Internet research in psychology

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 66, Issue , 2015, Pages 877-902

  Gosling, Samuel D ^a   Mason, Winter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet research; Online research

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; METHODS; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS;

EID: 84964307445     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: 15452085     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015321     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Adamic LA, Glance N. 2005. The political blogosphere and the 2004 U. S. election: Divided they blog. Proc. WWW2005 Workshop Weblog. Ecosyst., Jpn., pp. 36-43
2. Allport GW, Postman LJ. 1947. The Psychology of Rumour. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
3. Amichai-Hamburger Y, Ben-Artzi E. 2003. Loneliness and Internet use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(1):71-80
4. Aral S, Walker D. 2011. Creating social contagion through viral product design: a randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Manag. Sci. 57(9):1623-39
5. Back MD, Küfner ACP, Egloff B. 2010. The emotional timeline of September 11, 2001. Psychol. Sci. 21:1417-19
6. Back MD, Küfner ACP, Egloff B. 2011. "Automatic or the people?" Anger on September 11, 2001, and lessons learned for the analysis of large digital data sets. Psychol. Sci. 22(6):837-38
7. Back MD, Stopfer JM, Vazire S, Gaddis S, Schmukle SC, et al. 2010. Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychol. Sci. 21:372-74
8. Bakshy E, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ. 2010. Identifying "influencers" on Twitter. ACM Int. Conf. Web Search Data Min., 4th, Hong Kong, pp. 1-10
9. Bazarova NN, Taft JG, Choi Y, Cosley D. 2013. Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 32(2):121-41
10. Berger J, Heath C. 2008. Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 95(3):593-607
11. Bleidorn W, Klimstra TA, Denissen JJA, Rentfrow PJ, Potter J, Gosling SD. 2013. Personality maturation around the world: a cross-cultural examination of social investment theory. Psychol. Sci. 24:2530-40
12. Block J. 2008. Issues for DSM-V: Internet addiction. Am. J. Psychiatry 165(3):306-7
13. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, et al. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489:295-98
14. Bordia P, DiFonzo N. 2004. Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: rumor as social cognition. Soc. Psychol. Q. 67(1):33-49
15. Brenner V. 1996. An initial report on the online assessment of Internet addiction: the first 30 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychol. Rep. 70:179-210
16. Buchanan T, Williams JE. 2010. Ethical issues in psychological research on the Internet. See Gosling & Johnson 2010, pp. 255-71
17. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6:3-5
18. Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills JE, Douglas AC, Niang M, et al. 2009. Internet addiction: metasynthesis of 1996-2006 quantitative research. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 12(2):203-7
19. Cacioppo JT, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2009. Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97(6):977-91
20. Campbell AT, Lane ND. 2013. Smartphone sensing: a game changer for behavioral science. Workshop held at Univ. Calif., Davis
21. Cartwright D, Harary F. 1956. Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychol. Rev. 63(5):277-93
22. Centola D, Macy M. 2007. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113(3):702-34
23. Chandler J, Mueller P, Paolacci G. 2014. Nonnäiveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behav. Res. Methods 46:112-30
24. Chou C, Hsiao M-C. 2000. Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students' case. Comput. Educ. 35(1):65-80
25. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. 2007. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:370-79
26. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55(1):591-621
27. Cohen R. 2011. Facebook and Arab dignity. New York Times, Jan. 24. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/opinion/25iht-edcohen25.html
28. Cohn MA, Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW. 2004. Linguistic markersofpsychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychol. Sci. 15:687-93
29. Conover M, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, Gonçalves B, Menczer F, Flammini A. 2011. Political polarization on Twitter. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, pp. 89-96
30. Coviello L, Sohn Y, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, Franceschetti M, et al. 2014. Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PLOS ONE 9(3):e90315
31. Crump MJC, McDonnell JV, Gureckis TM. 2013. Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLOS ONE 8:e57410
32. Davis RA. 2001. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17(2):187-95
33. De Choudhury M, Counts S, Horvitz E. 2013a. Social media as a measurement tool of depression in populations. Proc. 5th ACM Int. Conf. Web Sci., Paris, Fr., May 2-May 4
34. De Choudhury M, Gamon M, Counts S, Horvitz E. 2013b. Predicting depression via social media. Proc. 7th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, Boston, MA, July 8-July 10
35. Deutsch M, Gerard HB. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51(3):629-36
36. DiFonzo N, Bordia P. 2007. Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
37. Dodou D, de Winter JCF. 2014. Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36:487-95
38. Ellison NB, Hancock JT, Toma CL. 2012. Profile as promise: a framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media Soc. 14(1):45-62
39. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2008. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 337:23-27
40. Friggeri A, Adamic LA, Eckles D, Cheng J. 2014. Rumor cascades in social networks. Proc. 8th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (ICWSM)
41. Garrett RK. 2009. Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 14(2):265-85
42. Ge M, Delgado-Battenfeld C, Jannach D. 2010. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. Proc. 4th ACM Conf. Recomm. Syst., pp. 257-60. New York: ACM
43. Glaser J, Dixit J, Green DP. 2002. Studying hate crime with the Internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? J. Soc. Issues 58:177-93
44. Goel S, Salganik MJ. 2010. Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(15):6743-47
45. Goel S, Watts DJ, Goldstein DG. 2012. The structure of online diffusion networks. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electron. Commerce, pp. 623-38. New York: ACM
46. Goldberg I. 1996. Internet addiction disorder. http://www.urz.uni-heidelberg.de/Netzdienste/anleitung/wwwtips/8/addict.html
47. Göritz AS. 2004. Recruitment for online access panels. Int. J. Mark. Res. 46(4):411-25
48. Göritz AS. 2010. Using lotteries, loyalty points, and other incentives to increase participant response and completion. See Gosling & Johnson 2010, pp. 219-33
49. Gosling SD, Bonnenburg AV. 1998. An integrative approach to personality research in anthrozoology: ratings of six species of pets and their owners. Anthrozoö s 11:148-56
50. Gosling SD, Johnson JA, eds. 2010. Advanced Methods for Conducting Online Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
51. Gosling SD, Sandy CJ, John OP, Potter J. 2010. Wired but not WEIRD: the promise of the Internet in reaching more diverse samples. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:94-95
52. Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP. 2004. Should we trust Web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. Am. Psychol. 59:93-104
53. Graham LT, Gosling SD. 2013. Personality profiles associated with different motivations for playing World of Warcraft. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16:189-93
54. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:1464-80
55. Guha R, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 403-12. New York: ACM
56. Hannak A, Anderson E, Barrett LF, Lehmann S, Mislove A, Riedewald M. 2012. Tweetin' in the rain: exploring societal-scale effects of weather on mood. Proc. 6th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Med., pp. 479-82
57. Heider F. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psychol. 21(1):107-12
58. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33:61-135
59. Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Terveen LG, Riedl JT. 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. (TOIS) 22(1):5-53
60. Int. Telecommun. Union. 2014. The World in 2014: ICT Facts and Figures. Geneva, Switz.: Int. Telecommun. Union
61. Iyengar S, Hahn KS. 2009. Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. J. Commun. 59(1):19-39
62. Johnson JA. 2005. Ascertaining the validity of Web-based personality inventories. J. Res. Personal. 39:103-29
63. Johnson JA. 2010. Web-based self-report personality scales. See Gosling & Johnson 2010, pp. 149-66
64. Juvonen J, Gross EF. 2008. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J. Sch. Health 78(9):496-505
65. Kashima Y. 2000. Maintaining cultural stereotypesin the serial reproduction ofnarratives. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26(5):594-604
66. Kirk M. (Writer/Producer) Feb. 22, 2011. Revolution in Cairo. Frontline. Boston, MA: WGBH Educ. Found. [telev. ser. episode]. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/revolution-in-cairo/
67. Kooti F, Yang H, Cha M, Gummadi KP, Mason WA. 2012. The emergence of conventions in online social networks. Proc. 6th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, pp. 194-201
68. Kosinski M, Stillwell DJ, Graepel T. 2013. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:5802-5
69. Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. 2014. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 140:1073-137
70. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. 2013. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 53(1):S13-20
71. Kraut R, Kiesler S, Boneva B, Cummings J, Helgeson V, Crawford A. 2002. Internet paradox revisited. J. Soc. Issues 58(1):49-74
72. Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, Couper M. 2004. Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. Am. Psychol. 59(2):105
73. Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukopadhyay T, Scherlis W. 1998. Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am. Psychol. 53:1017-31
74. Lane DJ, Wegner DM. 1995. The cognitive consequences of secrecy. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 69:237-53
75. Lathia N, Pejovic V, Rachuri KK, Mascolo C, Musolesi M, Rentfrow PJ. 2013. Smartphones for large-scale behavior change interventions. IEEE Pervasive Comput.: Mobile Ubiquitous Syst. 12:66-73
76. Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J. 2009. Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., pp. 497-506
77. Leskovec J, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J. 2010a. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. Proc. 19th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 641-50. New York: ACM
78. Leskovec J, Huttenlocher DP, Kleinberg JM. 2010b. Governance in social media: a case study of the Wikipedia promotion process. Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (ICWSM)
79. Leung L. 2004. Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the Internet as predictors of online activities and Internet addiction. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 7(3):333-48
80. Lim M. 2012. Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004-2011. J. Commun. 62(2):231-48
81. Luce KH, Winzelberg AJ, Das S, Osborne MI, Bryson SW, Taylor CB. 2007. Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23:1384-89
82. Lyons R. 2011. The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Stat. Polit. Policy 2(1):Article 2
83. Mangan M, Reips UD. 2007. Sleep, sex, and the Web: surveying the difficult-to-reach clinical population suffering from sexsomnia. Behav. Res. Methods 39:233-36
84. Manis M, Cornell SD, Moore JC. 1974. Transmission of attitude relevant information through a communication chain. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 30(1):81-94
85. Markham A, Buchanan E. 2012. Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Work. Comm. Tech. Rep. http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
86. Mascolo C, Rentfrow PJ. 2011. Social Sensing: Mobile Sensing Meets Social Science. Workshop held at Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, UK
87. Mason W, Suri S. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44:1-23
88. Mason WA, Conrey FR, Smith ER. 2007. Situating social influence processes: dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11(3):279-300
89. McKenna KY, Bargh JA. 2000. Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4(1):57-75
90. McNee SM, Riedl J, Konstan JA. 2006. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recom-mender systems. In CHI'06 Ext. Abstr. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst., pp. 1097-101. New York: ACM
91. Mehl MR, Conner TS, eds. 2012. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life. New York: Guilford
92. Mendoza M, Poblete B, Castillo C. 2010. Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? Proc. 1st Workshop Soc. Media Anal. (SOMA '10), pp. 71-79. New York: ACM
93. Miller GF. 2012. The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:221-37
94. Miluzzo E, Lane ND, Eisenman SB, Campbell AT. 2007. Cence Me-injecting sensing presence into social networking applications. Proc. 2nd Eur. Conf. Smart Sensing Context (EuroSSC 2007). Lake District, UK Morahan
95. Martin J, Schumacher P. 2003. Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19(6):659-71
96. Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N. 2009. Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:867-72
97. Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG. 2010. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5:411-19
98. Pariser E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding From You. New York: Penguin
99. Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54: 547-77
100. Pennebaker JW, Sussman JR. 1988. Disclosures of traumas and psychosomatic processes. Soc. Sci. Med. 26:327-32
101. Postmes T, Spears R. 1998. Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 123(3):238-59
102. Pury CLS. 2011. Automation can lead to confounds in text analysis: Back, Kufner, and Egloff (2010) and the not-so-angry Americans. Psychol. Sci. 22:835-36
103. Putnam RD. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster
104. Qiu L, Lin H, Ramsay J, Yang F. 2012. You are what you tweet: personality expression and perception on Twitter. J. Res. Personal. 46:710-18
105. Rachuri KK, Musolesi M, Mascolo C, Rentfrow PJ, Longworth C, Aucinas A. 2010. EmotionSense: a mobile phones based adaptive platform for experimental social psychology research. Proc. 12th ACM Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Comput. (UbiComp'10), Copenhagen, Den., pp. 281-90
106. Rains SA. 2014. The implications of stigma and anonymity for self-disclosure in health blogs. Health Commun. 29:23-31
107. Reips U-D. 2010. Design and formatting in Internet-based research. See Gosling & Johnson 2010, pp. 29-43
108. Reis HT, Gosling SD. 2010. Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. ST Fiske, DT Gilbert, G Lindzey, 1:82-114. New York: Wiley. 5th ed.
109. Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD. 2012. Using smartphones as mobile sensing devices: a practical guide for psychologists to current and potential capabilities. Preconf. Annu. Meet. Soc. Personal. Soc. Psychol., San Diego, CA
110. Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD, Potter J. 2008. A theory of the emergence, persistence, and expression of geographic variation in psychological characteristics. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3:339-69
111. Rich F. 2011. Wallflowers at the revolution. New York Times, Feb. 5. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/06/opinion/06rich.html
112. Ritter RS, Preston JL, Hernandez I. 2014. Happy Tweets: Christians are happier, more socially connected, and less analytical than atheists on Twitter. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 5:243-49
113. Rogers EM. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press
114. Rosnow RL. 1980. Psychology of rumor reconsidered. Psychol. Bull. 87(3):578-91
115. Scherer K. 1997. College life on-line. Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 38:655-65
116. Sears DO. 1986. College sophomores in the lab: influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51:515-30
117. Skitka LJ, Sargis EG. 2006. The Internet as psychological laboratory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57:529-55
118. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N 2008. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(4):376-85
119. Sourander A, Klomek AB, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, et al. 2010. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67(7):720-28
120. Stillwell DJ, Kosinski M. 2012. myPersonality project: use of online social networks for large-scale social research. 1st ACM Workshop Mobile Syst. Comput. Soc. Sci. (MobiSys), Univ. Cambridge, UK
121. Tanaka Y, Sakamoto Y, Matsuka T. 2012. Transmission of rumor and criticism in Twitter after the Great Japan Earthquake. Annu. Meet. Cogn. Sci. Soc, pp. 2387-92
122. Tausczik YR, Chung CK, Pennebaker JW. 2014. Tracking secret-keeping in emails. Manuscript under review
123. Thurman N, Schifferes S. 2012. The future of personalization at news websites. J. Stud. 13(5-6):775-90
124. Tokunaga RS. 2010. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(3):277-87
125. Tufekci Z, Wilson C. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. 62(2):363-79
126. Turkle S. 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books
127. Valenzuela S, Arriagada A, Scherman A. 2012. The social media basis of youth protest behavior: the case of Chile. J. Commun. 62(2):299-314
128. Vambheim SM, Wangberg SC, Johnsen JK, Wynn R. 2013. Language use in an Internet support group for smoking cessation: development of sense of community. Inform. Health Soc. Care 38(1):67-78
129. Van Dijk J, Hacker K. 2013. The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inf. Soc. 19(4):315-26
130. Waggoner AS, Smith ER, Collins EC. 2009. Person perception by active versus passive perceivers. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:1028-31
131. Weinberg JD, Freese J, McElhattan D. 2014. Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociol. Sci. 1:292-310
132. Weisbuch M, Ivcevic Z, Ambady N 2009. On being liked on the web and in the "real world": consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45:573-76
133. Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT. 2012. A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:203-20
134. Wolf M, Theis F, Kordy H. 2013. Language use in eating disorder blogs: psychological implications of social online activity. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 32:212-26
135. Wrzus C, Brandmaier AM, von Oertzen T, Müller V, Wagner GG, Riediger M. 2012. A new approach for assessing sleep duration and postures from ambulatory accelerometry. PLOS ONE 7:e48089
136. Yarkoni T. 2010. Personality in 100, 000 words: a large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. J. Res. Personal. 44:363-73
137. Yarkoni T. 2012. Psychoinformatics: new horizonsatthe interfaceofthe psychological and computingsciences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 21:391-97
138. Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD. 2011. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat. Methods 8:665-70
139. York JC. 2011. Not Twitter, not WikiLeaks: a human revolution [Web log post]. http://jilliancyork.com/2011/01/14/not-twitter-not-wikileaks-a-human-revolution/
140. Young KS. 1998. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 1(3):237-44