-70 (CRC Press, 1998).
37. Matthiasson, E. The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 16, 23-36 (1983).
38. Belfort, G., Davis, R. H. & Zydney, A. L. The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96, 1-58 (1994).
39. Elimelech, M., Zhu, X., Childress, A. E. & Hong, S. Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 127, 101-109 (1997).
40. Herzberg, M. & Elimelech, M. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 295, 11-20 (2007).
41. Li, Q. & Elimelech, M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 4683-4693 (2004).
42. Mi, B. & Elimelech, M. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2022-2028 (2010).
43. Borgnia, M. J., Kozono, D., Calamita, G., Maloney, P. C. & Agre, P. Functional reconstitution and characterization of AqpZ, the E. coli water channel protein. J. Mol. Biol. 291, 1169-1179 (1999).
44. Beitz, E., Wu, B., Holm, L. M., Schultz, J. E. & Zeuthen, T. Point mutations in the aromatic/arginine region in aquaporin 1 allow passage of urea, glycerol, ammonia, and protons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 269-274 (2006).
45. Hub, J. S. & de Groot, B. L. Mechanism of selectivity in aquaporins and aquaglyceroporins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1198-1203 (2008).
46. Sui, H., Han, B. G., Lee, J. K., Walian, P. & Jap, B. K. Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel. Nature 414, 872-878 (2001).
47. Murata, K. et al. Structural determinants of water permeation through aquaporin-1. Nature 407, 599-605 (2000).
48. Savage, D. F., O'Connell, J. D., Miercke, L. J. W., Finer-Moore, J. & Stroud, R. M. Structural context shapes the aquaporin selectivity filter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17164-17169 (2010).
49. Wang, M. et al. Layer-by-layer assembly of aquaporin Z-incorporated biomimetic membranes for water purification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 3761-3768 (2015).
50. Wang, H. et al. Highly permeable and selective pore-spanning biomimetic membrane embedded with aquaporin Z. Small 8, 1185-1190 (2012).
51. Kumar, M., Grzelakowski, M., Zilles, J., Clark, M. & Meier, W. Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the incorporation of the functional water channel protein aquaporin Z. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20719-20724 (2007).
52. Zhong, P. S., Chung, T.-S., Jeyaseelan, K. & Armugam, A. Aquaporin-embedded biomimetic membranes for nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 407-408, 27-33 (2012).
53. Hummer, G., Rasaiah, J. C. & Noworyta, J. P. Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube. Nature 414, 188-190 (2001).
54. Corry, B. Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 1427-1434 (2008).
55. Majumder, M., Chopra, N., Andrews, R. & Hinds, B. J. Nanoscale hydrodynamics: enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes. Nature 438, 44 (2005).
56. Holt, J. K. et al. Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034-1037 (2006).
57. Hinds, B. J. et al. Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube membranes. Science 303, 62-65 (2004).
58. Majumder, M., Chopra, N. & Hinds, B. J. Effect of tip functionalization on transport through vertically oriented carbon nanotube membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9062-9070 (2005).
59. Fornasiero, F. et al. Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17250-17255 (2008).
60. Corry, B. Water and ion transport through functionalised carbon nanotubes: implications for desalination technology. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 751-759 (2011).
61. Chan, W. F. et al. Zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube/polyamide nanocomposite membranes for water desalination. ACS Nano 7, 5308-5319 (2013).
62. Sanchez-Valencia, J. R. et al. Controlled synthesis of single-chirality carbon nanotubes. Nature 512, 61-64 (2014).
63. Shen, Y. X. et al. Highly permeable artificial water channels that can self-assemble into two-dimensional arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9810-9815 (2015).
64. Hu, X. B., Chen, Z., Tang, G., Hou, J. L. & Li, Z. T. Single-molecular artificial transmembrane water channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8384-8387 (2012).
65. Hourani, R. et al. Processable cyclic peptide nanotubes with tunable interiors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15296-15299 (2011).
66. Zhou, X. et al. Self-assembling subnanometer pores with unusual mass-transport properties. Nat. Commun. 3, 949 (2012).
67. Mauter, M. S., Elimelech, M. & Osuji, C. O. Nanocomposites of vertically aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes by magnetic alignment and polymerization of a lyotropic precursor. ACS Nano 4, 6651-6658 (2010).
68. Xu, T. et al. Subnanometer porous thin films by the co-assembly of nanotube subunits and block copolymers. ACS Nano 5, 1376-1384 (2011).
69. Gin, D. L., Gu, W., Pindzola, B. A. & Zhou, W. J. Polymerized lyotropic liquid crystal assemblies for materials applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 973-980 (2001).
70. Gin, D. L., Bara, J. E., Noble, R. D. & Elliott, B. J. Polymerized lyotropic liquid crystal assemblies for membrane applications. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 29, 367-389 (2008).
71. Zhang, Y., Sargent, J. L., Boudouris, B. W. & Phillip, W. A. Nanoporous membranes generated from self-assembled block polymer precursors: quo vadis? J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, 41683 (2015).
72. Jackson, E. A. & Hillmyer, M. A. Nanoporous membranes derived from block copolymers: from drug delivery to water filtration. ACS Nano 4, 3548-3553 (2010).
73. Zalusky, A. S., Olayo-Valles, R., Wolf, J. H. & Hillmyer, M. A. Ordered nanoporous polymers from polystyrene-polylactide block copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12761-12773 (2002).
74. Sorenson, G. P., Coppage, K. L. & Mahanthappa, M. K. Unusually stable aqueous lyotropic gyroid phases from gemini dicarboxylate surfactants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14928-14931 (2011).
75. Hatakeyama, E. S., Wiesenauer, B. R., Gabriel, C. J., Noble, R. D. & Gin, D. L. Nanoporous, bicontinuous cubic lyotropic liquid crystal networks via polymerizable gemini ammonium surfactants. Chem. Mater. 22, 4525-4527 (2010).
76. Zhou, M. et al. New type of membrane material for water desalination based on a cross-linked bicontinuous cubic lyotropic liquid crystal assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 9574-9575 (2007).
77. Pindzola, B. A., Jin, J. & Gin, D. L. Cross-linked normal hexagonal and bicontinuous cubic assemblies via polymerizable gemini amphiphiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 2940-2949 (2003).
78. Soberats, B. et al. 3D Anhydrous proton-transporting nanochannels formed by self-assembly of liquid crystals composed of a sulfobetaine and a sulfonic acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15286-15289 (2013).
79. Kerr, R. L., Miller, S. A., Shoemaker, R. K., Elliott, B. J. & Gin, D. L. New type of Li ion conductor with 3D interconnected nanopores via polymerization of a liquid organic electrolyte-filled lyotropic liquid-crystal assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15972-15973 (2009).
80. Smith, R. C., Fischer, W. M. & Gin, D. L. Ordered poly(p-phenylenevinylene) matrix nanocomposites via lyotropic liquid-crystalline monomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 4092-4093 (1997).
81. Zhou, M., Kidd, T. J., Noble, R. D. & Gin, D. L. Supported lyotropic liquid-crystal polymer membranes: promising materials for molecular-size-selective aqueous nanofiltration. Adv. Mater. 17, 1850-1853 (2005).
82. Broer, D. J., Bastiaansen, C. M., Debije, M. G. & Schenning, A. P. Functional organic materials based on polymerized liquid-crystal monomers: supramolecular hydrogen-bonded systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 7102-7109 (2012).
83. Henmi, M. et al. Self-organized liquid-crystalline nanostructured membranes for water treatment: selective permeation of ions. Adv. Mater. 24, 2238-2241 (2012).
84. Deng, H., Gin, D. L. & Smith, R. C. Polymerizable lyotropic liquid crystals containing transition-metal and lanthanide ions: architectural control and introduction of new properties into nanostructured polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3522-3523 (1998).
85. Lee, H.-K. et al. Synthesis of a nanoporous polymer with hexagonal channels from supramolecular discotic liquid crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40, 2669-2671 (2001).
86. Ishida, Y. et al. Guest-responsive covalent frameworks by the cross-linking of liquid-crystalline salts: tuning of lattice flexibility by the design of polymerizable units. Chemistry 17, 14752-14762 (2011).
87. Feng, X. et al. Scalable fabrication of polymer membranes with vertically aligned 1 nm pores by magnetic field directed self-assembly. ACS Nano 8, 11977-11986 (2014).
88. Gopinadhan, M. et al. Thermally switchable aligned nanopores by magnetic-field directed self-assembly of block copolymers. Adv. Mater. 26, 5148-5154 (2014).
89. Feng, X. et al. Thin polymer films with continuous vertically aligned 1 nm pores fabricated by soft confinement. ACS Nano 10, 150-158 (2015).
90. Peinemann, K. V., Abetz, V. & Simon, P. F. Asymmetric superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase separation. Nat. Mater. 6, 992-996 (2007).
91. Phillip, W. A. et al. Tuning structure and properties of graded triblock terpolymer-based mesoporous and hybrid films. Nano Lett. 11, 2892-2900 (2011).
92. Gu, Y. & Wiesner, U. Tailoring pore size of graded mesoporous block copolymer membranes: moving from ultrafiltration toward nanofiltration. Macromolecules 48, 6153-6159 (2015).
93. Clodt, J. I. et al. Performance study of isoporous membranes with tailored pore sizes. J. Membr. Sci. 495, 334-340 (2015).
94. Seo, M. & Hillmyer, M. A. Reticulated nanoporous polymers by controlled polymerization-induced microphase separation. Science 336, 1422-1425 (2012).
95. Joshi, R. K. et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752-754 (2014).
96. Nair, R. R., Wu, H. A., Jayaram, P. N., Grigorieva, I. V. & Geim, A. K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442-444 (2012).
97. Surwade, S. P. et al. Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 459-464 (2015).
98. Russo, C. J. & Golovchenko, J. A. Atom-by-atom nucleation and growth of graphene nanopores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5953-5957 (2012).
99. Cohen-Tanugi, D. & Grossman, J. C. Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett. 12, 3602-3608 (2012).
100. O'Hern, S. C. et al. Selective ionic transport through tunable subnanometer pores in single-layer graphene membranes. Nano Lett. 14, 1234-1241 (2014).
101. O'Hern, S. C. et al. Nanofiltration across defect-sealed nanoporous monolayer graphene. Nano Lett. 15, 3254-3260 (2015).
102. O'Hern, S. C. et al. Selective molecular transport through intrinsic defects in a single layer of CVD graphene. ACS Nano 6, 10130-10138 (2012).
103. Mi, B. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science 343, 740-742 (2014).
104. Yeh, C. N., Raidongia, K., Shao, J., Yang, Q. H. & Huang, J. On the origin of the stability of graphene oxide membranes in water. Nat. Chem. 7, 166-170 (2014).
105. Su, Y. et al. Impermeable barrier films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5, 4843 (2014).
106. Liu, H., Wang, H. & Zhang, X. Facile fabrication of freestanding ultrathin reduced graphene oxide membranes for water purification. Adv. Mater. 27, 249-254 (2015).
107. Hung, W.-S. et al. Cross-linking with diamine monomers to prepare composite graphene oxide-framework membranes with varying d-spacing. Chem. Mater. 26, 2983-2990 (2014).
108. Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Chung, T. S. Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10235-10242 (2015).
109. Ostuni, E., Chapman, R. G., Holmlin, R. E., Takayama, S. & Whitesides, G. M. A survey of structure-property relationships of surfaces that resist the adsorption of protein. Langmuir 17, 5605-5620 (2001).
110. Banerjee, I., Pangule, R. C. & Kane, R. S. Antifouling coatings: recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Adv. Mater. 23, 690-718 (2011).
111. Jiang, S. & Cao, Z. Ultralow-fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 920-932 (2010).
112. Callow, J. A. & Callow, M. E. Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat. Commun. 2, 244 (2011).
113. Kang, G. D. & Cao, Y. M. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: a review. Water Res. 46, 584-600 (2012).
114. Rana, D. & Matsuura, T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 110, 2448-2471 (2010).
115. Shaffer, D. L., Jaramillo, H., Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S., Lu, X. & Elimelech, M. Post-fabrication modification of forward osmosis membranes with a poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer for improved organic fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 490, 209-219 (2015).
116. Van Wagner, E. M., Sagle, A. C., Sharma, M. M., La, Y.-H. & Freeman, B. D. Surface modification of commercial polyamide desalination membranes using poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether to enhance membrane fouling resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 367, 273-287 (2011).
117. Barbey, R. et al. Polymer brushes via surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 109, 5437-5527 (2009).
118. Ye, G., Lee, J., Perreault, F. & Elimelech, M. Controlled architecture of dual-functional block copolymer brushes on thin-film composite membranes for integrated "defending" and "attacking" strategies against biofouling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23069-23079 (2015).
119. Kang, S., Asatekin, A., Mayes, A. M. & Elimelech, M. Protein antifouling mechanisms of PAN UF membranes incorporating PAN-g-PEO additive. J. Membr. Sci. 296, 42-50 (2007).
120. Asatekin, A., Kang, S., Elimelech, M. & Mayes, A. M. Anti-fouling ultrafiltration membranes containing polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly(ethylene oxide) comb copolymer additives. J. Membr. Sci. 298, 136-146 (2007).
121. Chen, W. et al. Engineering a robust, versatile amphiphilic membrane surface through forced surface segregation for ultralow flux-decline. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 191-198 (2011).
122. Chen, W. et al. Efficient wastewater treatment by membranes through constructing tunable antifouling membrane surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 6545-6552 (2011).
123. Zhao, X. et al. Engineering amphiphilic membrane surfaces based on PEO and PDMS segments for improved antifouling performances. J. Membr. Sci. 450, 111-123 (2014).
124. Shaffer, D. L., Werber, J. R., Jaramillo, H., Lin, S. & Elimelech, M. Forward osmosis: where are we now? Desalination 356, 271-284 (2015).
125. Tiraferri, A., Yip, N. Y., Phillip, W. A., Schiffman, J. D. & Elimelech, M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. J. Membr. Sci. 367, 340-352 (2011).
126. Lu, X., Arias Chavez, L. H., Romero-Vargas Castrillón, S., Ma, J. & Elimelech, M. Influence of active layer and support layer surface structures on organic fouling propensity of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1436-1444 (2015).
127. Pohl, P., Saparov, S. M., Borgnia, M. J. & Agre, P. Highly selective water channel activity measured by voltage clamp: analysis of planar lipid bilayers reconstituted with purified AqpZ. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9624-9629 (2001).
128. Ruiz, L., Wu, Y. & Keten, S. Tailoring the water structure and transport in nanotubes with tunable interiors. Nanoscale 7, 121-132 (2015).