Evolutionary redesign of the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) Toll-like receptor repertoire by gene losses and expansions

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Solbakken, Monica H ^a   Tørresen, Ole K ^a   Nederbragt, Alexander J ^a   Seppola, Marit ^b   Gregers, Tone F ^a   Jakobsen, Kjetill S ^a   Jentoft, Sissel ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL; ATLANTIC COD; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GADUS MORHUA; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; SELECTION, GENETIC; TOLL-LIKE RECEPTORS;

EID: 84964917300     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep25211     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Buonocore, F. & Gerdol, M. Alternative adaptive immunity strategies: coelacanth, cod and shark immunity. Mol Immunol, doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.09.003 (2015).
2. Zhu, L. Y., Nie, L., Zhu, G., Xiang, L. X. & Shao, J. Z. Advances in research of fsh immune-relevant genes: a comparative overview of innate and adaptive immunity in teleosts. Dev Comp Immunol 39, 39-62, doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2012.04.001 (2013).
3. Magnadottir, B. Innate immunity of fsh (overview). Fish Shellfsh Immunol 20, 137-151, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2004.09.006 (2006).
4. Takeuchi, O. & Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and infammation. Cell 140, 805-820, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 (2010).
5. Kawasaki, T. & Kawai, T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Frontiers in immunology 5, 461, doi: 10.3389/fmmu.2014.00461 (2014).
6. Satake, H. & Sekiguchi, T. Toll-like receptors of deuterostome invertebrates. Frontiers in immunology 3, 34, doi: 10.3389/fmmu.2012.00034 (2012).
7. Palti, Y. Toll-like receptors in bony fish: from genomics to function. Dev Comp Immunol 35, 1263-1272, doi: 10.1016/j. dci.2011.03.006 (2011).
8. Roach, J. C. et al. The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 9577-9582, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502272102 (2005).
9. Rauta, P. R., Samanta, M., Dash, H. R., Nayak, B. & Das, S. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in aquatic animals: signaling pathways, expressions and immune responses. Immunol Lett 158, 14-24, doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.11.013 (2014).
10. Boehm, T. & Swann, J. B. Origin and evolution of adaptive immunity. Annual review of animal biosciences 2, 259-283, doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114201 (2014).
11. Boehm, T. et al. VLR-based adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 30, 203-220, doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075038 (2012).
12. Haase, D. et al. Absence of major histocompatibility complex class II mediated immunity in pipefsh, Syngnathus typhle: evidence from deep transcriptome sequencing. Biology letters 9, 20130044, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0044 (2013).
13. Star, B. et al. The genome sequence of Atlantic cod reveals a unique immune system. Nature 477, 207-210, doi: 10.1038/nature10342 (2011).
14. Malmstrom, M., Jentof, S., Gregers, T. F. & Jakobsen, K. S. Unraveling the evolution of the Atlantic cod's (Gadus morhua L.) alternative immune strategy. PLoS One 8, e74004, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074004 (2013).
15. Star, B. & Jentof, S. Why does the immune system of Atlantic cod lack MHC II? Bioessays 34, 648-651, doi: 10.1002/bies.201200005 (2012).
16. Saleh, M. The machinery of Nod-like receptors: refning the paths to immunity and cell death. Immunological Reviews 243, 235-246, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01045.x (2011).
17. Zhang, J. et al. Toll-like receptor recognition of bacteria in fsh: ligand specifcity and signal pathways. Fish Shellfsh Immunol 41, 380-388, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.09.022 (2014).
18. Hwang, S. D., Kondo, H., Hirono, I. & Aoki, T. Molecular cloning and characterization of Toll-like receptor 14 in Japanese founder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Shellfsh Immunol 30, 425-429, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.08.005 (2011).
19. Zhao, F. et al. Expression profiles of toll-like receptors in channel catfsh (Ictalurus punctatus) afer infection with Ichthyophthirius multifliis. Fish Shellfsh Immunol 35, 993-997, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.05.023 (2013).
20. Kang, J. Y. & Lee, J. O. Structural biology of the Toll-like receptor family. Annual review of biochemistry 80, 917-941, doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052909-141507 (2011).
21. Boltana, S., Roher, N., Goetz, F. W. & Mackenzie, S. A. PAMPs, PRRs and the genomics of gram negative bacterial recognition in fsh. Dev Comp Immunol 35, 1195-1203, doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2011.02.010 (2011).
22. Nishiya, T., Kajita, E., Miwa, S. & Defranco, A. L. TLR3 and TLR7 are targeted to the same intracellular compartments by distinct regulatory elements. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 37107-37117, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504951200 (2005).
23. Leifer, C. A. et al. Cytoplasmic targeting motifs control localization of toll-like receptor 9. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 35585-35592, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M607511200 (2006).
24. Qi, R., Singh, D. & Kao, C. C. Proteolytic processing regulates Toll-like receptor 3 stability and endosomal localization. The Journal of biological chemistry 287, 32617-32629, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.387803 (2012).
25. Ewald, S. E. et al. The ectodomain of Toll-like receptor 9 is cleaved to generate a functional receptor. Nature 456, 658-662, doi: 10.1038/nature07405 (2008).
26. Brownlie, R. et al. Chicken TLR21 acts as a functional homologue to mammalian TLR9 in the recognition of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Mol Immunol 46, 3163-3170, doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.06.002 (2009).
27. Keestra, A. M., de Zoete, M. R., Bouwman, L. I. & van Putten, J. P. Chicken TLR21 is an innate CpG DNA receptor distinct from mammalian TLR9. J Immunol 185, 460-467, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901921 (2010).
28. Matsuo, A. et al. Teleost TLR22 recognizes RNA duplex to induce IFN and protect cells from birnaviruses. J Immunol 181, 3474-3485 (2008).
29. Sundaram, A. Y., Consuegra, S., Kiron, V. & Fernandes, J. M. Positive selection pressure within teleost Toll-like receptors tlr21 and tlr22 subfamilies and their response to temperature stress and microbial components in zebrafsh. Molecular biology reports 39, 8965-8975, doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1765-y (2012).
30. Sundaram, A. Y., Kiron, V., Dopazo, J. & Fernandes, J. M. Diversifcation of the expanded teleost-specifc toll-like receptor family in Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. BMC evolutionary biology 12, 256, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-256 (2012).
31. Reyes-Becerril, M. et al. Molecular cloning and comparative responses of Toll-like receptor 22 following ligands stimulation and parasitic infection in yellowtail (Seriola lalandi). Fish Shellfsh Immunol 46, 323-333, doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.06.020 (2015).
32. Salazar, C., Haussmann, D., Kausel, G. & Figueroa, J. Molecular cloning of Salmo salar Toll-like receptors (TLR1, TLR22, TLR5M and TLR5S) and expression analysis in SHK-1 cells during Piscirickettsia salmonis infection. J Fish Dis, doi: 10.1111/jfd.12354 (2015).
33. Pifer, R., Benson, A., Sturge, C. R. & Yarovinsky, F. UNC93B1 is essential for TLR11 activation and IL-12-dependent host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii. The Journal of biological chemistry 286, 3307-3314, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.171025 (2011).
34. Koblansky, A. A. et al. Recognition of proflin by Toll-like receptor 12 is critical for host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii. Immunity 38, 119-130, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.016 (2013).
35. Sahoo, B. R. et al. Understanding the distinguishable structural and functional features in zebrafsh TLR3 and TLR22, and their binding modes with fsh dsRNA viruses: an exploratory structural model analysis. Amino acids 47, 381-400, doi: 10.1007/s00726-014-1872-2 (2015).
36. Botos, I., Segal, D. M. & Davies, D. R. The structural biology of Toll-like receptors. Structure (London, England: 1993) 19, 447-459, doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.02.004 (2011).
37. Farhat, K. et al. Heterodimerization of TLR2 with TLR1 or TLR6 expands the ligand spectrum but does not lead to diferential signaling. Journal of leukocyte biology 83, 692-701, doi: 10.1189/jlb.0807586 (2008).
38. Raetz, M. et al. Cooperation of TLR12 and TLR11 in the IRF8-dependent IL-12 response to Toxoplasma gondii proflin. J Immunol 191, 4818-4827, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301301 (2013).
39. Andrade, W. A. et al. Combined action of nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors and TLR11/TLR12 heterodimers imparts resistance to Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Cell host & microbe 13, 42-53, doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.12.003 (2013).
40. Stewart, C. R. et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile infammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat Immunol 11, 155-161, doi: 10.1038/ni.1836 (2010).
41. Jin, M. S. et al. Crystal structure of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer induced by binding of a tri-acylated lipopeptide. Cell 130, 1071-1082, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.008 (2007).
42. Kannaki, T. R., Reddy, M. R., Verma, P. C. & Shanmugam, M. Diferential Toll-like receptor (TLR) mRNA expression patterns during chicken embryological development. Animal biotechnology 26, 130-135, doi: 10.1080/10495398.2014.939658 (2015).
43. Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S. & Meyer, A. The evolutionary signifcance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet 10, 725-732, doi: 10.1038/nrg2600 (2009).
44. Eirin-Lopez, J. M., Rebordinos, L., Rooney, A. P. & Rozas, J. The birth-and-death evolution of multigene families revisited. Genome dynamics 7, 170-196, doi: 10.1159/000337119 (2012).
45. Nei, M. & Rooney, A. P. Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annual review of genetics 39, 121-152, doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240 (2005).
46. Areal, H., Abrantes, J. & Esteves, P. J. Signatures of positive selection in Toll-like receptor (TLR) genes in mammals. BMC evolutionary biology 11, 368, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-368 (2011).
47. Barreiro, L. B. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of human Toll-like receptors and their diferent contributions to host defense. PLoS genetics 5, e1000562, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000562 (2009).
48. Mikami, T., Miyashita, H., Takatsuka, S., Kuroki, Y. & Matsushima, N. Molecular evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors: Evolutionary rate difference between their leucine-rich repeats and their TIR domains. Gene 503, 235-243, doi: 10.1016/j. gene.2012.04.007 (2012).
49. Magoc, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27, 2957-2963, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 (2011).
50. Miller, J. R. et al. Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24, 2818-2824, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn548 (2008).
51. English, A. C. et al. Mind the gap: upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS One 7, e47768, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047768 (2012).
52. Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9, e112963, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 (2014).
53. Cunningham, F. et al. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D662-669, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1010 (2015).
54. UniProt. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D204-212, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku989 (2015).
55. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC bioinformatics 10, 421, doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 (2009).
56. Benson, D. A. et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D36-42, doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1195 (2013).
57. Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28, 2731-2739, doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121 (2011).
58. Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature biotechnology 29, 644-652, doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883 (2011).
59. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for diferential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 139-140, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 (2010).
60. Sickle-a windowed adaptive trimming tool for FASTQ fles using quality.
61. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. Bioinformatics in Action 17, 10-12, doi: citeulike-article-id:11851772 (2012).
62. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 27-30 (2000).
63. Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nature protocols 10, 845-858, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 (2015).
64. Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D, http://www.jmol.org/.
65. Delport, W., Poon, A. F., Frost, S. D. & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. Datamonkey 2010: a suite of phylogenetic analysis tools for evolutionary biology. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 2455-2457, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq429 (2010).
66. Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest: selection of best-ft models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21, 2104-2105, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263 (2005).
67. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 22, 2688-2690, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 (2006).
68. FigTree http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/sofware/fgtree/(2015).