Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): A systematic review of identifying criteria

BMC Public Health

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Baliatsas, Christos ^a,b   Van Kamp, Irene ^b   Lebret, Erik ^a,b   Rubin, G James ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY; REVIEW;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY;

EID: 84864815541     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-643     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Randolph TG, Human ecology and susceptibility to the chemical environment Springfield (IL): Charles Thomas 1962
2. Multiple chemical sensitivities: A systematic review of provocation studies. Das-Munshi J, Rubin GJ, Wessely S, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006 118 1257 1264 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.046 17137865
3. Perceived Treatment Efficacy for Conventional and Alternative Therapies Reported by Persons with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. Reed-Gibson P, Elms ANM, Ruding LA, Environ Health Perspect 2003 111 1498 1504 10.1289/ehp.5936 12948890
4. Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposureA questionnaire survey. Röösli M, Moser M, Baldinini Y, Meier M, Braun-Fahrländer C, Int J Hygiene Environ Health 2004 207 141 150 10.1078/1438-4639-00269
5. WHO, Fact Sheet No. 296: Electromagnetic fields and public health World Health Organization 2005 http://www.emfandhealth.com/WHO-EMSensitivity.pdf
6. Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey. Hillert L, Berglind N, Arnetz BB, Bellander T, Scand J Work Environ Health 2002 28 33 41 10.5271/sjweh.644 11871850
7. Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Carlsson F, Karlson B, Orbaek P, sterberg K, stergren PO, Public Health 2005 119 568 577 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.07.011 15925670
8. Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California. Levallois P, Neutra R, Lee G, Hristova L, Environ Health Perspect 2002 110 619 623 10.1289/ehp.02110s4619 12194896
9. Sensitivity to electricity-temporal changes in Austria. Schröttner J, Leitgeb N, BMC Publ Health 2008 8 310 10.1186/1471-2458-8-310
10. The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland. Schreier N, Huss A, Röösli M, Soz Praventivmed 2006 51 202 209 10.1007/s00038-006-5061-2 17193782
11. Prevalence and Psychiatric Co-Morbidity of Self-Reported Electromagnetic Field Sensitivity in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study. Tseng MM, Lin YP, Cheng TJ, Epidemiology 2008 19 108 s109
12. Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: A review of the literature. Levallois P, Environ Health Perspect 2002 110 613 618 12194895
13. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: A systematic review of provocation studies. Rubin GJ, Das-Munshi J, Wessely S, Psychosom Med 2005 67 224 232 10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64 15784787
14. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. Röösli M, Environ Res 2008 107 277 287 10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003 18359015
15. Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'electromagnetic hypersensitivity'): An updated systematic review of provocation studies. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S, Bioelectromagnetics 2009 31 1 11
16. Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. Röösli M, Frei P, Mohler E, Hug K, Bull World Health Organ 2010 88 887 896 10.2471/BLT.09.071852 21124713
17. Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies. Rubin GJ, Hillert L, Nieto-Hernandez R, Van Rongen E, Oftedal G, Bioelectromagnetics 2011 32 593 609 10.1002/bem.20690 21769898
18. Das Munshi J, Wessely S: A systematic review of treatments for electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Rubin GJ, Psychother Psychosom 2006 75 12 18 10.1159/000089222 16361870
19. Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance. sterberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Carlsson EF, Orbaek P, Hum Exp Toxicol 2007 26 231 241 10.1177/0960327107070575 17439926
20. Cognitive and neurobiological alterations in electromagnetic hypersensitive patients: Results of a case-control study. Landgrebe M, Frick U, Hauser S, Langguth B, Rosner R, Hajak G, Eichhammer P, Psychol Med 2008 38 1781 1791 10.1017/S0033291708003097 18366821
21. A two-week monitoring of self-reported arousal, worry and attribution among persons with annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells. Persson R, Carlsson EF, sterberg K, Orbaek P, Karlson B, Scand J Psychol 2008 49 345 356 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00660.x 18466187
22. Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones. Rubin GJ, Cleare AJ, Wessely S, J Psychosom Res 2008 64 1 9 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.05.006 18157992
23. Symptoms, personality traits, and stress in people with mobile phone-related symptoms and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Johansson A, Nordin S, Heiden M, Sandström M, J Psychosom Res 2010 68 37 45 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.06.009 20004299
24. Non-specific physical symptoms in relation to actual and perceived proximity to mobile phone base stations and powerlines. Baliatsas C, Van Kamp I, Kelfkens G, Schipper M, Bolte J, Yzermans J, Lebret E, BMC Publ Health 2011 11 421 10.1186/1471-2458-11-421
25. Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields - a survey among general practitioners. Huss A, Röösli M, BMC Publ Health 2006 6 267 10.1186/1471-2458-6-267
26. The views of primary care physicians on health risks from electromagnetic fields. Berg-Beckhoff G, Heyer K, Kowall B, Breckenkamp J, Razum O, Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010 107 817 823 21151417
27. Medical practitioners and electromagnetic fields (EMF): Testing their concern. Salomon D, Comptes Rendus Physique 2010 11 636 640 10.1016/j.crhy.2011. 01.001
28. Electromagnetic field sensitivity. Rea WJ, Pan Y, Fenyves EJ, Sujisawa I, Samadi N, Ross GH, J Bioelectricity 1991 10 241 256
29. Double-blind provocation study of hypersensitivity reactions associated with exposure from VDUs. Preliminary short version. Hamnerius Y, Agrup G, Galt S, Nilsson R, Sandblom J, Lindgren R, R Swed Acad Sci Rep 1993 2 67 72
30. A nonconventional approach to the treatment of environmental illness Arnetz BB, Berg M, Anderzen I, Lundeberg T, Haker E, J Occup Environ Med 1995 37 838 844 10.1097/00043764-199507000-00013 7552468
31. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from electric hypersensitivity: subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study. Andersson B, Berg M, Arnetz BB, Melin L, Langlet I, Liden SA, J Occup Environ Med 1996 38 752 758 10.1097/00043764-199608000-00009 8863199
32. Patient reactions to some electromagnetic fields from dental chair and unit: a pilot study. Bertoft G, Swed Dent J 1996 20 107 112 8957136
33. Provocation of the electromagnetic distress syndrome. Toomingas A, Scand J Work Environ Health 1997 22 457 458
34. Neurophysiological Effects of Flickering Light in Patients with Perceived Electrical Hypersensitivity. Sandström M, Lyskov E, Berglund A, Medvedev S, Hansson-Mild K, J Occup Environ Med 1997 39 15 22 10.1097/00043764-199701000- 00006 9029427
35. Cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with electric sensitivity - A multidisciplinary approach in a controlled study. Hillert L, Hedman BK, Dolling BF, Arnetz BB, Psychother Psychosom 1998 67 302 310 10.1159/000012295 9817951
36. Effects of an ELF (50Hz, 1 mT) electromagnetic field (EMF) on concentration in visual attention, perception and memory including effects of EMF sensitivity. Trimmel M, Schweiger E, Toxicol Lett 1998 96-97 377 382 22387339
37. Provocation of electric hypersensitivity under everyday conditions. Flodin U, Seneby A, Tegenfeldt C, Scand J Work Environ Health 2000 26 93 98 10.5271/sjweh.517 10817373
38. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with sensitivity to electricity. Lonne-Rahm S, Andersson B, Melin L, Schultzberg M, Arnetz B, Berg M, J Occup Environ Med 2000 42 512 516 10.1097/00043764-200005000-00009 10824304
39. The effect of supplementary antioxidant therapy in patients who report hypersensitivity to electricity: a randomized controlled trial. Hillert L, Kolmodin-Hedman B, Eneroth P, Arnetz BB, Medscape General Medicine 2001 3 11 11976608
40. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics. Lyskov E, Sandström M, Hansson-Mild K, Bioelectromagnetics 2001 22 457 462 10.1002/bem.73 11568930
41. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: no causal link. Hietanen M, Hamalainen AM, Husman T, Bioelectromagnetics 2002 23 264 270 10.1002/bem.10016 11948605
42. Environmental illness - Effectiveness of a salutogenic group-intervention programme. Hillert L, Savlin P, Levy BA, Heidenberg A, Kolmodin-Hedman B, Scand J Public Health 2002 30 166 175 10.1080/14034940210133852 12357983
43. Project NEMESIS: perception of a 50 Hz electric and magnetic field at low intensities (laboratory experiment). Mueller CH, Krueger H, Schierz C, Bioelectromagnetics 2002 23 26 36 10.1002/bem.95 11793403
44. Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Leitgeb N, Schröttner J, Bioelectromagnetics 2003 24 387 394 10.1002/bem.10138 12929157
45. Annoyance and performance in three groups of environmentally intolerant subjects during experimental challenge with chemical odors. sterberg K, Persson R, Karlson B, Orbæk P, Scand J Work Environ Health 2004 6 486 496
46. Ostergren PO, Merlo J, Lindström M, Rosvall M, Kahn FA, Lithman T, Hälsoförhållanden i Skåne. Folkhälsoenkät Skåne 2000 (Report in Swedish) Region Skåne: Kommunförbundet Skåne och Skåne läns allmänna Försäkringskassa 2001 23152940
47. 915MHz microwaves and 50Hz magnetic field affect chromatin conformation and 53BP1 foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Belyaev IY, Hillert L, Protopopova M, Tamm C, Malmgren LOG, Persson BRR, Selivanova G, Harms-Ringdahl M, Bioelectromagnetics 2005 26 173 184 10.1002/bem.20103 15768430
48. Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls. Frick U, Kharraz A, Hauser S, Wiegand R, Rehm J, Von Kovatsits U, Eichhammer P, Bioelectromagnetics 2005 26 287 298 10.1002/bem.20085 15832334
49. Cutaneous microcirculation is not altered by a weak 50 Hz magnetic field. Wenzel F, Reissenweber J, David E, Biomed Tech 2005 50 14 18
50. UMTS base stationlike exposure, well-being, and cognitive performance. Regel SJ, Negovetic S, Röösli M, Berdinas V, Schuderer J, Huss A, Lott U, Kuster N, Achermann P, Environ Health Perspect 2006 114 1270 1275 10.1289/ehp.8934 16882538
51. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? A within participants, double-blind, randomised provocation study. Rubin GJ, Hahn G, Everitt B, Cleare AJ, Wessely S, Br Med J 2006 332 886 889 10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55
52. Does short-term exposure to mobile phone base station signals increase symptoms in individuals who report sensitivity to electromagnetic fields? A double- blind randomized provocation study. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, Zougkou K, Russo R, Sepulveda F, Mirshekar-Syahkal D, Rasor P, Deeble R, Fox E, Environ Health Perspect 2007 115 1603 1608 10.1289/ehp.10286 18007992
53. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Zougkou K, Russo R, Joseph S, Rasor P, Fox E, Bioelectromagnetics 2007 28 137 151 10.1002/bem.20279 17013888
54. Investigation of Electric Current Perception Thershold of Different EHS Groups. Schröttner J, Leitgeb N, Hillert L, Bioelectromagnetics 2007 28 208 213 10.1002/bem.20294 17080457
55. Mobile telephone use effects on peripheral audiovestibular function: A case- control study. Bamiou DE, Ceranic B, Cox R, Watt H, Chadwick P, Luxon LM, Bioelectromagnetics 2008 29 108 117 10.1002/bem.20369 17929266
56. The effects of 884MHz GSM wireless communication signals on headache and other symptoms: An experimental provocation study. Hillert L, Akerstedt T, Lowden A, Wiholm C, Kuster N, Ebert S, Boutry C, Moffat SD, Berg M, Arnetz BB, Bioelectromagnetics 2008 29 185 196 10.1002/bem.20379 18044740
57. Perception of the electromagnetic field emitted by a mobile phone. Kwon MS, Koivisto M, Laine M, Hamalainen H, Bioelectromagnetics 2008 29 154 159 10.1002/bem.20375 18027840
58. Neuronal correlates of symptom formation in functional somatic syndromes: A fMRI study. Landgrebe M, Barta W, Rosengarth K, Frick U, Hauser S, Langguth B, Rutschmann R, Greenlee MW, Hajak G, Eichhammer P, NeuroImage 2008 41 1336 1344 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.171 18499479
59. Entwicklung eines deutschsprachigen Messinstruments für Elektrosmog-Beschwerden (in German). Frick U, Mayer M, Hauser S, Binder H, Rosner R, Eichhammer P, Umweltmedizin in Forschung & Praxis 2006 11 11 22
60. EMF-protection sleep study near mobile phone base stations. Leitgeb N, Schröttner J, Cech R, Kerbl R, Somnologie 2008 12 234 243 10.1007/s11818-008-0353-9
61. Die Freiburger Beschwerdenliste (FBL) (in German). Fahrenberg J, Z Klin Psychol 1975 4 79 100
62. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ, Psychiatry Res 1989 28 193 213 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 2748771
63. GSM base stations: Short-term effects on well-being. Augner C, Florian M, Pauser G, Oberfeld G, Hacker GW, Bioelectromagnetics 2009 30 73 80 10.1002/bem.20447 18803247
64. Effects of short-term W-CDMA mobile phone base station exposure on women with or without mobile phone related symptoms. Furubayashi T, Ushiyama A, Terao Y, Mizuno Y, Shirasawa K, Pongpaibool P, Simba AY, Wake K, Nishikawa M, Miyawaki K, Yasuda A, Uchiyama M, Yamashita HK, Masuda H, Hirota S, Takahashi M, Okano T, Inomata-Terada S, Sokejima S, Maruyama E, Watanabe S, Taki M, Ohkubo C, Ugawa Y, Bioelectromagnetics 2009 30 100 113 10.1002/bem.20446 18780296
65. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: A provocation study. Nam KC, Lee JH, Noh HW, Cha EJ, Kim NH, Kim DW, Bioelectromagnetics 2009 30 641 650 10.1002/bem.20518 19551766
66. Polluted places or polluted minds? An experimental sham-exposure study on background psychological factors of symptom formation in Idiophatic Environmental Intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields Szemerszky R, Koteles F, Lihi R, Bardos G, Int J Hyg Environ Health 2010 213 387 394 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.001 20538519
67. Can exposure to a terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA)-like signal cause symptoms? A randomized double-blind provocation study. Nieto-Hernandez R, Williams J, Cleare AJ, Landau S, Wessely S, Rubin GJ, Occup Environ Med 2011 68 339 344 10.1136/oem.2010.055889 20864469
68. Odontologic survey of referred patients with symptoms allegedly caused by electricity or visual display units. Bergdahl J, Tillberg A, Stenman E, Acta Odontol Scand 1998 56 303 307 10.1080/000163598428491 9860100
69. Preliminary report: symptoms associated with mobile phone use. Hocking B, Occup Med 1998 48 357 360 10.1093/occmed/48.6.357
70. Hypersensitivity to electricity: Working definition and additional characterization of the syndrome. Hillert L, Hedman BK, Söderman E, Arnetz BB, J Psychosom Res 1999 47 429 438 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00048-3 10624841
71. Perceived electrosensitivity and magical ideation. Stockenius S, Brugger P, Percept Mot Skills 2000 90 899 900 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.899 10883774
72. Environmental illness: evaluation of salivary flow, symptoms, diseases, medications, and psychological factors. Bergdahl J, Bergdahl M, Acta Odontol Scand 2001 59 104 110 10.1080/000163501750157270 11370747
73. Environmental illness: Fatigue and cholinesterase activity in patients reporting hypersensitivity to electricity. Hillert L, Flato S, Georgellis A, Arnetz BB, Kolmodin-Hedman B, Environ Res 2001 85 200 206 10.1006/enrs.2000.4225 11237508
74. Hansson Mild K: Neurophysiological study of patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. Lyskov E, Sandström M, Int J Psychophysiol 2001 42 233 241 10.1016/S0167-8760(01)00141-6 11812390
75. Medical and social prognosis for patients with perceived hypersensitivity to electricity and skin symptoms related to the use of visual display terminals. Stenberg B, Bergdahl J, Edvardsson B, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Widman L, Scand J Work Environ Health 2002 28 349 357 10.5271/sjweh.685 12432989
76. Hansson-Mild, Wiklund U, Rask P, Klucharev V, Stenberg B, Bjerle P: ECG monitoring in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. Sandström M, Lyskov E, Hörnsten R, Int J Psychophysiol 2003 49 227 235 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00145-4 14507441
77. Coping and self-image in patients with visual display terminal-related skin symptoms andperceived hypersensitivity to electricity. Bergdahl J, Stenberg B, Eriksson N, Lindén G, Widman L, Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004 77 538 542 10.1007/s00420-004-0546-x 15538619
78. Psychobiological personality dimensions in two environmental-illness patient groups. Bergdahl J, Marell L, Bergdahl M, Perris H, Clin Oral Investig 2005 9 251 256 10.1007/s00784-005-0015-2 16215748
79. Baseline prevalence of symptoms related to indoor environment. Eriksson NM, Stenberg BG, Scand J Public Health 2006 34 387 396 10.1080/14034940500228281 16861189
80. The Mainzer EMF-Wachhund: results from a watchdog project on self-reported health complaints attributed to exposure to electromagnetic fields. Schüz J, Petters C, Egle UT, Jansen B, Kimbel R, Letzel S, Nix W, Schmidt LG, Vollrath L, Bioelectromagnetics 2006 27 280 287 10.1002/bem.20212 16511876
81. Altered cortical excitability in subjectively electrosensitive patients: results of a pilot study. Landgrebe M, Hauser S, Langguth B, Frick U, Hajak G, Eichhammer P, J Psychosom Res 2007 62 283 288 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.007 17324677
82. Increased concentrations of certain persistent organic pollutants in subjects with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity-a pilot study. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hardell K, Björnfoth H, van Bavel B, Lindström G, Electromagn Biol Med 2008 27 197 203 10.1080/ 15368370802089053 18568937
83. Are they really sick? A report on persons who are electrosensitive and/or injured by dental material in Sweden. Lidmark AM, Wikmans T, Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine 2008 23 153 160
84. Blood Laboratory Findings in Patients Suffering From Self-Perceived Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS). Dahmen N, Ghezel-Ahmadi D, Engel A, Bioelectromagnetics 2009 30 299 306 10.1002/bem.20486 19259984
85. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fieldsa randomized survey study. Frick U, Rehm J, Eichhammer P, Int J Hyg Environ Health 2002 205 353 360 10.1078/1438-4639-00170 12173533
86. Effects of Everyday Radiofrequency Electromagnetic-Field Exposure on Sleep Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study. Mohler E, Frei P, Fahrländer CB, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Röösli M, Radiat Res 2010 174 347 356 10.1667/RR2153.1 20726726
87. Coping strategies, social support and responsibility in chemical Intolerance. Nordin M, Andersson L, Nordin S, J Clin Nurs 2010 19 2162 2173 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03264.x 20659196
88. Sense and sensibility in the context of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. Röösli M, Mohler E, Frei P, Comptes Rendus Physique 2010 11 576 584 10.1016/j.crhy.2010.10.007
89. Psychiatric and somatic disorders and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) in 264 environmental patients. Bornschein S, Hausteiner C, Zilker T, Förstl H, Psychol Med 2002 32 1387 1394 12455937
90. Evidence for overlap between idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. Bailer J, Witthöft M, Paul C, Bayerl C, Rist F, Psychosom Med 2005 67 921 929 10.1097/01.psy.0000174170.66109.b7 16314597
91. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Frei P, Mohler E, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Braun-Fahrländer C, Röösli M, Sc of the Tot Env 2009 408 102 108 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.023
92. Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods. Frei P, Mohler E, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Braun-Fahrländer C, Röösli M, Environ Int 2010 36 714 720 10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.005 20538340
93. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H: Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000, 32:1008-1015.