A flawed revolution? Britain's new european parliament electoral system

Representation

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 7-15

  Curtice, John ^a,b   Range, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b The ESRC Centre for Research   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945666999     PISSN: 00344893     EISSN: 17494001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00344899808523366     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. R. Katz, ‘Intraparty Preference Voting’, in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (eds.), Electoral Laurs and Their Political Consequences (New York, Agathon, 1986).
2. A. Lijphart, Electoral Systems and Partg Systems: A Study qfTurenty-Seven Democracies, 1943-90 (Oxford University Press, 1994).
3. J. Loosemore and VJ. Hanby, ‘The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems’, British Journal ofPolitical Science, r (1971), pp. 467-77.
4. McLean and R. Mortimore, ‘Apportionment and the Boundary Commission for England’, Electoral Studies, 11:4 (1992), pp.293-309.
5. M. Marsh, ‘The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems’, European Journal ofPolitical Research, 13 (1985), pp. 365-78.
6. L. Miles and A. Kintis, ‘The New Members: Sweden, Austria and Finland’, in J. Lodge (ed.), The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament (London, Pinter, 1996).