Inhibition-induced plasticity in tinnitus patients after repetitive exposure to tailor-made notched music

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1007-1015

  Stein, A ^a   Engell, A ^a   Junghoefer, M ^a   Wunderlich, R ^a   Lau, P ^a   Wollbrink, A ^a   Rudack, C ^b   Pantev, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked fields (AEF); Auditory phantom perception; Cortical reorganization; Lateral inhibition; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN CORTEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TAILOR MADE NOTCHED MUSIC; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TINNITUS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84963986666     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alcaini M., Giard M., Thevenet M., Pernier J. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:611-615.
2. Amitay S., Irwin A., Moore D.R. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci 2006, 9:1446-1448.
3. Baguley D.M., Axon P., Winter I.M., Moffat D.A. The effect of vestibular nerve section upon tinnitus. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002, 27:219-226.
4. Behrmann M., Geng J.J., Shomstein S. Parietal cortex and attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004, 14:212-217.
5. Beste C., Dinse H.R. Learning without training. Curr Biol 2013, 23:R489-R499. [Elsevier Ltd].
6. Catz N., Noreña A.J. Enhanced representation of spectral contrasts in the primary auditory cortex. Front Syst Neurosci 2013, 7:21.
7. De Ridder D., Elgoyhen A.B., Romo R., Langguth B. Phantom percepts: tinnitus and pain as persisting aversive memory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:8075-8080.
8. Diesch E., Andermann M., Flor H., Rupp A. Functional and structural aspects of tinnitus-related enhancement and suppression of auditory cortex activity. Neuroimage 2010, 50:1545-1559.
9. Diesch E., Andermann M., Flor H., Rupp A. Interaction among the components of multiple auditory steady-state responses: enhancement in tinnitus patients, inhibition in controls. Neuroscience 2010, 167:540-553.
10. Dobie R.A. Depression and tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2003, 36:383-388.
11. Eggermont J.J., Komiya H. Moderate noise trauma in juvenile cats results in profound cortical topographic map changes in adulthood. Hear Res 2000, 142:89-101.
12. Eggermont J.J., Roberts L.E. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27:676-682.
13. Eggermont J.J., Roberts L.E. The neuroscience of tinnitus: understanding abnormal and normal auditory perception. Front Syst Neurosci 2012, 6:53.
14. Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V., Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear Res 2000, 148:153-160.
15. Giard M.H., Perrin F., Echallier J.F., Thévenet M., Froment J.C., Pernier J. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 92:238-252.
16. Hämäläinen M.S., Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994, 32:35-42.
17. Henry J.A., Dennis K.C., Schechter M.A. General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005, 48:1204-1235.
18. Jastreboff P.J. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990, 8:221-254.
19. Langguth B., Salvi R., Elgoyhen A.B. Emerging pharmacotherapy of tinnitus. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2009, 14:687-702.
20. Lavikainen J., Huotilainen M., Pekkonen E., Ilmoniemi R.J., Näätänen R. Auditory stimuli activate parietal brain regions: a whole-head MEG study. Neuroreport 1994, 6:182-184.
21. Lee T.W., Girolami M., Sejnowski T.J. Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Comput 1999, 11:417-441.
22. Maris E., Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 164:177-190.
23. Meikle M.B., Vernon J., Johnson R.M. The perceived severity of tinnitus. Some observations concerning a large population of tinnitus clinic patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984, 92:689-696.
24. Mirz F., Gjedde A., Ishizu K., Pedersen C.B. Cortical networks subserving the perception of tinnitus - a PET study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2000, 543:241-243.
25. Mühlnickel W., Elbert T., Taub E., Flor H. Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:10340-10343.
26. Noreña A., Cransac H., Chery-Croze S. Towards an objectification by classification of tinnitus. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:666-675.
27. Noreña A., Micheyl C., Chery-Croze S. An auditory negative after-image as a human model of tinnitus. Hear Res 2000, 149:24-32.
28. Okamoto H., Stracke H., Stoll W., Pantev C. Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:1207-1210.
29. Pantev C., Bertrand O., Eulitz C., Verkindt C., Hampson S., Schuierer G., et al. Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 94:26-40.
30. Pantev C., Wollbrink A., Roberts L.E., Engelien A., Lütkenhöner B. Short-term plasticity of the human auditory cortex. Brain Res 1999, 842:192-199.
31. Pantev C., Okamoto H., Teismann H. Music-induced cortical plasticity and lateral inhibition in the human auditory cortex as foundations for tonal tinnitus treatment. Front Syst Neurosci 2012, 6:50.
32. Peyk P., De Cesarei A., Junghöfer M. ElectroMagnetoEncephalography software: overview and integration with other EEG/MEG toolboxes. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 2011:861705.
33. Polley D.B., Steinberg E.E., Merzenich M.M. Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. J Neurosci 2006, 26:4970-4982.
34. Roberts L.E., Bosnyak D.J., Thompson D.C. Neural plasticity expressed in central auditory structures with and without tinnitus. Front Syst Neurosci 2012, 6:40.
35. Roberts L.E., Eggermont J.J., Caspary D.M., Shore S.E., Melcher J.R., Kaltenbach J.A. Ringing ears: the neuroscience of tinnitus. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:14972-14979.
36. Schaette R., McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci 2011, 31:13452-13457.
37. Schecklmann M., Landgrebe M., Poeppl T.B., Kreuzer P., Männer P., Marienhagen J., et al. Neural correlates of tinnitus duration and distress: a positron emission tomography study. Hum Brain Mapp 2013, 34:233-240.
38. Schlee W., Weisz N., Bertrand O., Hartmann T., Elbert T. Using auditory steady state responses to outline the functional connectivity in the tinnitus brain. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3720.
39. Seppänen M., Hämäläinen J., Pesonen A.-K., Tervaniemi M. Music training enhances rapid neural plasticity of n1 and p2 source activation for unattended sounds. Front Hum Neurosci 2012, 6:43.
40. Stouffer J., Tyler R. Characterization of tinnitus by tinnitus patients. J Speech Hear Disord 1990, 55:439-453.
41. Sussman E.S., Bregman A.S., Wang W.J., Khan F.J. Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2005, 5:93-110.
42. Teismann H., Okamoto H., Pantev C. Short and intense tailor-made notched music training against tinnitus: the tinnitus frequency matters. PLoS One 2011, 6:e24685.
43. Turrigiano G.G., Nelson S.B. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5:97-107.
44. Van Wassenhove V., Nagarajan S.S. Auditory cortical plasticity in learning to discriminate modulation rate. J Neurosci 2007, 27:2663-2672.
45. Watanabe T., Náñez J.E., Sasaki Y. Perceptual learning without perception. Nature 2001, 413:844-848.
46. Weisz N., Moratti S., Meinzer M., Dohrmann K., Elbert T. Tinnitus perception and distress is related to abnormal spontaneous brain activity as measured by magnetoencephalography. PLoS Med 2005, 2:e153.
47. Yang S., Weiner B.D., Zhang L.S., Cho S.-J., Bao S. Homeostatic plasticity drives tinnitus perception in an animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:14974-14979.
48. Zhang F., Deshpande A., Benson C., Smith M., Eliassen J., Fu Q.-J. The adaptive pattern of the auditory N1 peak revealed by standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography. Brain Res 2011, 1400:42-52. [Elsevier B.V.].