Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization

Technology in Society

Volumn 33, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 36-43

  Delvenne, Pierre ^a   Fallon, Catherine ^a   Brunet, Sébastien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELGIUM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT; FLANDERS; MODERN STRUCTURES; NETHERLANDS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; THEORETICAL APPROACH; WESTERN SOCIETIES;

RATING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

MODERNIZATION;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; MODERNITY; MODERNIZATION;

EUROPE;

EID: 79958701420     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Invernizzi N. Participación ciudadana en ciencia y tecnología en América Latina: una oportunidad para refundar el compromiso social de la universidad pública. Revista CTS 2004, 1(2).
2. Beck U. Risk society 1992, Sage, London.
3. Giddens A. The consequences of modernity 1990, Polity Press, Cambridge.
4. Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive modernization 1994, Polity Press, Cambridge.
5. Schot J. The contested rise of a modernist technology politics. Modernity and technology 2003, 257-278. MIT Press, Cambridge. T. Misa, P. Brey, A. Feenberg (Eds.).
6. Irwin A., Wynne B. Misunderstanding science 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Joss S. The Role of Participation in Institutionalised Technology Assessment. A Case Study of Consensus Conferences. PhD Thesis. London: Imperial College; 1998.
8. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. Agir dans un monde incertain 2001, Seuil, Paris.
9. Hennen L. Uncertainty and modernity. Participatory technology assessment: a response to technical modernity?. Science and Public Policy 1999, 26(5).
10. Laurent B. Un tournant participatif? Une mise en perspective historique de la participation du public dans les politiques scientifiques américaines. La démocratie participative: histoires et généalogies 2011, 246-260. La Découverte, Paris. M.-H. Bacqué, Y. Sintomer (Eds.).
11. Van Eijndhoven J. Technology assessment: product or process?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1997, 54(2).
12. Rip A., Schot J. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1997, 54(2).
13. Guston D., Sarewitz D. Real-Time technology assessment. Technology in Society 2002, 24.
14. Joss S., Bellucci S. Participatory technology assessment. European Perspectives 2002, Center for the Study of Democracy, London.
15. Grin J., Van de Graaf H., Hoppe R. Technology assessment through interaction 1997, Rathenau Institute, The Hague.
16. Grunwald A. Scientific independence as a Constitutive part of parliamentary technology assessment. Science and Public Policy 2006, 33(2).
17. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-Thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an Age of uncertainty 2001, Polity Press, Cambridge.
18. Holzer B., Sorensen M. Rethinking Subpolitics: beyond the " iron cage" of modern politics?. Theory, Culture & Society 2003, 20-79.
19. Blok A. Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 16.
20. Bruun Jensen C. Citizen projects and consensus-building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in democracy. Acta Sociologica 2005, 48(3).
21. Mouffe C. The return of the political 1993, Verso, London and New York.
22. Mouffe C. The democratic paradox 2000, Verso, London and New York.
23. Smith A., Stirling A. Moving outside or inside? objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2007, 8-3.
24. Stirling A. " Opening up" and " Closing down" Power, participation and Pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33.
25. Beck U., Bonss W., Lau C. The theory of reflexive modernization. problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society 2003, 20-21.
26. Rip A. A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance - And its Ironies. Reflexive governance for sustainable development 2006, 82-100. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, R. Kemp (Eds.).
27. Brunet S., Delvenne P., Fallon C., Gillon P. Dealing with nanotechnology: do the boundaries matter? safety, reliability and risk analysis 2009, CRC Press, London.
28. Vig N., Paschen H. Parliaments and technology 2000, State University Press, New York.
29. Delvenne P, Science, technologie et innovation sur le chemin de la réflexivité. Mise en perspective des offices parlementaires de Technology Assessment. Louvain-La-Neuve: Academia Bruylant (collection Thélème); (in press).