-
2
-
-
84905687190
-
Congress's Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–95)
-
Blair, P. D., 2014. “Congress's Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–95).” Science and Public Policy 41 (4): 449–457. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct057
-
(2014)
Science and Public Policy
, vol.41
, Issue.4
, pp. 449-457
-
-
Blair, P.D.1
-
3
-
-
29444435566
-
The Practice of TA; Science, Interaction and Communication
-
Decker M., Ladikas M., (eds), Berlin: Springer, and, ” In, edited by
-
Bütschi, D., R., Carius, M., Decker, S., Gram, A., Grunwald, P., Machleidt, S., Steyaert, and R., van Est. 2004. “The Practice of TA; Science, Interaction and Communication.” In Bridges between Science, Society and Policy: Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts, edited by M., Decker and M., Ladikas, 13–55. Berlin: Springer.
-
(2004)
Bridges between Science, Society and Policy: Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts
, pp. 13-55
-
-
Bütschi, D.1
Carius, R.2
Decker, M.3
Gram, S.4
Grunwald, A.5
Machleidt, P.6
Steyaert, S.7
van Est, R.8
-
4
-
-
15844364579
-
Politics and Institutions: European Parliamentary Technology Assessment
-
Cruz-Castro, L., and L., Sanz-Menéndez. 2005. “Politics and Institutions: European Parliamentary Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 72 (5): 429–448. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.007
-
(2005)
Technological Forecasting & Social Change
, vol.72
, Issue.5
, pp. 429-448
-
-
Cruz-Castro, L.1
Sanz-Menéndez, L.2
-
5
-
-
33745605716
-
-
Heidelberg: Springer, and, eds
-
Decker, M., and M., Ladikas, eds. 2004. Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer.
-
(2004)
Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment–Methods and Impacts Berlin
-
-
Decker, M.1
Ladikas, M.2
-
6
-
-
79958701420
-
Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions as Indications of Reflexive Modernization
-
Delvenne, P., C., Fallon, and S., Brunet. 2011. “Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions as Indications of Reflexive Modernization.” Technology in Society 33 (1–2): 36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.004
-
(2011)
Technology in Society
, vol.33
, Issue.1-2
, pp. 36-43
-
-
Delvenne, P.1
Fallon, C.2
Brunet, S.3
-
7
-
-
84893663116
-
-
Brussels: European Parliament. STOA.and
-
Enzing, C., J., Deuten, M., Rijnders-Nagle, and J., van Til. 2011. Technology Across Borders–Exploring Perspectives for Pan-European Parliamentary Technology Assessment. Brussels: European Parliament. STOA. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2011/482684/IPOL-JOIN_ET%282011%29482684_EN.pdf
-
(2011)
Technology Across Borders–Exploring Perspectives for Pan-European Parliamentary Technology Assessment
-
-
Enzing, C.1
Deuten, J.2
Rijnders-Nagle, M.3
van Til, J.4
-
8
-
-
85045078459
-
-
Options for Strengthening Research and Innovation.” Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, EU Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society
-
European Commission. 2013. “Options for Strengthening Research and Innovation.” Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, EU Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf
-
(2013)
-
-
-
9
-
-
84978447557
-
PTA in Europa: der Vergleich
-
Falkner G., Peissl W., Torgersen H., (eds), Wieno:, and, ” In, edited by
-
Falkner, G., W., Peissl, and H., Torgersen. 1994. “PTA in Europa: der Vergleich.” In Technikfolgen-Abschätzung in Europa, Forschungsstelle für Technikbewertung, edited by G., Falkner, W., Peissl, and H., Torgersen, 166–193. Wieno. http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-projektberichte/d2-2e03.pdf
-
(1994)
Technikfolgen-Abschätzung in Europa, Forschungsstelle für Technikbewertung
, pp. 166-193
-
-
Falkner, G.1
Peissl, W.2
Torgersen, H.3
-
10
-
-
84881832049
-
Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods
-
Dov M., Meijers A., Woods J., (eds), Amsterdam: North Holland, ” In, edited by
-
Grunwald, A. 2009. “Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by M., Dov, A., Meijers, and J., Woods, 1103–1146. Amsterdam: North Holland.
-
(2009)
Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences
, pp. 1103-1146
-
-
Grunwald, A.1
-
13
-
-
84993813888
-
-
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. 26, 4, Special Issue: Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science, 399–408, Autumn
-
Guston, D. 2001. “Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 26, No. 4, Special Issue: Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science, pp. 399–408, Autumn.
-
(2001)
Science, Technology, & Human Values
-
-
Guston, D.1
-
14
-
-
84893665118
-
Embedding Society in European Science and Technology Policy Advice
-
Ladikas M., (ed), Brussels: European Commission, and, ” In, edited by
-
Hennen, L., and M., Ladikas. 2009. “Embedding Society in European Science and Technology Policy Advice.” In Embedding Society in Science and Technology Policy–European and Chinese Perspectives, edited by M., Ladikas, 39–64. Brussels: European Commission.
-
(2009)
Embedding Society in Science and Technology Policy–European and Chinese Perspectives
, pp. 39-64
-
-
Hennen, L.1
Ladikas, M.2
-
16
-
-
34250776232
-
Traffic Problems Go Through the Technology Assessment Machine: A Culturalist Comparison
-
In, edited by, N., Vig, and, H., Paschen, New York: State University of New York Press
-
Hoppe, R., and J. Grin. 2000. “Traffic Problems Go Through the Technology Assessment Machine: A Culturalist Comparison.” In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by N. Vig and H. Paschen, 273–324. New York: State University of New York Press.
-
(2000)
Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe
, pp. 273-324
-
-
Hoppe, R.1
Grin, J.2
-
17
-
-
85045078265
-
-
Participatory Technology Assessment–European Perspectives.” Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at University of Westminster in association with TA Swiss, London, and, ed
-
Joss, S., and S., Bellucci, ed. 2002. “Participatory Technology Assessment–European Perspectives.” Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at University of Westminster in association with TA Swiss, London.
-
(2002)
-
-
Joss, S.1
Bellucci, S.2
-
18
-
-
0041793823
-
New Challenges or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context
-
Kunkle, G. C., 1995. “New Challenges or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context.” Technology in Society 17 (2): 175–196. doi: 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00007-E
-
(1995)
Technology in Society
, vol.17
, Issue.2
, pp. 175-196
-
-
Kunkle, G.C.1
-
19
-
-
85045095646
-
Eine kurze Geschichte der TA-Konzepte. in TAB-Brief
-
17., Berlin
-
Meyer, R. 1999. Eine kurze Geschichte der TA-Konzepte. in TAB-Brief, No. 17. Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung.
-
(1999)
Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung
-
-
Meyer, R.1
-
20
-
-
85045078165
-
-
Annual Report to the Congress: Fiscal Year 1995
-
OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1996. “Annual Report to the Congress: Fiscal Year 1995.” http://ota-cdn.fas.org/reports/9600.pdf
-
(1996)
-
-
-
21
-
-
85045105451
-
TA Practices in Europe, Deliverable 2.2 of the PACITA (Parliaments and Civil Society in Technology Assessment) project, 2012
-
September: PACITA Consortium
-
PACITA, eds. J. Ganzevles and Q. van Est. 2012. TA Practices in Europe, Deliverable 2.2 of the PACITA (Parliaments and Civil Society in Technology Assessment) project, 2012, commissioned by: European Commission, September: PACITA Consortium. http://www.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/TA-Practices-in-Europe-final.pdf
-
(2012)
commissioned by: European Commission
-
-
Pacita, E.J.G.1
van Est, Q.2
-
22
-
-
85045087510
-
Internationale Institutionalisierungsformen von Technikfolgen-Abschätzung–Vorbilder für Österreich?
-
Tichy G., (ed), Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, and, ” In, edited by
-
Peissl, W., and H., Torgersen. 1996. “Internationale Institutionalisierungsformen von Technikfolgen-Abschätzung–Vorbilder für Österreich?” In Technikfolgenabschätzung in Österreich–Entscheidungshilfe in einer komplexen Welt. Beispiele aus der Praxis, edited by G., Tichy, 30–66. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
-
(1996)
Technikfolgenabschätzung in Österreich–Entscheidungshilfe in einer komplexen Welt. Beispiele aus der Praxis
, pp. 30-66
-
-
Peissl, W.1
Torgersen, H.2
-
23
-
-
15844374935
-
Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary Systems
-
Vig N.J., Paschen H., (eds), New York: State University of New York Press, ” In, edited by
-
Petermann, P. 2000. “Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary Systems.” In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by N. J., Vig and H., Paschen, 37–61. New York: State University of New York Press.
-
(2000)
Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe
, pp. 37-61
-
-
Petermann, P.1
-
24
-
-
84970482104
-
Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment
-
Rip, A. 1986. “Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8 (2): 349–371.
-
(1986)
Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization
, vol.8
, Issue.2
, pp. 349-371
-
-
Rip, A.1
-
25
-
-
84876917750
-
Futures of Technology Assessment
-
Decker M., Grunwald A., Knapp M., (eds), Berlin: Edition Sigma, ” In, edited by
-
Rip, A. 2012. “Futures of Technology Assessment.” In Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenafschätzung in der Technikgestaltung, edited by M., Decker, A., Grunwald, and M., Knapp, 29–39. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
-
(2012)
Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenafschätzung in der Technikgestaltung
, pp. 29-39
-
-
Rip, A.1
-
26
-
-
0000181665
-
The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment
-
Schot, J., and A., Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
-
(1997)
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
, vol.54
, Issue.2-3
, pp. 251-268
-
-
Schot, J.1
Rip, A.2
-
27
-
-
76549090982
-
-
Activities without Institutionalization: Limits and Lessons of TA and TA-like Activities in Japan.” 2009 Atlanta Conference Science and Innovation Policy., and
-
Shiroyama, H., G., Yoshizawa, M., Matsuo, and R., Hatanaka. “Activities without Institutionalization: Limits and Lessons of TA and TA-like Activities in Japan.” 2009 Atlanta Conference Science and Innovation Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACSIP.2009.5367849
-
-
-
Shiroyama, H.1
Yoshizawa, G.2
Matsuo, M.3
Hatanaka, R.4
-
29
-
-
84885660070
-
Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation
-
Stilgoe, J., R., Owen, and P., Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
-
(2013)
Research Policy
, vol.42
, Issue.9
, pp. 1568-1580
-
-
Stilgoe, J.1
Owen, R.2
Macnaghten, P.3
-
30
-
-
85045116614
-
-
Revamping the Work of the Committee for the Future.” Publication of the Committee of the Future 7/2011
-
Tiihonen, P., “Revamping the Work of the Committee for the Future.” Publication of the Committee of the Future 7/2011. http://web.eduskunta.fi/dman/Document.phx?documentId=yf14511143357746&cmd=download
-
-
-
Tiihonen, P.1
-
31
-
-
0000367756
-
Technology Assessment: Product or Process?
-
Van Eijndhoven, J. 1997. “Technology Assessment: Product or Process?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 269–286. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00210-7
-
(1997)
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
, vol.54
, Issue.2-3
, pp. 269-286
-
-
Van Eijndhoven, J.1
-
32
-
-
84871028830
-
Technology Assessment: Analytic and Democratic Practice
-
Chadwick R., (ed), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, and, ” In, edited by
-
Van Est, R., and F., Brom. 2012. “Technology Assessment: Analytic and Democratic Practice.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics: Second Edition, volume 4, edited by R., Chadwick, 306–320. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
-
(2012)
Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics: Second Edition, volume 4
, pp. 306-320
-
-
Van Est, R.1
Brom, F.2
-
33
-
-
84871003102
-
Governance of Nanotechnology in the Netherlands: Informing and Engaging in Different Social Spheres
-
Van Est, R., B., Walhout, V., Rerimassie, D., Stemerding, and L., Hanssen. 2012. “Governance of Nanotechnology in the Netherlands: Informing and Engaging in Different Social Spheres.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society (iJETS) 10 (1): 6–26.
-
(2012)
International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society (iJETS)
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 6-26
-
-
Van Est, R.1
Walhout, B.2
Rerimassie, V.3
Stemerding, D.4
Hanssen, L.5
-
34
-
-
84978618669
-
Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond
-
Van Oudsheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
-
(2014)
Journal of Responsible Innovation
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 67-86
-
-
Van Oudsheusden, M.1
-
36
-
-
84870399104
-
Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation
-
Dusseldorp M., Beecroft R., (eds), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, ” In, edited by
-
Von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M., Dusseldorp and R., Beecroft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
-
(2012)
Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden
-
-
Von Schomberg, R.1
|