Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in 'Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields'

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Volumn 213, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 387-394

  Szemerszky, Renáta ^a   Köteles, Ferenc ^a   Lihi, Réka ^a   Bárdos, György ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

EHS; Electrosensitivity; Nocebo effect; Somatisation; Somatosensory amplification

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955307102     PISSN: 14384639     EISSN: 1618131X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bailer J., Witthoft M., Bayerl C., Rist F. Syndrome stability and psychological predictors of symptom severity in idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. Psychol. Med. 2007, 37:271-281.
2. Barsky A.J., Cleary P.D., Sarnie M.K., Ruskin J.N. Panic disorder, palpitations, and the awareness of cardiac activity. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 1994, 182:63-71.
3. Barsky A.J., Goodson J.D., Lane R.S., Cleary P.D. The amplification of somatic symptoms. Psychosom. Med. 1988, 50:510-519.
4. Barsky A.J., Saintfort R., Rogers M.P., Borus J.F. Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. JAMA 2002, 287:622-627.
5. Barsky A.J., Wyshak G., Klerman G.L. The somatosensory amplification scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1990, 24:323-334.
6. Bérdi M., Köteles F. The measurement of optimism: the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 2009, 65(2):305-326.
7. Bergdahl J. Psychologic aspects of patients with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display units. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1995, 53:304-310.
8. Bergqvist, U., Vogel, E., 1997. Possible health implication of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. European Group of Experts for the European Commission, DG V. National Institute for Working Life, Solna, Sweden.
9. Brand S., Heller P., Bircher A.J., Braun-Fahrleander C., Huss A., Niederer M., Schwarzenbach S., Waeber R., Wegmann L., Kuechenhoff J. Patients with environment-related disorders: comprehensive results of interdisciplinary diagnostics. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2009, 212:157-171.
10. Brown R.J. Medically unexplained symptoms: a new model. Psychiatry 2006, 5:43-47.
11. Brown R.J., Poliakoff E., Kirkman M.A. Somatoform dissociation and somatosensory amplification are differentially associated with attention to the tactile modality following exposure to body-related stimuli. J. Psychosom. Res. 2007, 62:159-165.
12. Carlsson F., Karlson B., Orbaek P., Osterberg K., Ostergren P.O. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health 2005, 119:568-577.
13. David E., Reissenweber J., Wojtysiak A. Provocation studies in electromagnetically hypersensitive persons. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings: International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity 2006, 123-133. WHO, Prague. K. Hansson Mild, M. Repacholi, E. van Deventer, P. Ravazzani (Eds.).
14. Eltiti S., Wallace D., Zougkou K., Russo R., Joseph S., Rasor P., Fox E. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:137-151.
15. Frick U., Rehm J., Eichhammer P. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields-a randomized survey study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2002, 205:353-360.
16. Geers A.L., Helfer S.G., Kosbab K., Weiland P.E., Landry S.J. Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response. J. Psychosom. Res. 2005, 58:121-127.
17. Hillert L., Kolmodin-Hedman B. Hypersensitivity to electricity: sense or sensibility?. J. Psychosom. Res. 1997, 42:427-432.
18. Hillert, L., Leitgeb, N., Meara, J., Working Group Report. In: Hansson Mild, K., Repacholi, M., van Deventer, E., Ravazzani, P. (Eds.), Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings: International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity. WHO, Prague, pp. 15-26.
19. Keeley R. When are medication side effects due to the nocebo phenomenon?. JAMA 2002, 287:2503. (author reply 2503-2504).
20. Köteles F., Bárdos G. What makes us sicker? An experimental study on non-specific adverse drug effects. Psychology & Health 2009, 24(Suppl. 1):239.
21. Köteles F., Gémes H., Papp G., Túróczi P., Pásztor A., Freyler A., Szemerszky R., Bárdos G. Validation of the Hungarian version of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS). Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika 2009, 10:321-335.
22. Kroenke K. Physical symptom disorder: a simpler diagnostic category for somatization-spectrum conditions. J. Psychosom. Res. 2006, 60:335-339.
23. Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom. Med. 2002, 64:258-266.
24. Landgrebe M., Barta W., Rosengarth K., Frick U., Hauser S., Langguth B., Rutschmann R., Greenlee M.W., Hajak G., Eichhammer P. Neuronal correlates of symptom formation in functional somatic syndromes: a fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 41:1336-1344.
25. Lonne-Rahm S., Andersson B., Melin L., Schultzberg M., Arnetz B., Berg M. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with " sensitivity to electricity" J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2000, 42:512-516.
26. Lyskov E., Sandstrom M., Mild K.H. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics. Bioelectromagnetics 2001, 22:457-462.
27. Mailloux J., Brener J. Somatosensory amplification and its relationship to heartbeat detection ability. Psychosom. Med. 2002, 64:353-357.
28. Mechanic D. Social psychologic factors affecting the presentation of bodily complaints. N. Engl. J. Med. 1972, 286:1132-1139.
29. Mueller, C.H., Krueger, H., Schierz, C., 2000. Project NEMESIS: double-blind study on effects of 50Hz EMF on sleep quality and physiological parameters in people suffering from electrical hypersensitivity. The Bioelectromagnetics Society 22nd Annual Meeting, pp. 89-90.
30. Mueller C.H., Krueger H., Schierz C. Project NEMESIS: perception of a 50Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment). Bioelectromagnetics 2002, 23:26-36.
31. Nakao M., Barsky A.J. Clinical application of somatosensory amplification in psychosomatic medicine. Biopsychosoc. Med. 2007, 1:17.
32. Nevelsteen S., Legros J.J., Crasson M. Effects of information and 50Hz magnetic fields on cognitive performance and reported symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 2007, 28:53-63.
33. NRPB, 2004. Mobile phones and health 2004: report by the board of the National Radiological Protection Board. Documents of the NRPB, vol. 15.
34. Petrie K.J., Moss-Morris R., Grey C., Shaw M. The relationship of negative affect and perceived sensitivity to symptom reporting following vaccination. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2004, 9:101-111.
35. Petrie K.J., Sivertsen B., Hysing M., Broadbent E., Moss-Morris R., Eriksen H.R., Ursin H. Thoroughly modern worries: the relationship of worries about modernity to reported symptoms, health and medical care utilization. J. Psychosom. Res. 2001, 51:395-401.
36. Regel S.J., Negovetic S., Roosli M., Berdinas V., Schuderer J., Huss A., Lott U., Kuster N., Achermann P. UMTS base station-like exposure, well-being, and cognitive performance. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114:1270-1275.
37. Reissenweber, J., David, E., Kentner, S., 2000. Different aspects of electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The Bioelectromagneties Society 22nd Annual Meeting, pp. 270-271.
38. Roosli M. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Environ. Res. 2008, 107:277-287.
39. Roosli M., Moser M., Baldinini Y., Meier M., Braun-Fahrlander C. Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure-a questionnaire survey. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2004, 207:141-150.
40. Rubin G.J., Cleare A.J., Wessely S. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J. Psychosom. Res. 2008, 64:1-9. (discussion 11-12).
41. Rubin G.J., Hahn G., Everitt B.S., Cleare A.J., Wessely S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ 2006, 332:886-891.
42. Rubin G.J., Nieto-Hernandez R., Wessely S. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2009, 34:1-11.
43. Salavecz G., Neculai K., Rózsa S., Kopp M. Reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika 2006, 7:231-246.
44. Scheier M.F., Carver C.S., Bridges M.W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 67:1063-1078.
45. Schrottner J., Leitgeb N. Sensitivity to electricity-temporal changes in Austria. BMC Public Health 2008, 8:310.
46. Seitz H., Stinner D., Eikmann T., Herr C., Roosli M. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication-a literature review published between 2000 and 2004. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 349:45-55.
47. Sipos, K., Sipos, M., Spielberger, C.D., 1994. A State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) magyar változata. In: Mérei, F., Szakács, F. (Eds.), Pszichodiagnosztikai vademecum I/2. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest, pp. 123-148.
48. Sivertsen B., Hysing M. Commentary. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J. Psychosom. Res. 2008, 64:11-12.
49. Spielberger C.D., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene R.E. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1970, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
50. Spinhoven P., van der Does A.J. Somatization and somatosensory amplification in psychiatric outpatients: an explorative study. Compr. Psychiatry 1997, 38:93-97.
51. Staudenmayer, H., 2006. Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance (IEI): a causation analysis. In: Hansson Mild, K., Repacholi, M., van Deventer, E., Ravazzani, P. (Eds.), Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings: International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity. WHO, Prague, pp. 39-53.
52. Stauder A., Konkoly Thege B. Characteristics of the Hungarian version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika 2006, 7:203-216.
53. Stenberg B., Bergdahl J., Edvardsson B., Eriksson N., Linden G., Widman L. Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2002, 28:349-357.
54. Szemerszky R., Köteles F., Bárdos G. Non-specific symptoms attributed to environmental electromagnetic load and the psychological background of symptom production. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 2009, 64:553-571.
55. Toomingas A. Provocation of the electromagnetic distress syndrome. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1997, 22:457-458.
56. Trimmel M., Schweiger E. Effects of an ELF (50Hz, 1 mT) electromagnetic field (EMF) on concentration in visual attention, perception and memory including effects of EMF sensitivity. Toxicol. Lett. 1998, 96-97:377-382.
57. Wennberg, A., Franzen, Paulsson, L.-E., 1994. Electromagnetic field provocations of subjects with 'electric hypersensitivity'. In: Simunic, D. (Ed.), COST 244 meeting on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. COST 244, Graz, pp. 133-139.
58. Wenzel F., Reissenweber J., David E. Cutaneous microcirculation is not altered by a weak 50Hz magnetic field. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.) 2005, 50:14-18.
59. Witthoft M., Rist F., Bailer J. Evidence for a specific link between the personality trait of absorption and idiopathic environmental intolerance. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2008, 71:795-802.