The ideological divide and climate change opinion: "Top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue DEC, 2014, Pages

  Jacquet, Jennifer ^a   Dietrich, Monica ^a   Jost, John ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Ideology; Liberal conservative divide; System justification; U.S. political psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923345410     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458     Document Type: Short Survey

References (66)

1. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., and Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 12107-12109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003187107
2. Attari, S. Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C. I., DeKay, M. L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dawes, R., et al. (2009). Preferences for change: do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? Ecol. Econ. 68, 1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.007
3. Bailey, A., Giangola, L., and Boykoff, M. T. (2014). How grammatical choice shapes media representations of climate (un)certainty. Environ. Commun. 8, 197. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2014.906481
4. Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., and Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 600-603. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1532
5. Bazerman, M. H. (2006). Climate change as a predictable surprise. Clim. Change 77, 179-193. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9058-x
6. Bidwell, D. (2013). The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy 58, 189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010
7. Boykoff, M. T., and Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob. Environ. Change 14, 125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
8. Budescu, D. V., Por, H.-H., and Broomell, S. B. (2012). Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Clim. Change 113, 181-200. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0330-3
9. Campbell, T. H., and Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: on the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 107, 809-824. doi: 10.1037/a0037963
10. Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: the dominating impact of group influences on political beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 808-822. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
11. Costa, D. L., and Kahn, M. E. (2013). Energy conservation "nudges" and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11, 680-702. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12011
12. Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., and Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 18452-18456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908738106
13. Ditto, P. H., and Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 345-355.
14. Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., and McCright, A. (2001). Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environ. Polit. 10, 23-48. doi: 10.1080/714000580
15. Dunlap, R. E., and McCright, A. M. (2008). A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment Magazine (October). Available at: http://www.environmentmagazine.org/archives/back issues/september-october 2008/dunlap-full.html [accessed August 1, 2014]
16. Dunlap, R. E., and McCright, A. M. (2011). "Organized climate-change denial," in The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, eds J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 144-160.
17. Elsasser, S. W., and Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Leading voices in the denier choir: conservative columnists' dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 754-776. doi: 10.1177/0002764212469800
18. Engels, A., Hüther, O., Schäfer, M., and Held, H. (2013). Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1018-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.008
19. Feinberg, M., and Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol. Sci. 22, 34-38. doi: 10.1177/0956797610391911
20. Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., and Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. Int. J. Press Polit. 17, 3-31. doi: 10.1177/1940161211425410
21. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., and Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of "system-sanctioned change. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36, 326-338. doi: 10.1177/0146167209351435
23. Gromet, D. M., Kunreuther, H., and Larrick, R. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 9314-9319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218453110
24. Guber, D. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 93-115. doi: 10.1177/0002764212463361
25. Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., and Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world?: attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol. Sci. 21, 86-92. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355572
26. Hart, P. S., and Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39, 701-723. doi: 10.1177/0093650211416646
27. Hennes, E. P., Feygina, I., Ruisch, B. C., and Jost, J. T. (2014). Motivated information processing in the service of the system: the case of anthropogenic climate change. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., and Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Soc. Cogn. 30, 669-688. doi: 10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
29. Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., and Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 297-307. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192
30. Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., and Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Underst. Sci. 23, 866-883. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091
31. Jacquet, J., Hagel, K., Hauert, C., Marotzke, J., Röhl, T., and Milinski, M. (2013). Intra- and intergenerational discounting in the climate game. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 1025-1028. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2024
32. Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed-and What it Means for Our Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Johnson, B. B. (2012). Climate change communication: a provocative inquiry into motives, meanings, and means. Risk Anal. 32, 973-991. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01731.x
34. Jones, J. M. (2010). Conservatives' doubts about global warming grow. Gallup Poll. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/126563/conservatives-doubts-global-warming-grow.aspx
35. Jost, J. T. (2009). "Elective affinities": on the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychol. Inq. 20, 129-141. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028599
36. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., and Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Polit. Psychol. 25, 881-919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
37. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., and Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol. Bull. 129, 339-375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
38. Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., and Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 307-337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
39. Jost, J. T., and Hennes, E. P. (2013). The mind of the climate change skeptic. Observer. Available at: http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2013/april-13/the-mind-of-the-climate-change-skeptic.html [accessed August 1, 2014]
40. Jost, J. T., Hennes, E. P., and Lavine, H. (2013). ""Hot" political cognition: its self-, group, and system-serving purposes," in Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition, ed. D. Carlston (New York: Oxford University Press), 851-875.
41. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., and Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 126-136. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
42. Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 8, 407-424. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2182588
43. Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., et al. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 732-735. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1547
44. Krosnick, J. A., and MacInnis, B. (2013). Does the American public support legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Daedalus 142, 26-39. doi: 10.1162/DAED_a_00183
45. Leviston, Z., and Walker, I. (2014). System legitimacy and support for climate change policy in Australia. Paper Presented at the Biennial Conference of the International Society of Justice Research, New York, NY.
46. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., and Gignac, G. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-therefore, (climate) science is a hoax. Psychol. Sci. 24, 622-633. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457686
47. Liu, X., Vedlitz, A., and Shi, L. (2014). Examining the determinants of public environmental concern: evidence from national public surveys. Environ. Sci. Policy 39, 77-94. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.006
48. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37, 2098-2109. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
49. Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Oreskes, N., and Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
51. Painter, J., and Ashe, T. (2012). Cross-national comparison of the presence of climate scepticism in the print media in six countries, 2007-10. Environ. Res. Lett. 7:044005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044005
52. Pew Research Center. (2013). GOP Deeply Divided Over Climate Change. The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Available at: http://www.people-press.org/2013/11/01/gop-deeply-divided-over-climate-change/ [accessed August 1, 2014]
53. Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., and Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 1015-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
54. Saad, L. (2012). In U.S., global warming views steady despite warm winter. Gallup Poll. Retrieved October 26, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/153608/Global-Warming-Views-Steady-Despite-Warm-Winter.aspx
55. Schelling, T. C. (1995). Intergenerational discounting. Energy Policy 23, 395-401. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(95)90164-3
56. Schelly, C. (2014). Residential solar electricity adoption: what motivates, and what matters? A case study of early adopters. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2, 183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.01.001
57. Schuldt, J. P., and Roh, S. (2014). Media frames and cognitive accessibility: what do "global warming" and "climate change" evoke in partisan minds? Environ. Commun. 1-20.
58. Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., and Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol. Sci. 18, 429-434. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
59. Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, T., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., et al. (2010). Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association's Task Force on the Interface between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Available at: http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change-booklet.pdf [accessed August 1, 2014]
60. Taber, C., and Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50, 755-769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
61. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior," in The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Chicago: Nelson-Hall), 7-24.
62. Thórisdóttir, H., and Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated Closed-Mindedness Mediates the Effect of Threat on Political Conservatism. Polit. Psychol. 32, 785-811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00840.x
63. Unsworth, K. L., and Fielding, K. S. (2014). It's political: how the salience of one's political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Glob. Environ. Change 27, 131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002
64. Vainio, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., and Paloniemi, R. (2014). System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 17, 509-523. doi: 10.1177/1368430213503502
65. Weber, E. U., and Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychol. 66, 315-328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253
66. Xiao, C., and McCright, A. (2007). Environmental concern and sociodemographic variables: a study of statistical models. J. Environ. Educ. 38, 3-13. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.38.1.3-14