Clinical outcomes during the learning curve of MIDline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF®) using the cortical bone trajectory

Acta Neurochirurgica

Volumn 158, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1413-1420

  Dabbous, Bassam ^a,b   Brown, Daniel ^a   Tsitlakidis, Abraham ^c   Arzoglou, Vasileios ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Consultant neurosurgeon and independent scholar ^*  (Greece)

Author keywords

CBT; Cortical bone trajectory; Lumbar fusion; MIDLF; Midline lumbar fusion; MIS

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL BONE TRAJECTORY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION; SPINE INSTABILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; EDUCATION; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84976548022     PISSN: 00016268     EISSN: 09420940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-2810-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cawley DT, Alexander M, Morris S (2014) Multifidus innervation and muscle assessment post-spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 23:320–327
2. Cheng WK, Inceoglu S (2015) Cortical and standard trajectory pedicle screw fixation techniques in stabilizing multisegment lumbar spine with low-grade spondylolisthesis. Int J Spine Surg 9:46
3. Cheung NK, Ferch RD, Ghahreman A, Bogduk N (2013) Long-term follow-up of minimal-access and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 72:443–450
4. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X (2010) Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J 19(2):316–324
5. Gonchar I, Kotani Y, Matsumoto Y (2014) Cortical bone trajectory versus percutaneous pedicle screw in minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion. Spine J 14:S114–S115
6. Gonchar I, Kotani Y, Matsui Y, Miyazaki T, Kasemura T, Masuko T (2014) Experience of 100 consecutive spine reconstructions using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws vs. traditional pedicle screws. http://www.smiss.org/abstract/experience-100-consecutive-spine-reconstructions-using-cortical-bone-trajectory-cbt-screws. Accessed 01 Jan 2016
7. Glennie RA, Dea N, Kwon BK, Street JT (2015) Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Clin Neurosci 22:972–975
8. Kojima K, Asamoto S, Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa M, Fukui Y (2015) Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory—a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157:1173–1178
9. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Nemoto K (2015) Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. J Neurosurg Spine 23:471–478
10. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA (2009) Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 9:366–373
11. Wray S, Mimran R, Vadapalli S, Shetye SS, McGilvray KC, Puttlitz CM (2015) Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase. J Neurosurg Spine 22:503–510
12. Mizuno M, Kuraishi K, Umeda Y, Sano T, Tsuji M, Suzuki H (2014) Midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54:716–721
13. Wittenberg RH, Shea M, Swartz DE, Lee KS, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC (1991) Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. Spine 16:647–652
14. Phan K, Hogan J, Maharaj M, Mobbs RJ (2015) Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a review of published reports. Orthop Surg 7:213–221
15. Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, Chang SW, Crawford NR (2013) Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine 38:635–641
16. Ntoukas V, Muller A (2010) Minimally invasive approach versus traditional open approach for one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 53:21–24
17. Park Y, Ha JW (2007) Comparison of one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine 32:537–543
18. Xu YC, Yao H, Wang QY, Hou G, Zhao HQ (2015) Analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in treating lumbar degenerative disease in the elderly. Zhongguo Gu Shang 28(11):1021–1025
19. Wang MY, Cummock MD, Yu Y, Trivedi RA (2010) An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 12:694–699