Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 972-975

  Glennie, R Andrew ^b   Dea, Nicolas ^a   Kwon, Brian K ^a   Street, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cortical; Degenerative; Lumbar; Pedicle screw; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORTICAL BONE; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREW LOOSENING; SPINE FUSION; VERY ELDERLY; DEVICES; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PEDICLE SCREWS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84928938567     PISSN: 09675868     EISSN: 15322653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. S.W. Terman, T.J. Yee, and D. Lau Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients J Neurosurg Spine 20 2014 644 652
2. C.L. Goldstein, K. Macwan, and K. Sundararajan Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review Clin Orthop Relat Res 472 2014 1727 1737
3. C.L. Ang, B. Phak-Boon Tow, and S. Fook Minimally invasive compared with open lumbar laminotomy: no functional benefits at 6 or 24 months after surgery Spine J 2013 pii: S1529-9430(13)01382-X [Epub ahead of print]
4. O. Adogwa, S.L. Parker, and A. Bydon Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life J Spinal Disord Tech 24 2011 479 484
5. M.J. McGirt, S.L. Parker, and J. Lerner Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients J Neurosurg Spine 14 2011 771 778
6. C. Schizas, N. Tzinieris, and E. Tsiridis Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience Int Orthop 33 2009 1683 1688
7. R.H. Wu, J.F. Fraser, and R. Hartl Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 2010 2273 2281
8. L. Perez-Orribo, S. Kalb, and P.M. Reyes Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 2013 635 641
9. K. Matsukawa, Y. Yato, and T. Kato In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 2014 E240 E245
10. B.G. Santoni, R.A. Hynes, and K.C. McGilvray Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws Spine J 9 2009 366 373
11. S. Inceoglu, W.H. Montgomery Jr., and S. St Clair Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies J Neurosurg Spine 14 2011 670 676
12. D.A. Baluch, A.A. Patel, and B. Lullo Effect of physiologic loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 2014 E1297 E1302
13. R.W. McCalden, J.A. McGeough, and M.B. Barker Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 1993 1193 1205
14. A. Rodriguez, M.T. Neal, and A. Liu Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation Neurosurg Focus 36 2014 E9
15. T.R. Liebs, O. Melsheimer, and J. Hassenpflug Early detection of systematic defects by endoprostheses registries Orthopade 43 2014 549 554