메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 292-313

Embracing variety: introducing the inclusive modelling of (Parliamentary) technology assessment

Author keywords

interaction models; PACITA; parliaments; technology assessment

Indexed keywords


EID: 84968730116     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2014.968439     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (24)

References (36)
  • 2
    • 84905687190 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Congress's Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–95)
    • Blair, P. D., 2014. “Congress's Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–95).” Science and Public Policy 41 (4): 449–457. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct057
    • (2014) Science and Public Policy , vol.41 , Issue.4 , pp. 449-457
    • Blair, P.D.1
  • 4
    • 15844364579 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Politics and Institutions: European Parliamentary Technology Assessment
    • Cruz-Castro, L., and L., Sanz-Menéndez. 2005. “Politics and Institutions: European Parliamentary Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 72 (5): 429–448. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.01.007
    • (2005) Technological Forecasting & Social Change , vol.72 , Issue.5 , pp. 429-448
    • Cruz-Castro, L.1    Sanz-Menéndez, L.2
  • 6
    • 79958701420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions as Indications of Reflexive Modernization
    • Delvenne, P., C., Fallon, and S., Brunet. 2011. “Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions as Indications of Reflexive Modernization.” Technology in Society 33 (1–2): 36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.004
    • (2011) Technology in Society , vol.33 , Issue.1-2 , pp. 36-43
    • Delvenne, P.1    Fallon, C.2    Brunet, S.3
  • 8
    • 85045078459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Options for Strengthening Research and Innovation.” Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, EU Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society
    • European Commission. 2013. “Options for Strengthening Research and Innovation.” Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, EU Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Science in Society. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf
    • (2013)
  • 13
    • 84993813888 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. 26, 4, Special Issue: Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science, 399–408, Autumn
    • Guston, D. 2001. “Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 26, No. 4, Special Issue: Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science, pp. 399–408, Autumn.
    • (2001) Science, Technology, & Human Values
    • Guston, D.1
  • 14
    • 84893665118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Embedding Society in European Science and Technology Policy Advice
    • Ladikas M., (ed), Brussels: European Commission, and, ” In, edited by
    • Hennen, L., and M., Ladikas. 2009. “Embedding Society in European Science and Technology Policy Advice.” In Embedding Society in Science and Technology Policy–European and Chinese Perspectives, edited by M., Ladikas, 39–64. Brussels: European Commission.
    • (2009) Embedding Society in Science and Technology Policy–European and Chinese Perspectives , pp. 39-64
    • Hennen, L.1    Ladikas, M.2
  • 15
    • 0000137243 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The OTA Story: The Agency Perspective
    • Herdman, R. C., and J. E., Jensen. 1997. “The OTA Story: The Agency Perspective.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 54 (2&3): 131–144. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00167-9
    • (1997) Technological Forecasting & Social Change , vol.54 , Issue.2-3 , pp. 131-144
    • Herdman, R.C.1    Jensen, J.E.2
  • 16
    • 34250776232 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Traffic Problems Go Through the Technology Assessment Machine: A Culturalist Comparison
    • In, edited by, N., Vig, and, H., Paschen, New York: State University of New York Press
    • Hoppe, R., and J. Grin. 2000. “Traffic Problems Go Through the Technology Assessment Machine: A Culturalist Comparison.” In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by N. Vig and H. Paschen, 273–324. New York: State University of New York Press.
    • (2000) Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe , pp. 273-324
    • Hoppe, R.1    Grin, J.2
  • 17
    • 85045078265 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Participatory Technology Assessment–European Perspectives.” Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at University of Westminster in association with TA Swiss, London, and, ed
    • Joss, S., and S., Bellucci, ed. 2002. “Participatory Technology Assessment–European Perspectives.” Centre for the Study of Democracy (CSD) at University of Westminster in association with TA Swiss, London.
    • (2002)
    • Joss, S.1    Bellucci, S.2
  • 18
    • 0041793823 scopus 로고
    • New Challenges or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context
    • Kunkle, G. C., 1995. “New Challenges or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context.” Technology in Society 17 (2): 175–196. doi: 10.1016/0160-791X(95)00007-E
    • (1995) Technology in Society , vol.17 , Issue.2 , pp. 175-196
    • Kunkle, G.C.1
  • 19
    • 85045095646 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eine kurze Geschichte der TA-Konzepte. in TAB-Brief
    • 17., Berlin
    • Meyer, R. 1999. Eine kurze Geschichte der TA-Konzepte. in TAB-Brief, No. 17. Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung.
    • (1999) Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung
    • Meyer, R.1
  • 20
    • 85045078165 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Annual Report to the Congress: Fiscal Year 1995
    • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1996. “Annual Report to the Congress: Fiscal Year 1995.” http://ota-cdn.fas.org/reports/9600.pdf
    • (1996)
  • 21
    • 85045105451 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • TA Practices in Europe, Deliverable 2.2 of the PACITA (Parliaments and Civil Society in Technology Assessment) project, 2012
    • September: PACITA Consortium
    • PACITA, eds. J. Ganzevles and Q. van Est. 2012. TA Practices in Europe, Deliverable 2.2 of the PACITA (Parliaments and Civil Society in Technology Assessment) project, 2012, commissioned by: European Commission, September: PACITA Consortium. http://www.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/TA-Practices-in-Europe-final.pdf
    • (2012) commissioned by: European Commission
    • Pacita, E.J.G.1    van Est, Q.2
  • 22
    • 85045087510 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Internationale Institutionalisierungsformen von Technikfolgen-Abschätzung–Vorbilder für Österreich?
    • Tichy G., (ed), Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, and, ” In, edited by
    • Peissl, W., and H., Torgersen. 1996. “Internationale Institutionalisierungsformen von Technikfolgen-Abschätzung–Vorbilder für Österreich?” In Technikfolgenabschätzung in Österreich–Entscheidungshilfe in einer komplexen Welt. Beispiele aus der Praxis, edited by G., Tichy, 30–66. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
    • (1996) Technikfolgenabschätzung in Österreich–Entscheidungshilfe in einer komplexen Welt. Beispiele aus der Praxis , pp. 30-66
    • Peissl, W.1    Torgersen, H.2
  • 23
    • 15844374935 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary Systems
    • Vig N.J., Paschen H., (eds), New York: State University of New York Press, ” In, edited by
    • Petermann, P. 2000. “Technology Assessment Units in the European Parliamentary Systems.” In Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe, edited by N. J., Vig and H., Paschen, 37–61. New York: State University of New York Press.
    • (2000) Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe , pp. 37-61
    • Petermann, P.1
  • 24
    • 84970482104 scopus 로고
    • Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment
    • Rip, A. 1986. “Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8 (2): 349–371.
    • (1986) Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization , vol.8 , Issue.2 , pp. 349-371
    • Rip, A.1
  • 25
    • 84876917750 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Futures of Technology Assessment
    • Decker M., Grunwald A., Knapp M., (eds), Berlin: Edition Sigma, ” In, edited by
    • Rip, A. 2012. “Futures of Technology Assessment.” In Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenafschätzung in der Technikgestaltung, edited by M., Decker, A., Grunwald, and M., Knapp, 29–39. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
    • (2012) Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenafschätzung in der Technikgestaltung , pp. 29-39
    • Rip, A.1
  • 26
    • 0000181665 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment
    • Schot, J., and A., Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
    • (1997) Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol.54 , Issue.2-3 , pp. 251-268
    • Schot, J.1    Rip, A.2
  • 27
    • 76549090982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Activities without Institutionalization: Limits and Lessons of TA and TA-like Activities in Japan.” 2009 Atlanta Conference Science and Innovation Policy., and
    • Shiroyama, H., G., Yoshizawa, M., Matsuo, and R., Hatanaka. “Activities without Institutionalization: Limits and Lessons of TA and TA-like Activities in Japan.” 2009 Atlanta Conference Science and Innovation Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACSIP.2009.5367849
    • Shiroyama, H.1    Yoshizawa, G.2    Matsuo, M.3    Hatanaka, R.4
  • 29
    • 84885660070 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation
    • Stilgoe, J., R., Owen, and P., Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
    • (2013) Research Policy , vol.42 , Issue.9 , pp. 1568-1580
    • Stilgoe, J.1    Owen, R.2    Macnaghten, P.3
  • 30
    • 85045116614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revamping the Work of the Committee for the Future.” Publication of the Committee of the Future 7/2011
    • Tiihonen, P., “Revamping the Work of the Committee for the Future.” Publication of the Committee of the Future 7/2011. http://web.eduskunta.fi/dman/Document.phx?documentId=yf14511143357746&cmd=download
    • Tiihonen, P.1
  • 31
    • 0000367756 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Technology Assessment: Product or Process?
    • Van Eijndhoven, J. 1997. “Technology Assessment: Product or Process?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 269–286. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00210-7
    • (1997) Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol.54 , Issue.2-3 , pp. 269-286
    • Van Eijndhoven, J.1
  • 32
    • 84871028830 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Technology Assessment: Analytic and Democratic Practice
    • Chadwick R., (ed), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, and, ” In, edited by
    • Van Est, R., and F., Brom. 2012. “Technology Assessment: Analytic and Democratic Practice.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics: Second Edition, volume 4, edited by R., Chadwick, 306–320. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    • (2012) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics: Second Edition, volume 4 , pp. 306-320
    • Van Est, R.1    Brom, F.2
  • 34
    • 84978618669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond
    • Van Oudsheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
    • (2014) Journal of Responsible Innovation , vol.1 , Issue.1 , pp. 67-86
    • Van Oudsheusden, M.1
  • 36
    • 84870399104 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation
    • Dusseldorp M., Beecroft R., (eds), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, ” In, edited by
    • Von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M., Dusseldorp and R., Beecroft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
    • (2012) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden
    • Von Schomberg, R.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.