Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Wang, Jinhua ^a   Yang, Xi ^b   Cai, Hongmin ^b   Tan, Wanchang ^a   Jin, Cangzheng ^a   Li, Li ^c  

^a SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY CANCER CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; CALCINOSIS; CHINA; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CHINA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84974555742     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep27327     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Cady, B. & Chung, M. Mammographic screening: no longer controversial. American Journal of Clin Oncol 28(1), 1-4 (2005).
2. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), breast imaging atlas. 4th ed., Reston,Va, Am College Radiology, 1-259 (2003).
3. Fletcher, S. W. & Elmore, J. G. Clinical Practice: mammographic screening for breast cancer. New Engl J Med 348(17), 1672-1680 (2003).
4. Winchester, D. P., Jeske, J. M. & Goldschmidt, R. A. The diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am Cancer J Clin 50(3), 184 (2000).
5. Schreer, I. & Luttges, J. Breast cancer: early detection. Eur J Radiol 11 (Suppl 2), S307-S314 (2001).
6. Stephen, A. & Feig, M. D. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography. Radiol Clin N Am 38(4), 653-668 (2000).
7. Yunus, M., Ahmed, N. & Masroor, I. Mammographic criteria for determining the diagnostic value of microcalcifications in the detection of early breast cancer. J Pak Med Assoc 4(1), 24-29 (2004).
8. Muttarak, M., Kongmebho, lP. & Sukhamwang, N. Breast calcifications: which are malignant. Singap Med J 50(9), 907-914 (2009).
9. Goergen, S. K., Evans, J. & Cohen, G. P. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 204(1), 131-135 (1997).
10. Barlow, W. E., Chi, C. & Carney, P. A. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer I 96(24), 1840-1850 (2004).
11. Muttarak, M., Pojchamarnwiputh, S. & Chaiwan, B. Breast carcinomas: why are they missed. Singap Med J 47(8), 851-857 (2006).
12. Astley, S. & Hutt, I. Automation in mammography:computer vision and human perception London. World Scientific Publishing Co 1-25 (1994).
13. Burhene, L. J. W., Wood, S. A. & D'Orsi, C. J. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215(2), 554-562 (2000).
14. Jiang, Y., Nishikawa, R. M., Schmidt, R. A. & Metz, C. E. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications. Acad Radiol 13(1), 84-94 (2006).
15. Malich, A., Fischer, D. R. & B(o)ttcher, J. CAD for mammography:the technique,results,current role and further developments. Eur Radiol 16(7), 1449-1460 (2006).
16. Cai, H. M., Peng, Y. X., Ou, C. W., Chen, M. S. & Li, L. Diagnosis of breast masses from dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusionweighted MR: a machine learning approach. PLoS One 9(1), e87387 (2014).
17. Dartois, L. et al. A comparison between different prediction models for invasive breast cancer occurrence in the French E3N cohort. Breast Cancer Res Tr 150(2), 415-426 (2015).
18. Krishnan, M. et al. Statistical analysis of mammographic features and its classification using support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications 37(1), 470-478 (2010).
19. Wang, D., Shi, L. & Heng, P. A. Automatic detection of breast cancers in mammograms using structured support vector machines. Neurocomputing 72(13), 3296-3302 (2009).
20. Akay, M. F. Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis. Expert systems with applications 36(2), 3240-3247 (2009).
21. Holsbach, N., Fogliatto, F. S. & Anzanello, M. J. A data mining method for breast cancer identification based on a selection of variables. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 19(4), 1295-1304 (2014).
22. Sahan, S., Polat, K., Kodaz, H. & Güne?, S. A new hybrid method based on fuzzy-artificial immune system and k-nn algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. Comput BiolMed 37(3), 415-423 (2007).
23. Pérez, N. et al. Improving the performance of machine learning classifiers for Breast Cancer diagnosis based on feature selection. Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2014 Federated Conference on. IEEE.209-217 (2014).
24. Pérez, N., Guevara, M. A. & Silva, A. Improving breast cancer classification with mammography, supported on an appropriate variable selection analysis. SPIE medical imaging. 867022-867022 (2013).
25. Ibrahim, R. et al. Multi-level gene/MiRNA feature selection using deep belief nets and active learning. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE.3957-3960 (2014).
26. Güçlü, U. & Gerven, A. J. Deep neural networks reveal a gradient in the complexity of neural representations across the ventral stream. J Neurosci 35(27), 10005-10014 (2015).
27. Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T. & Frey, B. J. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA-and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat Biotechnol 33(8), 831-838 (2015).
28. Song, Y. Y. et al. Automatic vaginal bacteria segmentation and classification based on superpixel and deep learning. J Med Imag Health In 4(5), 781-786 (2014).
29. Shao, Y. Z. et al. Characterizing the clustered microcalcifications on mammograms to predict the pathological classification and grading: A mathematical modeling approach. Journal of digital imaging 24(5), 764-771 (2011).
30. Hinton, G. E. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504-507 (2006).
31. Shin, H. C. et al. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning. IEEE T on Medical Imaging 99, 11 (2016).
32. Suk, H. I. et al. Latent feature representation with stacked auto-encoder for AD/MCI diagnosis. Brain Structure and Function 220(2), 841-859 (2015).
33. Suk, H. I. et al. Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. NeuroImage 101, 569-582 (2014).
34. Arevalo, J., González, F. A. & Ramos-Pollán, R. Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 127, 248-257 (2016).
35. Petersen, K., Nielsen, M. & Diao, P. Breast tissue segmentation and mammographic risk scoring using deep learning. Breast Imaging. Springer International Publishing 2014, 88-94 (2014).
36. Collobert, R. & Weston, J. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning In Proc. 25th ICML 160-167 (2008).
37. Huval, B., Coates, A. & Ng, A. Deep learning for class-generic object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv 1312, 6885 (2013).
38. Shin, H. C., Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., Doran, S. J. & Leach, M. O. Stacked autoencoders for unsupervised feature learning and multiple organ detection in a pilot study using 4D patient data. IEEE T Pattern Anal 35(8), 1930-1943 (2013).
39. Gao, S. H., Zhang, Y., Jia, K., Lu, J. & Zhang, Y. Single sample face recognition via learning deep supervised auto-Encoders. IEEE T Inf Foren Sec 10(10), 2108-2118 (2015).
40. Moura, D. C. & López, M. A. G. An evaluation of image descriptors combined with clinical data for breast cancer diagnosis. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery 8(4), 561-574 (2013).
41. Pérez, N. P. et al. Improving the Mann-Whitney statistical test for feature selection: An approach in breast cancer diagnosis on mammography. Artificial intelligence in medicine 63(1), 19-31 (2015).
42. Brem, R. F. et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(2), 439-444 (2005).
43. Malich, A. et al. Tumor detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 12(10), 2454-2459 (2001).
44. Li, L. H., Wu, Z. B. & Salem, A. F. Computerized analysis of tissue density effect on missed cancer detection in digital mammography. Comput Med Imag Grap 30(5), 291-297 (2006).
45. Sankar, D. & Thomas, T. Fast fractal coding method for the detection of microcalcification in mammograms. Piscataway, NJ, IEEE 368-373 (2008).
46. Yu, S. & Guan, L. A. CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE T Med Imaging 19(2), 115-126 (2000).
47. Jiang, J., Yao, B. & Wason, A. M. A genetic algorithm design for microcalcification detection and classification in digital mammograms. Comput Medical Imag Grap 31(1), 49-61 (2007).
48. Stomper, P. C., Geradts, J. & Edge, S. B. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomasassociated with malignant microcalcification lesion without a mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181(6), 1679-1684 (2003).
49. Egan, R. L., McSweeney, M. B. & Sewell, C. W. Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases. Radiology 137(1), 1-7 (1980).
50. Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D. & Larochelle, H. Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 19, 153-160 (2007).
51. Palm, R. B. Prediction as a candidate for learning deep hierarchical models of data. Master thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2012).
52. He, H. & Garcia, E. A. Learning from imbalanced data. Knowledge and Data Engineering. IEEE Transactions on 21(9), 1263-1284 (2009).
53. Guan, S. et al. Deep learning with MCA-based instance selection and bootstrapping for imbalanced data classification. The First IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC). 288-295 (2015).
54. Berry, J. et al. Training deep nets with imbalanced and unlabeled data. Interspeech 1756-1759 (2012).
55. Masko, D. & Hensman, P. The impact of imbalanced training data for convolutional neural networks. Bachelor thesis, KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (2015).