Hybrid Sterility Locus on Chromosome X Controls Meiotic Recombination Rate in Mouse

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Balcova, Maria ^a   Faltusova, Barbora ^a   Gergelits, Vaclav ^a   Bhattacharyya, Tanmoy ^a,b   Mihola, Ondrej ^a   Trachtulec, Zdenek ^a   Knopf, Corinna ^a,c   Fotopulosova, Vladana ^a   Chvatalova, Irena ^d   Gregorova, Sona ^a   Forejt, Jiri ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^b JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Optical Imaging and its Translation to Medicine   (Austria)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION 1; PROTEIN MLH1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HISTONE LYSINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; PRDM9 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CHROMOSOME SUBSTITUTION; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO; FEMALE; GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; HSTX2 GENE; HYBRID STERILITY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; INFERTILITY; MALE STERILITY; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MEIR1 GENE; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRDM9 GENE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; X CHROMOSOME; ANIMAL; DNA DAMAGE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; MEIOSIS;

ANIMALS; DNA DAMAGE; FEMALE; GENETIC LINKAGE; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; MEIOSIS; MICE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; X CHROMOSOME;

EID: 84964837310     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005906     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baker CL, Walker M, Kajita S, Petkov PM, Paigen K, (2014) PRDM9 binding organizes hotspot nucleosomes and limits Holliday junction migration. Genome Res24: 724–732. doi: 10.1101/gr.170167.11324604780
2. Moens PB, Kolas NK, Tarsounas M, Marcon E, Cohen PE, et al. (2002) The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. J Cell Sci115: 1611–1622. 11950880
3. Baier B, Hunt P, Broman KW, Hassold T, (2014) Variation in genome-wide levels of meiotic recombination is established at the onset of prophase in mammalian males. PLoS Genet10: e1004125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100412524497841
4. Bellani MA, Boateng KA, McLeod D, Camerini-Otero RD, (2010) The expression profile of the major mouse SPO11 isoforms indicates that SPO11beta introduces double strand breaks and suggests that SPO11alpha has an additional role in prophase in both spermatocytes and oocytes. Mol Cell Biol30: 4391–4403. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00002-1020647542
5. Boateng KA, Bellani MA, Gregoretti IV, Pratto F, Camerini-Otero RD, (2013) Homologous pairing preceding SPO11-mediated double-strand breaks in mice. Dev Cell24: 196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.12.00223318132
6. Baudat F, de Massy B, (2007) Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis. Chromosome Res15: 565–577. 17674146
7. Lichten M, de Massy B, (2011) The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination. Cell147: 267–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.03822000007
8. Myers S, Bowden R, Tumian A, Bontrop RE, Freeman C, et al. (2010) Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science327: 876–879. doi: 10.1126/science.118236320044541
9. Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, et al. (2010) PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science327: 836–840. doi: 10.1126/science.118343920044539
10. Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K, (2010) Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science327: 835. doi: 10.1126/science.118149520044538
11. Baudat F, Imai Y, de Massy B, (2013) Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet14: 794–806. doi: 10.1038/nrg357324136506
12. Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV, (2012) Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature485: 642–645. doi: 10.1038/nature1108922660327
13. Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y, (2005) A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature438: 374–378. 16292313
14. Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, Roig I, Wang R, et al. (2012) Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol14: 424–430. doi: 10.1038/ncb245122388890
15. Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE, (2008) MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet4: e1000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100018618787696
16. Petkov PM, Broman KW, Szatkiewicz JP, Paigen K, (2007) Crossover interference underlies sex differences in recombination rates. Trends Genet23: 539–542. 17964681
17. Kyslikova L, Forejt J, (1972) Chiasma frequency in three inbred strains of mice. Folia Biol (Praha)18: 216–221.
18. Forejt J, (1972) Chiasmata and crossing-over in the male mouse (Mus musculus). Suppression of recombination and chiasma frequencies in the ninth linkage group. Folia Biol (Praha)18: 161–170.
19. Dumont BL, White MA, Steffy B, Wiltshire T, Payseur BA, (2011) Extensive recombination rate variation in the house mouse species complex inferred from genetic linkage maps. Genome Res21: 114–125. doi: 10.1101/gr.111252.11020978138
20. Chowdhury R, Bois PR, Feingold E, Sherman SL, Cheung VG, (2009) Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet5: e1000648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100064819763160
21. Ma L, O'Connell JR, VanRaden PM, Shen B, Padhi A, et al. (2015) Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control from a Large Pedigree Analysis. PLoS Genet11: e1005387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100538726540184
22. Koehler KE, Cherry JP, Lynn A, Hunt PA, Hassold TJ, (2002) Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. Genetics162: 297–306. 12242241
23. Dumont BL, Payseur BA, (2008) Evolution of the genomic rate of recombination in mammals. Evolution62: 276–294. 18067567
24. Dumont BL, Payseur BA, (2011) Genetic analysis of genome-scale recombination rate evolution in house mice. PLoS Genet7: e1002116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100211621695226
25. Dumont BL, Payseur BA, (2011) Evolution of the genomic recombination rate in murid rodents. Genetics187: 643–657. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.12385121149647
26. Murdoch B, Owen N, Shirley S, Crumb S, Broman KW, et al. (2010) Multiple loci contribute to genome-wide recombination levels in male mice. Mamm Genome21: 550–555. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9303-521113599
27. Mihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlcek C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J, (2009) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science323: 373–375. doi: 10.1126/science.116360119074312
28. Bhattacharyya T, Reifova R, Gregorova S, Simecek P, Gergelits V, et al. (2014) X chromosome control of meiotic chromosome synapsis in mouse inter-subspecific hybrids. PLoS Genet10: e1004088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100408824516397
29. Bhattacharyya T, Gregorova S, Mihola O, Anger M, Sebestova J, et al. (2013) Mechanistic basis of infertility of mouse intersubspecific hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A110: E468–477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121912611023329330
30. Flachs P, Bhattacharyya T, Mihola O, Pialek J, Forejt J, et al. (2014) Prdm9 incompatibility controls oligospermia and delayed fertility but no selfish transmission in mouse intersubspecific hybrids. PLoS One9: e95806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.009580624756080
31. Yang H, Wang JR, Didion JP, Buus RJ, Bell TA, et al. (2011) Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet43: 648–655. doi: 10.1038/ng.84721623374
32. Gregorova S, Divina P, Storchova R, Trachtulec Z, Fotopulosova V, et al. (2008) Mouse consomic strains: exploiting genetic divergence between Mus m. musculus and Mus m. domesticus subspecies. Genome Res18: 509–515. doi: 10.1101/gr.716050818256238
33. Nadeau J, Singer J, Matin A, Lander E, (2000) Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet24: 221–225. 10700173
34. Nadeau JH, Forejt J, Takada T, Shiroishi T, (2012) Chromosome substitution strains: gene discovery, functional analysis, and systems studies. Mamm Genome23: 693–705. doi: 10.1007/s00335-012-9426-y22961226
35. Kong A, Thorleifsson G, Frigge ML, Masson G, Gudbjartsson DF, et al. (2014) Common and low-frequency variants associated with genome-wide recombination rate. Nat Genet46: 11–16. doi: 10.1038/ng.283324270358
36. Flachs P, Mihola O, Simecek P, Gregorova S, Schimenti JC, et al. (2012) Interallelic and intergenic incompatibilities of the Prdm9 (Hst1) gene in mouse hybrid sterility. PLoS Genet8: e1003044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.100304423133405
37. Liu EY, Morgan AP, Chesler EJ, Wang W, Churchill GA, et al. (2014) High-resolution sex-specific linkage maps of the mouse reveal polarized distribution of crossovers in male germline. Genetics197: 91–106. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.16165324578350
38. Forejt J, (1996) Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet12: 412–417. 8909138
39. Dzur-Gejdosova M, Simecek P, Gregorova S, Bhattacharyya T, Forejt J, (2012) Dissecting the genetic architecture of f(1) hybrid sterility in house mice. Evolution66: 3321–3335. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01684.x23106700
40. Good JM, Giger T, Dean MD, Nachman MW, (2010) Widespread over-expression of the X chromosome in sterile F hybrid mice. PLoS Genet6.
41. White MA, Stubbings M, Dumont BL, Payseur BA, (2012) Genetics and Evolution of Hybrid Male Sterility in House Mice. Genetics.
42. Oka A, Mita A, Sakurai-Yamatani N, Yamamoto H, Takagi N, et al. (2004) Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics166: 913–924. 15020476
43. Oka A, Shiroishi T, (2014) Regulatory divergence of X-linked genes and hybrid male sterility in mice. Genes Genet Syst89: 99–108. 25475933
44. Storchova R, Gregorova S, Buckiova D, Kyselova V, Divina P, et al. (2004) Genetic analysis of X-linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mamm Genome15: 515–524. 15366371
45. Forejt J, Pialek J, Trachtulec Z, Macholan M, Baird SJE, Muclinger P, Pialek J, (2012) Hybrid male sterility genes in the mouse subspecific crosses. In: Evolution of the House Mouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pratto F, Brick K, Khil P, Smagulova F, Petukhova GV, et al. (2014) DNA recombination. Recombination initiation maps of individual human genomes. Science346: 1256442. doi: 10.1126/science.125644225395542
47. Paigen K, Petkov P, (2010) Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat Rev Genet11: 221–233. doi: 10.1038/nrg271220168297
48. Singer JB, Hill AE, Burrage LC, Olszens KR, Song J, et al. (2004) Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice. Science304: 445–448. 15031436
49. Reynolds A, Qiao H, Yang Y, Chen JK, Jackson N, et al. (2013) RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat Genet45: 269–278. doi: 10.1038/ng.254123396135
50. Sun F, Fujiwara Y, Reinholdt LG, Hu J, Saxl RL, et al. (2015) Nuclear localization of PRDM9 and its role in meiotic chromatin modifications and homologous synapsis. Chromosoma.
51. Margolin G, Khil PP, Kim J, Bellani MA, Camerini-Otero RD, (2014) Integrated transcriptome analysis of mouse spermatogenesis. BMC Genomics15: 39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-3924438502
52. Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, Angel JM, Attie AD, et al. (2004) The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet36: 1133–1137. 15514660
53. Collaborative Cross C (2012) The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics190: 389–401. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.13263922345608
54. Yang F, Silber S, Leu NA, Oates RD, Marszalek JD, et al. (2015) TEX11 is mutated in infertile men with azoospermia and regulates genome-wide recombination rates in mouse. EMBO Mol Med.
55. Wang J, Fan HC, Behr B, Quake SR, (2012) Genome-wide single-cell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm. Cell150: 402–412. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.03022817899
56. Cox A, Ackert-Bicknell CL, Dumont BL, Ding Y, Bell JT, et al. (2009) A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse. Genetics182: 1335–1344. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.10548619535546
57. Hunter N, Chambers S, Louis E, Borts R, (1996) The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J15: 1726–1733. 8612597
58. Greig D, Travisano M, Louis EJ, Borts RH, (2003) A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces. J Evol Biol16: 429–437. 14635842
59. Liti G, Barton DB, Louis EJ, (2006) Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics174: 839–850. 16951060
60. Anderson LK, Reeves A, Webb LM, Ashley T, (1999) Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics151: 1569–1579. 10101178
61. R_Development_Core_Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [http://www.R-project.org]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
62. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P, (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J50: 346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.20081042518481363
63. Koller M (2015) Robustlmm: Robust Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 1.7–5. https://githubcom/kollerma/robustlmm.
64. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1–8.
65. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, ArXiv e-print; in press, URL: http://arxivorg/abs/14065823