Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies

Bioelectromagnetics

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 593-609

  Rubin, G James ^a   Hillert, Lena ^b   Nieto Hernandez, Rosa ^a   van Rongen, Eric ^c   Oftedal, Gunnhild ^d  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c Health Council of the Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Autonomic nervous system; Cellular phone; Electroencephalography; Electromagnetic fields; Psychophysiology

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SLEEP RESEARCH;

AUTONOMIC NERVOUS; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; CELLULAR PHONE; DOUBLE-BLIND EXPERIMENTS; EMF EXPOSURE; EXPOSED TO; HEART RATE AND BLOOD PRESSURE; LITERATURE SEARCH; PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS;

ATTENTION; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; BLOOD PRESSURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MEMORY; MOBILE PHONE; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

ATTENTION; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; BLOOD PRESSURE; CELLULAR PHONE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MEMORY; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 80255124803     PISSN: 01978462     EISSN: 1521186X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20690     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Andersson B, Berg M, Arnetz BB, Melin L, Langlet I, Liden S. 1996. A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electrical hypersensitivity": Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study. J Occup Environ Med 38: 752-758.
2. Arnetz BB, Akerstedt T, Hillert L, Lowden A, Kuster N, Wiholm C. 2007. The effects of 884MHz GSM wireless communication signals on self-reported symptom and sleep (EEG). An experimental provocation study. PIERS Online 3: 1148-1150.
3. Bamiou DE, Ceranic B, Cox R, Watt H, Chadwick P, Luxon LM. 2008. Mobile telephone use effects on peripheral audiovestibular function: A case-control study. Bioelectromagnetics 29: 108-117.
4. Bergqvist UO, Vogel E, Aringerl L, Cunningham J, Gobba F, Leitgeb N, Miro L, Neubauer G, Ruppe I, Vecchia P, Wadman C. 1997. Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V. Arbete och Halsa 19: 1-45.
5. Carlsson F, Karlson B, Orbaek P, Osterberg K, Ostergren P-O. 2005. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health 119: 568-577.
6. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Zougkou K, Russo R, Joseph S, Rasor P, Fox E. 2007. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 28: 137-151.
7. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, Zougkou K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, Fox E. 2009. Short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals does not affect cognitive functioning or physiological measures in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields and controls. Bioelectromagnetics 30: 556-563.
8. Furubayashi T, Ushiyama A, Terao Y, Mizuno Y, Shirasawa K, Pongpaibool P, Simba AY, Wake K, Nishikawa M, Miyawaki K, Yasuda A, Uchiyama M, Yamashita HK, Masuda H, Hirota S, Takahashi M, Okano T, Inomata-Terada S, Sokejima S, Maruyama E, Watanabe S, Taki M, Ohkubo C, Ugawa Y. 2009. Effects of short-term W-CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 30: 100-113.
9. Hamnerius Y, Agrup G, Galt S, Nilsson R, Sandblom J, Lindgren R. 1993. Double-blind provocation study of hypersensitivity reactions associated with exposure from VDUs. Preliminary short version. R Swed Acad Sci Rep 2: 67-72.
10. Havas M, Marrongelle J, Pollner B, Kelley E, Rees CRG, Tully L. 2010. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. Eur J Oncol Libr 5: 273-300.
11. HCN. 2004. The TNO study on effects of GSM and UMTS signals on well-being and cognition. Review and recommendations for further research. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
12. Heart Rhythm Instruments. 2002. System Guide and User's Manual. Heart Rhythm Instruments, Metuchen, NJ. (Last accessed 13 June 2011).
13. Hietanen M, Hamalainen A-M, Husman T. 2002. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: No causal link. Bioelectromagnetics 23: 264-270.
14. Hillert L, Hedman BK, Soderman E, Arnetz BB. 1999. Hypersensitivity to electricity: Working definition and additional characterization of the syndrome. J Psychosom Res 47: 429-438.
15. Hillert L, Akerstedt T, Lowden A, Wiholm C, Kuster N, Ebert S, Boutry C, Arnetz BB. 2007. Effects of a 900MHz GSM exposure on self-reported symptoms and blood chemistry, an experimental provocation study. The Bioelectromagnetics Society, 29th Annual Meeting. Abstract Collection, pp. 98-99.
16. Hillert L, Akerstedt T, Lowden A, Wiholm C, Kuster N, Ebert S, Boutry C, Moffat SD, Berg M, Arnetz BB. 2008. The effects of 884MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: An experimental provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics 29: 185-196.
17. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke MJ, Egger M. 2007. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: MR000010.
18. Huss A, Egger M, Hug K, Huwiler-Muntener K, Röösli M. 2007. Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: Systematic review of experimental studies. Environ Health Perspect 115: 105-1012.
19. Johansson A, Nordin S, Heiden M, Sandstrom M. 2010. Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. J Psychosom Res 68: 37-45.
20. Kaul G. 2009. Was verursacht "elektromagnetische hypersensibilität?" Individuelle wahrnehmung oder reaktiv ausgelöste empfindlichkeit auf elektromagnetische felder (What causes "electromagnetic hypersensitivity?" Individual perception of induced sensitivity to electromagnetic fields). Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (Federal Institute for. Occupational Safety and Health): Dortmund, Germany.
21. Leitgeb N, Schroettner J, Cech R, Kerbl R. 2008. EMF-protection sleep study near mobile phone base stations. Somnologie 12: 234-243.
22. Lonne-Rahm S, Andersson B, Melin L, Schultzberg M, Arnetz BB, Berg M. 2000. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with "sensitivity to electricity". J Occup Environ Med 42: 512-516.
23. Lowden A, Akerstedt T, Ingre M, Wiholm C, Hillert L, Kuster N, Nilsson JP, Arnetz B. 2010. Sleep after mobile phone exposure in subjects with mobile phone-related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 32: 4-14.
24. Lyskov E, Sandström M, Mild KH. 2001. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics. Bioelectromagnetics 22: 457-462.
25. Marc-Vergnes J-P. 2011. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: The opinion of an observer neurologist. Comptes Rendus Physique 11: 564-575.
26. Mueller CH, Schierz C. 2004. Project NEMESIS: Double-blind study on effects of 50Hz EMF on sleep quality, physiological parameters and field perception in people suffering from electrical hypersensitivity. In: Mild KH, Repacholi M, van Deventer E, Ravazzani P, editors. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Prague: Proceedings of the International Workshop on EMF Hypersensitivity. pp 107-121.
27. Nam KC, Lee JH, Noh HW, Cha EJ, Kim NH, Kim DW. 2009. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: A provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics 30: 641-650.
28. Nieto-Hernandez R, Williams J, Cleare AJ, Landau S, Wessely S, Rubin GJ. 2011. Can exposure to a terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA)-like signal cause symptoms? A randomised double-blind provocation study. Occup Environ Med 68: 339-344.
29. Nilsen A. 1982. Facial rash in visual display unit operators. Contact Dermatitis 8: 25-28.
30. Oftedal G, Vistnes AI, Rygge K. 1995. Skin symptoms after the reduction of electric-fields from visual display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 21: 335-344.
31. Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A, Stovner LJ. 2007. Mobile phone headache: A double blind, sham-controlled provocation study. Cephalalgia 27: 447-455.
32. Osterberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Carlsson F, Orbaek P. 2007. Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 231-241.
33. Rea WJ, Pan Y, Fenyves EJ, Sujisawa I, Samadi N, Ross GH. 1991. Electromagnetic field sensitivity. J Bioelectricity 10: 241-256.
34. Regel SJ, Negovetic S, Röösli M, Berdinas V, Schuderer J, Huss A, Lott U, Kuster N, Achermann P. 2006. UMTS base station-like exposure, well being and cognitive performance. Environ Health Perspect 114: 1270-1275.
35. Röösli M. 2008. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environ Res 107: 277-287.
36. Röösli M, Moser M, Baldinini Y, Meier M, Braun-Fahrlander C. 2004. Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure-A questionnaire survey. Int J Hygiene Environ Health 207: 141-150.
37. Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. 2005. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: A systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med 67: 224-232.
38. Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. 2006. A systematic review of treatments for electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Psychother Psychosom 75: 12-18.
39. Rubin GJ, Cleare AJ, Wessely S. 2008. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. J Psychosom Res 64: 1-9.
40. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S. 2010. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): An updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 31: 1-11.
41. Sjöberg P, Hamnerius Y. 1995. Study of provoked hypersensitivity reactions from a VDU. In: Katjalainen J, Knave B, editors. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. Proceedings of the 2nd Copenhagen Conference. pp 101-110.
42. Stovner LJ, Oftedal G, Straume A, Johnsson A. 2008. Nocebo as headache trigger: Evidence from a sham-controlled provocation study with RF fields. Acta Neurol Scand 117 (Suppl 188): 67-71.
43. Swanbeck G, Bleeker T. 1989. Skin problems from visual display units: Provocation of skin symptoms under experimental conditions. Acta Derm-Venereol 69: 46-51.
44. Trimmel M, Schweiger E. 1998. Effects of an ELF (50Hz, 1mT) electromagnetic field (EMF) on concentration in visual attention, perception and memory including effects of EMF sensitivity. Toxicol Lett 96-97: 377-382.
45. Trottier L, Kofsky H. 2010. Likely fatal flaw in new Havas heart rate study. (Last accessed 8 March 2011).
46. Valentini E, Curcio G, Moroni F, Ferrara M, De Gennaro L, Bertini M. 2007. Neurophysiological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on humans: A comprehensive review. Bioelectromagnetics 28: 415-432.
47. van Rongen E, Croft R, Juutilainen J, Lagroye I, Miyakoshi J, Saunders R, de Seze R, Tenforde T, Verschaeve L, Veyret B, Xu Z. 2009. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on the human nervous system. J Toxicol Environ Health 12(Part B): 572-597.
48. Wallace D, Eltiti S, Ridgewell A, Garner K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, Walker S, Quinlan T, Dudley S, Maung S, Deeble R, Fox E. 2010. Do TETRA (Airwave) base station signals have a short-term impact on health and well-being? A randomized double-blind provocation study. Environ Health Perspect 118: 735-741.
49. Wang T. 1995. Sick building syndrome: A study of some contributing factors, PhD Dissertation. University of Surrey. Guildford, UK.
50. Wennberg A, Franzén O, Paulsson L-E. 1994. Reaktioner vid exponering for elektriska och magnetiska fält-provokationer av personer med och utan "elöverkänslighet" (Reactions to exposure to electric and magnetic fields-provocations of subjects with "electrical sensitivity"). Stockholm: Arbetsmiljöinstitutet. Arbete och Hälsa. 1994:9 (report in Swedish).
51. Wenzel F, Reissenweber J, David E. 2005. Cutaneous microcirculation is not altered by a weak 50Hz magnetic field. Biomed Tech (Berl) 50: 14-18.
52. World Health Organization. 2005. Electromagnetic fields and public health: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Factsheet 296. (Last accessed 7 March 2011).
53. Wiholm C, Lowden A, Kuster N, Hillert L, Arnetz BB, Akerstedt T, Moffat SD. 2009. Mobile phone exposure and spatial memory. Bioelectromagnetics 30: 59-65.
54. Wilén J, Johansson A, Kalezic N, Lyskov E, Sandström M. 2006. Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 23: 204-214.
55. Zwamborn APM, Vossen SHJA, van Leersum BJAM, Ouwens MA, Mäkel WN. 2003. Effects of Global Communication System radio-frequency fields on well being and cognitive functions of human subjects with and without subjective symptoms. The Hague: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO).