Forward osmosis: Where are we now?

Desalination

Volumn 356, Issue , 2015, Pages 271-284

  Shaffer, Devin L ^a   Werber, Jay R ^a   Jaramillo, Humberto ^a   Lin, Shihong ^a   Elimelech, Menachem ^a  

^a Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

Desalination; Energy consumption; Forward osmosis; Fouling; High salinity brines; Thin film composite

Indexed keywords

DESALINATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FOULING;

DESALINATION TECHNOLOGIES; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; FILM COMPOSITES; FORWARD OSMOSIS; FOULING PROPENSITIES; FOULING REVERSIBILITIES; MEMBRANE PROPERTIES; STRUCTURAL PARAMETER;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

BRINE; COMPOSITE; DESALINATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FOULING; OSMOSIS; SALINITY;

EID: 84916620282     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.031     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
2. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
3. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
4. Klaysom C., Cath T.Y., Depuydt T., Vankelecom I.F. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:6959-6989.
5. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3812-3818.
6. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:340-352.
7. Wei J., Qiu C., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Fane A.G. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:292-302.
8. Zhang S., Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S., Chen H., Jean Y.C., Amy G. Well-constructed cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis: minimized internal concentration polarization with an ultra-thin selective layer. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:522-535.
9. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
10. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Straub A.P., Romero-Vargas Castrillon S., Elimelech M. A method for the simultaneous determination of transport and structural parameters of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:523-538.
11. Cath T.Y., Elimelech M., McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Achilli A., Anastasio D., Brady A.R., Childress A.E., Farr I.V., Hancock N.T., Lampi J., Nghiem L.D., Xie M., Yip N.Y. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination 2013, 312:31-38.
12. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:292-302.
13. Mi B., Elimelech M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:337-345.
14. Liu Y., Mi B. Combined fouling of forward osmosis membranes: synergistic foulant interaction and direct observation of fouling layer formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 407-408:136-144.
15. Romero-Vargas Castrillón S., Lu X., Shaffer D.L., Elimelech M. Amine enrichment and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for organic fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 450:331-339.
16. Wang Y., Wicaksana F., Tang C.Y., Fane A.G. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:7102-7109.
17. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
18. Ge Q., Su J., Amy G.L., Chung T.-S. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:1318-1326.
19. Stone M.L., Rae C., Stewart F.F., Wilson A.D. Switchable polarity solvents as draw solutes for forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 312:124-129.
20. Ge Q., Ling M., Chung T.-S. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442:225-237.
21. Zhao S., Zou L., Mulcahy D. Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis-nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute. Desalination 2012, 284:175-181.
22. Bamaga O.A., Yokochi A., Zabara B., Babaqi A.S. Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations. Desalination 2011, 268:163-169.
23. Cath T.Y., Hancock N.T., Lundin C.D., Hoppe-Jones C., Drewes J.E. A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362:417-426.
24. Hoover L.A., Phillip W.A., Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Forward with osmosis: emerging applications for greater sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:9824-9830.
25. Wang K.Y., Teoh M.M., Nugroho A., Chung T.-S. Integrated forward osmosis-membrane distillation (FO-MD) hybrid system for the concentration of protein solutions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2421-2430.
26. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 239:10-21.
27. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:13486-13493.
28. Altaee A., Mabrouk A., Bourouni K., Palenzuela P. Forward osmosis pretreatment of seawater to thermal desalination: high temperature FO-MSF/MED hybrid system. Desalination 2014, 339:18-25.
29. Semiat R. Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8193-8201.
30. Mistry K.H., McGovern R.K., Thiel G.P., Summers E.K., Zubair S.M., Lienhard J.H. Entropy generation analysis of desalination technologies. Entropy 2011, 13:1829-1864.
31. Sandler S.I. Chemical, Biochemical, and Engineering Thermodynamics 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
32. Elimelech M., Phillip W.A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333:712-717.
33. McGovern R.K., Lienhard V J.H. On the potential of forward osmosis to energetically outperform reverse osmosis desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 469:245-250.
34. McGinnis R.L., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305:13-19.
35. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
36. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AICHE J. 2007, 53:1736-1744.
37. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:243-249.
38. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:458-466.
39. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
40. Gerstandt K., Peinemann K.V., Skilhagen S.E., Thorsen T., Holt T. Membrane processes in energy supply for an osmotic power plant. Desalination 2008, 224:64-70.
41. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
42. Fritzmann C., Löwenberg J., Wintgens T., Melin T. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 216:1-76.
43. Petersen R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83:81-150.
44. Bui N.-N., Lind M.L., Hoek E.M.V., McCutcheon J.R. Electrospun nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 385-386:10-19.
45. Bui N.N., McCutcheon J.R. Hydrophilic nanofibers as new supports for thin film composite membranes for engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:1761-1769.
46. Song X., Liu Z., Sun D.D. Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3256-3260.
47. Ren J., McCutcheon J.R. A new commercial thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis. Desalination 2014, 343:187-193.
48. 2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination 2013, 312:67-74.
49. Straub A.P., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Raising the bar: increased hydraulic pressure allows unprecedented high power densities in pressure-retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2014, 1:55-59.
50. Greenlee L.F., Lawler D.F., Freeman B.D., Marrot B., Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009, 43:2317-2348.
51. Lobo V. Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 1993, 65:2613-2640.
52. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
53. Phuntsho S., Lotfi F., Hong S., Shaffer D.L., Elimelech M., Shon H.K. Membrane scaling and flux decline during fertiliser-drawn forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater. Water Res. 2014, 57:172-182.
54. USEPA Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia-Freshwater 2013, 242. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
55. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
56. Yong J.S. Reverse Draw Solute Transport in Forward Osmosis Systems 2012, 148. (Doctoral dissertation), Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University.
57. Shaffer D.L., Arias Chavez L.H., Ben-Sasson M., Romero-Vargas Castrillón S., Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:9569-9583.
58. Geise G.M., Park H.B., Sagle A.C., Freeman B.D., McGrath J.E. Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 369:130-138.
59. Yip N.Y., Elimelech M. Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:10273-10282.
60. Boo C., Khalil Y.F., Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of trimethylamine-carbon dioxide thermolytic draw solution for engineered osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 473:302-309.
61. Li D., Zhang X., Yao J., Simon G.P., Wang H. Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47:1710-1712.
62. Li D., Zhang X., Yao J., Zeng Y., Simon G.P., Wang H. Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering. Soft Matter 2011, 7:10048-10056.
63. Ling M.M., Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:5869-5876.
64. Stone M.L., Wilson A.D., Harrup M.K., Stewart F.F. An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 312:130-136.
65. Wilson A.D., Stewart F.F. Structure-function study of tertiary amines as switchable polarity solvents. RSC Adv. 2014, 4:11039-11049.
66. Rubinstein M., Colby R. Polymer Physics 2003, University Press, Oxford.
67. Laguecir A., Ulrich S., Labille J., Fatin-Rouge N., Stoll S., Buffle J. Size and pH effect on electrical and conformational behavior of poly(acrylic acid): simulation and experiment. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42:1135-1144.
68. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:172-181.
69. Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5581-5588.
70. Misdan N., Lau W.J., Ismail A.F. Seawater Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) desalination by thin-film composite membrane-current development, challenges and future prospects. Desalination 2012, 287:228-237.
71. Kim Y., Elimelech M., Shon H.K., Hong S. Combined organic and colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: fouling reversibility and the role of applied pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 460:206-212.
72. Mi B., Elimelech M. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:2022-2028.
73. Mi B., Elimelech M. Silica scaling and scaling reversibility in forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 312:75-81.
74. Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Fouling control in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:148-156.
75. Valladares Linares R., Bucs S.S., Li Z., AbuGhdeeb M., Amy G., Vrouwenvelder J.S. Impact of spacer thickness on biofouling in forward osmosis. Water Res. 2014, 57:223-233.
76. Hancock N.T., Xu P., Roby M.J., Gomez J.D., Cath T.Y. Towards direct potable reuse with forward osmosis: technical assessment of long-term process performance at the pilot scale. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445:34-46.
77. Nguyen N.C., Chen S.-S., Yang H.-Y., Hau N.T. Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high nutrient sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 132:224-229.
78. Motsa M.M., Mamba B.B., D'Haese A., Hoek E.M.V., Verliefde A.R.D. Organic fouling in forward osmosis membranes: the role of feed solution chemistry and membrane structural properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 460:99-109.
79. Yoon H., Baek Y., Yu J., Yoon J. Biofouling occurrence process and its control in the forward osmosis. Desalination 2013, 325:30-36.
80. Li Z.-Y., Yangali-Quintanilla V., Valladares-Linares R., Li Q., Zhan T., Amy G. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis. Water Res. 2012, 46:195-204.
81. She Q., Jin X., Li Q., Tang C.Y. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:2478-2486.
82. Parida V., Ng H.Y. Forward osmosis organic fouling: effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation. Desalination 2013, 312:88-98.
83. Lu X., Romero-Vargas Castrillón S., Shaffer D.L., Ma J., Elimelech M. In situ surface chemical modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for enhanced organic fouling resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:12219-12228.
84. Ben-Sasson M., Lu X., Bar-Zeev E., Zodrow K.R., Nejati S., Qi G., Giannelis E.P., Elimelech M. In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling mitigation. Water Res. 2014, 62:260-270.
85. Zodrow K.R., Tousley M.E., Elimelech M. Mitigating biofouling on thin-film composite polyamide membranes using a controlled-release platform. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453:84-91.
86. Morra M. On the molecular basis of fouling resistance. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2000, 11:547-569.
87. Rana D., Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110:2448-2471.
88. Kurihara M., Yamamura H., Nakanishi T. High recovery/high pressure membranes for brine conversion SWRO process development and its performance data. Desalination 1999, 125:9-15.
89. Rautenbach R., Linn T., Eilers L. Treatment of severely contaminated waste water by a combination of RO, high-pressure RO and NF - potential and limits of the process. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 174:231-241.
90. Van der Bruggen B., Lejon L., Vandecasteele C. Reuse, treatment, and discharge of the concentrate of pressure-driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:3733-3738.
91. Srivastava R.K., Jozewicz W. Flue gas desulfurization: the state of the art. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2001, 51:1676-1688.
92. Hasson D., Segev R., Lisitsin D., Liberman B., Semiat R. High recovery brackish water desalination process devoid of precipitation chemicals. Desalination 2011, 283:80-88.
93. Strathmann H. Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications. Desalination 2010, 264:268-288.
94. Lin S., Yip N.Y., Cath T.Y., Osuji C.O., Elimelech M. Hybrid pressure retarded osmosis-membrane distillation system for power generation from low-grade heat: thermodynamic analysis and energy efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:5306-5313.
95. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 207:370-382.
96. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8625-8629.
97. Coday B.D., Xu P., Beaudry E.G., Herron J., Lampi K., Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams. Desalination 2014, 333:23-35.
98. WDR FO: RO's new best friend. Water Desalination Report 2014, 50:1.
99. Antony A., Low J.H., Gray S., Childress A.E., Le-Clech P., Leslie G. Scale formation and control in high pressure membrane water treatment systems: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 383:1-16.
100. El-Dessouky H.T., Ettouney H.M. Fundamentals of Salt Water Desalination 2002, Elsevier Science Ltd.
101. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Distillation vs. membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination 2002, 143:207-218.
102. Mabrouk A.N.A., Fath H.E.-b.S. Techno-economic analysis of hybrid high performance MSF desalination plant with NF membrane. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 51:844-856.
103. Zaviska F., Zou L. Using modelling approach to validate a bench scale forward osmosis pre-treatment process for desalination. Desalination 2014, 350:1-13.
104. Bamaga O.A., Yokochi A., Beaudry E.G. Application of forward osmosis in pretreatment of seawater for small reverse osmosis desalination units. Desalin. Water Treat. 2009, 5:183-191.
105. Heijman S.G.J., Guo H., Li S., van Dijk J.C., Wessels L.P. Zero liquid discharge: heading for 99% recovery in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination 2009, 236:357-362.
106. Ang W.L., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N., Leo C.P. A review on the applicability of integrated/hybrid membrane processes in water treatment and desalination plants. Desalination 2014, (In press). 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.008.
107. Altaee A., Mabrouk A., Bourouni K. A novel forward osmosis membrane pretreatment of seawater for thermal desalination processes. Desalination 2013, 326:19-29.
108. Al-Sofi M.A.K., Hassan A.M., Mustafa G.M., Dalvi A.G.I., Kither M.N.M. Nanofiltration as a means of achieving higher TBT of ≥120°C in MSF. Desalination 1998, 118:123-129.
109. Al-Rawajfeh A.E. Influence of nanofiltration pretreatment on scale deposition in multi-stage flash thermal desalination plants. Therm. Sci. 2011, 15:11.
110. Hassan A.M., Al-Sofi M.A.K., Al-Amoudi A.S., Jamaluddin A.T.M., Farooque A.M., Rowaili A., Dalvi A.G.I., Kither N.M., Mustafa G.M., Al-Tisan I.A.R. A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (part 1). Desalination 1998, 118:35-51.
111. Al-Sofi M.A.K., Hassan A.M., Hamed O.A., Dalvi A.G.I., Kither M.N.M., Mustafa G.M., Bamardouf K. Optimization of hybridized seawater desalination process. Desalination 2000, 131:147-156.
112. Altaee A., Zaragoza G. A conceptual design of low fouling and high recovery FO-MSF desalination plant. Desalination 2014, 343:2-7.
113. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
114. Cunningham V.L., Binks S.P., Olson M.J. Human health risk assessment from the presence of human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 53:39-45.
115. Schriks M., Heringa M.B., van der Kooi M.M.E., de Voogt P., van Wezel A.P. Toxicological relevance of emerging contaminants for drinking water quality. Water Res. 2010, 44:461-476.
116. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. Water Res. 2012, 46:2683-2692.
117. Coday B.D., Yaffe B.G.M., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Rejection of trace organic compounds by forward osmosis membranes: a literature review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:3612-3624.
118. Kim C., Lee S., Shon H.K., Elimelech M., Hong S. Boron transport in forward osmosis: measurements, mechanisms, and comparison with reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 419-420:42-48.
119. Shaffer D.L., Yip N.Y., Gilron J., Elimelech M. Seawater desalination for agriculture by integrated forward and reverse osmosis: improved product water quality for potentially less energy. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:1-8.
120. D'Haese A., Le-Clech P., Van Nevel S., Verbeken K., Cornelissen E.R., Khan S.J., Verliefde A.R.D. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up. Water Res. 2013, 47:5232-5244.
121. Hancock N.T., Black N.D., Cath T.Y. A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:1145-1154.