Technology Assessment, Analytic and Democratic Practice

Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics: Volume 1-4, Second Edition

Volumn 1-4, Issue , 2012, Pages 306-320

  van Est, R ^a   Brom, F ^a  

^a Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Argumentative TA; Classical TA; Constructive TA; Democracy; ELSA; Ethics; Methods; Parliamentary TA; Participatory TA; Policy Analysis; Political debate; Public debate; Societal aspects; TA; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871028830     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00010-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. D. Banta (2003) The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy 63 121-132
2. B. Bimber and D.H. Guston (1997) Special issue: Technology assessment: The end of OTA. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2/3 125-308
3. M. Decker and M. Ladikas (Eds) (2004) Bridges Between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment – Methods and Impacts Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
4. J. Grin and A. Grunwald (Eds) (2000) Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in the 21st Century. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
5. D.H. Guston and D. Sarewitz (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technology in society V24 93-109
6. S. Joss and S. Bellucci (Eds) (2002) Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives London: Centre for the Study of Democracy
7. S. Maasen and M. Merz (2006) TA Swiss Broadens Its Perspective. Technology Assessment with a Social and Cultural Sciences Orientation. Bern: TA Swiss Centre for Technology Assessment
8. J. Schot and F. Geels (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 537-554
9. J. Schot and A. Rip (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 251-268
10. Public Participation in Science and Technology, special issue (1999) Science and Public Policy 26 289-380
11. N. Slocum (2003) Participatory Methods Toolkit. A Practitioner’sManual. Brussels: King Baudouin Foundation and Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment (viWTA)
12. A. Tübke, K. Ducatel, J. Gavigan and P. Moncada-Paternò-Catsello (Eds) (2002) Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Perspectives Seville: IPTS IPTS Technical Report Series. EUR 20137 EN
13. J. Van Eijndhoven (1997) Technology assessment: Product orprocess? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 269-286
14. N.J. Vig and H. Paschen (Eds) (2000) Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe New York: State University of New York Press
15. J. Wilsdon and R. Willis (2004) See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos
16. European Parliamentary Technology Assessment Network. http://www.eptanetwork.org/
17. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm
18. EUROPTA Project, Teknologi-Rådet, The Danish Board of Technology. http://www.tekno.dk/europta
19. Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanayse. http://www.itas.fzk.de/deu/tatup/inhalt.htm
20. Knowledge network System Innovations and Transitions. http://www.ksinetwork.nl
21. Rathenau Instituut. http://www.rathenau.nl