-
3
-
-
17244382684
-
-
Title 45, Public Welfare, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks, Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects effective from December 13
-
Common Rule. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Public Welfare, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks, Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects effective from December 13, 2001. http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/ humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm
-
(2001)
Common Rule. Code of Federal Regulations
-
-
-
4
-
-
17244377613
-
-
http://www.corec.org.uk/wordDocs/pis.doc. Which are consistent with the Governance arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees July 2001.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
0037151796
-
Post-randomisation exclusions: The intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis
-
D. Fergusson, S.D. Aaron, G. Guyatt & P. Hebert. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002; 325: 652-654.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.325
, pp. 652-654
-
-
Fergusson, D.1
Aaron, S.D.2
Guyatt, G.3
Hebert, P.4
-
7
-
-
85007729500
-
People are 'participants' in research
-
I. Chalmers, W. Jackson & D. Carvel. People are 'participants' in research. BMJ 1999; 318: 1141.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 1141
-
-
Chalmers, I.1
Jackson, W.2
Carvel, D.3
-
8
-
-
17244375751
-
-
note
-
th) 321 at 336, and said at page 116-117 'The right to determine what shall be done with one's own body is a fundamental right in our society. The concepts inherent in this right are the bedrock upon which the principles of self-determination and individual autonomy are based. Free individual choice in matters affecting this right should, in my opinion, be accorded very high priority.'
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0032585226
-
The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals
-
Oct 31
-
S.J. Edwards, R.J. Lilford & J. Hewison. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. BMJ. 1998 Oct 31; 317(7167): 1209-1212.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.317
, Issue.7167
, pp. 1209-1212
-
-
Edwards, S.J.1
Lilford, R.J.2
Hewison, J.3
-
13
-
-
0035131936
-
Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a 'trial effect'
-
Mar
-
D.A. Braunholtz, S.J. Edwards & R.J. Lilford. Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a 'trial effect'. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar; 54(3): 217-224.
-
(2001)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.54
, Issue.3
, pp. 217-224
-
-
Braunholtz, D.A.1
Edwards, S.J.2
Lilford, R.J.3
-
14
-
-
0034635732
-
The Healthcare professional and the Bolam test
-
Jones J. Warren. The Healthcare professional and the Bolam test. British Dentistry Journal 2000; 188(5): 237-240.
-
(2000)
British Dentistry Journal
, vol.188
, Issue.5
, pp. 237-240
-
-
Warren, J.J.1
-
15
-
-
0032458718
-
Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials
-
Dec
-
S.J. Edwards, R.J. Lilford, D.A. Braunholtz, J.C. Jackson, J. Hewison & J. Thornton. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998 Dec; 2(15):i-vi, 1-132.
-
(1998)
Health Technol Assess
, vol.2
, Issue.15
-
-
Edwards, S.J.1
Lilford, R.J.2
Braunholtz, D.A.3
Jackson, J.C.4
Hewison, J.5
Thornton, J.6
-
17
-
-
0033405518
-
A proposed consent process in studies that use an exception to informed consent
-
Dec
-
E.P. Sloan, K. Nagy & J. Barrett. A proposed consent process in studies that use an exception to informed consent. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Dec; 6(12): 1283-1291.
-
(1999)
Acad Emerg Med
, vol.6
, Issue.12
, pp. 1283-1291
-
-
Sloan, E.P.1
Nagy, K.2
Barrett, J.3
-
18
-
-
0027303017
-
NHS patients as experts and Holm S. What is wrong with compliance?
-
NHS patients as experts and Holm S. What is wrong with compliance? Journal of Medical Ethics 1993; 19: 108-110.
-
(1993)
Journal of Medical Ethics
, vol.19
, pp. 108-110
-
-
-
22
-
-
0033829086
-
Who will adhere? Key issues in the study and prediction of adherence in randomized controlled trials
-
K.A. Martin, D.J. Brown, J. Dunbar-Jacob & M.G. Perri. Who will adhere? Key issues in the study and prediction of adherence in randomized controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 2000; 21: 195S-199S.
-
(2000)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.21
-
-
Martin, K.A.1
Brown, D.J.2
Dunbar-Jacob, J.3
Perri, M.G.4
-
24
-
-
17244365082
-
-
note
-
I thank my anonymous reviewer for this point.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
0036302082
-
'Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?' The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial
-
Sep
-
K. Featherstone & J.L. Donovan. 'Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?' The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Sep; 55(5): 709-719.
-
(2002)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.55
, Issue.5
, pp. 709-719
-
-
Featherstone, K.1
Donovan, J.L.2
-
26
-
-
17044449918
-
Creating a new culture of communication
-
Jul-Aug
-
Dorn B.C. & J.E. Roover. Creating a new culture of communication. Mich Health Hosp. 2002 Jul-Aug; 38(4): 24.
-
(2002)
Mich Health Hosp
, vol.38
, Issue.4
, pp. 24
-
-
Dorn, B.C.1
Roover, J.E.2
-
27
-
-
0027880662
-
Encouraging discussion with partners and building negotiation skills: HIV prevention strategies for women in relationships in Brazil, Tanzania and Indonesia
-
S.E. Middlestadt. Encouraging discussion with partners and building negotiation skills: HIV prevention strategies for women in relationships in Brazil, Tanzania and Indonesia. Adv Consum Res. 1993; 20: 297-301.
-
(1993)
Adv Consum Res
, vol.20
, pp. 297-301
-
-
Middlestadt, S.E.1
-
28
-
-
84985372509
-
Can there be a right-based moral theory
-
There is a lively debate over the necessity of rights to express the value of autonomy. See J.L. Mackie. Can there be a right-based moral theory. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1978; 3: 355. See also D.A.J. Richards Rights and Autonomy. Ethics 1981; 92: 3.
-
(1978)
Midwest Studies in Philosophy
, vol.3
, pp. 355
-
-
Mackie, J.L.1
-
29
-
-
84985372509
-
Rights and autonomy
-
There is a lively debate over the necessity of rights to express the value of autonomy. See J.L. Mackie. Can there be a right-based moral theory. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1978; 3: 355. See also D.A.J. Richards Rights and Autonomy. Ethics 1981; 92: 3.
-
(1981)
Ethics
, vol.92
, pp. 3
-
-
Richards, D.A.J.1
-
30
-
-
0005601669
-
Rights-based moralities
-
edited by Jeremy Waldron. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
J. Raz. 1984. Rights-based moralities. In: Theories of Rights edited by Jeremy Waldron. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
(1984)
Theories of Rights
-
-
Raz, J.1
-
32
-
-
0004147505
-
-
London: Stationery Office
-
Human Rights Act 1998. London: Stationery Office, 1998.
-
(1998)
Human Rights Act 1998
-
-
-
35
-
-
0031241981
-
Inducement in research
-
Oct
-
M. Wilkinson & A. Moore. Inducement in research. Bioethics. 1997 Oct; 11(5):373-389.
-
(1997)
Bioethics
, vol.11
, Issue.5
, pp. 373-389
-
-
Wilkinson, M.1
Moore, A.2
-
36
-
-
0036731054
-
National practices regarding payment to research subjects for participating in pediatric research
-
K.L. Weise, M.L. Smith, K.J. Maschke & H.L. Copeland. National practices regarding payment to research subjects for participating in pediatric research Pediatrics 2002; 110(3): 577-582.
-
(2002)
Pediatrics
, vol.110
, Issue.3
, pp. 577-582
-
-
Weise, K.L.1
Smith, M.L.2
Maschke, K.J.3
Copeland, H.L.4
|