Technology Assessment: Product or Process?

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 54, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 269-286

  Van Eijndhoven, Josée C M ^a  

^a Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000367756     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00210-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Smits, R., and Leijten, J.: Technology Assessment, Waakhond of Speurhond?, Kerckebosch, Zeist, 1991, pp. 264, 340.
2. Smits, R.: State of the Art of Technology Assessment in Europe, A Report to the 2nd European Congress on Technology Assessment, Mailand (14-16 November 1990).
3. Westermeyer, W.: An Evaluation of the Scientific and Technological Options Programme, A Report to the European Parliament, PE 164.968, Luxembourg (October 1994), p. 1, 2.
4. Vig, N. J.: Parliamentary Technology Assessment in Europe: Comparative Evolution, Impact Assessment Bulletin 10(4), 3-24 (1992).
5. Tweede Kamer: Integratie van Wetenschap en Technologie in de Samenleving (Integration of Science and Technology in Society), white paper, parliamentary year 1983-1984, 18 421 nrs. 1-2.
6. Commissie voor de Evaluatie van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Technologisch Aspectenonderzoek: NOTA in discussie, Een evaluatie van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Technologisch Aspectenonderzoek (Evaluation report of NOTA), Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, December 1992.
7. Staff: Denmark: The Technology Board Attached to the Danish Folketing, in European Parliamentary Technology Assessment - EPTA - Description of the Organizations Participating in the EPTA Coordination Network, 1990, An information Report to the 2nd European Congress of Technology Assessment, Mailand, 14-16 November 1990, p. 24-27.
8. Hansen, L.: The Danish Board of Technology Established on a Permanent Basis, TA-Datenbank Nachrichten 4(4), 17-18 (1995).
9. Staff: European Parliament, The STOA Programme, in European Parliamentary Technology Assessment -EPTA - Description of the Organizations Participating in the EPTA Coordination Network, 1990, An information Report to the 2nd European Congress of Technology Assessment, Mailand, 14-16 November 1990, pp. 4-7.
10. Vig, N. J.: Parliamentary Technology Assessment in Europe: A Comparative Perspective, in Science, Technology and Politics: Policy Analysis in Congress. G. C. Bryner, ed., Westview, Boulder, 1992.
11. Jaeger, D.: Germany: The Bundestag Committee of Inquiry on Technology Assessment and Evaluation, in European Parliamentary Technology Assessment - EPTA - Description of the Organizations Participating in the EPTA Coordination Network, 1990, An information Report to the 2nd European Congress of Technology Assessment, Mailand, 14-16 November 1990, pp. 36-42.
12. Petermann, T.: Technikfolgenabschaetzung beim Deutschen Bundestag wird zu einer staendigen Aufgabe-Verlaengerung des TAB im Budenstag einstimmig beschlossen, TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten 2(2), 16-17 (1993).
13. Coenen, R., Von Berg, I., and Schevitz, J.: TA-Monitoring Bericht I, Parlementarische TA-Einrichtungen und ihre Gegenwartigen Themen, TAB- Arbeitsbericht 5/91, September 1991, Karlsruhe.
14. Bechman, G.: Technology Assessment: Democratic Function of Technology Assessment in Technology Policy Making, Science and Public Policy 20(1), 11-16 (1993).
15. Schwartz, M., and Thompson, M.: Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York, 1990.
16. Coates, V. T.: Readings in TA, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 1975.
17. Collingridge, D.: The Social Control of Technology, Frances Pinter, London, 1980.
18. Procter, M.: Probing the Core of Controversy: Issue Management in the Office of Technology Assessment, in Technology Assessment, An Opportunity for Europe. S. C. De Hoo, R. E. H. M. Smits, and R. Petrella, eds., The Hague, 1987, pp. 111-120.
19. Smits, R. E. H. M.: Technology Assessment: An Opportunity for Europe; Aspects of the Integration of Science and Technology in American Society, Publication of the Dutch Ministry of Education and Science in cooperation with the Commission of the European Communities (DG XII)/FAST, Government Printing Office, The Hague, January 1987, p. 30.
20. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: Critical Connections: Communications for the Future, OTA-CIT-407, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1990.
21. Coates, J.: Technology Assessment in the United States Congress, in Technology Assessment, An Opportunity for Europe. S. C. De Hoo, R. E. H. M. Smits, and R. Petrella, eds., The Hague, 1987, pp. 31-38.
22. Hennen, L.: Konsens ueber Konsensus Konferenzen? TA-Datenbank Nachrichten 3(4), 75-76 (1995).
23. Rip, A., Misa, T. J., and Schot, J.: Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Pinter, London, 1995, p. 16.
24. Schot, J.: Technology Dynamics: An Inventory of Policy Implications for Constructive Technology Assessment, NOTA Working Document 45, The Hague, 1991.
25. Schot, J.: Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Technology Dynamics, Science, Technology and Human Values 17(1), 36-56 (1991).
26. Schot, J.: De inzet van Constructief Technology Assessment, Kennis en Methode 20(3), 265-293 (1996).
27. Clark, W. C., and Majone, G.: The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications, Science, Technology and Human Values 10(3), 6-19, (1985).