An investigation into the relationship between students' conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1531-1550

  Othman, Jazilah ^a   Treagust, David F ^b   Chandrasegaran, A L ^b  

^a Maris Stella High School   (Singapore)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249092117     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701459897     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albanese, A. and Vicentini, M. (1997) Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model. Science and Education, 6, pp. 251-261.
2. Anderson, G. (2004) Fundamentals of educational research, Routledge Falmer, London and New York
3. Barker, V. and Miller, R. (2000) Students' reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course?. International Journal of Science Education, 22:11, pp. 1171-1200.
4. Ben-Zyi, R., Eylon, B.-S. and Silberstein, J. (1986) Is an atom of copper malleable?. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, pp. 64-66.
5. Butts, B. and Smith, R. (1987) HSC chemistry students' understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds. Research in Science Education, 17, pp. 192-201.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2005) Research methods in education, Routledge Falmer, New York
7. Coll, R. K. and Taylor, N. (2001) Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19:2, pp. 171-191.
8. Coll, R. K. and Treagust, D. F. (2003) Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40:5, pp. 464-486.
9. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E. and Scott, P. (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Education Researcher, 23:7, pp. 5-12.
10. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. and Wood-Robinson, V. (1994) Making sense of secondary science-Research into children's ideas, Routledge, New York
11. Ebenezer, J. V. and Erickson, G. L. (1996) Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80:2, pp. 181-201.
12. Gilbert, J. K. (1977) The study of student misunderstandings in the physical sciences. Research in Science Education, 7, pp. 165-171.
13. Griffiths, A. K. and Preston, K. R. (1992) Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, pp. 611-628.
14. Harrison, A. G. and Treagust, D. F. (2002) The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. Chemical education: Towards a research-based practice, pp. 189-212. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
15. Johnson, P. (1998) Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20:4, pp. 393-412.
16. Johnson, P. (1998) Children's understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20:5, pp. 567-583.
17. Krnel, D., Watson, R. and Glazar, S. A. (1998) Survey of research related to the development of the concept of 'matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 20:3, pp. 257-289.
18. Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D. and Blakeslee, T. D. (1993) Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30:3, pp. 249-270.
19. Lien, A. J. (1971) Measurement and evaluation in learning, William C. Brown & Co, Dubuque, IO
20. Mann, M. and Treagust, D. F. (1998) A pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students' conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 44:2, pp. 55-58.
21. Ministry of Education Singapore (2004) Science Syllabus-Lower Secondary
22. Mulford, D. R. and Robinson, W. R. (2002) An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79:6, pp. 739-744.
23. Nakhleh, M. B. (1992) Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69:3, pp. 191-196.
24. Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A. and Saglam, Y. (2005) Middle school students' beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42:5, pp. 581-612.
25. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, B. D. (1984) Concept mapping for meaningful learning. Learning how to learn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26. Nunally, J. (1978) Psychometric theory, McGraw Hill, New York
27. Othman, J. (2006) Students' difficulty with chemical bonding: An investigation into the relationship between students' ideas about particles and their understanding of chemical bonding. Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia
28. Peterson, R. F. and Treagust, D. F. (1989) Grade-12 students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure. Journal of Chemical Education, 66:6, pp. 459-460.
29. Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F. and Garnett, P. (1986) Identification of secondary students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument. Research in Science Education, 16, pp. 40-48.
30. Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F. and Garnett, P. (1989) Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade 11 and 12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, pp. 301-314.
31. Robinson, W. R. (1998) An alternative framework for chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 75:10, pp. 1074-1075.
32. Taber, K. S. (1994) Misunderstanding the ionic bond. Education in Chemistry, 31:4, pp. 100-103.
33. Taber, K. S. (2001) Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2:2, pp. 123-158.
34. Taber, K. S. (1998) An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20:5, pp. 597-608.
35. Taber, K. S. (2003) Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education, 87:5
36. Taber, K. S. and Coll, R. K. (2002) Bonding. Chemical education: Towards a research-based practice, pp. 213-234. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
37. Taber, K. S. and Watts, M. (2000) Learners' explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemical Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1:3, pp. 329-353.
38. Tan, K-C. D. (1994) Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate upper secondary students' conceptions of chemical bonding, Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia
39. Tan, K-C. D. and Treagust, D. F. (1999) Evaluating students' understanding of chemical bonding. School Science Review, 81:294, pp. 75-83.
40. Treagust, D. F. (1995) Diagnostic assessment of students' science knowledge. Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice, pp. 327-346. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey
41. Treagust, D. F. and Harrison, A. G. (2000) In search of explanatory frameworks: An analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in motion'. International Journal of Science Education, 22:11, pp. 1157-1170.