Solar irradiation estimations and comparisons by ANFIS, Angström-Prescott and dependency models

Solar Energy

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 118-124

  Güçlü, Yavuz Selim ^a   Yeleğen, Mehmet Öner ^b   Dabanli, Ismail ^a   Şişman, Eyüp ^c  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b FATIH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ANFIS; Angstr m Prescott; Model; Solar irradiation; Sunshine; Temporal dependency

Indexed keywords

ANFIS; DEPENDENCY MODEL; SOLAR IRRADIATION; SUNSHINE; TEMPORAL DEPENDENCY;

MODELS;

ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESTIMATION METHOD; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; IRRADIATION; SOLAR POWER; SOLAR RADIATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ADANA [ADANA (PRV)]; ADANA [TURKEY]; ANTAKYA; HATAY; MERSIN [TURKEY]; SILIFKE; TURKEY;

EID: 84908168059     PISSN: 0038092X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aguiar R.J., Collares Pereira M., Conde J.P. Simple procedure for generating sequences of daily radiation values using a library or Markov transition matrices. Sol. Energy 1988, 40(3):269-279.
2. Akinoğlu B.G., Ecevit A. Construction of a quadratic model using modified Angström coefficients to estimate global solar radiation. Sol. Energy 1990, 45:85-92.
3. Angström A. Solar terrestrial radiation. Q J R Meteorol. Soc. 1924, 50:121-126.
4. Benghanem M., Mellit A., Alamri S.N. ANN-based modelling and estimation of daily global solar radiation data: a case study. Energy Convers. Manage. 2009, 50:1644-1655.
5. Dogniaux, R., Lemoine, M. 1983. Classification of radiation sites in terms of different indices of atmospheric transparency. In: Palz, W. (Éd.), Solar Energy R&D in the European Community, Series F, vol. 2, Solar Energy Data. D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordecht, pp. 94-107.
6. Gopinathan K.K. A general formula for computing the coefficients of the correlation connecting global solar radiation to sunshine duration. Sol. Energy 1988, 41:499-502.
7. t with application to global synthetic weather generation. Sol. Energy 1988, 40(2):83-92.
8. Güçlü Y.S., Dabanli I., Şişman E. Short- and long-term solar radiation estimation method. Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment 2014, 48. Springer, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_48.
9. Hinrichsen K. The Angström formula with coefficients having a physical meaning. Sol. Energy 1994, 52:491-495.
10. Jang J.S.R. Self-learning fuzzy controller based on temporal back-propagation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1992, 3(5):714-723.
11. Kimball H.H. Variations in the total and luminous solar radiation with geographical position in the United States. Monthly Weather Rev. 1919, 47:769-793.
12. Lewis G. The utility of the Angström-type equation fort he estimation of global radiation. Sol. Energy 1989, 43(5):297-299.
13. Moghaddamnia A., Remesan R., Kashani M.H., Mohammadi M., Han D., Piri J. Comparison of LLR, MLP, Elman, NNARX and ANFIS Models-with a case study in solar radiation estimation. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 2009, 71:975-982.
14. Mohanty, S. 2014. ANFIS based prediction of monthly average global solar radiation over Bhubaneswar (State of Odisha). In: International Journal of Ethics in Engineering & Management Education, ISSN: 2348-4748, Volume 1, Issue 5.
15. Ögelman H., Ecevit A., Taşemiroğlu E. Method for estimating solar radiation from bright sunshine data. Sol. Energy 1984, 33:619-625.
16. Page, J.K. 1964. The estimation of monthly ea values of daily total short wave radiation on vertical and inclined surfaces from sunshine records for latitudes 40°N-40°S. In: Proceedings of the UN Conference on New Sources of Energy, Paper no. 598, 4, pp. 378-390.
17. Prescott J.A. Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans. Roy. Soc. S.A. 1940, 64:114-118.
18. Rietveld M.R. A new method for estimating the regression coefficients in the Formula relating solar radiation to sunshine. Agric. Meteorol. 1978, 19:243-252.
19. Sabbagh J.A., Sayigh A.A.M., El-Salam E.M.A. Estimation of the total solar radiation from meteorological data. Sol. Energy 1977, 19:307-311.
20. Şahin A.D., Şen Z. Statistical analysis of the Angström formula coefficients and application for Turkey. Sol. Energy 1998, 62:29-38.
21. Samuel T.D.M.A. Estimation of global radiation for Sri Lanka. Sol. Energy 1991, 45(5):333.
22. Şen Z. Fuzzy algorithm for estimation of solar irradiation from sunshine duration. Sol. Energy 1998, 63:39-49.
23. Şen Z. Angström equation parameter estimation by unrestricted method. Sol. Energy 2001, 71:95-107.
24. Şen Z. Yapay Sinir Ağlari Ilkeleri 2004, Turkish Water Foundation Publications, Istanbul.
25. Şen Z. Simple nonlinear solar irradiation estimation model. Renewable Energy 2007, 32:342-350.
26. Şen Z. Solar Energy Fundamentals and Modeling Techniques 2008, Springer, London.
27. Şen Z. Bulanik Mantik Ilkeleri ve Modelleme 2009, Turkish Water Foundation Publications, Istanbul.
28. Soler A. Monthly specific Rietveld's correlations. Solar Wind Technol. 1990, (2/3):305-306.
29. Suehrcke H. On the relationship between duration of sunshine and solar radiation on the earth's surface: Angstrom's equation revisited. Sol. Energy 2000, 68(5):417-425.
30. Suehrcke H., Bowden R.S., Hollands K.G.T. Relationship between sunshine duration and solar radiation. Sol. Energy 2013, 92:160-171.
31. Sugeno, M. (Ed.), 1985. Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Control North-Holland, New York.
32. Swartman R.K., Ogunlade O. Solar radiation estimates from common parameters. Sol. Energy 1967, 11:170-172.
33. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst.: Man Cybern. 1985, 15(1):116-132.
34. Tolabi H.B., Moradi M.H., Ayob S.B.M. A review on classification and comparison of different models in solar radiation estimation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2014, 38:689-701.
35. Wahab A.M. New approach to estimate Angström coefficients. Sol. Energy 1993, 51:241-245.
36. Yildiz, M., Öz, S. 1994. Evaluation of the solar energy potential of Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 6th National Energy Congress, pp. 250-60.