Using in situ dynamic cultures to rapidly biofabricate fabric-reinforced composites of chitosan/bacterial nanocellulose for antibacterial wound dressings

Frontiers in Microbiology

Volumn 7, Issue MAR, 2016, Pages

  Zhang, Peng ^a   Chen, Lin ^a   Zhang, Qingsong ^a   Hong, Feng F ^a  

^a DONGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Antibacterial wound dressing; Bacterial cellulose; Chitosan; Composite sheet; Horizontal rotating bioreactor; In situ dynamic culture technology

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL NANOCELLULOSE; CHITOSAN; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BIOFABRICATION; BIOMECHANICS; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; WATER ABSORPTION; WOUND DRESSING;

EID: 84964324856     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1664302X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00260     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Agrawal, A., Rahbar, N., and Calvert, P. D. (2013). Strong fiber-reinforced hydrogel. Acta Biomater. 9, 5313-5318. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.011.
2. Bäckdahl, H., Helenius, G., Bodin, A., Nannmark, U., Johansson, B. R., Risberg, B., et al. (2006). Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27, 2141-2149. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026.
3. Bäckdahl, H., Risberg, B., and Gatenholm, P. (2011). Observations on bacterial cellulose tube formation for application as vascular graft. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 31, 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.07.010.
4. Bodin, A., Bharadwaj, S., Wu, S., Gatenholm, P., Atala, A., and Zhang, Y. (2010). Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 31, 8889-8901. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.108.
5. Brown, E., Zhang, J., and Laborie, M.-P. (2011). Never-dried bacterial cellulose/fibrin composites: preparation, morphology and mechanical properties. Cellulose 18, 631-641. doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9500-8.
6. Cai, Z., and Kim, J. (2010). Bacterial cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and first evaluation of biocompatibility. Cellulose 17, 83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9362-5.
7. Chen, H. H., Chen, L. C., Huang, H. C., and Lin, S. B. (2011). In situ modification of bacterial cellulose nanostructure by adding CMC during the growth of Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Cellulose 18, 1573-1583. doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9594-z.
8. Cheng, K. C., Catchmark, J., and Demirci, A. (2009). Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using a biofilm reactor and its material property analysis. J. Biol. Eng. 3:12. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-3-12.
9. Ciechanska, D. (2004). Multifunctional bacterial cellulose/chitosan composite materials for medical applications. Fibers Text. East. Eur. 12, 69-72. Available online at: https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.baztech-c326df6d-d738-4e23-ad3b-7157813ebde9/tab/summary.
10. Clasen, C., Sultanova, B., Wilhelms, T., Heisig, P., and Kulicke, W. M. (2006). Effects of different drying processes on the material properties of bacterial cellulose membranes. Macromol. Symp. 244, 48-58. doi: 10.1002/masy.200651204.
11. Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S., and Brown, J. R. M. (2006). Microbial cellulose-the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27, 145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035.
12. Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Kawecki, M., Wysota, K., Sakiel, S., Wróblewski, P., et al. (2007). "Biomedical applications of microbial cellulose in burn wound recovery, " in Cellulose: Molecular and Structural Biology, eds R. Brown and J. Saxena (Houten: Springer), 307-321.
13. Fernandes, S. C. M., Oliveira, L., Freire, C. S. R., Silvestre, A. J. D., Neto, C. P., Gandini, A., et al. (2009). Novel transparent nanocomposite films based on chitosan and bacterial cellulose. Green Chem. 11, 2023-2029, doi: 10.1039/b919112g.
14. Fontana, J. D., Souza, A. M., Fontana, C. K., Torriani, I. L., Moreschi, J. C., Gallotti, B. J., et al. (1990). Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 24-25, 253-264. doi: 10.1007/BF02920250.
15. Fu, L., Zhang, J., and Yang, G. (2013). Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr. Polym. 92, 1432-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071.
16. Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Wu, Z., Zhuo, Q., Huang, X., et al. (2012). Skin tissue repair materials from bacterial cellulose by a multilayer fermentation method. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 12349-12357. doi: 10.1039/C2JM00134A.
17. Galván Márquez, I., Akuaku, J., Cruz, I., Cheetham, J., Golshani, A., and Smith, M. L. (2013). Disruption of protein synthesis as antifungal mode of action by chitosan. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 164, 108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.025.
18. Gatenholm, P., and Klemm, D. (2010). Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 35, 208-213. doi: 10.1557/mrs2010.653.
19. Hagiwara, Y., Putra, A., Kakugo, A., Furukawa, H., and Gong, J. (2010). Ligament-like tough double-network hydrogel based on bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 17, 93-101. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9357-2.
20. HeBler, N., and Klemm, D. (2009). Alteration of bacterial nanocellulose structure by in situ modification using polyethylene glycol and carbohydrate additives. Cellulose 16, 899-910. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9301-5.
21. Hong, F. (2012b). Method for Preparing Nano-Cellulose Antibacterial Composite Material through On-Line Culture. China, Patent CN102552965/CN2012114527. Available online at: http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20120711&CC=CN&NR=102552965A&KC=A.
22. Hong, F., Tang, S., and Yang, X. (2012a). Device for Quickly Preparing Bacterial Cellulose Composite Material in Large Scale. China, Patent CN202830006/CN2012221360U. Available online at: http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20130327&CC=CN&NR=202830006U&KC=U.
23. Hong, F., Wei, B., and Chen, L. (2015). Preliminary study on biosynthesis of bacterial nanocellulose tubes in a novel double-silicone-tube bioreactor for potential vascular prosthesis. Biomed. Res. Int. 9:560365. doi: 10.1155/2015/560365.
24. Hornung, M., Ludwig, M., Gerrard, A., and Schmauder, H. P. (2006). Optimizing the production of bacterial cellulose in surface culture: evaluation of substrate mass transfer influences on the bioreaction (Part 1). Eng. Life Sci. 6, 537-545. doi: 10.1002/elsc.200620162.
25. Kim, J., Cai, Z., Lee, H. S., Choi, G. S., Lee, D. H., and Jo, C. (2011). Preparation and characterization of a Bacterial cellulose/chitosan composite for potential biomedical application. J. Polym. Res. 18, 739-744. doi: 10.1007/s10965-010-9470-9.
26. Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H.-P., and Bohn, A. (2005). Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 44, 3358-3393. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460587.
27. Kong, M., Chen, X. G., Xing, K., and Park, H. J. (2010). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144, 51-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012.
28. Lin, S. B., Hsu, C.-P., Chen, L.-C., and Chen, H.-H. (2009). Adding enzymatically modified gelatin to enhance the rehydration abilities and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Food Hydrocolloids 23, 2195-2203. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.05.011.
29. Lin, W. C., Lien, C. C., Yeh, H. J., Yu, C. M., and Hsu, S. H. (2013). Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose-chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 94, 603-611. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076.
30. Lopes, J. L., Machado, J. M., Castanheira, L., Granja, P. L., Gama, F. M., Dourado, F., et al. (2011). Friction and wear behaviour of bacterial cellulose against articular cartilage. Wear 271, 2328-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.042.
31. Maksimova, Y. G. (2014). Microbial biofilms in biotechnological processes. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 50, 750-760. doi: 10.1134/S0003683814080043.
32. Marsh, P. B., Merola, G. V., and Simpson, M. E. (1953). Experiments with an alkali swelling-centrifuge test applied to cotton fiber. Text. Res. J. 23, 831-841. doi: 10.1177/004051755302301111.
33. Martínez Ávila, H., Schwarz, S., Feldmann, E. M., Mantas, A., von Bomhard, A., Gatenholm, P., et al. (2014). Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 7423-7435. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5819-z.
34. McKenna, B., Mikkelsen, D., Wehr, J., Gidley, M., and Menzies, N. (2009). Mechanical and structural properties of native and alkali-treated bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. Cellulose 16, 1047-1055. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9340-y.
35. Meftahi, A., Khajavi, R., Rashidi, A., Sattari, M., Yazdanshenas, M., and Torabi, M. (2010). The effects of cotton gauze coating with microbial cellulose. Cellulose 17, 199-204. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9377-y.
36. Nakayama, A., Kakugo, A., Gong, J. P., Osada, Y., Takai, M., Erata, T., et al. (2004). High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv. Funct.Mater. 14, 1124-1128. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200305197.
37. Nge, T., Nogi, M., Yano, H., and Sugiyama, J. (2010). Microstructure and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose/chitosan porous scaffold. Cellulose 17, 349-363. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9394-x.
38. Petersen, N., and Gatenholm, P. (2011). Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. App. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 1277-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y.
39. Phisalaphong, M., and Jatupaiboon, N. (2008). Biosynthesis and characterization of bacteria cellulose-chitosan film. Carbohydr. Polym. 74, 482-488. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.004.
40. Pommet, M., Juntaro, J., Heng, J. Y. Y., Mantalaris, A., Lee, A. F., Wilson, K., et al. (2008). Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9, 1643-1651. doi: 10.1021/bm800169g.
41. Qin, Y. (2004). Absorption characteristics of alginate wound dressings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 91, 953-957. doi: 10.1002/app.13291.
42. Qin, Y. (2008). The gel swelling properties of alginate fibers and their applications in wound management. Polym. Adv. Technol. 19, 6-14. doi: 10.1002/pat.960.
43. Quero, F., Nogi, M., Lee, K. Y., Poel, G. V., Bismarck, A., Mantalaris, A., et al. (2011). Cross-linked bacterial cellulose networks using glyoxalization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3, 490-499. doi: 10.1021/am101065p.
44. Raafat, D., Bargen, K., Haas, A., and Sahl, H. G. (2008). Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3764-3773. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00453-08.
45. Retegi, A., Gabilondo, N., Pena, C., Zuluaga, R., Castro, C., Ganan, P., et al. (2010). Bacterial cellulose films with controlled microstructure-mechanical property relationships. Cellulose 17, 661-669. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9389-7.
46. Serafica, G., Mormino, R., Oster, G. A., Lentz, K. E., and Koehler, K. (2010). Microbial Cellulose Wound Dressing for Treating Chronic Wounds. US Patent, US 7390499. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
47. Serafica, G. S., Mormino, R. M., and Bungay, H. B. (2002). Inclusion of solid particles in bacterial cellulose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58, 756-760. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-0978-8.
48. Singh, G., Joyce, E. M., Beddow, J., and Mason, T. J. (2012). Evaluation of antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles coated sonochemically onto textile fabrics. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2, 106-120. Available online at: http://www.jmbfs.org/issue/august-september-2012-vol-2-no-1/jmbfs-0117-singh/?issue_id=1307&article_id=6.
49. Tang, J., Bao, L., Li, X., Chen, L., and Hong, F. F. (2015). Potential of PVA-doped bacterial nano-cellulose tubular composites for artificial blood vessels. J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 8537-8547. doi: 10.1039/c5tb01144b.
50. Ul-Islam, M., Shah, N., Ha, J., and Park, J. (2011). Effect of chitosan penetration on physico-chemical and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 28, 1736-1743. doi: 10.1007/s11814-011-0042-4.
51. Verschuren, P. G., Cardona, T. D., Nout, M. J. R., De Gooijer, K. D., and Van den Heuvel, J. C. (2000). Location and limitation of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum established from oxygen profiles. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 89, 414-419. doi: 10.1016/s1389-1723(00)89089-1.
52. Wei, B., Yang, G. A., and Hong, F. (2011). Preparation and evaluation of a kind of bacterial cellulose dry films with antibacterial properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 84, 533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.017.
53. Wesarg, F., Schlott, F., Grabow, J., Kurland, H.-D., Hebler, N., Kralisch, D., et al. (2012). In situ synthesis of photocatalytically active hybrids consisting of bacterial nanocellulose and anatase nanoparticles. Langmuir 28, 13518-13525. doi: 10.1021/la302787z.
54. Wu, Y. B., Yu, S. H., Mi, F. L., Wu, C. W., Shyu, S. S., Peng, C. K., et al. (2004). Preparation and characterization on mechanical and antibacterial properties of chitosan/cellulose blends. Carbohydr. Polym. 57, 435-440. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.05.013.
55. Yan, Z., Chen, S., Wang, H., Wang, B., and Jiang, J. (2008). Biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose/multi-walled carbon nanotubes in agitated culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 74, 659-665. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.028.
56. Yang, X. Y., Huang, C., Guo, H. J., Xiong, L., Luo, J., Wang, B., et al. (2014). Beneficial effect of acetic acid on the xylose utilization and bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Indian J. Microbiol. 54, 268-273. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0450-3.
57. Yang, Y. M., Zhao, Y. H., Liu, X. H., Ding, F., and Gu, X. S. (2007). The effect of different sterilization procedures on chitosan dried powder. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 104, 1968-1972. doi: 10.1002/app.25906.
58. Young, C. D., Wu, J. R., and Tsou, T. L. (1998). High-strength, ultra-thin and fiber-reinforced pHEMA artificial skin. Biomaterials 19, 1745-1752. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00083-0.
59. Zaborowska, M., Bodin, A., Bäckdahl, H., Popp, J., Goldstein, A., and Gatenholm, P. (2010). Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 6, 2540-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004.
60. Zhang, P., Tang, S. J., and Hong, F. (2013). Production of a bacterial cellulose-cotton gauze blended composite film in a horizontal rotating bioreactor. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 245. Available online at: http://acselb-529643017.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com/chem/245nm/program/view.php?obj_id=172649&terms=.