Actual and perceived exposure to electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms: An epidemiological study based on self-reported data and electronic medical records

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Volumn 218, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 331-344

  Baliatsas, Christos ^a,b   Bolte, John ^b   Yzermans, Joris ^c   Kelfkens, Gert ^b   Hooiveld, Mariette ^c   Lebret, Erik ^a,b   van Kamp, Irene ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic fields; Epidemiological studies; IEI EMF; Non ionizing radiation; Non specific physical symptoms

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ANALYSIS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF REPORT; SLEEP; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTION; SELF REPORT; SLEEP; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84973227284     PISSN: 14384639     EISSN: 1618131X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions 1991, Newbury Park, Sage.
2. Augner C., Florian M., Pauser G., Oberfeld G., Hacker G.W. GSM base stations: short-term effects on well-being. Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 30:73-80.
3. Augner C., Gnambs T., Winker R., Barth A. Acute effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on subjective well-being and physiological reactions: a meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 424:11-15.
4. Baan R., Grosse Y., Lauby-Secretan B., El Ghissassi F., Bouvard V., Benbrahim-Tallaa L., et al. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12:624-626.
5. Baliatsas C., Van Kamp I., Kelfkens G., Schipper M., Bolte J., Yzermans J., et al. Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived proximity to mobile phone base stations and powerlines. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:421.
6. Baliatsas C., van Kamp I., Lebret E., Rubin G.J. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:643.
7. Baliatsas C., van Kamp I., Bolte J., Schipper M., Yzermans J., Lebret E. Non-specific physical symptoms and electromagnetic field exposure in the general population: can we get more specific? A systematic review. Environ. Int. 2012, 41:15-28.
8. Baliatsas C., Van Kamp I., Hooiveld M., Yzermans J., Lebret E. Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior. J. Psychosom. Res. 2014, 76:405-413.
9. Baliatsas C., Rubin G.J. Electromagnetic fields, symptoms and idiopathic environmental intolerance. Epidemiology of Electromagnetic Fields 2014, 261-274. CRC Press. M. Röösli (Ed.).
10. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51:1173-1182.
11. Beekhuizen J., Heuvelink G.B.M., Huss A., Bürgi A., Kromhout H., Vermeulen R. Impact of input data uncertainty on environmental exposure assessment models: a case study for electromagnetic field modelling from mobile phone base stations. Environ. Res. 2014, 135:148-155.
12. Beekhuizen J., Vermeulen R., van Eijsden M., van Strien R., Bürgi A., Loomans E., et al. Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies. Environ. Int. 2014, 67:22-26.
13. Berg-Beckhoff G., Blettner M., Kowall B., Breckenkamp J., Schlehofer B., Schmiedel S., et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Occup. Environ. Med. 2009, 66:124-130.
14. Bogers R.P., Bolte J.F.B., Houtveen J.H., Lebret E., van Strien R., Schipper M., et al. Design of an ecological momentary assessment study of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms. BMJ Open 2013, 3:e002933. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002933.
15. Bolte J., Pruppers M., Kamer J., van der Zande G., Schipper M., Fleurke S.R., et al. The Dutch Exposimeter study: developing an activity exposure matrix. Epidemiology 2008, 19:s78-s79.
16. Bolte J., Van der Zande G., Kamer J. Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2011, 32:652-663.
17. Bolte J.F.B., Eikelboom T. Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in the Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. Environ. Int. 2012, 48:133-142.
18. Bolte J., van Kamp I., Pruppers M., Kamer J., van der Zande G., Schipper M., et al. The Dutch personal EMF exposure study: measurements during everyday activities combined with GPS to build an Activity Exposure Matrix (EMF-AEM). Proceedings: BioEM2013 2013, The Bioelectromagnetics Society, Thessaloniki.
19. Bonnet-Belfais M., Lambrozo J., Aurengo A. Comment on 'Childhood leukemia close to high-voltage power lines - the Geocap study, 2002-2007' - is proximity an appropriate MF exposure surrogate?. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109:1382-1383.
20. Campbell J.M. Ambient stressors. Environ. Behav. 1984, 15:355-380.
21. Chen Q., Lang L., Wu W., Xu G., Zhang X., Li T., et al. A meta-analysis on the relationship 545 between exposure to ELF-EMFs and the risk of female breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e69272.
22. Engel C.C., Katon W.J. Population and need-based prevention of unexplained symptoms in the community. Institute of Medicine, Strategies to Protect the Health of Deployed U.S. Forces: Medical Surveillance, Record Keeping, and Risk Reduction 1999, 173-212. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
23. Florig H.K., Hoburg J.F. Power-frequency magnetic fields from electric blankets. Health Phys. 1990, 58:493-502.
24. Frei P., Mohler E., Bürgi A., Fröhlich J., Neubauer G., Braun-Fahrländer C., et al. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408:102-108.
25. Frei P., Mohler E., Bürgi A., Fröhlich J., Neubauer G., Braun-Fahrländer C., et al. Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: evaluation of different exposure assessment methods. Environ. Int. 2010, 36:714-720.
26. Frei P., Mohler E., Braun-Fahrländer C., Fröhlich J., Neubauer G., Röösli M. Cohort study on the effects of everyday life radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure on non-specific symptoms and tinnitus. Environ. Int. 2012, 38:29-36.
27. Frick U., Rehm J., Eichhammer P. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields-a randomized survey study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2002, 205:353.
28. Genuis S.J., Lipp C.T. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction?. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 414:103-112.
29. Grobbee D.E., Hoes A.W. Clinical Epidemiology - Principles, Methods and Applications for Clinical Research 2009, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, London.
30. Hagström M., Auranen J., Ekmanm R. Electromagnetic hypersensitive Finns: symptoms, perceived sources and treatments, a questionnaire study. Pathophysiology 2013, 20:117-122.
31. Hayes A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression based Approach 2013, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
32. Heinrich S., Thomas S., Praml G., von Kries R., Radon K. The impact of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields on chronic wellbeing in young people - a cross sectional study based on personal dosimetry. Environ. Int. 2011, 37:26-30.
33. Hillert L., Leitgeb N., Meara J. Working group report. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings: International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity 2006, 15-26. WHO, Prague. K.H. Mild, M. Repacholi, E. Van Deventer, P. Ravazzani (Eds.).
34. Hutter H.P., Ehrenhöfer L., Freuis E., Hartl P., Kundi M. Poor-to-moderate agreement between self and proxy interviews of mobile phone use. Bioelectromagnetics 2012, 33:561-567.
35. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300GHz). Health Phys. 1998, 74:494-522.
36. Inyang I., Benke G., McKenzie R., Abramson M. Comparison of measuring instruments for radiofrequency radiation from mobile telephones in epidemiological studies: implications for exposure assessment. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2008, 18:134-141.
37. Johansson A., Nordin S., Heiden M., Sandström M. Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. J. Psychosom. Res. 2010, 68:37-45.
38. Kaptein A.A., Helder D.I., Kleijn W.C., Rief W., Moss-Morris R., Petrie K.J. Modern health worries in medical students. J. Psychosom. Res. 2005, 58:453-457.
39. Kelfkens G., Baliatsas C., Bolte J., Van Kamp I. ECOLOG based estimation of exposure to mobile phone base stations in the Netherlands. Proceedings: 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF 2012, Electromagnetic Research Group (EMRG), Valletta.
40. Kleinerman R.A., Linet M.S., Hatch E.E., Tarone R.E., Black P.M., Selker R.G., et al. Self-reported electrical appliance use and risk of adult brain tumors. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 161:136-146.
41. Koteles F., Szemerszky R., Freyler A., Bardos G. Somatosensory amplification as a possible source of subjective symptoms behind modern health worries. Scand. J. Psychol. 2011, 52:174-178.
42. Kowall B., Breckenkamp J., Blettner M., Schlehofer B., Schuz J., Berg-Beckhoff G. Determinants and stability over time of perception of health risks related to mobile phone base stations. Int. J. Public Health 2012, 57:735-743.
43. Kroenke K., Swindle R. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for somatization and symptom syndromes: a critical review of controlled clinical trials. Psychother. Psychosom. 2000, 69:205-215.
44. Lamberts H., Wood M. International Classification of Primary Care 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
45. Lamberts H., Oskam S.K., Okkes I.M. The clinical relationship between symptoms and the final diagnosis in general practice, determined by means of posterior probabilities calculated on the basis of the Transition Project. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 2005, 149:2566-2572. (in Dutch).
46. Landgrebe M., Frick U., Hauser S., Langguth B., Rosner R., Hajak G., Eichhammer P. Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: results of a case-control study. Psychol. Med. 2008, 38:1781-1791.
47. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping 1984, Springer-Verlag, New York.
48. Leitgeb N., Cech R., Schröttner J., Lehofer P., Schmidpeter U., Rampetsreiter M. Magnetic emissions of electric appliances. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2007, 211:69-73.
49. Leitgeb N. Macht Mobilfunk Kinder krank. Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd. 2012, 160:461-467. (in German).
50. MacKinnon D.P., Fairchild A.J., Fritz M.S. Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:593-614.
51. Mann S. Assessing personal exposures to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. C.R. Phys. 2010, 11:541-555.
52. Mezei G., Kheifets L.I., Nelson L.M., Mills K.M., Iriye R., Kelsey J.L. Household appliance use and residential exposure to 60-Hz magnetic fields. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11:41-49.
53. Mohler E., Frei P., Fahrländer C.B., Fröhlich J., Neubauer G., Röösli M. Effects of everyday radiofrequency electromagnetic-field exposure on sleep quality: a cross-sectional study. Radiat. Res. 2010, 174:347-356.
54. Mohler E., Frei P., Fröhlich J., Braun-Fahrländer C., Röösli M. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and sleep quality: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2012, 7. e37455.
55. Neitzke H.P., Osterhoff J., Peklo K., Voigt H., Wohlatz T. Bestimmung der Exposition von Personengruppen, die im Rahmen des Projektes "Querschnittstudie zur Erfassung und Bewertung möglicher gesundheitlicher Beeinträchtigungen durch die Felder von Mobilfunkbasisstationen" untersucht werden 2005, Schlussbericht, Ecolog- Institut, Hannover, (in German).
56. Neitzke H.P., Osterhoff J., Peklo K., Voigt H. Determination of exposure due to mobile phone base stations in an epidemiological study. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2007, 124:35-39.
57. Nieto-Hernandez R., Williams J., Cleare A.J., Landau S., Wessely S., Rubin G.J. Can exposure to a terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA)-like signal cause symptoms? A randomized double-blind provocation study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 68:339-344.
58. Nordin M., Andersson L., Nordin S. Coping strategies, social support and responsibility in chemical Intolerance. J. Clin. Nurs. 2010, 19:2162-2173.
59. Rief W., Broadbent E. Explaining medically unexplained symptoms-models and mechanisms. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 27:821-841.
60. Röösli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 2008, 107:277-287.
61. Röösli M., Frei P., Mohler E., Hug K. Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. Bull. World Health Organ. 2010, 88:887-896.
62. Röösli M., Mohler E., Frei P. Sense and sensibility in the context of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. C.R. Phys. 2010, 11:576-584.
63. Rubin G.J., Cleare A.J., Wessely S. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J. Psychosom. Res. 2008, 64:1-9.
64. Rubin G.J., Nieto-Hernandez R., Wessely S. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2010, 31:1-11.
65. Rubin G.J., Hillert L., Nieto-Hernandez R., Van Rongen E., Oftedal G. Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2011, 32:593-609.
66. Schreurs P.J.G., Van de Willige G., Brosschot J.F., Tellegen B., Graus G.M.H. De Utrechtse Coping Lijst: UCL. Omgaan met problemen en gebeurtenissen 1993, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
67. Shum M., Kelsh M.A., Sheppard A.R., Zhao K. An evaluation of self-reported mobile phone use compared to billing records among a group of engineers and scientists. Bioelectromagnetics 2011, 32:37-48.
68. Szemerszky R., Koteles F., Lihi R., Bardos G. Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in 'idiophatic environmental intolerance' attributed to electromagnetic fields. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2010, 213:387-394.
69. Thomas S., Kühnlein A., Heinrich S., Praml G., Nowak D., von Kries R. Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults - a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry. Bioelectromagnetics 2008, 29:463-470.
70. Tuengler A., von Klitzing L. Hypothesis on how to measure electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Electromag. Biol. Med. 2013, 32:281-290.
71. van den Berg B., Grievink L., Stellato R.K., Yzermans C.J., Lebret E. Symptoms and related functioning in a traumatized community. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165:2402-2407.
72. van den Berg B. Physical symptoms that are frequently unexplained among survivors of the Enschede fireworks disaster 2007, (Doctoral dissertation), Utrecht University.
73. van Kamp I. Coping with noise and its health consequences 1990, (Doctoral dissertation), University of Groningen.
74. Viel J.F., Cardis E., Moissonnier M., de Seze R., Hours M. Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. Environ. Int. 2009, 35:1150-1154.
75. Viel J.F., Tiv M., Moissonnier M., Cardis E., Hours M. Variability of radiofrequency exposure across days of the week: a population-based study. Environ. Res. 2011, 111:510-513.
76. Visser P., Hofman W.F., Kumar A., Cluydts R., de Diana I.P.F., Marchant P., et al. Sleep and Mood: measuring the sleep quality. Sleep Research, Proc. of the North Eur. Symp. on Sleep Research 1978, 135-145. MTP Press Limited, Basel, Lancaster. R.G. Priest, A. Pletscher, J. Ward (Eds.).
77. Vrijheid M., Armstrong B.K., Bédard D., Brown J., Deltour I., Iavarone I., et al. Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2009, 19:369-381.
78. Walker E.A., Unutzer J., Katon W.J. Understanding and caring for the distressed patient with multiple medically unexplained symptoms. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract. 1998, 11:347-356.
79. Winters W., Devriese S., Diest I.V., Nemery B., Veulemans H., Eelen P., et al. Media warnings about environmental pollution facilitate the acquisition of symptoms in response to chemical substances. Psychosom. Med. 2003, 65:332-338.
80. Witthöft M., Rubin G.J. Are media warnings about the adverse health effects of modern life self-fulfilling? An experimental study on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF). J. Psychosom. Res. 2013, 74:206-212.
81. WONCA Classification Committee An international glossary for general/family practice. Fam. Pract. 1995, 12:341-369.
82. Yzermans J., Baliatsas C., Van Kamp I. Symptoms and perceptions scale (SaP): an exploratory psychometric analysis. Psychol. Health 2012, 27:s1-s354.
83. Zhao L., Liu X., Wang C., Yan K., Lin X., Li S., et al. Magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia risk: a meta-analysis based on 11,699 cases and 13,194 controls. Leuk. Res. 2014, 38:269-274.
84. Zheng T., Holford T.R., Mayne S.T., Hansen Owens P., Zhang B., Boyle P., et al. Exposure to electromagnetic fields from use of electric blankets and other in-home electrical appliances and breast cancer risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 151:1103-1111.