The evolution of withdrawal: negotiating research relationships in biobanking

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Melham, Karen ^a   Moraia, Linda Briceno ^a   Mitchell, Colin ^a   Morrison, Michael ^a   Teare, Harriet ^a   Kaye, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biobank; Consent to governance; Research ethics; Right to withdraw

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975701654     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21957819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40504-014-0016-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beauchamp T, Childress J: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2008.
2. Corrigan O, Tutton R: What's in a name? Subjects, volunteers, participants and activists in clinical research. Clinical Ethics 2006, 1: 101–104. 10.1258/147775006777254524
3. Chwang E: Against the inalienable right to withdraw from research. Bioethics 2008, 22(7):372–378. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00666.x
4. Edwards SJ: Research participation and the right to withdraw. Bioethics 2005, 19(2):112–130. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00429.x
5. Eriksson S, Helgesson G: Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research. European Journal of Human Genetics 2005, 13: 1071–1076. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201458
6. Gertz R: Withdrawing from participating in a biobank – a comparative study. European Journal of Health Law 2008, 15(4):381–389. 10.1163/157180908X338269
7. Gottweis, HG, G Gaskell, and J Starkbaum. 2011. Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters. Nature Reviews Genetics 12:2. Gottweis, HG, G Gaskell, and J Starkbaum. 2011. Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters. Nature Reviews Genetics 12:2.
8. Helgesson G, Johnsson L: The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2005, 8(3):315–321. 10.1007/s11019-005-0397-6
9. Hobbs A, Starkbaum J, Gottweis U, Wichmann HE, Gottweis H: The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies. Public Health Genomics 2012, 15: 272–84. 10.1159/000336671
10. Holm S: Withdrawing from research: a rethink in the context of research biobanks. Health Care Analysis 2011, 19(3):269–281. 10.1007/s10728-011-0194-8
11. Kaye J: From single biobanks to international networks: developing e-governance. Human Genetics 2011, 130(3):377–382. 10.1007/s00439-011-1063-0
12. Kaye J, Curren L, Anderson N, Edwards K, Fullerton S, Kanellopoulou N, Lund D, MacArthur D, Mascalzoni D, Shepherd J, Taylor P, Terry S, Winter S: From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nature Reviews Genetics 2012, 13(5):371–6. 10.1038/nrg3218
13. st century research networks. European Journal of Human Genetics. May:1–6.
14. Lipworth W, Forsyth R, Kerridge I: Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies. Sociology of Health & Illness 2011, 33: 792–811. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x
15. Master Z, Nelson E, Murdoch B, Caulfield T: Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus. Nature Methods 2012, 9: 885–8. 10.1038/nmeth.2142
16. Markman JR, Markman M: Running an ethical trial 60 years after the Nuremberg Code. Lancet Oncology 2007, 8(12):1139–1146. 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70381-9
17. Meslin EM, Cho MK: Research ethics in the Era of personalized medicine: updating Science's contract with society. Public Health Genomics 2010, 13: 378–84. 10.1159/000319473
18. Schaefer GO, Wertheimer A: The right to withdraw from research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2010, 20(4):329–352.
19. Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM: Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science and Medicine Feb; 2009, 68(4):781–9. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020
20. Smith, M, and S Aufox. 2013. Biobanking: The melding of research with clinical care. Current Genetic Medicine Reports 1:7.
21. Stein DT, Terry SF: Reforming biobank consent policy: a necessary move away from broad consent toward dynamic consent. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 2013, 17: 855–6. 10.1089/gtmb.2013.1550
22. Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Chang CF, Hong H, Kobayashi I, Suzuki S, Muto K: For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan. Journal of Human Genetics 2011, 56: 358–63. 10.1038/jhg.2011.19
23. Wee, R. 2013. Dynamic consent in the age of digital biology. Journal of Primary Healthcare 5:3.
24. Wertheimer A: Exploitation. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 1996.