Feminism and families

Handbook of Marriage and the Family: Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 139-158

  Allen, Katherine R ^a   Walker, Alexis J ^b   McCann, Brandy Renee ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84975616493     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (130)

1. Adams, M. (2007). Women's rights and wedding bells:19th-Century pro-family rhetoric and (re)enforcement of the gender status quo. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 501-528.
2. Allen, K. R. (2000). A conscious and inclusive family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 4-17.
3. Allen, K. R. (2004). Janet Saltzman Chafetz plenary:Discussant comments. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 984-989.
4. Allen, K. R., Lloyd, S. A., & Few, A. L. (2009). Reclaiming feminist theory, methods, and practice for family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 3-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Allen, K. R., & Pickett, R. S. (1987). Forgotten streams in the family life course: Utilization of qualitative retrospective interviews in the analysis of lifelong single women's family careers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 517-526.
6. Anderson, K. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52, 853-865.
7. Anderson, K. L. (2010). Conflict, power, and violence in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 727-743.
8. Armenia, A. B. (2009). More than motherhood: Reasons for becoming a family day care provider. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 554-574.
9. Atkinson, M. P., Greenstein, T. N., & Lang, M. M. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1137-1148.
10. Baber, K. M. (2000). Women's sexualities. In M. Biaggio & M. Hersen (Eds.), Issues in the psychology of women (pp. 145-171). New York: Kluwer.
11. Baber, K. M. (2004). Building bridges: Feminist research, theory, and practice: A response to Janet Saltzman Chafetz. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 978-983.
12. Baber, K. M., & Allen, K. R. (1992). Women and families:Feminist reconstructions. New York: Guilford.
13. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
14. Best, A. L. (2006). Freedom, constraint, and family responsibility: Teens and parents collaboratively negotiate around the car, class, gender, and culture. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 55-84.
15. Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and family research in thefirst decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 706-726.
16. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York:Russell Sage.
17. Blume, L. B., & Blume, T. W. (2003). Toward a dialectical model of family gender discourse: Body, identity, and sexuality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 785-794.
18. Boston Women's Health Book Collective. (1971). Our bodies, ourselves. New York: Simon and Schuster.
19. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black lesbian woman 1 Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312-325.
20. Burton, L. M., Bonilla-Silva, E., Ray, V., Buckelew, R., & Freeman, E. H. (2010). Critical race theories, colorism, and the decade's research on families of color. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 440-459.
21. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
22. Cha, Y. (2010). Reinforcing separate spheres: The effect of spousal overwork on men's and women's employment in dual-earner households. American Sociological Review, 75, 303-329.
23. Chafetz, J. S. (2004). Bridging feminist theory and research methodology. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 963-977.
24. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
25. Clark, R. L., Glick, J. E., & Bures, R. M. (2009). Immigrant families over the life course: Research directions and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 852-872.
26. Combahee River Collective. (1982). The Combahee River Collective Statement, 1977. In G. T. Hull, P. B. Scott, & B. Smith (Ed.), All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women's studies (pp. 13-22). Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.
27. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
28. Collins, P. H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York:Routledge.
29. Connidis, I. A. (2010). Family ties & aging (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.
30. Craig, L. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share? A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender and Society, 20, 259-281.
31. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1279.
32. De Reus, L., Few, A. L., & Blume, L. B. (2005). Multicultural and critical race feminisms: Theorizing families in the third wave. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 447-468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Di Leonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship. Signs, 12, 440-453.
34. Dill, B. T., McLaughlin, A. E., & Nieves, A. D. (2007). Future directions of feminist research: Intersectionality. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 629-637). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Dodson, L., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2005). Poor mothers and habits of hiding: Participatory methods in poverty research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 949-959.
36. Dressel, P., & Clark, A. (1990). A critical look at family care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 769-782.
37. Dykstra, P. A., & Hagestad, G. O. (2007). Roads less taken:Developing a nuanced view of older adults without children. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1275-1310.
38. Edin, K., & Kissane, R. J. (2010). Poverty and the American family: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 460-479.
39. Elliot, L. (2009). Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps and what we can do about it. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
40. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24, 149-166.
41. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today's college campuses. In M. Kimmel & A. Aronson (Eds.), The gendered society reader (3rd ed., pp. 531-546). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Eriksson, R., & Nemo, M. (2010). Care for sick children as a proxy for gender equality in the family. Social Indicators Research, 97, 341-346.
43. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.
44. Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420-439.
45. Few, A. L. (2007). Integrating black consciousness and critical race feminism into family studies research. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 452-473.
46. Folbre, N. (2004). Family time: The social organization of care. New York: Routledge.
47. Freedman, E. B. (2002). No turning back: The history of feminism and the future of women. New York:Ballantine.
48. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York:Norton.
49. Glantz, M. J., Chamberlain, M. C., Liu, Q., Hsieh, C., Edwards, K. R., Van Horn, A., et al. (2009). Gender disparity in the rate of partner abandonment in patients with serious medical illness. Cancer, 115, 5237-5242.
50. Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Lesbian and gay parents and their children: Research on the family life cycle. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51. Goldberg, A. E., & Allen, K. R. (2007). Imagining men:Lesbian mothers' perceptions of male involvement during the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 352-365.
52. Goldberg, A. E., Downing, J. B., & Sauck, C. C. (2008). Perceptions of children's parental preferences in lesbian two-mother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 419-434.
53. Goldin, C., & Shim, M. (2004). Making a name: Women's surnames at marriage and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 143-160.
54. Gooding, G. E., & Kreider, R. M. (2010). Women's marital naming choices in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 681-701.
55. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science, whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
56. Hartmann, H. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Signs, 6, 366-394.
57. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Piatelli, D. (2007). From theory to method and back again: The synergistic praxis of theory and method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 143-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart:Commercialization of human feeling (20th anniversary ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. Hook, J. L. (2010). Gender inequality in the welfare state:Sex segregation in housework, 1965-2003. The American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1480-1523.
61. hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
62. Huato, J., & Zeno, K. W. (2009). The effects of family income, educational attainment, and race-ethnicity on the husband-wife income ratio in the United States, 1980, 1990, 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 261-275.
63. Hurtado, A. (1994). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of White women and women of color. In A. C. Herrmann & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Theorizing feminism: Parallel trends in the humanities and social sciences (pp. 136-154). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
64. Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931-949.
65. Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187-216.
66. Lareau, A. (2000). My wife can tell me who I know:Methodological and conceptual problems in studying fathers. Qualitative Sociology, 23, 407-433.
67. LaRossa, R. L. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857.
68. Lather, P. (2007). Getting lost: Feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
69. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
70. Lucero-Liu, A. A., & Christensen, D. H. (2009). (Re) Visioning intimate relationships: Chicanas in family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 96-107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Luepnitz, D. (1988). The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.
72. Mack-Canty, C., & Wright, S. (2004). Family values as practiced by feminist parents: Bridging third-wave feminism and family pluralism. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 851-880.
73. Mahalingam, R., Balan, S., & Molina, K. M. (2009). Transnational intersectionality: A critical framework for theorizing motherhood. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 69-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Martin, B. (1994). Lesbian identity and autobiographical differences[s]. In A. C. Herrmann & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Theorizing feminism: Parallel trends in the humanities and social sciences (pp. 316-338). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
75. Matthews, S. H. (2005). Crafting qualitative research articles on marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 799-808.
76. Mattingly, M. J., & Sayer, L. C. (2006). Under pressure:Gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 205-221.
77. Maume, D. J., Bardo, A. R., & Sebastian, R. A. (2009). Gender differences in sleep disruption among retail food workers. American Sociological Review, 74, 989-1007.
78. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771-1800.
79. McCann, B. R. (2010). Intimacy and family among single, working-class women: A focus on rural Appalachia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
80. McGraw, L. A., & Walker, A. J. (2007). Meanings of sisterhood and developmental disability: Narratives from white nondisabled sisters. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 474-500.
81. Mendez, J. B., & Wolf, D. L. (2007). Feminizing global research/globalizing feminist research: Methods and practice under globalization. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 651-662). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Mies, M. (2007). A global feminist perspective on research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 663-668). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83. Milkie, M. A., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). Taking on the second shift: Time allocations and time pressures of U.S. parents with preschoolers. Social Forces, 88, 487-517.
84. Miner-Rubino, K., Jayaratne, T. E., & Konik, J. (2007). Using survey research as a quantitative method for feminist social change. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 199-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85. Naples, N. A. (1992). Activist mothering: Crossgenerational continuity in the community work of women from low-income urban neighborhoods. Gender and Society, 6, 441-464.
86. Nelson, M. K. (2006). Single mothers "do" family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 781-795.
87. Nelson, M. K. (2008). Watching children: Describing the use of baby monitors on epinions. com. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 516-538.
88. Osmond, M. W. (1987). Radical-critical theories. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 103-124). New York: Plenum.
89. Ramazanogulu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology:Challenges and choices. London: Sage.
90. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5, 631-660.
92. Risman, B. J. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
93. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18, 429-450.
94. Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (2002). After the sexual revolution: Gender politics in teen dating. Contexts, 1, 16-24.
95. Rivara, F. P., Anderson, M. L., Fishman, P., Bonomi, A. E., Reid, R. J., Carrell, D., et al. (2007). Healthcare utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 32, 89-96.
96. Romito, P., & Grassi, M. (2007). Does violence affect one gender more than the other? The mental health impact of violence among male and female university students. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 1222-1234.
97. Sasaki, T., Hazen, N. L., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2010). The supermom trap: Do involved dads erode moms' selfcompetence? Personal Relationships, 17, 71-79.
98. Sassler, S., & Miller, A. (2007, August). Waiting to be asked: Gender, power and relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, NY.
99. Scanzoni, J., & Fox, G. L. (1980). Sex roles, family and society: The seventies and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 20-33.
100. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301-311.
101. Shih, K. Y., & Pyke, K. (2010). Power, resistance, and emotional economies in women's relationships with mothers-in-law in Chinese immigrant families. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 333-357.
102. Smart, C. (2009). Shifting horizons: Reflections on qualitative methods. Feminist Theory, 10, 295-308.
103. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic:A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
104. Smith, D. E. (1993). The Standard North American Family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50-65.
105. Sprague, J. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Walnut Creek, CA:AltaMira Press.
106. Springer, K. W. (2010). Economic dependence in marriage and husbands' midlife health: Testing three possible mechanisms. Gender and Society, 24, 378-401.
107. Stacey, J. (1990). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York: Basic Books.
108. Stanley, L. (1990). Feminist praxis and the academic mode of production. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 3-19). London: Routledge.
109. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20-60). London: Routledge.
110. Teaster, P. B., Roberto, K. A., & Dugar, T. (2006). Intimate partner violence of rural aging women. Family Relations, 55, 636-648.
111. Thébaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning:Understanding men's housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender and Society, 24, 330-354.
112. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families:Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845-871.
113. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1995). The place of feminism in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 847-865.
114. Thorne, B., & Yalom, M. (Eds.). (1982). Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions. New York: Longman.
115. Tucker, P. (2005). Stay-at-home dads: At-home dads can benefit children and mothers. Futurist, 39 (5), 12-13.
116. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2008) Occupational outlook handbook, 2008-09 edition, Table 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aatll.txt
117. Utz, R. L., Reidy, E. B., Carr, D., Nesse, R., & Wortman, C. (2004). The daily consequences of widowhood:The role of gender and intergenerational transfers on subsequent housework performance. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 683-712.
118. Walker, A. J. (1985). Reconceptualizing family stress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 827-837.
119. Walker, A. J. (1999). Gender and family relationships. In M. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 439-474). New York: Plenum Press.
120. Walker, A. J. (2000). Refracted knowledge: Viewing families through the prism of social science. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 595-608.
121. Walker, A. J. (2004). Methods, theory, and the practice of feminist research: A response to Janet Chafetz. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 990-994.
122. Walker, A. J. (2009). A feminist critique of family studies. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 19-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
123. Walker, A. J., & McGraw, L. (2000). Who is responsible for responsible fathering? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 563-569.
124. Walker, A. J., & Thompson, L. (1984). Feminism and family studies. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 545-570.
125. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125-151.
126. White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2008). Family theories (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
127. Wills, J. B., & Risman, B. J. (2006). The visibility of feminist thought in family studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 690-700.
128. Wood, L. E. (2005). Trends in national and regional economic distress: 1960-2000. Washington, DC:Appalachia Regional Commission.
129. Wood, J. M., Koch, P. B., & Mansfield, P. K. (2006). Women's sexual desire: A feminist critique. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 236-244.
130. Zimmerman, B. (1984). The politics of transliteration:Lesbian personal narratives. Signs, 9, 663-682.