Hydrograph estimation with fuzzy chain model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 538, Issue , 2016, Pages 587-597

  Güçlü, Yavuz Selim ^a,b   Şen, Zekai ^a,b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Clark; Fuzzy; Hydrograph; Peak discharge; SCS; Snyder

Indexed keywords

CHAINS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; SCANDIUM; SOIL CONSERVATION;

CLARK; FUZZY; HYDROGRAPHS; PEAK DISCHARGE; SNYDER;

FUZZY INFERENCE;

ESTIMATION METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; METHODOLOGY; PEAK DISCHARGE; URBANIZATION;

AYAMAMA BASIN; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84965140695     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.057     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bárdossy A., Duckstein L. Fuzzy Rule-based Modeling with Applications to Geophysical, Biological and Engineering Systems 1995, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
2. Bhunya P.K., et al. Hybrid model for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(6):458-467.
3. Burnash, R.J.C., Ferral R.L., McGuire, R.A., 1973. A generalized streamflow simulation system-Conceptual modeling for digital computers. Technical Report of the Joint Federal-State River Forecast Center, Department of Water Resources, State of California and National Weather Service, 204 pp.
4. Casper M., Gemmar P., Gronz O., Johst M., Stüber M. Fuzzy logic-based rainfall-runoff modelling using soil moisture measurements to represent system state. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2007, 52(3):478-490.
5. Chang F.J., Tsai M.T. A nonlinear spatio-temporal lumping of radar rainfall for modelling multi-step-ahead inflow forecasts by data-driven techniques. J. Hydrol. 2016, 535:256-269.
6. Chang F.J., Wang K.W. A systematical water allocation scheme for drought mitigation. J. Hydrol. 2013, 507:124-133.
7. Chau K.W., Wu C.L., Li Y.S. Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2005, 10(6).
8. Che D., Nangare M., Mays L. Determination of Clark's unit hydrograph parameters for watersheds. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2014, 19(2):384-387.
9. Chen C.S., Jhong Y.D., Wu T.Y., Chen S.T. Typhoon event-based evolutionary fuzzy inference model for flood stage forecasting. J. Hydrol. 2013, 490:134-143.
10. Clark C.O. Storage and the unit hydrograph. Trans. ASCE 1945, 110:1419-1488.
11. Feng L.H., Lu J. The practical research on flood forecasting based on artificial neural networks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(4):2974-2977.
12. Foster H.A. Theoretical frequency curves. ASCE Trans. 1924, 87:142-203.
13. Fuller W.E. Flood flows. ASCE Trans. 1914, 77:567-617.
14. Gericke O.J., Smithers J.C. Review of methods used to estimate catchment response time for the purpose of peak discharge estimation. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2014, 59(11):1935-1971.
15. Güçlü Y.S., Yeleğen M.Ö., Dabanli I., Şişman E. Solar irradiation estimations and comparisons by ANFIS, Angström-Prescott and dependency models. Sol. Energy 2014, 109:118-124.
16. Gumbel E.J. The return period of flood flows. Ann. Math. Stat. 1941, 12:163-190.
17. Hazen A. Discussion of 'The probable variations in yearly runoffas determined from a study of California streams' by L. Standish Hall. ASCE Trans. 1921, 84:214-222.
18. Hollister G.B., Leighton M.O. The Passaic Flood of 1902, Water Supply Paper 88 1903, USGS, Washington, DC.
19. Jang J.S.R. Self-learning fuzzy controller based on temporal back-propagation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1992, 3(5):714-723.
20. Kar A., Winn L., Lohani A., Goel N. Soft computing-based workable flood forecasting model for Ayeyarwady River Basin of Myanmar. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 17(7):807-822.
21. Kirpich Z.P. Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civ. Eng. 1940, 10(6):362. The original source for the Kirpich equation.
22. Koutroulis A.G., Tsanis I.K. A method for estimating flash flood peak discharge in a poorly gauged basin: case study for the 13-14 January 1994 flood, Giofyros basin, Crete. J. Hydrol. 2010, 385:150-164.
23. Kuichling E. The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1889, 20:1-56.
24. Lohani A.K., Goel N., Bhatia K. Improving real time flood forecasting using fuzzy inference system. J. Hydrol. 2014, 509:25-41.
25. Mamdani E.H. Application of fuzzy algorithms for simple dynamic plant. Proc. IEEE 1974, 121(12):1585-1588.
26. Mukerji A., Chatterjee C., Raghuwanshi N.S. Flood forecasting using ANN, Neuro-Fuzzy, and Neuro-GA models. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14(6).
27. Norbiato D., Borga M., Degli Esposti S., Gaume E., Anquetin S. Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: an assessment for gauged and ungauged basins. J. Hydrol. 2008, 362:274-290.
28. O'Connell P.P.L. On the relation of the freshwater floods of rivers to the areas and physical features of their basins and on a method of classifying rivers and streams with reference to the magnitude of their floods. Minutes Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 1868, 27(1868):204-217.
29. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 1995, McGraw Hill Co., New York.
30. Russell S.O., Campbell P.F. Reservoir operating rules with fuzzy programming. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. ASCE 1996, 122(3):165-170.
31. Saad M., Bigras P., Turgeon A., Duquette R. Fuzzy learning decomposition for the scheduling of hydroelectric power systems. Water Resour. Res. 1996, 32(1):179-186.
32. Saghafian B. Nonlinear transformation of unit hydrograph. J. Hydrol. 2006, 330:596-603.
33. Sedki A., Ouazar D., El Mazoudi E. Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm for daily rainfall-runoff forecasting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(1):4523-4527.
34. Shamir E., Lee B., Bae D., Georgakakos K.P. Flood forecasting in regulated basins using the ensemble extended Kalman Filter with the storage function method. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15(12).
35. Sherman L.K. Streamflow from rainfall by the unit-graph method. Eng. News Rec. 1932, 108:501-505.
36. Shrestra B.P., Duckstein L., Stakhiv E.Z. Fuzzy rule-based modeling of reservoir operation. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. ASCE 1996, 122(4):262-269.
37. Singh P.K., Mishra S.K., Jain M.K. A review of the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2013, 59(2):239-261.
38. Snyder F.F. Synthetic unit-graphs. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1938, 19:447-454.
39. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology 1972, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
40. Sugeno, M. (Ed.), 1985. Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Control North-Holland, New York.
41. Şen Z. Yapay Sinir Ağlari Ilkeleri (in Turkish) 2004, Turkish Water Foundation Publications, Istanbul.
42. Şen Z. Fuzzy Logic and Hydrological Modelling 2010, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
43. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst.: Man Cybern. 1985, 15(1):116-132.
44. Talei A., Chua L.H.C., Quek C. A novel application of neuro-fuzzy computational technique in event-based rainfall-runoff modeling. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:7456-7468.
45. Talei A., Chua L.H.C., Wong T.S. Evaluation of rainfall and discharge inputs used by Adaptive Network-based Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) in rainfall-runoff modelling. J. Hydrol. 2010, 391(3):248-262.
46. Talei A., Chua L.H.C., Quek C., Jansson P.E. Runoff forecasting using a Takagi-Sugeno neuro-fuzzy model with online learning. J. Hydrol. 2013, 488:17-32.
47. Tayfur G., Singh V.P. ANN and fuzzy logic models for simulating event-based rainfall-runoff. J. Hydraulic Eng. 2006, 132(12).
48. Thiessen A.H. Precipitation for large areas. Mon. Weather Rev. 1911, 39:1082-1084.
49. USDA-NRCS, 2007. National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 (Hydrology) Chapter 16, Michigan.
50. Wu X., Xiang X., Wang C., Chen X., Xu C., Yu Z. Coupled hydraulic and Kalman filter model for real time correction of flood forecast in the Three Gorges Interzone of Yangtze River, China. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013, 18:1416-1425.
51. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8(3):338-353.
52. Zhang Z., Koren V., Reed S., Smith M., Zhang Y., Moreda F., Cosgrove B.A. SAC-SMA a priori parameter differences and their impact on distributed hydrologic model simulations. J. Hydrol. 2012, 420-421:216-227.