The right to withdraw from research

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 329-352

  Schaefer, G Owen ^a   Wertheimer, Alan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ART; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFORMED CONSENT; MORALITY; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; UNCERTAINTY;

HUMAN BODY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 79951801101     PISSN: 10546863     EISSN: 10863249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Law Institute. 1981. Restatement (Second) of Contracts, Section 359. Available at http://www.lexinter.net/LOTWVers4/adequacy-of-damages.htm#359. -EFFECT-OF-ADEQUACY-OF-DAMAGES, accessed 27 November 2010.
2. Annas, George J. 2002. Medical Privacy and Medical Research-Judging the New Federal Regulations. New England Journal of Medicine 346:216-20. (Pubitemid 34438895)
3. Ben-Shahar, Omri, and Posner, Eric A. 2010. The Right to Withdraw in Contract Law. In John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper. (2nd Series.) Chicago: University of Chicago. Available at http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/ file/514-obs-eap-withdraw.pdf, accessed 23 November 2010.
4. Bergelson, Vera. 2010. Consent to Harm. In The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice, ed. Alan Wertheimer and Franklin G. Miller, pp. 163-92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Irish Council for Bioethics. 2009. Biometrics: Enhancing Security or Invading Privacy? Dublin: Irish Council for Bioethics.
6. Borror, Kristina C. 2002. RE: Human Research Subject Protections Under Federal-Wide Assurance FWA-93. Letter to Gregory W. Siskind, M. D., and David P. Hajjar, Ph. D., 4 April. Office of Human Subjects Protection, Department of Health and Human Services. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/detrm-letrs/ YR02/apr02k.pdf, accessed 28 November 2010.
7. Chwang, Eric. 2008. Against the Inalienable Right to Withdraw from Research. Bioethics 22:370-78.
8. CIOMS. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. 2002. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland.
9. Dworkin, Ronald. 1983. Comment on Narveson: In Defence of Equality. Social Philosophy and Policy 1:24-40.
10. Edwards, Sarah J. L. 2005. Research Participation and the Right to Withdraw. Bioethics 19:112-30. (Pubitemid 40529916)
11. Fabre, Cecile. 2006. Whose Body Is It Anyway? Justice and the Integrity of the Person. Oxford, U. K.: Clarendon Press.
12. FDA. 2009. Information Sheet Guidances, Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors: Payment to Research Subjects. Available at http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126429.htm, accessed 23 November 2010.
13. Herxheimer, Andrew. 1988. The Rights of the Patient in Clinical Research. Lancet 12:1128-30.
14. Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1919. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Hudson, Kathy L. 2007. Prohibiting Genetic Discrimination. New England Journal of Medicine 356:2021-23. (Pubitemid 46789891)
16. Institutional Review Board Handbook. 2007. The Institutional Review Board Handbook: Policies and Guidelines. Syracuse University. Available at http://orip. syr.edu/forms/THE%20IRB%20HANDBOOK-2007.pdf, accessed 28 November 2010.
17. Kuflik, Arthur. 1986. The Utilitarian Logic of Inalienable Rights. Ethics 97:75-87.
18. Levine, Robert J. 1988. Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research: Second Edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Miller, Franklin G., and Wertheimer, Alan. 2007. Facing up to Paternalism in Research Ethics. Hastings Center Report 37(3):24-34.
20. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects Research. Available at http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html, accessed 28 November 2010.
21. XX-Research Administration. 2010. Subject Selection, Recruitment and Compensation. University of California, Irvine. Available at http://www.research. uci.edu/ora/hrpp/subjectselection.htm, accessed 28 November 2010.
22. Schaefer, G. Owen; Emanuel, Ezekiel J.; and Wertheimer, Alan. 2009. The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research. JAMA 302:67-72.
23. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1990. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Trebilcock, Michael J. 1993. The Limits of Freedom of Contract. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Waldron, Jeremy. 1981. A Right to Do Wrong. Ethics 92(1):21-39.
26. WMA. World Medical Association. 2008. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Tokyo, Japan.