Motivated Recall in the Service of the Economic System: The Case of Anthropogenic Climate Change

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 145, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 755-771

  Hennes, Erin P ^a   Ruisch, Benjamin C ^b   Feygina, Irina ^c   Monteiro, Christopher A ^d   Jost, John T ^e  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^c Climate Central ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Framing; Motivated information processing; Recall; System justification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; RECALL;

ADULT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMICS; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION;

EID: 84964466709     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000148     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allen, R. S., Castano, E., & Allen, P. D. (2007). Conservatism and concern for the environment. Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30, 1-25.
2. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 12107- 12109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003187107
3. Associated Press. (2010, January 20). U.N. panel: We erred on glacier warning: Himalayan ice melting, but not as fast as IPCC projection. Retrieved from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34958926/ns/us_newsenvironment/
4. Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 612-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612
5. Banfield, J. C., Kay, A. C., Cutright, K. M., Wu, E. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2011). A person by situation account of motivated system defense. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 212-219. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/1948550610386809
6. Blake, J., Paikin, S., & TVO. (2010, March 9). The agenda with Steve Paikin. Toronto, ON: TVO.
7. Borick, C. P., & Rabe, B. G. (2010). A reason to believe: Examining the factors that determine individual views on global warming. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 777-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237 .2010.00719.x
8. Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
9. Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2009). Media communications and public understanding of climate science: Reporting scientific consensus on anthropogenic warming. In T. Boyce & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 43-58). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.
10. Byrne, S., & Hart, P. S. (2009). The "boomerang effect": A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 33 (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. H. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614-623. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.013
12. Cohen, G. L., Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2000). When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1151-1164. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1177/01461672002611011
13. Cole, S., Riccio, M., & Balcetis, E. (2014). Focused and fired up: Narrowed attention produces perceived proximity and increases goalrelevant action. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 815-822.
14. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., . . . Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/ 024024
15. Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547004270234
16. Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0956797612449177
17. Feldman, L., Nisbet, M. C., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2010). The climate change generation? Survey analysis of the perceptions and beliefs of young Americans. Yale Project on Climate Change and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/ files/The_Climate_Change_Generation_2010.pdf
18. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
19. Guber, D. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 93-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463361
20. Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanations on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1026481205719
21. Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
22. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A metaanalysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
23. Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38, 48-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277998
24. Helzer, E. G., & Dunning, D. (2012). On motivated reasoning and selfbelief. In S. Vazire & T. D. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 379-396). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25. Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669-688. http://dx.doi .org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
26. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
27. Jacquet, J., Dietrich, M., & Jost, J. T. (2014). The ideological divide and climate change opinion: "Top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014 .01458
28. Johnson, I. R., & Fujita, K. (2012). Change we can believe in: Using perceptions of changeability to promote system-change motives over system-justification motives in information search. Psychological Science, 23, 133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611423670
29. Jost, J. T. (2015). Resistance to change: A social psychological perspective. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82, 607-636.
30. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309 .1994.tb01008.x
31. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
32. Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., & Lavine, H. (2013). "Hot" political cognition: Its self-, group-, and system-serving purposes. In D. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 851-875). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., van der Toorn, J., Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., & Nosek, B. (2010). System justification: How do we know it's motivated? In D. R. Bobocel, A. C. Kay, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 173-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
35. Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147-174. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
36. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
37. Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360-364. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/0963721411422059
38. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015997
39. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
40. Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Lowe, L., & Visser, P. S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens' policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change, 77, 7-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9068-8
41. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791048
42. Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29, 322-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322
43. Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. (2014, June). System legitimacy and support for climate change policy in Australia. Paper presented at the International Society for Justice Research 15th Biennial Conference, New York, NY.
44. Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2014). A social-cognitive analysis of system justification goal striving. Social Cognition, 32, 95-129. http://dx.doi .org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.95
45. Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.100
46. Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098- 2109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
47. Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., Debell, M., Pasek, J., & Schneider, D. (2009). Featuring skeptics in news media stories about global warming reduces public beliefs in the seriousness of global warming. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University. [Technical paper]. Retrieved from http://climatepublicopinion.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/ 04/Global-Warming-Skeptics-Summary.pdf
48. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement's success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 100-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0263276409356001
49. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011a). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
50. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011b). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
51. Mutz, D. (2008). How the mass media divide us. In P. Nivola & D. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? (pp. 223-248). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. (2010). Piecing together the temperature puzzle. Retrieved from http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details .cgi?aid=10574
53. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2011). NASA announces 2011 Innovations in Global Climate Change Education awards. Retrieved from http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/releases/2011/ 11-049.html
54. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration. (2012). FY 2013 budget summary. Retrieved from http://www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/nbo/ fy13_bluebook/blueBook2013.pdf
55. National Science Foundation. (2014). Program information. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/progSearch.do?WT.si_n= ClickedAbstractsRecentAwards&WT.si_x=1&WT.si_cs=1&WT .z_pims_id=503465&SearchType=progSearch&page=2&QueryText= &ProgOrganization=&ProgOfficer=&ProgEleCode=6891&Boolean Element=false&ProgRefCode=&6891&BooleanRef=false&Prog Program=&ProgFoaCode=&Restriction=2&Search=Search#results
56. Pew Research Center. (2013). GOP deeply divided over climate change. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2013/11/01/gop-deeplydivided- over-climate-change/
57. Pew Research Center. (2015a). Americans, politics and science issues. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/07/2015-07- 01_science-and-politics_FINAL.pdf
58. Pew Research Center. (2015b). Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions. Retrieved from http://www .pewglobal.org/files/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change- Report-FINAL-November-5-2015.pdf
59. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. http://dx.doi .org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
60. Sanitioso, R., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. T. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 229 -241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59 .2.229
61. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
62. Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22, 505-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01 .002
63. Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2012). On the perpetuation of ignorance: System dependence, system justification, and the motivated avoidance of sociopolitical information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 264-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026272
64. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4 .422
65. Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, A., . . . Midgley, P. M. (Eds.). (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contributions of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30, 341-366. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
67. Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31, 137-155. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8
68. Ullrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence. Social Justice Research, 20, 117- 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0035-y