Automatic detection of breast cancers in mammograms using structured support vector machines

Neurocomputing

Volumn 72, Issue 13-15, 2009, Pages 3296-3302

  Wang, Defeng ^a   Shi, Lin ^a   Heng, Pheng Ann ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Breast cancer detection; Computer assisted diagnosis; Structured support vector machine; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; MAMMOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; VECTORS;

AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER; BREAST CANCER DETECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL DATABASE FOR SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHIES; MULTI-RESOLUTION FEATURE; RECURSIVE FEATURE ELIMINATION; SECOND-ORDER CONE PROGRAMMING; STRUCTURED SUPPORTS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

EID: 79952757441     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2009.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. T. O'Doherty, Review of effective image processing techniques of mammo-grams, Technical Report, Department of Information Technology, National University of Ireland, 1999.
2. E.D. Andersen, A.D. Andersen, American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2005, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2005.
3. L. Burhenne, S. Wood, C. D'Orsi, et al., Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography, Radiology 25 (2) (2000) 554-562.
4. R. Highnam, M. Brady, Mammographic Image Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.
5. T.O. Gulsrud, K. Engan, T. Hanstveit, Watershed segmentation of detected masses in digital mammograms, in: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Shanghai, 2005.
6. R.M. Nishikawa, M.L. Giger, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny, R.A. Schimidt, Computer aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 33 (1995) 174-178.
7. S. Liu, C.F. Babbs, E.J. Delp, Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10 (6) (2001) 874-884.
8. V.N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, 1999.
9. I. El-Naqa, Y. Yang, M.N. Wernick, N.P. Galatsanos, R.M. Nishikawa, A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 (12) (2002) 1552-1563.
10. A.K. Jain, R. Dubes, Algorithms for Clustering Data, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1988.
11. S. Everitt, S. Landau, M. Leese, Cluster Analysis, Hodder Arnold, London, 2001.
12. J.H. Ward, Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (1963) 236-244.
13. A. El-Hamdouchi, P. Willett, Comparison of hierarchic agglomerative clustering methods of document retrieval, The Computer Journal 32 (3) (1989) 220-227.
14. S. Salvador, P. Chan, Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms, in: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with AI, 2004, pp. 576-584.
15. G.R.G. Lanckriet, L.E. Ghaoui, C. Bhattacharyya, M.I. Jordan, A robust minimax approach to classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2002) 555-582.
16. M. Lobo, L. Vandenberghe, S. Boyd, H. Lebret, Applications of second-order cone programming, Linear Algebra and its Applications 284 (1998) 193-228.
17. Y. Nesterov, A. Nemirovskii, Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming, in: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM'94), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1994.
18. J. Sturm, Using sedumi 1.02, a matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones, Optimization Methods and Software 11 (1999) 625-653.
19. C. Bhattacharyya, K.S. Pannagadatta, A. Smola, A second order cone programming formulation for classifying missing data, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 17, 2004.
20. S. Haykin, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 1999.
21. B. Schölkopf, S. Mika, C. Burges, P. Knirsch, K.-R. Muller, G. Raetsch, A. Smola, Input space vs. feature space in kernel-based methods, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10 (5) (1999) 1000-1017.
22. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, R. Kopans, D. Moore, J. Kegelmeyer, The digital database for screening mammography, in: 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2000, pp. 212-218.
23. Y. Sun, C.F. Babbs, E.J. Delp, A comparison of feature selection methods for the detection of breast cancers in mammograms: adaptive sequential floating search vs. genetic algorithm, in: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Shanghai, 2005.
24. K. McLoughlin, P. Bones, N. Karssemeijer, Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23 (2004) 313-320.
25. I. Guyon, J. Weston, S. Barnhill, V. Vapnik, Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines, Mach. Learn. 46 (2002) 389-422.
26. K.R. Muller, S. Mika, K. Ratsch, G. Tsuda, B. Scholkopf, An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 12 (2) (2001) 181-201.
27. B. Schölkopf, A. Smola, K.-R. Muller, Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem, Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 1299-1319.
28. A.W. Marshall, I. Olkin, Multivariate Chebyshev inequalities, Ann. Math. Statist. 31 (4) (1960) 1001-1014.