Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach

European Spine Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 316-324

  Fan, Shunwu ^a   Hu, Zhijun ^a   Zhao, Fengdong ^a   Zhao, Xing ^a   Huang, Yue ^a   Fang, Xiangqian ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive; Multifidus muscle

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL OPEN APPROACH; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; MUSCLE INJURY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSOAS MUSCLE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; BACK PAIN; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MUSCULAR DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950917098     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1191-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. LA Danneels GG Vanderstraeten DC Cambier EE Witvrouw HJ De Cuyper 2000 CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects Eur Spine J 9 266 272 10.1007/s005860000190 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7lsl2qtw%3D%3D 11261613
2. JC Fairbank PB Pynsent 2000 The Oswestry Disability Index Spine 25 22 2940 2952 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FgsFymsA%3D%3D 11074683 discussion 2952
3. JM Fitzpatrick JE Wickham 1990 Minimal invasive surgery Br J Surg 77 721 722 10.1002/bjs.1800770702 1:STN:280:DyaK3czksFWlsw%3D%3D 2200553 (Pubitemid 20236101)
4. KT Foley LT Holly JD Schwender 2003 Minimally invasive lumbar fusion Spine 28 Suppl 15 S26 S35 10.1097/00007632-200308011-00006 12897471
5. R Gejo H Matsui Y Kawaguchi H Ishihara H Tsuji 1997 Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery Spine 24 1023 1028 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00017
6. JA Hides CA Richardson GA Jull 1996 Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain Spine 21 23 2763 2769 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00011 1:STN:280:DyaK2s7jtl2hug%3D%3D 8979323 (Pubitemid 26427740)
7. JA Hides MJ Stokes M Saide GA Jull DH Cooper 1994 Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle wasting ipsilateral to symptoms in patients with acute/subacute low back pain Spine 19 2 165 172 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3gsVymsg%3D%3D 8153825 (Pubitemid 24047305)
8. RE Isaacs VK Podichetty P Santiago FA Sandhu J Spears K Kelly, et al. 2005 Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation J Neurosurg Spine 3 98 105 10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0098 16370298
9. Y Kawaguchi H Matsui H Tsuji 1996 Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymatic analysis Spine 21 8 941 944 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00007 1:STN:280:DyaK283psFSqsQ%3D%3D 8726197 (Pubitemid 26127214)
10. Y Kawaguchi H Matsui H Tsuji 1997 Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery Spine 22 9 1018 1023 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00015 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ps12rtg%3D%3D 9152453 (Pubitemid 27203494)
11. LT Khoo S Palmer DT Laich RG Fessler 2002 Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion Neurosurgery 51 S166-1 12234445
12. DY Kim SH Lee SK Chung HY Lee 2005 Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation Spine 30 123 129 10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a 15626992
13. KT Kim SH Lee KS Suk SC Bae 2006 The quantitative analysis of tissue injury markers after mini-open lumbar fusion Spine 31 712 716 10.1097/01.brs.0000202533.05906.ea 16540878
14. HF Leu RK Hauser 1996 Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar spine fusion Neurosurg Clin North Am 7 1 107 117 1:STN:280:DyaK28vjt1Srtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26058418)
15. HM Mayer 2000 The ALIF concept Eur Spine J 9 Suppl 35 43 10.1007/PL00010020
16. TG Mayer H Vanharanta RJ Gatchel V Mooney D Barnes L Judge 1989 Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients Spine 14 1 33 36 10.1097/00007632-198901000-00006 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7hsVGitg%3D%3D 2913665 (Pubitemid 19044934)
17. AA Nanji 1983 Serum creatine kinase isoenzymes: a review Muscle Nerve 6 83 90 10.1002/mus.880060203 1:CAS:528:DyaL3sXktlKltr4%3D 6855802 (Pubitemid 13092077)
18. ST Onesti 2004 Failed back syndrome Neurologist 10 5 259 264 10.1097/01.nrl.0000138733.09406.39 15335443 (Pubitemid 39223712)
19. MM Panjabi 1992 The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement J Spinal Disord 5 4 383 389 10.1097/00002517-199212000-00001 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ksVygsQ%3D%3D 1490034
20. Y Park JW Ha 2007 Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach Spine 32 5 537 543 10.1097/01.brs.0000256473.49791.f4 17334287 (Pubitemid 46398919)
21. U Quint HJ Wilke A Shirazi-Adl M Parnianpour F Löer LE Claes 1998 Importance of the intersegmental trunk muscles for the stability of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical study in vitro Spine 23 18 1937 1945 10.1097/00007632- 199809150-00003 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvlt1Glsw%3D%3D 9779525 (Pubitemid 28473488)
22. JD Schwender LT Holly DP Rouben KT Foley 2005 Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results J Spinal Disord Tech 18 Suppl S1 S6 10.1097/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0 15699793 (Pubitemid 44620794)
23. PE Shrout JL Fleiss 1979 Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 2 420 428 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnkslSnsg%3D%3D 18839484
24. T Sihvonen A Herno L Paljärvi O Airaksinen J Partanen A Tapaninaho 1993 Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome Spine 18 575 581 10.1097/00007632-199304000-00009 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3kvVGqug%3D%3D 8484148
25. KJ Stevens DB Spenciner KL Griffiths KD Kim M Zwienenberg-Lee T Alamin, et al. 2006 Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies J Spinal Disord Tech 19 77 86 10.1097/01.bsd.0000193820.42522. d9 16760779 (Pubitemid 44284150)
26. H Suwa J Hanakita N Ohshita K Gotoh N Matsuoka A Morizane 2000 Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle thickness after various lumbar back surgery procedures Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 40 3 151 154 10.2176/nmc.40.151 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgtFejsw%3D%3D discussion 154-155
27. H Taylor AH McGregor S Medhi-Zadeh S Richards N Kahn JA Zadeh, et al. 2002 The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery Spine 27 2758 2762 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00004 12486343 (Pubitemid 36008569)
28. G Waddell 1987 A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain Spine 12 632 644 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002 1:STN:280: DyaL1c%2FntV2ktA%3D%3D 2961080
29. HJ Wilke S Wolf LE Claes M Arand A Wiesend 1995 Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups. A biomechanical in vitro study Spine 20 192 198 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3jt1KisQ%3D%3D 7716624