A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization

Nature

Volumn 489, Issue 7415, 2012, Pages 295-298

  Bond, Robert M ^a   Fariss, Christopher J ^a   Jones, Jason J ^b   Kramer, Adam D I ^c   Marlow, Cameron ^c   Settle, Jaime E ^a   Fowler, James H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MOBILIZATION; POLITICAL CHANGE; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ARTICLE; ELECTION; FRIEND; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION CENTER; INFORMATION SEEKING; POLITICAL MOBILIZATION; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK;

HUMANS; INTERNET; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; SAMPLE SIZE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866177569     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11421     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berger, J. & Le Mens, G. How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8146-8150 (2009).
2. Borgatti, S. P. et al. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892-895 (2009).
3. Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441, 502-505 (2006).
4. Onnela, J. P. & Reed-Tsochas, F. Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18375-18380 (2010).
5. Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481, 497-501 (2012).
6. Aral, S. & Walker, D. Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337, 337-341 (2012).
7. Centola, D.An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334, 1269-1272 (2011).
8. Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Borge-Holthofer, J., Rivero, A. & Moreno, Y. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1, 197 (2011).
9. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/ 1109.5235v2 (2011).
10. Aral, S., Muchnik, L. & Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21544-21549 (2009).
11. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 370-379 (2007).
12. Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. The dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network. Br. Med. J. 337, a2338 (2008).
13. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2249-2258 (2008).
14. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S. & Watts, D. J. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311, 854-856 (2006).
15. Centola, D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329, 1194-1197 (2010).
16. Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5334-5338 (2010).
17. Lazer, D. et al. Computational social science. Science 323, 721-723 (2009).
18. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. The benefits of facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 12, 1143-1168 (2007).
19. Traud, A. L., Kelsic, E. D., Mucha, P. J. & Porter, M. A. Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Rev. 53, 526-543 (2011).
20. Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360-1380 (1973).
21. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives (Little, Brown, and Company, 2009).
22. Nickerson, D. W. Does email boost turnout? Q. J. Polit. Sci. 2, 369-379 (2007).
23. Kenny, C. B. Political participation and effects from the social environment. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 36, 259-267 (1992).
24. Huckfeldt, R. & Sprague, J. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).
25. Gerber, A. S. & Green, D. P. Does canvassing increase voter turnout? A field experiment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10939-10942 (1999).
26. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P. & Larimer, C. W. Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102, 33-48 (2008).
27. Bryan, C. J., Walton, G. M., Rogers, T. & Dwecka, C. S. Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12653-12656 (2011).
28. Nickerson, D. W. Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102, 49-57 (2008).
29. Vitak, J. et al. It's complicated: Facebook users' political participation in the 2008 election. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 107-114 (2011).
30. Fowler, J. H. in The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior (ed. Zuckerman, A.) 269-287 (Temple Univ. Press, 2005).