Wrestling with democracy: Voting systems as politics in the twentieth-century west

Wrestling with Democracy: Voting Systems as Politics in the Twentieth-Century West

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-394

  Pilon, Dennis ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966784753     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (385)

1. Ahmed, Amel F. “Constituting the Electorate: Voting System Reform and Working Class Incorporation in France, the United Kingdom and the United States, 1867-1913.” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2006.
2. Eckelberry, Robert L. “The Swedish System of Proportional Representation.” PhD diss., University of Nebraska, 1964.
3. Hastings, Preston B. “Proportional Representation and the Weimar Constitution.” PhD diss., University of North Texas, 1992.
4. Jansen, Harold. “The Single Transferable Vote in Alberta and Manitoba.” PhD diss., University of Alberta, 1998.
5. Phillips, Harry Charles John. “Challenges to the Voting System in Canada, 1874-1974.” PhD diss., University of Western Ontario, 1976.
6. Ziegler, Donald J. “Proportional Representation in the Social and Political Conflict in Germany 1871-1920.” PhD diss., University of Nebraska, 1956.
7. Aardal, Bernt. “Electoral Systems in Norway.” In Grofman and Lijphart, Evolution of Electoral Systems in Nordic Countries, 167-224.
8. Ahmed, Amel. “Reading History Forward: The Origins of Electoral Systems in European Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 43, nos 8-9 (2010): 1059-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414010370436.
9. Aimer, Peter. “From Westminster Plurality to Continental Proportionality: Electoral System Change in New Zealand.” In Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada’s Electoral System, ed. H. Milner, 145-155. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999.
10. Aimer, Peter, and Raymond Miller. “Partisanship and Principle: Voters and the New Zealand Electoral Referendum of 1993.” European Journal of Political Research 41, no. 6 (2002): 795-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.t01-1-00032.
11. Alexander, Gerard. “Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13, no. 3 (2001): 249-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095169280101300302.
12. Allern, Elin H., and Karina Pedersen. “The Impact of Party Organisational Changes on Democracy.” West European Politics 30, no. 1 (Jan. 2007): 68-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019688.
13. Anderson, John M. “Romantic Democracy.” American Quarterly 2, no. 3 (Autumn 1950): 251-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3031341.
14. Andeweg, Rudy B. “Institutional Conservatism in the Netherlands: Proposals for and Resistance to Change.” West European Politics 12, no. 1 (Jan. 1989): 42-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402388908424722.
15. Andeweg, Rudy B. “Institutional Reform in Dutch Politics: Elected Prime Ministers, Personalized PR, and Popular Veto in Comparative Perspective.” Acta Politica 32, no. 3 (Autumn 1997): 227-57.
16. Andréws, Josephine T., and Robert W. Jackman. “Strategic Fools: Electoral Rule Choice under Extreme Uncertainty.” Electoral Studies 24, no. 1 (2005): 84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.electstud.2004.03.002.
17. Arditi, Benjamin. “From Globalism to Globalization: The Politics of Resistance.” New Political Science 26, no. 1 (Mar. 2004): 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0739314042000185102.
18. Barber, Benjamin. “The Politics of Political Science: ‘Value-Free’ Theory and the Wolin-Strauss Dust-up of 1963.” American Political Science Review 100, no. 4 (Nov. 2006): 539-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000305540606240X.
19. Barrow, Clyde W. “Charles A. Beard’s Social Democracy: A Critique of the Populist-Progressive Style in American Political Thought.” Polity 21, no. 2 (Winter 1988): 253-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3234806.
20. Barrow, Clyde W. “The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science.” New Political Science 30, no. 2 (2008): 215-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393140802082598.
21. Bastian, Sanil. “The Political Economy of Electoral Reform: Proportional Representation in Sri Lanka.” In Bastian and Luckham, Can Democracy Be Designed?, 196-219.
22. Bastian, Sanil, and Robin Luckham. “Introduction: Can Democracy Be Designed?” In Bastian and Luckham, Can Democracy Be Designed?, 1-13.
23. Bawm, Kathleen. “The Logic of Institutional Preferences: German Electoral Law as a Social Choice Outcome.” American Journal of Political Science 37, no. 4 (1993): 965-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111539.
24. Bennett, Scott. “Political Corruption, the Fall of the Braddon Government and Hare-Clark Voting: E.T. Miles, 1899-1900.” Tasmanian Historical Research Association: Papers and Proceedings 39, no. 4 (Dec. 1992): 155-6.
25. Benoit, Kenneth. “Electoral Laws as Political Consequences: Explaining the Origins and Change of Electoral Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 10, no. 1 (2007): 363-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.101608.
26. Berns, Walter. “Voting Studies.” In Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics, ed. Herbert J. Storing, 3-62. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1962.
27. Blais, André “The Classification of Electoral Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 16, no. 1 (1988): 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1988.tb00143.x.
28. Blais, André, Agnieszka Dobrzynska, and Indridi H. Indridason. “To Adopt or Not Adopt Proportional Representation: The Politics of Institutional Choice.” British Journal of Political Science 35, no. 1 (2004): 182-90.
29. Blewett, Neal. “The Franchise in the United Kingdom 1885-1918.” Past & Present 32, no. 1 (Dec. 1965): 27-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/past/32.1.27.
30. Bogdanor, Vernon. “Conclusion: Electoral Systems and Party Systems.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. V. Bogdanor and D. Butler, 247-62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
31. Bogdanor, Vernon. “Electoral Reform and British Politics.” Electoral Studies 6, no. 2 (1987): 115-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(87)90018-7.
32. Bogdanor, Vernon. “Literature, Sources and Methodology for the Study of Electoral Reform in the United Kingdom.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Serge Noiret, 335 Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
33. Boix, Carles. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 3 (Sept. 1999): 609-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585577.
34. Bonnell, Victoria E. “The Uses of Theory, Concepts and Comparison in Historical Sociology.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, no. 2 (Apr. 1980): 156-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009270.
35. Boston, Jonathon. “Electoral Reform In New Zealand: The Report of the Royal Commission.” Electoral Studies 6, no. 2 (1987): 105-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(87)90017-5.
36. Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Jeffrey A. Karp. “Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology.” Journal of Politics68, no. 2 (May 2006): 434-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00418.x.
37. Bromund, Ted R. “Uniting the Whole People: Proportional Representation in Great Britain, 1884-5, Reconsidered.” Historical Research 74, no. 183 (Feb. 2001): 77-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2281.00117.
38. Bull, Martin J., and James L. Newell. “Italian Politics and the 1992 Elections: From ‘Stable Instability’ to Instability and Change.” Parliamentary Affairs 46, no. 2 (Apr. 1993): 203-27.
39. Butler, David. “Electoral Reform and Political Strategy in Britain.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Serge Noiret, 451-63. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
40. Cairns, Alan. “The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921” Canadian Journal of Political Science 1, no. 1 (Mar. 1968): 55-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900035228.
41. Calvo, Ernesto. “The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation.” World Politics 6, no. 2 (Apr. 2009): 254-95.
42. Cammack, Paul. “Democratization and Citizenship in Latin America.” In Democracy and Democratization, ed. G. Parry and M. Moran, 174-95. London: Routledge, 1994.
43. Carothers, Thomas. “Democracy without Illusions.” Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations) 76, no. 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1997): 85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20047911.
44. Carty, R. Kenneth, André Blais, and Patrick Fournier. “When Citizens Choose to Reform SMP: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform.” In To Keep or to Change First Past the Post, ed. André Blais, 140-61. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539390.003.0006.
45. Capoccia, Giovanni, and Daniel Ziblatt. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43, nos 8-9 (2010): 931-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414010370431.
46. Christensen, Raymond V. “Electoral Reform in Japan: How It Was Enacted and Changes It May Bring.” Asian Survey 34, no. 7 (July 1994): 589-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.1994.34.7.00p0405n.
47. Collier, David, and Robert Adcock. “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts.” Annual Review of Political Science 2, no. 1 (1999): 537-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537.
48. Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research.” World Politics 49, no. 3 (Apr. 1997): 430-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0009.
49. Colomer, Josep. “The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. J. Colomer, 81-109. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230522749.
50. Commons, John R. Proportional Representation. 2nd ed. 1907; reprint, New York: August M. Kelley Publishers, 1967.
51. Corbetta, P., and A. Parisi. “The Referendum on the Electoral Law for the Senate: Another Momentous April.” In Italian Politics: A Review. Vol. 9, Ending the First Republic, ed. C. Mershon and G. Pasquino, 75-92. Boulder: Westview, 1995.
52. Craig, David M. “High Politics and the New Political History.” Historical Journal (Cambridge, England) 53, no. 2 (2010): 453-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X10000129.
53. Criddle, Byron. “Electoral Systems in France.” Parliamentary Affairs 45, no. 1 (Jan. 1992): 108-16.
54. Curtice, John. “Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change: Scotland and Wales.” Acta Politica 41, no. 3 (2006): 300-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500160.
55. Curtice, John, and Martin Range. “A Flawed Revolution? Britain’s New European Parliament Electoral System.” Representation 35, no. 1 (1998): 7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344899808523366.
56. Cusack, Thomas, Torben Iversen, and David Soskice. “Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 2 (May 2010): 393-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000134.
57. Cusack, Thomas, “Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 101, no. 3 (Aug. 2007): 373-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070384.
58. Denemark, David. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform.” In Mixed Member Electoral System: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. M. Shugart and M. Wattenberg, 70-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019925768X.003.0005.
59. De Sousa Santos, Boaventura. “The World Social Forum and the Global Left.” Politics & Society 36, no. 2 (2008): 247-70.
60. Diamond, Larry. “Defining and Developing Democracy.” In Dahl, Shapiro, and Cheibub, Democracy Sourcebook, 29-39.
61. Donovan, Mark. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Italy.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600104.
62. Donovan, Mark. “The Referendum and the Transformation of the Party System.” Modern Italy 1, no. 1 (1995): 53-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13532949508454758.
63. Dorey, Peter. “Between Ambivalence and Antipathy: The Labour Party and Electoral Reform.” Representation 40, no. 1 (2003): 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344890308523243.
64. Dunbabin, J.P.D. “Some Implications of the 1885 British Shift towards SingleMember Constituencies: A Note.” English Historical Review 109, no. 430 (Feb. 1994): 89-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/CIX.430.89.
65. Dunleavy, Patrick. “Assessing How Far Charter 88 and the Constitutional Reform Coalition Influenced Voting System Reform in Britain.” Parliamentary Affairs 62, no. 4 (2009): 618-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp020.
66. Dunleavy, P., and H. Margetts. “From Majoritarian to Pluralist Democracy? Electoral Reform in Britain since 1997.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13, no. 3 (2001): 295-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095169280101300304.
67. Dunleavy, P., and H. Margetts. “Understanding the Dynamics of Electoral Reform.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 9-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600102.
68. Dunleavy, P., and H. Margetts. “The United Kingdom: Reforming the Westminster Model.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. J. Colomer, 294-308. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
69. Elklit, Jørgen. “The Best of Both Worlds? The Danish Electoral System 1915-20 in a Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 11, no. 3 (1992): 189-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(92)90014-W.
70. Elklit, Jørgen. “The Politics of Electoral System Development and Change: The Danish Case.” In The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries, ed. B. Grofman and A. Lijphjart, 15-66. New York: Agathon.
71. Fabbrini, Sergio. “Has Italy Rejected the Referendum Path to Change? The Failed Referenda of May 2000.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 6, no. 1 (Spring 2001): 38-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545710010025907.
72. Farnsworth, Lee W. “Challenges to Factionalism on Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” Asian Survey 6, no. 9 (Sept. 1966): 501-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.1966.6.9.01p0205d.
73. Farr, James. “Historical Concepts in Political Science: The Case of ‘Revolution.’“ American Journal of Political Science 26, no. 4 (Nov. 1982): 688-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110968.
74. Farrell, David. “The United Kingdom Comes of Age: The British Electoral Reform ‘Revolution’ of the 1990s.” In Mixed Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. M. Shugart and M. Wattenberg, 521-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
75. Farrell, David, and Ian McAllister. “1902 and the Origins of the Preferential Electoral Systems in Australia.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 51, no. 2 (2005): 155-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2005.00368.x.
76. Feuchtwanger, E.J. ““Electoral Systems: An Anglo-German Comparison, 18671933.” Historical Research 65, no. 157 (June 1992): 194-200.
77. Flanagan, Scott, and Aie-Rei Lee. “Value Change and Democratic Reform in Japan and Korea.” Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 5 (June 2000): 626-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033005003.
78. Flinders, Matthew. “Charter 88, New Labour and Constitutional Anomie.” Parliamentary Affairs 62, no. 4 (2009): 645-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp023.
79. Frears, John. “The French Electoral System in 1986: PR by Lists and Highest Average.” Parliamentary Affairs 39, no. 4 (Oct. 1986): 489-95.
80. Furlong, P. “Government Stability and Electoral Systems: The Italian Example.” Parliamentary Affairs 44, no. 1 (1991): 50-9.
81. Gambetta, Diego, and Steve Warner. “Italy: Lofty Ambitions and Unintended Consequences.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. J. Colomer, 23752. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
82. Garner, James W. “Electoral Reform in France.” American Political Science Review 7, no. 4 (Nov. 1913): 610-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1944310.
83. Goldey, David, and Phillip Williams. “France.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler, 62-8. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
84. Graham, B.D. “The Choice of Voting Methods in Federal Politics, 1902-1918.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 8, no. 2 (Nov. 1962): 164-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1962.tb01039.x.
85. Green, Fletcher M. “Cycles of American Democracy.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 48, no. 1 (June 1961): 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1902401.
86. Green, Philip. “‘Democracy’ as a Contested Concept.” In Democracy, ed. Philip Green, 2-18. New Jersey: Humanity Books, 1999.
87. Hacker, A. “Inescapable Subjective Judgments.” In The Practice of Comparative Politics, ed. P.G. Lewis, D.C. Potter, and F.G. Castles, 214-27. London: Longman, 1978.
88. Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C.R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, no. 5 (1996): 936-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
89. Hamer, David. “The Second Ballot: A New Zealand Electoral Experiment.” New Zealand Journal of History 21, no. 1 (Apr. 1987): 97-111.
90. Hands, Gordon. “Roberto Michels and the Study of Political Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 1, no. 2 (Apr. 1971): 155-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400009029.
91. Harris, Joseph P. “The Practical Workings of Proportional Representation in the United States and Canada.” National Municipal Review 19, no. S5 (May 1930): S335-S83.
92. Hideo, Otake. “Forces for Political Reform: The Liberal Democratic Party’s Young Reformers and Ozawa Ichiro.” Journal of Japanese Studies 22, no. 2 (Summer 1996): 269-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/132974.
93. Hodge, Carl Cavanagh. “Three Ways to Lose a Republic: The Electoral Politics of the Weimar SPD.” European History Quarterly 17, no. 2 (1987): 165-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026569148701700203.
94. Hooghe, Marc, and Kris Deschouwer. “Veto Players and Electoral Reform in Belgium.” West European Politics 34, no. 3 (2011): 626-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555987.
95. Hopkins, Michael F. “Continuing Debate and New Approaches in Cold War History.” Historical Journal (Cambridge, England) 50, no. 4 (2007): 913-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X07006437.
96. Hrebenar, Ronald J. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Japan.” Asian Survey17, no. 10 (Oct. 1977): 978-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.1977.17.10.01p0343w.
97. Hughes, Colin A. “STV in Australia.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. S. Bowler and B. Grofman, 15577. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
98. Immergut, Ellen M. “Historical-Institutionalism in Political Science and the Problem of Change.” In Understanding Change: Models, Methodologies, and Metaphors, ed. Andréas Wimmer and Reinhart Kossler, 237-59. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005.
99. Immergut, Ellen M., and Karen M. Anderson. “Historical Institutionalism and West European Politics.” West European Politics 31, nos 1-2 (Jan.-Mar. 2008): 345-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380701835165.
100. Irvine, William. “A Review and Evaluation of Electoral System Reform Proposals.” In Institutional Reforms for Representative Government, Royal Commission on Economic Union Research. Vol. 38, ed. Peter Aucoin, 71-98. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
101. Jenson, Jane, and Frederic Merand. “Sociology, Institutionalism and the European Union.” Comparative European Politics 8, no. 1 (2010): 74-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cep.2010.5.
102. Jesse, Eckhard. “Electoral Reform in West Germany: Historical, Political and Judicial Aspects.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries., ed. Serge Noiret, 365-93. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
103. Jesse, Eckhard. “The Electoral System: More Continuity than Change.” In Institutions and Institutional Change in the Federal Republic of Germany, ed. Ludger Helms. New York: St Martin’s, 2000.
104. Jesse, Eckhard. “The West German Electoral System: The Case for Reform, 1949-87.” West European Politics 10, no. 3 (July 1987): 434-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402388708424642.
105. Johnston, J. Paul, and Miriam Koene. “Learning History’s Lessons Anew: The Use of STV in Canadian Municipal Elections.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. S. Bowler and B. Grofman, 205-47. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
106. Jones, Mark P. “A Guide to the Electoral Systems of the Americas.” Electoral Studies 14, no. 1 (1995): 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00021-Z.
107. Katznelson, Ira. “Reflections on History, Method, and Political Science.” Political Methodologist: Newsletter of the Political Methodology Section, American Political Science Association 8, no. 1 (Fall 1997): 11-14.
108. Keeler, John T.S., and Martin A. Schain. “Institutions, Political Poker, and Regime Evolution in France.” In Presidential Institutions and Democractic Politics, ed. Kurt von Mettenheim, 84-105. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
109. Kelsen, Hans. “Foundations of Democracy.” Ethics 66, no. 1 (Oct. 1955): 1-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/291036.
110. Kinsey, Barbara Sgouraki, and Olga Shvetsova. “Applying the Methodology of Mechanism Design to the Choice of Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20, no. 3 (2008): 303-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951629808090137.
111. Knapp, Andréw. “Orderly Retreat: Mitterrand Chooses PR.” Electoral Studies 4, no. 3 (1985): 255-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(85)90018-6.
112. Knapp, Andréw. “Proportional but Bipolar: France’s Electoral System in 1986.” West European Politics 10, no. 1 (Jan. 1987): 89-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0140238870 8424616.
113. Kolk, Henk van der. “Electoral System Change in the Netherlands: The Road from PR to PR (1917-2006).” Representation 43, no. 4 (2007): 271-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344890701574914.
114. Kreuzer, Marcus. “Germany: Partisan Engineering of Personalized Proportional Representation.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. J. Colomer, 222-36. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
115. Kreuzer, Marcus. “Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation.” American Political Science Review 104, no. 2 (May 2010): 369-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000122.
116. Krier, Dan. “Finance Capital, Neo-Liberalism and Critical Institutionalism.” Critical Sociology 35, no. 3 (2009): 395-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08969 20508101505.
117. Lamare, James W., and Jack Vowles. “Party Interests, Public Opinion, and Institutional Preferences: Electoral System Change in New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Political Science 31, no. 3 (1996): 321-46. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10361149651085.
118. Lamb, Peter. “Laski on Rights and the Problem of Liberal Democratic Theory.” Politics 19, no. 1 (1999): 15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00081.
119. Leffler, Melvyn P. “From the Truman Doctrine to the Carter Doctrine: Lessons and Dilemmas of the Cold War.” Diplomatic History 7, no. 4 (Fall 1983): 24566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1983.tb00394.x.
120. Leffler, Melvyn P. “Inside Enemy Archives: The Cold War Reopened.” Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations) 75, no. 4 (1996): 120-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20047663.
121. Lehoucq, Fabrice Edouard. “Institutional Change and Political Conflict: Evaluating Alternative Explanations of Electoral Reform in Costa Rica.” Electoral Reform 14, no. 1 (1995): 23-45.
122. Lewis, John D. “The Elements of Democracy.” American Political Science Review34, no. 3 (June 1940): 467-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1949351.
123. Lewis, P.A. “Agency, Structure and Causality in Political Science: A Comment on Sibeon.” Politics 22, no. 1 (Feb. 2002): 17-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00154.
124. Leyenaar, Monique, and Reuven Y. Hazan. “Reconceptualising Electoral Reform.” West European Politics 34, no. 3 (2011): 437-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555974.
125. Lijphart, Arend. “The Demise of the Last Westminster System: Comments on the Report of New Zealand’s Royal Commission on the Electoral System.” Electoral Studies 6, no. 2 (1987): 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(87)90016-3.
126. Lijphart, Arend. “The Dutch Electoral System in Comparative Perspective: Extreme Proportional Representation, Multipartism, and the Failure of Electoral Reform.” Netherlands Journal of Sociology 14 (1978): 115-33.
127. Lingelbach, William E. “American Democracy and European Interpreters.” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 61, no. 1 (Jan. 1937): 1-25.
128. Lippincott, Benjamin E. “The Bias of American Political Science.” Journal of Politics 2, no. 2 (May 1940): 125-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2125249.
129. Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 (Mar. 1959): 69-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1951731.
130. Livingston, James. “Social Theory and Historical Method in Williams’s Work.” Diplomatic History 25, no. 2 (Spring 2001): 251-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0145-2096.00262.
131. Luckham, Robin, Anne Marie Goetz, and Mary Kaldor. “Democratic Institutions and Democratic Politics.” In Can Democracy Be Designed?, ed. S. Bastian and R. Luckham, 14-59. New York: Zed Books, 2003.
132. Lundberg, Thomas Carl. “Electoral System Reviews in New Zealand, Britain and Canada: A Critical Comparison.” Government and Opposition 42, no. 4 (2007): 471-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00232.x.
133. Lutz, Georg. “Switzerland: Introducing Proportional Representation from Below.” In The Handbook of Electoral System Design, ed. J. Colomer, 279-93. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
134. Lynch, Peter. “Making Every Vote Count in Scotland: Devolution and Electoral Reform.” In Steps toward Making Every Vote Count: Electoral Reform in Canada and Its Provinces, ed. H. Milner, 145-58. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004.
135. Mahaim, Ernest. “Proportional Representation and the Debates upon the Electoral Question in Belgium.” Annals 15, no. 3 (1900): 381-404.
136. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, 3-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
137. Maloy, J.S. “A Genealogy of Rational Choice: Rationalism, Elitism, and Democracy.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41, no. 3 (Sept. 2008): 749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008423908080815.
138. Markoff, John. “Where and When Was Democracy Invented?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41, no. 4 (1999): 660-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417599003096.
139. Massicotte, Louis, and André Blais. “Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey.” Electoral Studies 18, no. 3 (1999): 341-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8.
140. McAdam, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” PS: Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (June 2010): 529-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001234.
141. McCarthy, Patrick. “The Referendum of 9 June.” In Italian Politics: A Review. Vol. 7, ed. S. Hellman and G. Pasquino, 11-28. New York: Pinter Publishers, 1992.
142. McClosky, Herbert. “The Fallacy of Absolute Majority Rule.” Journal of Politics11, no. 4 (Nov. 1949): 637-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2126227.
143. McKee, Paul. “The Republic of Ireland.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler, 167-89. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
144. McLean, Iain. “The Jenkins Commission and the Implications of Electoral Reform for the UK Constitution.” Government and Opposition 34, no. 2 (1999): 143-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1999.tb00475.x.
145. Medearis, John. “Schumpeter, the New Deal, and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 4 (Dec. 1997): 819-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2952166.
146. Meier, Heinz K. “The Swiss National General Strike of November 1918.” In Neutral Europe between War and Revolution 1917-23, ed. Hans A. Schmitt, 86. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1988.
147. Melleuish, Gregory. “Bruce Smith, Edward Shann, W.K. Hancock: The Economic Critique of Democracy in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 44, no. 4 (2009): 579-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10361140 903296529.
148. Miller, Gary J. “The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Political Science.” Journal of Economic Literature 35, no. 3 (Sept. 1997): 1173-204.
149. Miller, James E. “Taking Off the Gloves: The United States and the Italian Elections of 1948.” Diplomatic History 7, no. 1 (Winter 1983): 35-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.1983.tb00381.x.
150. Milner, Henry. “Obstacles to Electoral Reform in Canada.” American Review of Canadian Studies 24, no. 1 (1994): 39-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02722019409481757.
151. Nagel, Jack. “Social Choice in a Pluralitarian Democracy: The Politics of Market Liberalization in New Zealand.” British Journal of Political Science 28, no. 2 (1998): 223-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000155.
152. Nagel, Jack. “New Zealand: Reform by (Nearly) Immaculate Design.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. Josep M. Colomer, 530-43. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
153. Naville, Ernest. “PR in Switzerland.” PR Review 1, no. 2 (Dec. 1893): 55-8.
154. Nelson, Joan. “The Politics of Economic Transformation: Is Third World Experience Relevant in Eastern Europe?” World Politics 45, no. 3 (1993): 433-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2950725.
155. Neumann, Robert G. “The Struggle for Electoral Reform in France.” American Political Science Review 45, no. 3 (Sept. 1951): 741-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1951162.
156. Niehuss, Merith. “Historiography, Sources and Methods of Electoral and Electoral Law Analysis in Germany: 1871-1987.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Serge Noiret, 141-61. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsge-sellschaft, 1990.
157. Noiret, S., ed. Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
158. Norris, Pippa. “Introduction: The Politics of Electoral Reform.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600101.
159. Norris, Pippa. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Britain.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 65-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600105.
160. O’Mahony, Jane. “The Irish Referendum Experience.” Representation 35, no. 4 (1998): 225-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344899808523044.
161. Orliffe, Herbert. “Proportional Representation.” Canadian Forum 22, no. 205 (Feb. 1938): 388-90.
162. Paley, Julia. “Toward an Anthropology of Democracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31, no. 1 (2002): 469-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085453.
163. Parker, Simon. “Electoral Reform and Political Change in Italy, 1991-1994.” In The New Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi, ed. S. Gundle and S. Parker, 40-58. London: Routledge, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203431443_chapter_2.
164. Parsons, Tim. “The Community Schools Movement.” Community Issues 2, no. 6 (Dec. 1970): 1-77.
165. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “A Postmortem of the Bicamerale.” In Italian Politics: A Review. Vol. 14, The Return of Politics, ed. D. Hine and S. Vassallo. New York: Berghahn Books, 2000: 101-20.
166. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “Reforming the Italian Constitution.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 3, no. 1 (1998): 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545719808454965.
167. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “That Obscure Object of Desire: A New Electoral Law for Italy.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. S. Noiret. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
168. Pasquino, Gianfranco. “Tricks and Treats: The 2005 Italian Electoral Law and Its Consequences.” South European Society & Politics 12, no. 1 (2007): 79-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13608740601155500.
169. Penades, Alberto. “Choosing Rules for Government: The Institutional Preferences of Early Socialist Parties.” In Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability, ed. J. Maravall and I. Sanchez-Cuenca, 202 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611414.009.
170. Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre, and Desmond S. King. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” Journal of Politics 67, no. 4 (Nov. 2005): 1275-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x.
171. Pierce, Roy. “France Reopens the Constitutional Debate.” American Political Science Review 46, no. 2 (June 1952): 422-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1950838.
172. Pierce, Roy. “The French Election of January 1956.” Journal of Politics 19, no. 3 (Aug. 1957): 391-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2126767.
173. Pierce, Roy. “French Legislative Elections: The Historical Background.” In The French National Assembly Elections of 1978, ed. Howard R. Penniman, 1-37. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1980.
174. Pilet, Jean-Benoit, and Damien Bol. “Party Preferences and Electoral Reform: How Time in Government Affects the Likelihood of Supporting Electoral Change.” West European Politics 34, no. 3 (2011): 568-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555984.
175. Pilon, Dennis. “Democracy, BC-Style.” In British Columbia Politics and Government, ed. Michael Howlett, Dennis Pilon, and Tracy Summerville, 87-108. Toronto: Emond Montgomery, 2010.
176. Pilon, Dennis. “Explaining Voting System Reform in Canada: 1874 to 1960.” Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’etudes canadiennes 40, no. 3 (Autumn 2006): 135-61.
177. Pilon, Dennis. “Investigating Media as a Deliberative Space: Newspaper Opinions about Voting Systems in the 2007 Ontario Provincial Referendum.” Canadian Political Science Review 3, no. 3 (Sept. 2009): 1-23.
178. Pollock, James K. “The West German Electoral Law of 1953.” American Political Science Review 49, no. 1 (Mar. 1955): 107-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1951642.
179. Polosky, Janet L. “A Revolution for Socialist Reforms: The Belgian General Strike for Universal Suffrage.” Journal of Contemporary History 27, no. 3 (1992): 449-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200949202700304.
180. Pottie, David, and Shireen Hassim. “The Politics of Institutional Design in the South African Tradition.” In Bastian and Luckham, Can Democracy Be Designed?, 60-92.
181. Prewitt, Kenneth. “Political Ideas and a Political Science for Policy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600, no. 1 (2005): 14-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276660.
182. Pryce, Roy. “The New Italian Electoral Law.” Parliamentary Affairs 6, no. 3 (1952): 269-76.
183. Pugh, Martin. “Political Parties and the Campaign for Proportional Representation 1905-1914.” Parliamentary Affairs 33, no. 3 (Summer 1980): 294-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/33.3.294.
184. Pulzer, Peter. “Germany.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler, 84-109. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
185. Quintal, David P. “The Theory of Electoral Systems.” Western Political Quarterly 23, no. 4 (1970): 752-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/446474.
186. Rahat, Gideon. “The Study of the Politics of Electoral Reform in the 1990s: Theoretical and Methodological Lessons.” Comparative Politics 36, no. 4 (July 2004): 461-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4150171.
187. Rahat, Gideon, and Reuven Y. Hazan. “The Barriers to Electoral System Reform: A Synthesis of Alternative Approaches.” West European Politics 34, no. 3 (2011): 478-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555976.
188. Reed, S.R., and M.F. Thies. “The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems, ed. M. Shugart and M. Wattenberg, 152-72. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019925768X.003.0008.
189. Reilly, Ben, and Michael Maley. “The Single Transferable Vote and the Alternative Vote Compared.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. S. Bowler and B. Grofman, 37-58. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
190. Remner, Karen L. “The Politics of Institutional Change: Electoral Reform in Latin America, 1978-2002.” Party Politics 14, no. 1 (2008): 5-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354068807083821.
191. Renwick, Alan. “Do ‘Wrong Winner’ Elections Trigger Electoral Reform? Lessons from New Zealand.” Representation 45, no. 4 (2009): 357-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00344890903235256.
192. Renwick, Alan. “Electoral Reform in Europe since 1945.” West European Politics 34, no. 3 (2011): 456-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.555975.
193. Renwick, Alan. “Why Did National Promise a Referendum on Electoral Reform in 1990?” Political Science (Wellington, N.Z.) 59, no. 1 (2007): 7-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003231870705900104.
194. Reynolds, Andréw. “Electoral System Reform in the United Kingdom.” In Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada’s Electoral System, ed. H. Milner, 171-8. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999.
195. Ritter, Gerhard A. “The Electoral Systems of Imperial Germany and Their Consequences for Politics.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Serge Noiret, 53-75. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
196. Roberts, G.K. “The Explanation of Politics: Comparison, Strategy and Theory.” In The Practice of Comparative Politics, 2nd ed., ed. P.G. Lewis, D.C. Potter, and F.G. Castles, 287-304. London: Longman, 1978.
197. Robertson David, Brian. “The Return to History and the New Institutionalism in American Political Science.” Social Science History 17, no. 1 (Spring 1993): 1-36.
198. Rogers, Daniel E. “Transforming the German Party System: The United States and the Origins of Political Moderation, 1945-1949.” Journal of Modern History 65, no. 3 (Sept. 1993): 512-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/244673.
199. Rogowski, Ronald. “Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions.” International Organization 41, no. 2 (Spring 1987): 203-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027442.
200. Rosanvallon, Pierre. “The History of the Word Democracy in France.” Journal of Democracy 6, no. 4 (1995): 140-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0072.
201. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. “Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, 305-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
202. Rustin, Michael. “Revisiting Charter 88.” Parliamentary Affairs 62, no. 4 (2009): 568-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp025.
203. Rydon, Joan. “Electoral Methods and the Australian Party System.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 2, no. 1 (Nov. 1956): 68-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1956.tb01001.x.
204. Saul, John. “For Fear of Being Condemned as ‘Old Fashioned’: Liberal Democracy vs Popular Democracy in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Review of African Political Economy 24, no. 73 (1997): 339-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056249708704267.
205. Saunders, Robert. “The Politics of Reform and the Making of the Second Reform Act, 1848-1867.” Historical Journal (Cambridge, England) 50, no. 3 (2007): 571-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X07006267.
206. Sawer, Marian. “Australia: Replacing Plurality Rule with Majority-Preferential Voting.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. Josep Colomer, 475-86. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004.
207. Scammon, Richard. “Postwar Elections and Electoral Processes.” In Governing Postwar Germany, ed. Edward H. Litchfield, 500-33. New York: Kennikat, 1953.
208. Scarrow, Susan E. “Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 55-69. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019925768X.003.0004
209. Seidle, F. Leslie. “The Canadian Electoral System and Proposals for Reform.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, 2nd ed., ed. A. Brian Tanguay and Alain-G. Gagnon, 282-306. Toronto: Nelson, 1996.
210. Seip, Dick. “The Netherlands.” In European Electoral Systems Handbook, ed. Geoffrey Hand, Jacques Georgel, and Christoph Sasse, 193-216. London: Butterworths, 1979.
211. Seton-Watson, Christopher. “Italy.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler, 110-21. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
212. Shepard, Walter J. “Democracy in Transition.” American Political Science Reviewno. 1 (Feb. 1935): 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1947163.
213. Shepsle, Kenneth A. “A Comment on Institutional Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13, no. 3 (2001): 321-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095169280101300305.
214. Shin, Michael E., and John Agnew. “The Geographical Dynamics of Italian Electoral Change.” Electoral Studies 26, no. 2 (2007): 287-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.05.002.
215. Shiratori, Rei. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in Japan.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 79-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600106.
216. Shugart, Matthew. “Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Michael Gallagher and Paul Mitchell, 25-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199257566.003.0002.
217. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. “‘Extreme’ Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative.” In Mixed Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. M. Shugart and P. Wattenberg, 25-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
218. Skocpol, Theda, and Margaret Somers. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22, no. 2 (Apr. 1980): 174-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009282.
219. Steinmo, Sven. “Historical Institutionalism.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, ed. Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating, 118-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
220. Stockwin, J.A.A. “Japan.” In Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, ed. Vernon Bogdanor and David Butler, 209-27. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
221. Studlar, Donley. “Will Canada Seriously Consider Electoral System Reform? Women and Aboriginals Should.” In Making Every Vote Count, ed. H. Milner, 123-32. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999.
222. Sundberg, Jan. “The Electoral System of Finland: Old, and Working Well.” In The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in Nordic Countries, ed. B. Grofman and A. Lijphjart, 68-9, 74. New York: Agathon, 2002.
223. Thayer, James R. “The Contribution of Public Opinion Polls to the Understanding of the 1953 Election to Italy, West Germany and Japan.” Public Opinion Quarterly 19, no. 3 (Autumn 1955): 259-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266571.
224. Thelen, Kathleen, and Sven Steinmo. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics, ed. S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth, 1-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528125.002.
225. Therborn, Goran. “The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy.” New Left Review 103 (May-June 1977): 3-41.
226. Ullrich, Hartmut. “Historiography, Sources and Methods for the Study of Electortal Laws in Italy.” In Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries, ed. Serge Noiret, 297-334. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
227. Vincent, John. “The Effect of Second Reform Act in Lancashire.” Historical Journal (Cambridge, England) 11, no. 1 (1968): 84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00002363.
228. Vowles, Jack. “The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand.” International Political Science Review 16, no. 1 (1995): 95-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600107.
229. Wahl, Nicholas. “The French Constitution of 1958: II. The Initial Draft and Its Origins.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 2 (June 1959): 358-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1952152.
230. Walker, Jack L. “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 60, no. 2 (June 1966): 285-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953356.
231. Walker, R.B. “Catherine Helen Spence and South Australian Politics.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 15, no. 1 (Apr. 1969): 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.1969.tb00938.x.
232. Weaver, Leon. “The Rise, Decline, and Resurrection of Proportional Representation in Local Governments in the United States.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. B. Grofman and A. Lijphart, 139-53. New York: Agathon, 1986.
233. Whitehead, Laurence. “The Vexed Issue of the Meaning of Democracy.” Journal of Political Ideologies 2, no. 2 (1997): 121-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569319708420754.
234. Wolfe, Eugene L. “Japanese Electoral and Political Reform: Role of the Young Turks.” Asian Survey 35, no. 12 (Dec. 1995): 1059-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.1995.35.12.01p00747.
235. Wollheim, Richard. “Democracy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 19, no. 2 (Apr. 1958): 225-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2707936.
236. Zelizer, Julian E. “What Political Science Can Learn from the New Political History.” Annual Review of Political Science 13, no. 1 (2010): 25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.032708.120246.
237. Ziblatt, Daniel. “Shaping Democratic Practices and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 1 (Feb. 2009): 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090042.
238. Adcock, Robert Mark Bevir, and Shannon C. Stimson, eds. Modern Political Science: Anglo-American Exchanges since 1880. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
239. Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown, 1965.
240. Amadae, S.M. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2003.
241. Andréws, G.R., and H. Chapman, eds. The Social Construction of Democracy, 1870-1990. New York: New York University Press, 1995.
242. Archibugi, Daniele, ed. Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso, 2003.
243. Arrow, Kenneth J. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley, 1951.
244. Aucoin, Peter, ed. Institutional Reforms for Representative Government, Royal Commission on Economic Union Research. Vol. 38. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.
245. Barber, Kathleen. A Right to Representation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2000.
246. Barrow, Logie, and Ian Bullock. Democratic Ideas and the British Labour Movement, 1880-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521287.
247. Bastian, S., and R. Luckham, eds. Can Democracy Be Designed? London: Zed Books, 2003.
248. Bendix, Richard. Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order. New York: Wiley, 1964.
249. Benello, C. George, and Dimitrios Roussopoulos, eds. The Case for Participatory Democracy. New York: Viking Compass, 1971.
250. Bernhard, Michael. Institutions and the Fate of Democracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.
251. Beyme, Klaus von. Parliamentary Democracy: Democratization, Destabilization, Reconsolidation, 1789-1999. Houndsmill: Macmillan, 2000.
252. Blais, André, ed. To Keep or to Change First Past the Post: The Politics of Electoral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539390.001.0001.
253. Bogdanor, Vernon. The People and the Party System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
254. Bogdanor, Vernon, and David, Butler, eds. Democracy and Elections: Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
255. Bowler, Shaun, and Bernard Grofman, eds. Election in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
256. Brady, Alexander. Democracy in the Dominions: A Comparative Study in Institutions. 3rd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1958.
257. Buxton, William. Talcott Parsons and the Capitalist Nation-State: Political Sociology as a Strategic Vocation. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1985.
258. Campbell, John L. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
259. Campbell, Peter. French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. 2nd ed. Hamden: Archon Books, 1965.
260. Carstairs, Andréw McLaren. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1980.
261. Carter, April. Direct Action and Democracy Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.
262. Christensen, Ray. Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000.
263. Cole, Alistair, and Peter Campbell. French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. Aldershot: Gower, 1989.
264. Collier, Ruth Berins. Paths towards Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
265. Colomer, Josep M., ed. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230522749.
266. Commons, John R. Proportional Representation. 2nd ed. 1907. Reprint, New York: August M. Kelley Publishers, 1967.
267. Cook, Terrence E., and Patrick M. Morgan, eds. Participatory Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
268. Cowling, Maurice. 1867 Disraeli, Gladstone and Revolution: The Passing of the Second Reform Bill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511560477.
269. Cox, Gary W. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
270. Crick, Bernard. In Defence of Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972.
271. Crouch, Colin. Post-Democracy. London: Polity, 2004.
272. Crozier, Michel, Samuel Huntington, and Joji Watanuki. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press, 1975.
273. Cunningham, Frank. Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2002.
274. Curtis, Gerald D. The Logic of Japanese Politics; Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.
275. Dahl, Robert, ed. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale, 1966.
276. Dahl, Robert, ed. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
277. Dahl, Robert A., Ian Shapiro, and Jose Antonio Cheibub, eds. The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
278. Dahms, Harry F., ed. No Social Science without Critical Theory. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2008.
279. Dalton, R.J., S.C. Flanagan, and P.A. Beck, eds. Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment? New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
280. Denver, David, James Mitchell, Charles Pattie, and Hugh Bochel. Scotland Decides: The Devolution Issue and the Scottish Referendum. London: Frank Cass, 2000.
281. Diamond, Larry, Juan Linz, and Seymour Martin Lipset, eds. Democracy in Developing Countries. Vol. 4: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1989.
282. Diamond, L., and M. Plattner, eds. The Global Resurgence of Democracy. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
283. Duverger, Maurice. Political Parties: 1954. Reprint, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1963.
284. Ebsworth, Raymond. Restoring Democracy in Germany: The British Contribution. New York: Praeger, 1960.
285. Eley, Geoff. Forging Democracy: The History of the Left in Europe, 1850-2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
286. Evans, P., D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628283.
287. Farrell, David M. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
288. Farrell, David, and Ian McAllister. The Australian Electoral System. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2006.
289. Finer, Herman. The Case against PR. London: Fabian Society, 1924.
290. Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin Wright, eds. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso, 2003.
291. Gallagher, Michael, and Paul Mitchell, eds. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199257566.001.0001.
292. Gill, Stephen. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. 2nd ed. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230584518.
293. Ginsberg, Benjamin. The Consequences of Consent: Elections, Citizen Control and Popular Acquiescence. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1982.
294. Golay, John Ford. The Founding of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
295. Goldstein, Robert J. Political Repression in 19th Century Europe. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
296. Goodwyn, Lawrence. Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
297. Green, Philip, ed. Democracy. New Jersey: Humanity Books, 1993.
298. Green, Philip, and Sanford Levinson, eds. Power and Community: Dissenting Essays in Political Science. New York: Random House, 1970.
299. Grofman, Bernard, Sung-Chull Lee, Edwin A. Winckler, and Brian Woodall, eds. Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
300. Grofman, Bernard, and Arend Lijphart, eds. Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon, 1986.
301. Grugel, Jean. Democratization: A Critical Introduction. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
302. Gundle, Stephen, and Simon Parker, eds. The New Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi. London: Routledge, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203431443.
303. Hallett, George Jr. Proportional Representation: The Key to Democracy. 1940. Reprint, Westport: Hyperion, 1979.
304. Hand, Geoffrey, Jacques Georgel, and Christoph Sasse, eds. European Electoral Systems Handbook. London: Butterworths, 1979.
305. Hart, Jenifer. Proportional Representation: Critics of the British Electoral System, 1820-1945. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.
306. Hay, Colin. Political Analysis. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
307. Held, David. Models of Democracy. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
308. Helleiner, Eric. States and the Reemergence of Global Finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.
309. Helms, Ludger, ed. Institutions and Institutional Change in the Federal Republic of Germany. New York: St Martin’s, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780333977699.
310. Hermans, Ferdinand A. Democracy or Anarchy? A Study of Proportional Representation. 1941. Reprint, New York: Johnson Reprint, 1972.
311. Hirschl, Ran. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
312. Hoag, Clarence, and George, Hallett, Jr. Proportional Representation. New York: Macmillan, 1926.
313. Hudson, W.J., and M.P. Sharp. Australian Independence: Colony to Reluctant Kingdom. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1988.
314. Irvine, William. Does Canada Need a New Electoral System? Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1979.
315. Isaac, Jeffrey C. Democracy in Dark Times. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.
316. Jackson, Keith, and Alan McRobie. New Zealand Adopts Proportional Representation. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
317. Jones, Andréw. The Politics of Reform 1884. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
318. Katz, Richard. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195044294.001.0001.
319. Katz, R., and P. Mair, eds. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage, 1994.
320. Keyssar, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books, 2000.
321. Kohno, Masaru. Japan’s Postwar Party Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
322. Kolko, Gabriel. The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943-45. New York: Vintage Books, 1968.
323. Laski, Harold. Democracy in Crisis. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1933.
324. Levin, Michael. The Spectre of Democracy: The Rise of Modern Democracy as Seen by Its Critics. New York: New York University Press, 1992.
325. Lijphart, Arend. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
326. Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
327. Lijphart, Arend. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
328. Lipset, Seymour Martin. Political Man: The Sociological Bases of Politics. 1960; New York: Anchor Books, 1963.
329. Lundell, Krister. The Origins of Electoral Systems in the Postwar Era. New York: Routledge, 2009.
330. Mackie, Gerry. Democracy Defended. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490293.
331. Mackie, Thomas T., and Richard Rose. The International Almanac of Electoral History. 2nd ed. New York: Facts on File, 1982.
332. Macpherson, C.B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
333. Macpherson, C.B. The Real World of Democracy. 1965. Toronto: CBC Enterprises, 1992.
334. Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659935.
335. Maravall, J., and I. Sanchez-Cuenca, eds. Controlling Governments: Voters, Institutions, and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008
336. Marshall, T.H. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
337. Massicotte, Louis, André Blais, and Antoine Yoshinaka. Establishing the Rules of the Game: Election Laws in Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
338. Merkl, Peter H. The Origin of the West German Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1963.
339. Mershon, Carol, and Gianfranco Pasquino, eds. Italian Politics. Vol. 9, Ending the First Republic. Boulder: Westview, 1995.
340. Mettenheim Kurt von, ed. Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
341. Miliband, Ralph. The State in Capitalist Society. 1969; London: Quartet Books, 1973.
342. Mills, C. Wright. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
343. Milner, Henry, ed. Making Every Vote Count: Reassessing Canada’s Electoral System. Peterborough: Broadview, 1999.
344. Milner, Henry, ed. Steps toward Making Every Vote Count: Electoral Reform in Canada and Its Provinces. Peterborough: Broadview, 2004.
345. Moore, Barrington, Jr. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon, 1966.
346. Myers, A.R. Parliaments and Estates in Europe to 1789. London: Thames and Hudson, 1975.
347. Newman, W.L. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.
348. Noiret, Serge, ed. Political Strategies and Electoral Reforms: Origins of Voting Systems in Europe in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990.
349. Nordlinger, Eric A. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.
350. Norris, Pippa. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790980.
351. Ostrogorski, M. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Vol. 1. England: 1902.
352. Panebianco, Angelo. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
353. Parry, Gerraint, and Michael Moran, eds. Democracy and Democratization. London: Routledge, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203198551.
354. Pateman, Carole. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
355. Pennock, J. Roland. Democratic Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
356. Pierce, Roy. French Politics and Political Institutions. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
357. Piven, Frances Fox. Challenging Authority: How Ordinary People Change America. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006.
358. Pugh, Martin. Electoral Reform in War and Peace 1906-18. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.
359. Pugh, Martin. The Evolution of the British Electoral System, 1832-1987. London: Historical Association, 1990.
360. Rae, Douglas. The Political Consequences of Electoral Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971.
361. Renwick, Alan. The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
362. Reynolds, Andréw. Electoral Systems and Democratization in Southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198295103.001.0001.
363. Rokkan, Stein. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of Processes of Development. New York: David McKay, 1970.
364. Roper, Jon. Democracy and Its Critics: Anglo-American Democratic Thought in the Nineteenth Century. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.
365. Rose, Richard, ed. Electoral Behaviour: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press, 1974.
366. Rowat, Donald C. The Ombudsman Plan: Essays on the Worldwide Spread of an Idea. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1973.
367. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyne Huber Stephens, and John D. Stephens. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
368. Schumpeter, Joseph P. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 1943; New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1976.
369. Self, Peter. Government by the Market? Boulder: Westview, 1993.
370. Seymour, Charles. Electoral Reform in England and Wales: The Development and Operation of the Parliamentary Franchise, 1832-1885. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1915.
371. Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
372. Skocpol, Theda, ed. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
373. Steinmetz, George, ed. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.
374. Steinmo, S., K. Thelen, and F. Longstreth, eds. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528125.
375. Storing, Herbert J., ed. Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1962.
376. Stretton, Hugh. The Political Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.
377. Swanson, D.L., and P. Mancini, eds. Politics, Media and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Political Consequences. Westport: Praeger, 1996.
378. Thompson, Dorothy. The Chartists. London: Temple Smith, 1984.
379. Thompson, E.P. Customs in Common. New York: New Press, 1991.
380. Thompson, E.P. The Poverty of Theory. Manchester: Merlin, 1978.
381. Tilly, Charles. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
382. Todd, Malcolm J., and Gary Taylor, eds. Democracy and Participation: Popular Protest and New Social Movements. London: Merlin, 2004.
383. Tornudd, Klaus. The Electoral System of Finland. London: Hugh Evelyn, 1968.
384. Wainwright, Hilary. Reclaim the State: Experiments in Popular Democracy. London: Verso, 2003.
385. Waligorski, Conrad. The Political Theory of Conservative Economists. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1990.