Erratum to Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics (International Journal of Science Education, (2009), DOI: 10.1080/09500690701747226);Development and use of a conceptual survey in introductory quantum physics

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 631-654

  Wuttiprom, Sura ^a   Sharma, Manjula Devi ^b   Johnston, Ian D ^b   Chitaree, Ratchapak ^a   Soankwan, Chernchok ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650378508     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802573844     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Alparslan, C., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2003). Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 133-137.
2. Anderson, D.L., Fisher, K.M., & Norman, G.J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.
3. Christianson, R.G., & Fisher, K.M. (1999). Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 687-698.
4. Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3-56.
5. Davis, B.G. (1997). Misconceptions as barriers to understanding science. In B.G. Davis (Ed.), Science teaching reconsidered: A hand book (pp. 27-32). Washington, DC: National Academy.
6. Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(010105), 1-7.
7. diSessa, A.A. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
8. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
9. Duit, R., & Treagust, D.F. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin. (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3-25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
10. Falk, J. (2004). Developing a quantum mechanics concept inventory. Masters thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
11. Falk, J. (in press). Review of empirical studies into students' depictions of quantum mechanics. Educational Research Review.
12. FLAG. (2000). Field-tested learning assessment guide. Retrieved May 7, 2007, from http://www.flaguide.org/tools/tools_technique.php.
13. Fletcher, P.R. (2004). How tertiary level physics student learn and conceptualise quantum mechanics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney, Australia.
14. Fletcher, P.R., & Johnston, I.D. (1999). Quantum mechanics: Exploring conceptual change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, USA, 27-30 March.
15. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
16. Hardy, D.J., O'Brien A.P., Gaskin, C.J., O'Brien, A.J., Morrison-Ngatai, E., Skews, G., Ryan, T., & Mcnulty, N. (2004). Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(1), 95-109.
17. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.
18. Hewitt, P. (2005). Conceptual Physics (9th ed.). San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
19. Johnston, I.D., Crawford, K., & Fletcher, P.R. (1998) Students' difficulties in learning quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 427-446.
20. Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science learning. Research in Science Education, 34, 71-96.
21. Knight, D.R. (2003a). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics: A strategic approach. San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
22. Knight, D.R. (2003b). Five easy lessons: Strategies for successful physics teaching. San Francisco: Addison Wesley.
23. Mashhadi, A. (1996). What is the nature of the understanding of the concept of wave particle duality among advance level physics student? Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University, UK.
24. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. New York: Prentice Hall.
25. McDermott, L.C., & Redish, E.F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755-767.
26. McKagan, S.M., & Wieman, C. (2006, August). The quantum mechanics conceptual survey. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://cosmos.colorado.edu/phet/survey/QMCS/.
27. Muller, D.A., Sharma, M.D., Eklund, J., & Reimann, P. (2007). Conceptual change through vicarious learning in an authentic physics setting. Instructional Science, 35(6), 519-533.
28. Olsen, R.V. (2002). Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565-574.
29. Planinic, M., Boone, W.J., Krsnik, R., & Beilfuss, M.L. (2006). Exploring alternative concepts from Newtonian dynamics and simple dc circuits: Links between item difficulty and item confidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 150-171.
30. Redish, E.F. (2003). Evaluating our instruction: Surveys. In Teaching physics with physics suite (pp. 91-114). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
31. Redish, E.F., Steinberg, R.N., & Wittmann, M.C. (2006, March). Quantum mechanics tutorial. Retrieved June 20, 2006, from http://www.physics.umd.edu/perg/qm/qmcourse/NewModel/qmtuts.htm.
32. Robinett, R. (2004, December). Quantum mechanics visualization instrument. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.phys.psu.edu/~rick/OUP/INSTRUCTORS/QMVI/alt_QMVI.htm.
33. Singh, C., & Rosengrant D. (2003). Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 607-617.
34. Slotta, J.D., & Chi, M.T.H. (2006). Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261-289.
35. Streveler, A.R., Olds, M.B., Miller, R.L., & Nelson, M.A. (2003). Using a Delphi study to identify the most difficulty concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. Paper presented at the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, USA, 22-25 June.
36. Venter, I. (2006). Development of a valid and reliable test for higher-educated young adults measuring dietary fibre food source and health-disease association knowledge. Tydskrift vir Gesinsekologies en Verbruikerswetenskappe, 34, 10-19.
37. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 381-419.
38. Wuttiprom, S., Chitaree, R., Soankwan, C., Sharma, M.D., & Johnston, I.D. (2006). Developing a prototype conceptual survey in fundamental quantum physics. Paper presented at the Uniserve Science Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia 27-29 September. Retrieved May 7, 2007 from http://science.uniserve.edu.au/pubs/procs/2006/wuttiprom.pdf.
39. Wuttiprom, S., Sharma, M.D., Johnston, I.D., Chitaree, R., & Soankwan, C. (2006). Preliminary results from a new quantum mechanics conceptual survey. Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Physics National Congress, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 3-8 December.
40. Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001). Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding. Physics Teacher, 39, 496-504.