Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students' writing performance

Assessing Writing

Volumn 29, Issue , 2016, Pages 15-24

  Becker, Anthony ^a  

^a Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

ESL; Formative assessment; Scoring rubric; Second language (L2) writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84973334383     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ainsworth L., Christinson J. Student-generated rubrics: an assessment model to help all students succeed 1998, Dale Seymour Publications, Parsippany, NJ.
2. Andrade H., Du Y., Wang X. Putting rubrics to the test: the effect of a model, criteria generation: and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices 2008, 27:3-13.
3. Andrade H., Du Y., Mycek K. Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students' writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2010, 17:199-214.
4. Andrade H. The role of instructional rubrics and self-assessment in learning to write: a smorgasbord of findings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 1999.
5. Andrade H. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership 2000, 57:13-18.
6. Andrade H., Buff C., Terry J., Erano M., Paolino S. Assessment-driven improvements in middle schools students' writing. Middle School Journal 2009, 40:4-12.
7. Andrade H., Wang X.L., Du Y., Awaki R.L. Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research 2009, 102:287-301.
8. Brooks G. Assessment and academic writing: a look at the use of rubrics in the second language writing classroom. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review 2013, 17:227-240.
9. Chapelle C.A., Enright M.K., Jamieson J.M. Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language 2008, Routledge, New York, NY.
10. Cohen E.G., Lotan R.A., Abram P.L., Scarloss B.A., Schultz S.E. Can groups learn?. Teachers College Record 2002, 104:1045-1068.
11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
12. Du Q. Bridging the gap between ESL composition programs and disciplinary writing: the teaching and learning of summarization skill. WAC and second language writers: research towards linguistically and culturally inclusive programs and practices 2014, 113-128. Parlor Press, Anderson, SC. T.M. Zawacki, M. Cox (Eds.).
13. English A.K., English L.M. Northstar: reading and writing level 4 2009, Pearson Longman, New York, NY. 3rd ed.
14. Ferris D.R., Hedgcock J.S. Teaching L2 composition: purpose, process, and practice 2013, Routledge, New York, NY.
15. Gliner J.A., Morgan G.A., Leech N.L. Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis 2009, Routledge, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
16. Goodrich Andrade H. The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education 2001, 4(4). Retrieved from: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4/.
17. Grabe W., Kaplan R.B. Theory and practice of writing: an applied linguistic perspective 1996, Longman, New York, NY.
18. Hinkel E. Effective curriculum for teaching second language writing 2015, Routledge, New York, NY.
19. Howell R.J. Exploring the impact of grading rubrics on academic performance: findings from a quasi-experimental, pre-post evaluation. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 2011, 22:31-49.
20. Hyland K. Teaching and researching writing 2002, Longman, New York, NY.
21. Jonsson A., Svingby G. The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity, and educational consequences. Educational Research Review 2007, 2:130-144.
22. Lee I. Bringing innovation to EFL writing through a focus on assessment for learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 2011, 5:19-33.
23. Leedy P., Ormrod J. Practical research: planning and design 2001, Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 7th ed.
24. McHugh M.L. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb) 2012, 22:276-282.
25. Panadero E., Jonsson A. The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited. Educational Research Review 2013, 9:129-144.
26. Perkins D. Smart school: from training memories to educating minds 1992, The Free Press, New York, NY.
27. Reddy Y.M., Andrade H. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, 35:435-448.
28. Reynolds-Keefer L. Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: an opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 2010, 15(8). Retrieved from:. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15%26n=8.
29. Sadler D.R. Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning. Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education 2009, 1-15. Springer Publishing, New York, NY. G. Joughin (Ed.).
30. Skillings M.J., Ferrell R. Student-generated rubrics: bringing students into the assessment process. The Reading Teacher 2000, 53:452-455.
31. Stiggins R.J. Student-involved assessment for learning 2004, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
32. Sundeen T.H. Instructional rubrics: effects of presentation options on writing quality. Assessing Writing 2014, 21:74-88.
33. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics 2012, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. 6th ed.
34. Wilson M. Why I won't be using rubrics to respond to students' writing. The English Journal 2007, 96:62-66.
35. Wolf K., Stevens E. The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching 2007, 7:3-14.
36. Xiao Y. Applying metacognition in EFL writing instruction in China. Reflections on English Language Teaching 2007, 6:19-33.