Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods

Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1103-1146

  Grunwald, Armin ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881832049     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50044-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. R. U. Ayres, J. W. Carlson, and S. W. Simon. Technology Assessment and Policy-Making in the United States. New York, 1970.
2. B.R. Barber (1984) Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age University of California Press
3. T. Beauchamp (2001) Philosophical Ethics. An Introduction to Moral Philosophy McGraw Hill
4. G. Bechmann, M. Decker, U. Fiedeler and B.-J. Krings (2007) Technology Assessment in a Complex World. International Journal on Foresight and Innovation Policy 3 6-27.
5. G. Bechmann and I. Hronszky (Eds) (2003) Expertise and Its Interfaces Edition Sigma
6. U. Beck (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne Suhrkamp
7. U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (Eds) (1996) Reflexive Modernisierung. Eine Kontroverse Frankfurt
8. W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technological Systems. Cambridge (Mass.), 1987.
9. W. E. Bijker and J. Law, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge (Mass.), 1994.
10. B.A. Bimber (1996) The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and fall of the Office of Technology Assessment State University of New York Press
11. D. Bütschi, R. Carius, M. Decker, S. Gram, A. Grunwald, P. Machleidt, S. Steyaert and R. van Est (2004) The Practice of TA; Science, Interaction, and Communication. M. Decker, M. Ladikas (Eds) Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment — Methods and Impacts Springer 12-55.
12. M. Camhis. Planning Theory and Philosophy. London, 1979.
13. J.F. Coates (1985) Foresight in Federal Government Policy Making. Futures Research Quarterly 1 13-18.
14. Collingridge D. The Social Control of Technology, New York, 1980.
15. N. Daniels (1996) Justice and Justification. Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. M. Decker and M. Ladikas (Eds) (2004) Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment — Methods and Impact Springer
17. M. Decker and A. Grunwald (2001) Rational Technology Assessment as Interdisciplinary Research. M. Decker (Eds) Implementation and Limits of Interdisciplinarity in European Technology Assessment Springer
18. M. Dierkes, U. Hoffmann and L. Marz (1992) Leitbild und Technik. Zur Entstehung und Steuerung technischer Innovationen Campus
19. F. Ferré (1995) Philosophy of Technology The University of Georgia Press
20. F. Fisher. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, London, 1990.
21. FOREN (2001) A Practical Guide to Regional Foresight Sevilla: Institute for Prospective Technology Studies
22. S. Funtowitz and J. Ravetz. The Emergence of Post-Normal Science. In Science, Politics and Morality, R. von Schomberg, ed, London, 1993.
23. D. Gee and M. Greenberg (2002) Asbestos: from ‘magic’ to malevolent mineral. P. Harremoes, D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne, S. Guedes Vaz (Eds) The Precautionary Principle in the 20th century. Late Lessons from early warnings Sage 49-63.
24. C.F. Gethmann and J. Mittelstraß (1992) Umweltstandards. Gaia 1 16-25.
25. M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge Sage
26. J. Grin (2000) Shaping 21st century society through vision assessment? Technology assessment to support judgement. J. Grin, A. Grunwald (Eds) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment Springer 9-30.
27. J. Grin and A. Grunwald (Eds) (2000) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment Springer
28. J. Grin, H. van de Graaf and R. Hoppe (1997) Technology Assessment through Interaction Rathenau Institute
29. J. Grundahl (1995) The Danish Consensus Conference Model. S. Joss, J. Durant (Eds) Public Participation in Science Chippenham 31-40.
30. A. Grunwald (1999) Technology Assessment or Ethics of Technology? Reflections on Technology Development between Social Sciences and Philosophy. Ethical Perspectives 6 170-182.
31. A. Grunwald (2000) Against Over-Estimating the Role of Ethics in Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 181-196.
32. A. Grunwald (2002) Philosophy the Concept of Technology. On the Anthropological Significance of Technology. A. Grunwald, M. Gutmann, E. Neumann-Held (Eds) On Human Nature. Anthropological, Philosophical and Biological Foundations Springer 173-188.
33. A. Grunwald. Methodical Reconstruction of Ethical Advises. In Expertise and Its Interfaces, G. Bechmann and I. Hronszky, eds., pp. 103-124, edition sigma, 2003.
34. A. Grunwald (2004) Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1 150-167.
35. A. Grunwald (2004) Participation as a means of enhancing the legitimacy of decisions on technology? A sceptical analysis. Poiesis & Praxis 3 106-122.
36. A. Grunwald (2005) Zur Rolle von Akzeptanz und Akzeptabilität von Technik bei der Bewältigung von Technikkonflikten. Technikfolgenabschätzung — Theorie und Praxis 14 54-60.
37. A. Grunwald (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. A. Nordmann, J. Schummer, A. Schwarz (Eds) Nanotechnologien im Kontext Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft 49-80.
38. A. Grunwald (2006) Scientific independence as a constitutive part of parliamentary technology assessment. Science and Public Policy 33 103-113.
39. A. Grunwald (2007) Converging Technologies: visions, increased contingencies of the conditio humana, and search for orientation. Futures 39 380-392.
40. A. Grunwald (2007) Working Towards Sustainable Development in the Face of Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9(3), 245-263.
41. A. Grunwald and J. Kopfmüller (2006) Nachhaltigkeit Campus
42. H. R. van Gunsteren. The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs. London, 1976.
43. D.H. Guston and D. Sarewitz (2002) Real-Time Technology Assessment. Technology & Culture 24 93-109.
44. J. Habermas (1988) Nachmetaphysisches Denken Suhrkamp
45. J. Habermas (1988) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Suhrkamp
46. J. Habermas (2001) Die Zukunft der Natur des Menschen Suhrkamp
47. P. Harremoes, D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne and S. Guedes Vaz (Eds) (2002) The Precautionary Principle in the 20th century. Late Lessons from early warnings Sage
48. H. Jonas (1979) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation Suhrkamp English: The Imperative of Responsibility, 1984.
49. S. Joss and S. Belucci (Eds) (2002) Participatory Technology Assessment — European Perspectives Westminster University Press
50. S. Joss and J. Durant (Eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science Chippenham
51. L. Klüver (1995) Consensus Conferences at the Danish Board of Technology. S. Joss, J. Durant (Eds) Public Participation in Science Chippenham 41-52.
52. P. Kroes and A. Meijers (Eds) (2000) The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology Elsevier Science
53. B. Latour (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Milton Keynes
54. L. Levidow (1999) Democratizing Technology — or Technologizing Democracy? R. von Schomberg (Eds) Democratizing Technology. Theory and Practice of a Deliberative Technology Policy Hengelo 51-70.
55. C.E. Lindblom (1973) The Science of Muddling Through. A. Faludi (Eds) A Reader in Planning Theory Oxford 151-170.
56. B. Ludwig (1997) The Concept of Technology Assessment — an entire Process to Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development 5 111-117.
57. P. Mambrey and A. Tepper (2000) Technology Assessment as Metaphor Assessment — Visions guiding the development of information and communications technologies. J. Grin, A. Grunwald (Eds) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment Springer 33-52.
58. J. Marcuse. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, 1966 (Der eindimensionale Mensch. Neuwied, 1967).
59. B.R. Martin and J. Irvine (1989) Research Foresight: Priority-Setting in Science London: Pinter Publishers
60. D. Meadows, D. Meadows, P. Milling, and E. Zahn. Limits to Growth. Report to the Club of Rome. Rome, 1972.
61. C. Mitcham. Thinking through Technology. Chicago, 1994.
62. G.E. Moore (1903) Principia Ethica Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
63. H. Nowotny (2003) Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and Public Policy 30 151-156.
64. H. Paschen and T. Petermann. Technikfolgenabschätzung — ein strategisches Rahmenkonzept für die Analyse und Bewertung von Technikfolgen. In: Tech-nikfolgenabschätzung als Technikforschung und Politikberatung, T. Petermann, ed., pp. 19-42, 1991.
65. H. Paschen, K. Gresser and S. Conrad (1978) Technology Assessment: Tech-nologiefolgenabschätzung. Ziele, methodische und organisatorische Probleme, Anwendungen Frankfurt: Campus
66. A.G. Pereira, R. von Schomberg and S. Funtowicz (2007) Foresight Knowledge Assessment. International Journal on Foresight and Innovation Policy 3 53-75.
67. M. Rader (2002) Synthesis of Technology Assessment. A. Tübke, K. Ducatel, J.P. Gavigan, P. Moncada-Paternò-Castello (Eds) Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Perspectives Sevilla 27-37.
68. J. Rawls (1999) A Theory of Justice Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press [1971].
69. O. Renn and T. Webler. Der kooperative Diskurs — Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten. In: Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. In: O. Renn, H. Kastenholz, P. Schild, U. Wilhelm, eds., pp. 3-103, Zürich, 1998.
70. A. Rip, T. Misa, and J. Schot, eds. Managing Technology in Society. London, 1995.
71. M.C. Roco and W.S. Bainbridge (Eds) (2002) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance Arlington: Virginia
72. C. Schmitt (1934) Politische Theologie München/Leipzig
73. R. von Schomberg (Eds) (1999) Democratizing Technology. Theory and Practice of a Deliberative Technology Policy Hengelo
74. J. Schot and A. Rip (1997) The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 251-268.
75. J. Schot (1999) Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values 17 36-56.
76. K. S. Shrader-Frechette. Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley, 1991.
77. B. Skorupinski and K. Ott (2000) Ethik und Technikfolgenabschätzung Zürich: ETH-Verlag
78. P. Slovic (1993) Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis 13 675-682.
79. R. Smits, A. Leyten and P. den Hertog (1995) Technology Assessment and Technology Policy in Europe: New Concepts, New Goals, New Infrastructures. Policy Sciences 28 272-299.
80. R. Smits and P. den Hertog (2007) TA and the management of innovation in economy and society. International Journal on Foresight and Innovation Policy 3 28-52.
81. R. Smits and J. Leyten. Technology Assessment. Watchdog or Tracker, Kerkebosch, Zeist, 1991.
82. N. Stehr. The Governance of Knowledge. London, 2004.
83. TATUP — Technikfolgenabschätzung (2007) Theorie und Praxis Special Issue “Auf dem Weg zu einer Theorie der Technikfolgenabschätzung”
84. United States Senate. Technology Assessment Act of 1972. Report of the Committee on Rules and Administration, 13 Sept. 1972. Washington, D.C., 1972.
85. I.R. van de Poel (2001) Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 429-446.
86. R. van Est and J. van Eijndhoven. Parliamentary Technology Assessment at the Rathenau Institute. In: Handbuch Technikfolgenabschätzung, S. Bröchler, G. Simonis, K. Sundermann, eds., pp. 427-436, Berlin, 1999.
87. A. van Gorp (2005) Ethical Issues in Engineering Design; Safety and Sustainability Delft: Simon Stevin Series in the Philosophy of Technology
88. A. van Gorp and A. Grunwald. Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Design Processes. Risks, Regulative Frameworks and Societal Division of Labour. In: S. Roeser and L. Asveld (eds.), in preparation.
89. VDI — Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. Technikbewertung. Richtlinie 3780. Düsseldorf. English version available at www.vdi.de
90. N. Vig and J. Paschen, eds. Parliaments and Technology Assessment. The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. Albany, USA, 1999.
91. R. von Schomberg (2005) The Precautionary Principle and its normative challenges. E. Fisher, J. Jones, R. von Schomberg (Eds) The Precautionary Principle and Public Policy Decision Making UK and Northampton, MA: Cheltenham 161-175.
92. J. Weyer, U. Kirchner, L. Riedl, and J. F. K. Schmidt. Technik, die Gesellschaft schafft. Soziale Netzwerke als Ort der Technikgenese. Berlin, 1997.
93. R. A. Williamson. Space Policy at the Office of Technoloy Assessment. In: Technikbeurteilung in der Raumfahrt. A. Grunwald, H. Sax, eds., pp. 211-225, Berlin, 1994.
94. L. Winner. Autonomous Technology. Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, USA, 1982.
95. L. Winner (1980) Do Artifacts have Politics? Daedalus 109 121-136.
96. B. Wynne. Technology Assessment and Reflexive Social Learning: Observations from the Risk Field. In: Managing Technology in Society. A. Rip, T. Misa, J. Schot, eds., pp. 19-36, London 1995.
97. Y. Yoshinaka, C. Clausen and A. Hansen (2003) The Social Shaping of Technology: A New Space for Politics? A. Grunwald (Eds) Technikgestaltung — Wunsch oder Wirklichkeit? Berlin: Springer 117-131.