A Quantum Chemistry Concept Inventory for Physical Chemistry Classes

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 605-612

  Dick Perez, Marilu ^a   Luxford, Cynthia J ^b   Windus, Theresa L ^a   Holme, Thomas ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Texas State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Misconceptions Discrepant Events; Physical Chemistry; Testing Assessment; Upper Division Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964596265     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: 19381328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00781     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Novak, J. D. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge; Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
2. Novak, J. D. Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners Sci. Educ. 2002, 86, 548-571 10.1002/sce.10032
3. Bodner, G. M. Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 873-878 10.1021/ed063p873
4. Taber, K. S. Constructivism's New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme into the Learning of Science Found. Chem. 2006, 8, 189-219 10.1007/s10698-005-4536-1
5. Harrison, A. G.; Treagust, D. F. Secondary Students' Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry Sci. Educ. 1996, 80, 509-534 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<509::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-F
6. Tsaparlis, G. Atomic Orbitals, Molecular Orbitals and Related Concepts: Conceptual Difficulties among Chemistry Students Res. Sci. Educ. 1997, 27, 271-287 10.1007/BF02461321
7. Tsaparlis, G. Towards a Meaningful Introduction to the Schrödinger Equation through Historical and Heuristic Approaches Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2001, 2, 203-213 10.1039/B1RP90023D
8. Tsaparlis, G.; Papaphotis, G. Quantum-Chemical Concepts: Are They Suitable for Secondary Students? Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2002, 3, 129-144 10.1039/B2RP90011D
9. Tsaparlis, G.; Papaphotis, G. High-school Students' Conceptual Difficulties and Attempts at Conceptual Change: The Case of Basic Quantum Chemical Concepts Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2009, 31, 895-930 10.1080/09500690801891908
10. Taber, K. S. Conceptualizing Quanta-Illuminating the Ground State of Student Understanding of Atomic Orbitals Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2002, 3, 145-158 10.1039/B2RP90012B
11. Taber, K. S. Compounding quanta-Probing the Frontiers of Student Understanding of Molecular Orbitals Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2002, 3, 159-173 10.1039/B2RP90013K
12. Taber, K. S. Learning Quanta: Barriers to Stimulating Transitions in Student Understanding of Orbital Ideas Sci. Educ. 2005, 89, 94-116 10.1002/sce.20038
13. Galley, W. C. Exothermic Bond Breaking: A Persistent Misconception J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 523-525 10.1021/ed081p523
14. Peterson, R. F.; Treagust, D. F.; Garnett, P. Development and Application of a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade 11 and 12 Students' Concepts of Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a Course of Instruction J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1989, 26, 301-314 10.1002/tea.3660260404
15. Taber, K. S. Student Understanding of Ionic Bonding: Molecular Versus Electrostatic Framework Sch. Sci. Rev. 1997, 78, 85-95
16. Birk, J. P.; Kurtz, M. J. Effect of Experience on Retention and Elimination of Misconceptions about Molecular Structure and Bonding J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 124-128 10.1021/ed076p124
17. Barker, V.; Millar, R. Students' Reasoning about Basic Chemical Thermodynamics and Chemical Bonding: What Changes Occur During a Context-Based Post-16 Chemistry Course? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2000, 22, 1171-1200 10.1080/09500690050166742
18. Coll, R. K.; Treagust, D. F. Learners' Mental Models of Chemical Bonding Res. Sci. Educ. 2001, 31, 357-382 10.1023/A:1013159927352
19. Nicoll, G. A Report of Undergraduates' Bonding Misconceptions Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2001, 23, 707-730 10.1080/09500690010025012
20. Luxford, C. J.; Bretz, S. L. Moving Beyond Definitions: What Student-Generated Models Reveal about Their Understanding of Covalent and Ionic Bonding Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2013, 14, 214-222 10.1039/C3RP20154F
21. Wang, C.-Y.; Barrow, L. H. Exploring Conceptual Frameworks of Models of Atomic Structures and Periodic Variations, Chemical Bonding, and Molecular Shape and Polarity: A Comparison of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students with High and Low Levels of Content Knowledge Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2013, 14, 130-146 10.1039/C2RP20116J
22. Tan, K. C. D.; Treagust, D. F. Evaluating Understanding of Chemical Bonding Sch. Sci. Rev. 1999, 81, 75-84
23. Othman, J.; Treagust, D. F.; Chandrasegaran, A. L. An Investigation into the Relationship Between Students' Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter and Their Understanding of Chemical Bonding Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2008, 30, 1531-1550 10.1080/09500690701459897
24. Luxford, C. J.; Bretz, S. L. Development of the Bonding Representations Inventory to Identify Student Misconceptions about Covalent and Ionic Bonding Representations J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 312-320 10.1021/ed400700q
25. Styer, D. F. Common Misconceptions Regarding Quantum Mechanics Am. J. Phys. 1996, 64, 31-34 10.1119/1.18288
26. Singh, C. Student Understanding of Quantum Mechanics Am. J. Phys. 2001, 69, 885-895 10.1119/1.1365404
27. Singh, C. Student Understanding of Quantum Mechanics at the Beginning of Graduate Studies Am. J. Phys. 2008, 76, 277-287 10.1119/1.2825387
28. Zhu, G.; Singh, C. Surveying Students' Understanding of Quantum Mechanics in One Dimension Am. J. Phys. 2012, 80, 252-259 10.1119/1.3677653
29. Zhu, G.; Singh, C. Improving Student Understanding of Addition of Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics Phys. Rev. Spec. Topics, Phys. Educ. Res. 2013, 9, 010101 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010101
30. Cataloglu, E.; Robinett, R. W. Testing the Development of Student Conceptual and Visualization Understanding in Quantum Mechanics through the Undergraduate Career Am. J. Phys. 2002, 70, 238-251 10.1119/1.1405509
31. Wuttiprom, S.; Sharma, M. D.; Johnston, I. D.; Chitaree, R.; Soankwan, C. Development and Use of a Conceptual Survey in Introductory Quantum Physics Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2009, 31, 631-654 10.1080/09500690701747226
32. McKagan, S. B.; Perkins, K. K.; Wieman, C. E. Design and Validation of the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey Phys. Rev. Spec. Topics, Phys. Educ. Res. 2010, 6, 020121 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020121
33. Brown, B. R. Developing and Assessing Research-Based Tools for Teaching Quantum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2015.
34. American Chemical Society. ACS Guidelines and Evaluation Procedures for Bachelor's Degree Programs, 2015. http://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/about/governance/committees/training/2015-acs-guidelines-for-bachelors-degree-programs.pdf (accessed December 2015).
35. Canadian Society for Chemistry. Guidelines for Accreditation, 2012. http://www.cheminst.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/Accreditation/CSC%20Accreditation%20Guidelines.pdf (accessed December 2015).
36. Hadfield, L. C.; Wieman, C. E. Student Interpretations of Equations Related to the First Law of Thermodynamics J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 750-755 10.1021/ed1001625
37. Becker, N.; Towns, M. Students' Understanding of Mathematical Expressions in Physical Chemistry Contexts: An Analysis Using Sherin's Symbolic Forms Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2012, 13, 209-220 10.1039/C2RP00003B
38. Gardner, D. E.; Bodner, G. M. Existence of a Problem-Solving Mindset among Students Taking Quantum Mechanics and Its Implications. In Advances in Teaching Physical Chemistry, ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2007; Vol. 973, pp 155-173. 10.1021/bk-2008-0973.ch009
39. Arjoon, J. A.; Xu, X. Y.; Lewis, J. E. Understanding the State of the Art for Measurement in Chemistry Education Research: Examining the Psychometric Evidence J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 536-545 10.1021/ed3002013
40. Sadler, P. M. Psychometric Models of Student Conceptions in Science: Reconciling Qualitative Studies and Distractor-Driven Assessment Instruments J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1998, 35, 265-296 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199803)35:3<265::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
41. Ferguson, G. A. On the Theory of Test Discrimination Psychometrika 1949, 14, 61-68 10.1007/BF02290141
42. Ding, L.; Beichner, R. Approaches to Data Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions Phys. Rev. Spec. Topics, Phys. Educ. Res. 2009, 5, 1-17 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020103
43. Kline, P. A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design; Methuen: New York, 1986.
44. Hake, R. R. Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses Am. J. Phys. 1998, 66, 64-74 10.1119/1.18809
45. Caleon, L. S.; Subramaniam, R. Development and Application of a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students' Understanding of Waves Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2010, 32, 939-961 10.1080/09500690902890130
46. Caleon, L. S.; Subramaniam, R. Do students know what they know and what they don't know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students' alternative conceptions Res. Sci. Educ. 2010, 40, 313-337 10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
47. Treagust, D. F.; Chandrasegaran, A. L.; Zain, A. N. M.; Ong, E. T.; Karpudewan, M.; Halim, L. Evaluation of an Intervention Instructional Program to Facilitate Understanding of Basic Particle Concepts among Students Enrolled in Several Levels of Study Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2011, 12, 251-261 10.1039/C1RP90030G